MGT4001 Business-Level Strategy Competitive Rivalry
MGT4001 Business-Level Strategy Competitive Rivalry
MGT4001 Business-Level Strategy Competitive Rivalry
Department of Management
Hang Seng University
Last Week Review
According to RBV, how do firms achieve above-average
returns?
A firm's unique sets (bundling and leveraging) of superior resources
and capabilities (core competencies) which create additional value
as the basis for competitive advantage over a long period of time
(sustainable).
How do we know what are the core competenc(ies)?
Valuable, Rare, costly-to-Imitate, and Non-substitutable
Value chain analysis
2
Learning Objectives
Define business-level strategy.
Discuss the relationship between customers and business-level strategies in terms
of who, what, and how.
Explain the differences among business-level strategies.
Use the five forces of competition model to explain how above-average returns can
be earned through each business-level strategy.
Describe the risks of using each of the business-level strategies.
Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive behaviour, and competitive
dynamics.
Describe market commonality and resource similarity as the building blocks of a
competitor analysis.
Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will take competitive actions.
Explain competitive dynamics in slow-cycle, in fast-cycle, and in standard-cycle
markets.
3
Analysis
Strategic
formulation
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 5
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
What is business-level strategy?
6
Nestlé
Business-
Business-level strategy level strategy
An integrated and coordinated set
of commitments and actions the
firm uses to gain a competitive
advantage by exploiting core
competencies in specific product Corporate-
markets. level strategy
6
Photo Sources: www.comentarium.com.br
Business-level Strategy
7
Business-level Strategy
Business-level strategy and RBV
Providing value to customers and gaining competitive advantage by
exploiting core competencies in individual product markets
A firm must decide whether it intends to:
Perform activities differently (lower overall costs than rivals); or
Perform different activities as compared to its rivals
(differentiating product or service at a premium price).
8
Types of Business-level Strategy
Competitive Advantage
Cost Uniqueness
(customer segments)
Competitive Scope
9
Cost Leadership Strategy
An integrated set of actions taken to produce goods or
services with acceptable features to customers at the
lowest cost, relative to that of competitors.
Standardised products
Features broadly acceptable to
many customers
Lowest competitive price
10
Cost Leadership Strategy
How to obtain a cost advantage
Determine and Average
control cost drivers Cost Leader
Competitor
(continuous improving
efficiency and cost Profit Profit
reduction)
Cost Cost
Reconfigure value advantage
chain activities
Cost
if needed
11
Cost Leadership Strategy
Sources of Cost Advantages
Economies of scale
Learning curve economies
Differential input access
Technology independent of scale
Policy choices
12
Photo Sources: wikipedia
Cost Leadership and Five Forces
New
Suppliers Buyers Substitutes Competitors
Entrants
Economies Being the Less Low price Rivals’
of scale and significant efficient as high hesitation
other cost customer rivals being switching in price
advantages and/or high forced out of cost against competition
as high entry margins the market substitutes
barriers absorbing first
increase in
costs
13
Cost Leadership and Sustainable CA
VRIN?
Competitive Risks
Processes used to produce and distribute good or service may
become obsolete due to competitors’ innovations.
Too much focus on cost reductions may occur at expense of
customers’ perceptions of differentiation.
Competitors, using their own core competencies, may successfully
imitate the cost leader’s strategy.
14
Differentiation Strategy
An integrated set of actions taken to produce goods or
services (at an acceptable cost) that customers perceive as
being different in ways that are important to them.
Non-standardised (customised)
products
Appropriate when customers value
differentiated features more than
low cost
15
Differentiation Strategy
How to obtain a differentiation advantage
Control cost drivers Average Differentiation
if needed Competitor Leader
Customise / Premium
reconfigure value
Profit Profit
chain activities to
maximise customers’
Cost Cost
value
16
Differentiation Strategy
Sources of Differentiation Advantages
Attributes of products and/or services (Product features,
complexity, timing of introduction, and location)
Relationship with customers
(Customisation, brands)
Linkages within or among
firms (product mix, distribution
channels, service and support)
17
Photo Sources: wikipedia
Differentiation and Five Forces
New
Suppliers Buyers Substitutes Competitors
Entrants
Product Premium Buyers’ Brand Limited
differentiation price and low price loyalty and rivalry due to
as high entry high margins sensitivity differentiation differentiated
barriers absorbing increasing as higher market
increase in willingness switching
costs of increase cost against
in price substitutes
18
Differentiation and Sustainable CA
VRIN?
Competitive Risks
The price differences between the differentiator’s product and the
cost leader’s product becomes too large.
Experience narrow customers’ perceptions of the value of
differentiated features.
Counterfeit goods replicate the differentiated features of the firm’s
products.
19
Focus Strategy
An integrated set of actions taken to produce goods or
services that serve the needs of a particular competitive
segment.
Particular buyer group
Different segment of a product line
Different geographic markets
20
Focus Strategy
Two types of focus strategies: focused cost leadership and
focused differentiation
Factors driving focus strategy:
Large firms overlooking small niches
Limitation in resources and capabilities to compete in broader market
Higher efficiency and building competitive advantage in narrow
segments
21
Focus Strategy and Sustainable CA
VRIN?
Competitive Risks
A focusing firm may be “outfocused” by its competitors.
A large competitor may set its sights on a firm’s niche market.
Customer preferences in niche market may change to more closely
resemble those of the broader market.
22
Integrated Strategy
A firm that successfully uses an integrated cost leadership /
differentiation strategy concentrating on both cost and
differentiation competitive advantages.
Efficient productions of differentiated
products
Adapting to new technology and
rapid environmental changes
Two sources of strategic flexibility
(FMS,TQM)
23
Integrated Strategy and Sustainable CA
VRIN?
Competitive Risks
Easily compromising and becoming ‘stuck-in-the-middle’ – lacking
the strong commitment and expertise that accompanies firms
following either a cost leadership or a differentiated strategy
24
Photo Sources: wikipedia
A firm’s strategies are dynamic…
32
Model of Competitive Rivalry
Mutual interdependence of firms
A firm’s competitive actions have noticeable effects and elicit
competitive responses from its competitors
Success of a strategy is a function of (i) the firm’s initial strategies;
(ii) how well it anticipates competitors’ responses to them; and (iii)
how well it responds to its competitors’ initial actions.
8
Competition Concepts
Competitors
Firms operating in the same market (i.e., industry), offering similar
products and targeting similar customers
Competitive behaviour
The set of competitive actions and competitive responses the firm
takes to build or defend its competitive advantages and to improve
its market position
27
Competition Concepts
Competitive rivalry
Competitive behaviours, i.e., the set of actions and responses,
occurring between an individual firm and its competitors, influencing
a firm’s ability to gain and sustain competitive advantages.
It affects all types of strategies, and has a dominant influence on
firm’s business-level strategies.
Competitive action (build or defend its competitive advantages or
improve its market position) versus competitive response (to counter
the effects of a competitor’s competitive action)
28
Competition Concepts
Competitive dynamics
Competitive behaviours taken by all firms competing within a market
Multimarket competition
Firms compete in several product or geographic market
29
Strategic Versus Tactical Behaviours
Strategic action/response
A market-based move that involves a significant commitment of
organisational resources and is difficult to implement and reverse.
Tactical action/response
A market-based move that is taken to fine-tune a strategy
It usually involves fewer resources and is relatively easy to
implement and reverse.
30
Model of Competitive Rivalry
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 31
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Competitor Analysis
A firm is better able to understand competitors and predict
their behaviours when forming its competitive actions and
responses (avoiding competitive blind spots).
Future objectives, current strategies, assumptions, and capabilities
The extents of direct competitions depends on the two
components: market commonality and resource similarity
Direct competitors: high market commonality and resource similarity
32
Competitor Analysis
Market commonality (intensity of rivalry)
Number of markets (both product and geographic regions) with
which the firm and competitors are jointly involved; and the degree of
importance of the individual markets to each competitors
Resource similarity (similarity of strategy)
The extent to which the type and amount of resources of a firm are
comparable to that of competitors
33
Competitor Analysis
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 34
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Model of Competitive Rivalry
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 35
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Likelihood of Attack: Timing
First mover benefits
First mover takes an initial competitive action in order to build or
defend its competitive advantages or to improve its market position.
It is more likely to earn above-average returns (albeit temporary); to
gain the loyalty of customers who may become committed to the
firm’s products, as well as the market share that can be difficult for
competitors to take during future competitive rivalry.
First mover must have readily available resources, and allocate
funds for product innovation, R&D, and aggressive advertisement.
Any drawbacks?
36
Likelihood of Attack: Timing
Second mover benefits
Second mover responds to the first mover’s competitive action,
typically through imitation.
More cautious than first movers, second movers studies customers’
reactions to product innovations; identifies and avoids mistakes and
huge spending the first mover made; and develop more efficient
processes and technologies (e.g. blueprints from first mover).
Any drawbacks?
37
Likelihood of Attack: Timing
Late mover incentives
Late mover responds to a competitive action only after considerable
time has elapsed.
Any success achieved will be slow in coming and much less than
that achieved by first and second movers.
Despite substantially reduced risks and returns, late mover can only
earn average returns and delays its understanding of how to create
value for customers.
38
First vs Second Mover
First mover is better than second mover when:
it achieves absolute cost advantage and/or high switch costs; or
its reputation and image advantages are costly-to-imitate.
Second mover is better than first mover when:
fast-follower can leapfrog the first mover by rapid technology; or
first-mover costs outweigh the first-mover advantages.
39
Photo Sources: Wikipedia
Likelihood of Attack: Size
Large firms are more likely to initiate more competitive
actions as well as strategic actions.
Large firms commonly have the slack resources required to launch a
larger number of total competitive actions.
Tend to rely on a limited variety of competitive actions, which can
ultimately reduce their competitive success.
40
Likelihood of Attack: Size
Small firms are more likely and quickly to launch competitive
actions.
Small firms are perceived as nimble and flexible competitors.
Relying on speed and surprise to defend competitive advantages or
develop new ones while engaged in competitive rivalry.
Having the flexibility needed to launch a greater variety of
competitive actions.
41
Competitive Dynamics: Market Speed
Slow-cycle market: markets in which the firm's competitive
advantages are shielded from imitation for long periods of
time, and in which imitation is costly
Competitive advantages are sustainable.
All firms concentrate on competitive
behaviours to protect, maintain and
extend proprietary competitive advantage.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 42
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Competitive Dynamics: Market Speed
Fast-cycle market: Markets in which the firm's capabilities that
contribute to competitive advantages are not shielded from
imitation and where imitation is often rapid and inexpensive
Competitive advantages are not sustainable – reverse engineering to
quickly imitate the firm’s product
Firms should avoid loyalty to single products, possibly cannibalising
their own current products to launch new ones; and should learn how
to rapidly and continuously develop new competitive advantages
before competitors can imitate them.
43
Competitive Dynamics: Market Speed
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as 44
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Competitive Dynamics: Market Speed
Standard-cycle market: Markets where firm’s competitive
advantages are moderately shielded from imitation and where
imitation is moderately costly
Competitive advantages partially sustained as quality is continuously
upgraded.
Firms should seek to serve many customers and gain a large market
share; and gain brand loyalty through brand management; and
carefully control operations.
45