Pert & CPM
Pert & CPM
Pert & CPM
CPM/PERT
PERT was developed by the US Navy for the planning and control of
the Polaris missile program and the emphasis was on completing the
program in the shortest possible time. PERT had the ability to cope
with uncertain activity completion times (e.g. for a particular
activity the most likely completion time is 4 weeks but it could be
anywhere between 3 weeks and 8 weeks).
CPM - Critical Path Method
ADVANTAGES:
Precedence relationships
large projects
more efficient
The Project Network
Difference between the latest time and the earliest time of an event
is the slack time for that event
Completion date?
On Schedule?
Within Budget?
Critical Activities?
How can the project be finished early at the least
cost?
example
The key question is: How long will it take to complete this
project ?
For clarity, this list is kept to a minimum by specifying only
immediate relationships, that is relationships involving activities
that "occur near to each other in time".
Before starting any of the above activity, the questions
asked would be
One answer could be, if we first do activity 1, then activity 2, then activity
3, ...., then activity 10, then activity 11 and the project would then take the sum
of the activity completion times, 30 weeks.
“What is the minimum possible time in which we can complete this project ? “
We shall see below how the network analysis diagram/picture we construct
helps us to answer this question.
CRITICAL PATH TAKES 24 WEEKS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
Packages are available to determine the shortest path
and other relevant information.
Data entry window
Output of the package
Limitations to CPM/PERT
Advantages Limitations
- Gantt charts are quite commonly used. - Do not clearly indicate details regarding
They provide an easy graphical the progress of activities
representation of when activities (might)
take place. - Do not give a clear indication of
interrelation ship between the separate
activities