Soil Consolidation - R1
Soil Consolidation - R1
Soil Consolidation - R1
consolidation
Dr Majid Sedighi
School of Engineering
Soil Compression and Settlement
Soil can deform due to the applied load…
The compression is caused by:
1) relocations of soil particles.
2) expulsion of water or air from the void spaces.
3) deformation of deformable particles.
Time
Settlement
Secondary
Primary Consolidation Consolidation
Immediate
settlement
Soil Compression and Settlement
5
Shallow Foundation : Settlement
1) Magnitude of settlement
2) Rate of settlement
3) Compatibility with acceptable range of structure/building
Clay Sand 8
Immediate Settlement
Clay Sand
a
Young’s modulus
r
Poisson’s ratio
r
Hooke’s law E a
a
Calculation of Immediate Settlement
𝑞𝐵
𝑠= ( 1 −𝜐 ) 𝐼 𝑠
2
𝐸
• is the immediate settlement.
• is the uniform pressure on the surface of a semi-infinite,
homogenous and isotropic mass.
• is the lesser dimension of a rectangular area or the diameter of
circular area of loading.
• is the Young’s modules of the soil.
• is the Poisson’s ratio of the soil.
• is the influence factor depending on the shape of the loaded area.
11
Clay compressibility
Consolidation test
Porous plate
Oedometer setup
Clay sample
Porous plate
13
Phase diagram of oedometer test
𝑊𝑠
𝐻 𝑠=
𝐴 𝐺𝑠 𝛾 𝑤
14
Phase diagram of oedometer test
ΔH Δe1
e0
Water e1
H
H1
Hs 𝑊𝑠
Solids 𝐻 𝑠=
𝐴 𝐺𝑠 𝛾 𝑤
d
c Step 3) Re-loading
f
Step 2) Un-loading
g
16
e versus log p
a
Soil has experienced the loading in past
b
Soil has experienced the loading d Soil has NOT experienced the
in past loading in past
c
Void ratio, e
17
Consolidation behaviour
a
Over consolidated
b
d Normally consolidated
Over consolidated c
Void ratio, e
f Normally consolidated
19
Preconsolidation pressure
Preconsolidation pressure
𝜎 ′𝑐
𝑂𝐶𝑅 =
Void ratio, e
𝜎′
𝑂𝐶𝑅>1
21
Preconsolidation pressure
Casagrande (1936) suggested a simple graphic construction to
determine the pre-
consolidation pressure from the laboratory e–log σ’ plot
H
H1
Hs 𝑊𝑠
Solids 𝐻 𝑠=
𝐴 𝐺𝑠 𝛾 𝑤
= dry weight of the soil
= Area of specimen
= specific gravity of soil solids
=unit weight of water
24
Example - Solution
ΔH Δe
e0
Water e1
H
H1
Hs 𝑊𝑠
Solids 𝐻 𝑠=
𝐴 𝐺𝑠 𝛾 𝑤
∆ 𝑉 =𝑉 0 − 𝑉 1 =𝐻𝐴 − ( 𝐻 − ∆ 𝐻 ) 𝐴=∆ 𝐻𝐴
∆ 𝑉 =∆ 𝐻𝐴= ∆ 𝑉 𝑣
∆𝑉𝑣 ∆𝑉
∆ 𝑒= = 1 + 𝑒0
𝑉𝑠 ∆ 𝑒=𝑉 𝑠 ∆ 𝐻
𝑉𝐴𝑣𝐻00 𝐻 0
𝑒 0 + 1 =𝑉 𝑠 = +1
𝑉 1+𝑒
𝑠 0
25
Example - Solution
Void ratio at the end of test = e1 = w1Gs =0.198 × 2.73 = 0.541
i.e.
26
Example - Solution
i.e. =0.0996 H, and can be used to obtain the void ratio at the end
of each increment period.
0 0 0 0.891
54 0.253 0.025 0.866
107 0.507 0.050 0.841
214 0.892 0.089 0.802
429 1.551 0.154 0.737
858 2.392 0.238 0.653
1716 3.324 0.331 0.560
3432 4.263 0.424 0.467
0 3.520 0.350 0.541
27
Example - Solution
0.90
0.80 a f b
d
0.70 c
e
0.60
0.50
325 kPa
0.40
10 100 1000 10000
28
(kP)
a
b
1 + 𝑒0
∆ 𝑒= ∆𝐻
𝐻0
Void ratio, e
d
c
29
Consolidation: Settlement
𝐶𝑐
1
𝐶𝑠
1
log σ ′ ❑
= Compression Index
= swell index
30
Settlement – Normally consolidate
clays
1) If the clay is normally consolidated
′ ′
σ 0 + Δ σ❑
𝑒𝑜 Δ 𝑒=𝐶 𝑐 log 10 ′
σ0
Δe 𝑉 𝐶𝐿
( )
′ ′
𝐶𝑐 𝐻 σ0+ Δ σ❑
𝑆= log
1+ 𝑒0 10 σ ′
0
′
σ0 σ ′0 + Δ σ ′❑
31
Settlement – Over consolidated
Clay
2) If the clay is over-consolidated, and remains so by the
end of consolidation )
′ ′
σ 0+ Δ σ❑
i nitial Δ 𝑒=𝐶 𝑠 log 10
𝑒𝑜 ′
σ0
𝑉 𝐶𝐿
( )
Δe ′ ′
𝐶𝑠 𝐻 σ 0+ Δ σ❑
𝑆= log
1+𝑒 0 10 σ ′
0
’ ’
’+
32
Settlement – Over consolidated
Clay
3) If an over-consolidated clay becomes normally
consolidated by the end of consolidation ’)
( ) ( )
′ ′ ′
𝐶𝑠 𝐻 σ𝑐 𝐶𝑐 𝐻 σ0+ Δ σ❑
𝑆= log + log
1+𝑒 0 10
′
σ0 1+𝑒 0 10 σ ′𝑐
i nitial
𝑒𝑜 𝑉 𝐶𝐿
Δe
’ ’ ’+ 33
Consolidation - Settlement
[
𝐶 𝑐 =0. 2343
𝐿𝐿(% )
100 ]𝐺𝑠 N agaraj∧Murty ( 1985)
𝐶 𝑠=0. 0463 [
𝐿𝐿(% )
100 ]
𝐺𝑠 N agaraj∧Murty ( 1985)
1 1
𝐶𝑠≅ ¿ 𝐶𝑐
5 10
34
Example 2
A soil profile is shown below. If a uniformly distributed load, is applied at
the ground surface, calculate the settlement of the clay layer caused by
primary consolidation if:
a. The clay is normally consolidated
b. The preconsolidation pressure is 190 kPa
C. The preconsolidation pressure is 170 kPa
kPa
𝑘𝑁
𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝛾 𝑠 = 14
𝑚
3 2𝑚
SAND
4𝑚
CLAY
1
C s Cc
6 , LL=40
4𝑚
SAND
35
Rate of clay consolidation
Rate of consolidation : e-log t
Pre-compression
of the specimen
Void ratio, e
Primary
consolidation
Secondary
consolidation
37
Clay consolidation
Δσ
Ground
Depth
Sand Clay
Total stress increase Pore water pressure increase Effective stress increase
Δσ ′
Δ σ =0
Δ 𝑢= Δ σ
Ground
Depth
Sand Clay
Total stress increase Pore water pressure increase Effective stress increase
Δu < Δσ
H Δσ’ > 0
Δσ Δσ Δσ
Ground
Depth
Sand Clay
Total stress increase Pore water pressure increase Effective stress increase
Δσ Δu = 0
Δ 𝑢=0
41
Consolidation Settlement
𝑃
Valve closed Valve closed
𝑃
Δ 𝑢=
𝐴
Δ 𝑢=0 (b)
(a)
𝑃
Δ 𝑢<
𝐴 Δ 𝑢=0
(c) (d)
If the valve is opened (drainage starts to happen), the water will flow
outward:
and
After some time, the excess hydrostatic pressure will become zero and
the system will reach a new state of equilibrium
and 43
Consolidation Settlement
Time
Δ𝑢
Settlement
Δ 𝑢=0
45
Consolidation - Time
The rate of consolidation
∂𝑣𝑧 𝑧
(𝑣 ¿ ¿ 𝑧 + 𝑑𝑧)𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦 ¿
∂𝑧
Δσ
𝑢
h=
γ𝑤
Groundwater
table
𝑑𝑧
2
𝑧
𝑑𝑦
𝑑𝑥
Sand Clay
𝑣 𝑧 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦
46
Consolidation - Time
∂𝑣𝑧
(𝑣 ¿ ¿ 𝑧 + 𝑑𝑧)𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦 ¿
∂𝑧
𝑑𝑧
𝑑𝑦
𝑑𝑥
𝑣 𝑧 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦 47
Consolidation - Time
∂𝑣𝑧 ∂𝑉
𝑑 𝑥 𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧=
∂𝑧 ∂𝑡
48
Consolidation - Time
𝑣
Discharge Hydraulic
velocity (L/T) conductivity (L/T)
∂h 𝑘 ∂𝑢
𝑣 𝑧 =𝑘𝑖=−𝑘 =−
∂𝑧 γ𝑤 ∂ 𝑧
𝑢=excess pore water pressure caused by the increase of stress 49
Consolidation - Time
Darcy’s Law
∂h 𝑘 ∂𝑢
𝑣 𝑧 =𝑘𝑖=−𝑘 =−
∂𝑧 γ𝑤 ∂ 𝑧
𝑘 ∂2𝑢 1 ∂𝑉
− =
γ 𝑤 ∂ z2 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 ∂ 𝑡
50
Consolidation - Time
𝑘 ∂2𝑢 1 ∂𝑉
− =
γ𝑤 ∂ z2
𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 ∂ 𝑡
∂ 𝑉 ∂ 𝑉 𝑣 ∂(𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒 𝑉 𝑠 ) ∂ 𝑉 𝑠 ∂e ∂𝑉𝑠
= = = +𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒
∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂t ∂𝑡
51
Consolidation - Time
𝑘 ∂2𝑢 1 ∂𝑉
− =
γ 𝑤 ∂ z2 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 ∂ 𝑡
∂ 𝑉 ∂ 𝑉 𝑣 ∂(𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒 𝑉 𝑠 ) ∂ 𝑉 𝑠 ∂e ∂𝑉𝑠
= = = +𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒
∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂t ∂𝑡
∂𝑉𝑠
=0
∂𝑡
𝑉 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧
𝑉 𝑠= =
1+ 𝑒 𝑜 1+𝑒 𝑜
52
Consolidation - Time
𝑘 ∂2𝑢 1 ∂𝑉
− =
γ 𝑤 ∂ z2 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 ∂ 𝑡
∂ 𝑉 ∂ 𝑉 𝑣 ∂(𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒 𝑉 𝑠 ) ∂ 𝑉 𝑠 ∂e ∂𝑉𝑠
= = = +𝑉 𝑠 + 𝑒
∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 ∂t ∂𝑡
∂ 𝑉 𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 ∂ e
=
∂𝑡 1+𝑒 𝑜 ∂ t
2
𝑘 ∂ 𝑢 1 ∂e
− =
γ𝑤 ∂ z2
1+ 𝑒 𝑜 ∂ t
53
Consolidation - Time
2
𝑘 ∂ 𝑢 1 ∂e
− =
γ𝑤 ∂ z2
1+ 𝑒 𝑜 ∂ t
∂ e= 𝑎𝑣 ∂ Δ σ )=− 𝑎 𝑣 ∂𝑢
( ′
2
𝑘 ∂ 𝑢 𝑎𝑣 ∂ u ∂u
− 2
=− =− 𝑚𝑣
γ𝑤 ∂ z 1+𝑒 𝑜 ∂ t ∂t
54
Consolidation - Time
𝑘 ∂ 𝑢 2
𝑎𝑣 ∂ u ∂u
− 2
=− =− 𝑚𝑣
γ𝑤 ∂ z 1+𝑒 𝑜 ∂ t ∂t
2
∂u ∂ 𝑢
=𝑐 𝑣 2
∂t ∂z
55
Consolidation - Time
2
∂u ∂ 𝑢
=𝑐 𝑣 2
∂t ∂z
𝑘 𝑘
𝑐 𝑣= =
( )
γ𝑤 𝑚𝑣 𝑎𝑣
γ𝑤
1+ 𝑒0
[ ( )]
𝑧 =0 ,𝑢=0 𝑚=∞
2𝑢 𝑜 𝑀𝑍
𝑢= ∑
2
−𝑀 𝑇𝑣
𝑧 =2 𝐻 𝑑𝑟𝑢=0
, sin 𝑒
𝑚=0 𝑀 𝐻 𝑑𝑟
𝑡 =0 , 𝑢=𝑢𝑜
56
Rate of consolidation 𝑧
Δσ
2
∂u ∂ 𝑢 𝑢
=𝑐 𝑣 2 h=
γ𝑤
∂t ∂z Groundwater
table
𝑧 =0 ,𝑢=0
𝐴
𝑧 =2 𝐻 𝑑𝑟𝑢=0
, Boundary conditions
2
𝑧
𝑡 =0 , 𝑢=𝑢𝑜
Sand Clay
[ ( )]
𝑚=∞
2𝑢 𝑜 𝑀𝑍 𝑚=an interger
𝑢= ∑
2
−𝑀 𝑇𝑣
sin 𝑒 𝑀 =( π / 2 ) (2 𝑚+1)
𝑚=0 𝑀 𝐻 𝑑𝑟 𝑢𝑜 =initial excess pore water pressure
𝑐𝑣 𝑡
Time factor 𝑇 𝑣= 2
𝐻 𝑑𝑟
57
Consolidation - Time
Distinction between the average degree of consolidation
and mid-plane degree of consolidation
Sand
Degree of
0 100 consolidation (%)
Clay
H 𝑑𝑟
Average degree of
consolidation
H
Midplane degree
of consolidation
H 𝑑𝑟
Sand
Depth
58
Drainage boundary
drainage
u𝑜 2 H 𝑑𝑟
drainage
u𝑜 H 𝑑𝑟
One
Dial gauge Load
drainage
u𝑜 H 𝑑𝑟
One
59
Consolidation - Time
𝑚=∞
The average degree of consolidation 𝑈=1 − ∑
2 −𝑀 𝑇
2
𝑒
2
𝑣
𝑚=0 𝑀
60
Consolidation - Time
The average degree of consolidation
61
Example 2
During the construction of a highway bridge, the average
permanent load on the clay layer is expected to increase by
115 kN/m2.
The average effective overburden pressure at the middle of
the clay layer is 210 kN/m2. Here, H =6 m, Cc =0.28, eo =0.9,
and cv =0.36 m2/month. The clay is normally consolidated.
Δσ
2
∂u ∂ 𝑢 𝑢
=𝑐 𝑣 2 h=
γ𝑤
∂t ∂z Groundwater
table
𝑧 =0 ,𝑢=0
𝐴
𝑧 =2 𝐻 𝑑𝑟𝑢=0
, Boundary conditions
2
𝑧
𝑡 =0 , 𝑢=𝑢𝑜
Sand Clay
[ ( )]
𝑚=∞
2𝑢 𝑜 𝑀𝑍 𝑚=an interger
𝑢= ∑
2
−𝑀 𝑇𝑣
sin 𝑒 𝑀 =( π / 2 ) (2 𝑚+1)
𝑚=0 𝑀 𝐻 𝑑𝑟 𝑢𝑜 =initial excess pore water pressure
𝑐𝑣 𝑡
Time factor 𝑇 𝑣= 2
𝐻 𝑑𝑟
64
Rate of consolidation
0
20
Average degree of consolidation,
40
60
80
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9
Time factor,
65
Consolidation - Time
How to reduce the time of consolidation
𝑐𝑣 𝑡
𝑇 𝑣= 2
𝐻 𝑑𝑟
2
𝑇𝑣 𝐻 𝑑𝑟
𝑡=
𝑐𝑣
66
Consolidation - Time
How to reduce the time required for
consolidation:
2
2
𝑇𝑣 𝐻
1
𝑑𝑟
𝑡=
𝑐𝑣 ¿ 𝑘 / (γ 𝑤 𝑚𝑣 )
68
Preloading consolidation with
Vertical Drains
Vertical drains are installed under a surcharge load to
accelerate the drainage of impervious soils and thus speed
up consolidation.
These drains provide a shorter path for the water to flow
through to get away from the soil.
69
Consolidation - Time
How to reduce the time of consolidation
2
𝑇𝑣 𝐻 𝑑𝑟
𝑡=
𝑐𝑣
Time for consolidation is
controlled by the square of the
drainage path length.
1) Sand Drains
2) Prefabricated vertical drains
(PVDs)
70
Impact of surcharge
Excess surcharge load
Surcharge load Time
Preload
U%
71
Impact of surcharge
Surcharge per unit area
Δσ (𝑝 )
Time
𝑡 2 𝑡1
Time
𝑆( 𝑝 )
𝑆(𝑝+ 𝑓 )
Settlement
Saving time 72
Impact of surcharge
0
Average degree of consolidation, U(%)
𝑈= 𝑓 ( 𝑇𝑣)
20
Saving time
40
60 U=70%
80 U=90%
100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9
Time factor,
p+f p
73
Impact of surcharge
𝑡 2
𝑡1
Time
𝑆( 𝑝 ) 𝑆( 𝑝𝑆)
𝑈= (𝑝+ 𝑓 )
𝑆( 𝑝 + 𝑓 )
Settlement
𝑈=
𝑙𝑜𝑔
[ σ ′ 𝑜 + Δ σ (𝑝 )
σ ′𝑜 ] =
[
𝑙𝑜𝑔 1+
Δ σ ( 𝑝)
σ ′𝑜 ] 𝑈= 𝑓 ( 𝑇𝑣)
𝑙𝑜𝑔
[ σ ′ 𝑜 + Δ σ (𝑝 ) + Δ σ ( 𝑓 )
σ ′𝑜 ] {
𝑙𝑜𝑔 1+
Δ σ (𝑝)
σ ′𝑜 [ 1+
Δ σ (𝑓 )
Δ σ (𝑝 ) ]}
2
𝑇𝑣 𝐻
[ ( )]
𝑚=∞
2𝑢 𝑜 𝑀𝑍 𝑑𝑟
𝑢= ∑ 𝑡 2=
2
−𝑀 𝑇𝑣
sin 𝑒
𝑚=0 𝑀 𝐻 𝑑𝑟 𝑐𝑣
74
Example 3 (based on Example 2)
75
Preloading consolidation with
vertical drains
Without vertical drains With vertical Drains
Surcharge Surcharge
Drain
Preload Blanket Preload
(Sand)
76
Preloading consolidation +
Vertical Drains
Time
Settlement curve
with drains
Settlement curve
without drains
90%
U%
77
Preloading consolidation
Simply place a surcharge fill on top of the soil
Once sufficient consolidation has taken place, the fill can
be removed and construction takes place. It can also
remain and form the embankment required for the
project.
Surcharge fills are typically 10-25 feet thick and generally
produces settlement of 1 to 3 feet.
Most effective in clay soils.
78
Consolidation - Time
How to reduce the time of consolidation
2
𝑇𝑣 𝐻 𝑑𝑟
𝑡=
𝑐𝑣
Time for consolidation is
controlled by the square of the
drainage path length.
1) Sand Drains
2) Prefabricated vertical drains
(PVDs)
79
Sand Drains
Widely used between 1930 -1980.
Diameters changing between 20-60 cm and with 1.5 to 6 m
spacing.
80
Prefabricated Vertical Drains
Drain core
Drain jacket
81
Prefabricated Vertical Drains
82
Prefabricated Vertical Drains
83
Preloading consolidation with
PVD Drains
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP-4_5gMb14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zobu0M4eaKU
84
Drain diameter Typical Maximum
Drain type Installation method (m) spacing length (m)
(m)
Driven or vibratory closed-
Sand drain end mandrel (displacement 0.15-0.6 1-5 30
type)
Hollow stem continuous-
Sand drain flight auger (low 0.3-0.5 2-5 35
displacement)
Sand drain Jetted (non-displacement) 0.2-0.3 2-5 30
Driven or vibratory closed-
Prefabricated end mandrel; flight anger; 30
sand drains rotary wash boring 0.06-0.15 1.2-4
(‘sandwicks’) (displacement or non-
displacement)
Prefabricated Driven or vibratory closed- 0.05-0.1
60
band-shaped end mandrel (displacement (equivalent 1.2-3.5
drains or low displacement) diameter)
85
Preloading Consolidation with Sand
Drains
Surcharge
Groundwater table
Vertical drainage
Sand Clay
( )
2 2
𝜕𝑢 𝜕 𝑢 1 𝜕𝑢 𝜕 𝑢
=𝑐 h + +𝑐 𝑣
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑟
2
𝑟 𝜕 𝑟 𝜕𝑧
2
𝑈 𝑣 ,𝑟 =1−(1 −𝑈 𝑟 )(1 −𝑈 𝑣 )
Radial Vertical
Drainage Drainage
87
Degree of Consolidation Due to
Radial Drainage
[ ]
2
𝜕𝑢 1 𝜕𝑢 𝜕 𝑢
=𝑐 h +
𝜕𝑡 𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝜕𝑟 2
𝑈 𝑟 =1 −exp (
− 8 𝑇𝑟
𝑚 )
𝑑𝑒
( )
2 2
𝑛 3 𝑛 −1 𝑛=
𝑚= 2 ln (𝑛 ) −
𝑛 −1 4𝑛
2 2𝑟 𝑑
88
Preloading with drains
Influence Zone
s s
Considering an
equivalent area s
approach s
re re
Drains
90
Degree of Consolidation Due to
Vertical Drainage
2
∂𝑢 ∂ 𝑢
=𝑐 𝑣
∂𝑡 ∂𝑧
2
𝑐𝑣 𝑡
𝑇 𝑣= 2
𝐻 𝑑𝑟
Time factor
91
Preloading with drains
𝑘𝑣
𝑐 𝑣=
𝑚𝑣 γ 𝑤 𝑐 h 𝑘h
𝑘h =
𝑐 h= 𝑐 𝑣 𝑘𝑣
𝑚𝑣 γ 𝑤
Range of possible field values for for soft clays
Nature of Clay
No or slightly developed microfabric, essentially 1 to 1.5
homogeneous deposits
From fairly well to well developed microfabric, e.g. 2 to 4
sedimentary clays with discontinuous lenses and layers of
more permeable material
𝑟 𝑑=0.1𝑚 𝑑𝑒 =3.0 𝑚
𝑐h
=1
𝑐𝑣
93
Preloading with vertical drains -
Summary
Degree of Consolidation Due to Combined horizontal
(Radial) and Vertical Drainage
( )
2 2
𝜕𝑢 𝜕 𝑢 1 𝜕𝑢 𝜕 𝑢
=𝑐 h + +𝑐 𝑣
𝜕𝑡 𝜕h
2
h 𝜕 h 𝜕𝑧
2
94
Analysis and design of preloading
with vertical drains
Design and analysis may involve:
1) Determining the degree of consolidation (U) for given
PVDs’ spacing (S) and time (t).
2) Determining the consolidation time (t) for given degree
of consolidation (U) and PVDs’ spacing (S).
3) Determining the PVD’s spacing (S) for given degree of
consolidation (U) and consolidation time (t).
U t
S
95