The document discusses structuralist and formalist approaches to analyzing literature. Structuralism focuses on underlying structures within a text like recurring themes, character archetypes, and narrative patterns. Formalism emphasizes the form and language of a work, examining elements like rhyme, metaphor, and symbolism to interpret meaning independent of historical context. The document provides examples analyzing "Little Red Riding Hood" from a structuralist perspective and "The Road Not Taken" using a formalist approach. It then outlines some key differences between the two approaches.
The document discusses structuralist and formalist approaches to analyzing literature. Structuralism focuses on underlying structures within a text like recurring themes, character archetypes, and narrative patterns. Formalism emphasizes the form and language of a work, examining elements like rhyme, metaphor, and symbolism to interpret meaning independent of historical context. The document provides examples analyzing "Little Red Riding Hood" from a structuralist perspective and "The Road Not Taken" using a formalist approach. It then outlines some key differences between the two approaches.
The document discusses structuralist and formalist approaches to analyzing literature. Structuralism focuses on underlying structures within a text like recurring themes, character archetypes, and narrative patterns. Formalism emphasizes the form and language of a work, examining elements like rhyme, metaphor, and symbolism to interpret meaning independent of historical context. The document provides examples analyzing "Little Red Riding Hood" from a structuralist perspective and "The Road Not Taken" using a formalist approach. It then outlines some key differences between the two approaches.
The document discusses structuralist and formalist approaches to analyzing literature. Structuralism focuses on underlying structures within a text like recurring themes, character archetypes, and narrative patterns. Formalism emphasizes the form and language of a work, examining elements like rhyme, metaphor, and symbolism to interpret meaning independent of historical context. The document provides examples analyzing "Little Red Riding Hood" from a structuralist perspective and "The Road Not Taken" using a formalist approach. It then outlines some key differences between the two approaches.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 67
Structuralist and Formalist
Approach in Literature
ENGLISH 10/QUARTER 3 WEEK4
ACTIVITY 1: GUESS TO WIN IT! Directions: Arrange the scrambled letters to form a word. One point will be given for every correct answer. 1. HACRACTER 2. TESNGIT 3. TLPO 4. EPOXTISONI 5. SIRNGI TINOCA 6. ILCXAM 7. OPITN FO EWIV 8. MIAGEYR 9. NOCLIFTC 10. METEH ACTIVITY 2: MATCH MORE Directions: Identify the words from activity 1 that match with the given definitions. 1. It is central topic, subject or message of the text/story. 2. It refers to a person or even animals who take part in the action. 3. It is the element of the story that refers to place and time the story the story happened. 4. This is the struggle of the protagonist that he needs to face. 5. It is a literary device that uses words that appeal to the senses to create vivid pictures for readers. 6. It tells the events in the story leading to climax. 7. It refers to the introduction of the story .
8. It is the sequence of events in
a story or play. 9. This element is the most intense and exciting part of s story
10. It refers to the angle from
which the story is told. ACTIVITY 3. LET’S GET READ! Read and discuss the selection with your groupmates.
A Day in the Country (excerpt)
By Anton Chekhov A dark leaden-colored mass is creeping over the sky towards the sun. Red zigzags of lightning gleam here and there across it. There is a sound of stirs up the dust. In a minute there will be a spurt of May rain and a real storm will begin. Fyokla, a little beggar-girl of six, is running through the village, looking for Terenty, the cobbler. The white-haired barefooted child is pale. Her eyes are wide-open, her lips are trembling. “Uncle, where is Terenty?” she asked everyone she meets. No one answers. They are all preoccupied with the approaching storm and take refuge in their huts. At last, she meets Silanty Silitch, the sacristan, Terenty’s bosom friend. “Uncle, where is Terenty?”. “At the kitchen-gardens,” answers Silanty. The beggar-girl runs behind the huts to the kitchen-gardens and there finds Terenty, the tall old man with a thin, pock-marked face, very long legs and bare feet. “Uncle Terenty!” the white-headed beggar girl addresses him. “Ah! servant of God Fyokla,” he says, “where have you come from?” “Uncle Terenty, come along, brother Danika has had an accident. “What sort of accident?”, the old man asks. “In the count’s copse Danika stuck his hand into a hole in a tree and he can’t get it out. He wanted to get a cuckoo’s egg out of the hole for me”. Terenty comes out of the kitchen-garden and begins striding down the village street. As soon as rain begins, the wind drops. The only sound is the patter of rain dropping like the fine shot on the young rye and the parched road. A flash of lightning, some fourteen feet long, gleams above their heads. There is loud peal of thunder and it seems to Fyokla that something big, heavy and round is rolling over the sky and tearing it open, exactly over her head. Terenty’s and Fyokla’s feet are covered with lamps and clay and it is difficult to walk, but Terenty strides on more rapidly. At last they go into the count’s copse. The washed trees, stirred by a gust of wind, drop a perfect waterfall upon them. Fyokla leads the old man into a thicket and after going a quarter of mile, points to Danika. Her brother, little fellow of eight with pale sickly face, stands leaning against the tree. Terenty’s and Fyokla’s feet are covered with lamps and clay and it is difficult to walk, but Terenty strides on more rapidly. At last they go into the count’s copse. The washed trees, stirred by a gust of wind, drop a perfect waterfall upon them. Fyokla leads the old man into a thicket and after going a quarter of mile, points to Danika. Her brother, little fellow of eight with pale sickly face, stands leaning against the tree. Towards midday, all three sit down on the river bank. Danika takes out of his bag a piece of bread, soaked and reduced to a mash and they began to eat. Terenty says a prayer when he has eaten the bread and falls asleep. Danika gazes at the water, pondering. He has many different things to think. Towards the evening, the return to the village. The children go for the night to a deserted barn while Terenty, leaving them, goes to the tavern. The children lie huddled together on the straw, dozing. Danika does not sleep. He gazes into the darkness and it seems to him that he is seeing all that he has seen in the day. The children fall asleep thinking of the homeless cobbler and in the night Trenty comes to them, makes the sign of the cross over them and puts bread under their heads. No one sees his love. It is seen only by the moon which floats in the sky and peeps caressingly through the holes in the wall of the deserted barn. ACTIVITY 4 TELL ME MORE Directions: Answer the question assigned to your group. 1.Who are the characters mentioned in the story? (Group I) 2.Where do you think the story happened? (Group 2) 3.What literary device is evident in the introduction of the story? (Group 3) 4. What is the problem presented in the story? (Group 4)
5. What is the point of view of the
narrator based on the first and second paragraph?( each Group) Structuralist and Formalist Approach in Literature
ENGLISH 10/QUARTER 3 WEEK4
OBJECTIVES: • Differentiate formalism from structuralism approach • Appreciate the over-all artistic value of the structure and elements of the selection (structuralist and formalist) • Analyze the story/text using structuralist/formalist approach Structuralism and Formalism are both approaches to understanding and analyzing works of literature, art, or culture. STRUCTURALIST - focuses on the underlying structures or systems within a text or artifact. It seeks to uncover the fundamental rules, patterns, or relationships that shape meaning. Think of it like dissecting a story to understand its basic components and how they interact. STRUCTURALIST (Example) Imagine you're analyzing a fairy tale like "Little Red Riding Hood" from a structuralist perspective. You might focus on recurring themes, character archetypes (like the innocent maiden or the cunning wolf), and the narrative patterns (the journey through the woods, the encounter with the predator, the rescue by a hero). Structuralism seeks to identify these underlying structures that make the story recognizable and meaningful across different cultures and contexts. FORMALISM - Formalism, on the other hand, emphasizes the form or structure of a work itself. It looks at elements such as language, style, and form to interpret meaning. Formalists often prioritize the text itself over external factors like historical context or authorial intention. FORMALISM (Example) - Now, let's consider "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost from a formalist viewpoint. Instead of delving into the author's intentions or historical background, formalism would examine the poem's structure and language. You might analyze Frost's use of rhyme, meter, and symbolism to convey themes of choice and individualism. Formalists would focus on the specific techniques and artistic devices employed within the poem itself, rather than looking at its broader cultural or historical context. Structuralist Formalist • It analyses universal, • A literary work can underlying structures in be understood only a text ((setting, by reference to its characters, etc) intrinsic features which are the elements Structuralist Formalist • It analyses a text’s • It only analyses one connection to other particular literary literary works since it work at a time; it is examines common not compared or underlying structures contrasted with another work Structuralist Formalist • It is a method of • It deals with the form interpret- of the text. An ting and analyzing a literary interpretive approach piece that focuses on the that emphasizes literary contrasting ideas and show form and the study of how they relate to the literary devices within whole structure. the text Structuralist Formalist • A literary piece is open to • This approach studies text interpretation. It depends on as a text. It views literature how the readers view the as a unique form of human text based on their knowledge that needs to be understanding which may examined on its own terms. involve personal belief, environment, behaviour or moral perception. Structuralist and Formalist Approach in Literature
ENGLISH 10/QUARTER 3 WEEK4
OBJECTIVE:
• Analyze the story/text using
structuralist/formalist approach ACTIVITY 5.CONNECT AND KINECT Directions: Read and understand the selection “The Tale of the Malign Wolf.” Analyze it using Formalist/Structuralist Approach. Be guided by the given questions found in the table. Tale of the Maligned Wolf by Tammy Lenski The forest was my home. I lived there, and I cared about it. I tried to keep it neat and clean. Then one sunny day, while I was cleaning up some garbage a camper had left behind, I heard footsteps. I leaped behind a tree and saw a little girl coming down the trail carrying a basket. I was suspicious of this little girl right away because she was dressed funny- all in red, and her head covered she did not want people to know who she was. Naturally, I stopped to check her out. I asked who she was, where she was going, where she had come from, and all that. She gave me a song and dance about going to her grandmother’s house with a basket of lunch. through the forest unannounced and dressed funny. She appeared to be a basically honest person, but she was in my forest, and she certainly looked suspicious with that strange getup of hers. So I decided to teach her just how serious it is to prance through the forest unannounced and dressed funny. I let her go on her way, but I ran ahead of her to grandmother’s house. When I saw that nice old woman, I explained my problem and she agreed that her granddaughter needed to learn a lesson. The old woman agreed to stay out of sight until I called her. Actually, she hid under the bed. When the girl arrived, I invited her into the bedroom where I was in bed, dressed like the grandmother. The girl came in all rosy-cheeked and said something nasty about my big ears. I’ve been insulted before so I made the best of it by suggesting that my big ears would help me to hear better. Now, what I meant was that I liked her and wanted to pay close attention to what she was saying. But she made another insulting crack about my bulging eyes. Now you can see how I was beginning to feel about this girl who put on such a nice front, but was apparently a very nasty person. Still, I’ve made it a policy to turn the other cheek, so I told her that my big eyes helped me to see her better. Her next insult really got to me. I’ve got this problem with having big teeth, and that little girl made an insulting crack about them. I know that I should have had better control, but I leaped up from that bed and growled that my teeth would help me to eat her better. Now let’s face it -no wolf could ever eat a little girl-everyone knows that but that crazy girl started running around the house screaming-me chasing her to calm her down. I’d taken off the grandmother’s clothes, but that only seemed to make it worse. All of a sudden the door came crashing open and a big lumberjack is standing there with his axe. I looked at him, and all of sudden it came clear that I was in trouble. There was an open window behind me and out I went out. I’d like to say that was the end of it. But that Grandmother character never did tell my side of the story. Before long the word got around that I was a mean, nasty guy. Everybody started avoiding me. I don’t know about that little girl with the funny red outfit, but I didn’t live happily ever after. Elements Descriptions 1. Characters: Who are the characters in the story? How are they related to one another? What are their actions? 2. Setting: Where did the story happen? Describe the environment/ atmosphere. Elements Descriptions 3. Conflict: What is the main problem in the story? 4. Plot: How did the story begin? What happened in the story? How did it end? Elements Descriptions
5. Tone: What was the
author’s attitude towards the subject? What kind of emotion or feeling did you get after reading? Elements Descriptions 6. Point of view: Who is telling or narrating the story? Is one character acting as a narrator (First Person), or someone telling what is going on (Third Person)? Elements Descriptions 7. Theme: What lesson does the author want me to learn from the story? What lesson does the author want me to learn about life? Why is it important to analyze the text/story that you read? ACTIVITY 6. THINK AND INK Direction: Determine which literary approach is used in each statement below. Write your answer in your activity sheet. 1. The wolf went out through an open window out of fear. 2. One sunny day, the wolf fixes the garbage in the forest. 3. The story tells about injustice. 4. Justice is about harmony, revenge is making oneself feel better. But for some people they are just the same. 5. The world was unfair to wolf, nobody listened to his sad story. ACTIVITY 5.CONNECT AND KINECT Directions: Read and understand the selection “The Tale of the Malign Wolf.” Analyze it using Formalist/Structuralist Approach. Be guided by the given questions found in the table. (Teacher provides copy of the text and activity sheet) ACTIVITY 5. THINK AND INK Direction: Determine which literary approach is used in each statement below. Write your answer in your activity sheet. 1. The wolf went out through an open window out of fear. 2. One sunny day, the wolf fixes the garbage in the forest. 3. The story tells about injustice. 4. Justice is about harmony, revenge is making oneself fee better. But for some people they are just the same. 5. The world was unfair to wolf, nobody listened to his sad story. Quiz: It’s Your Turn! Direction: Identify the statement if it is Structuralism or Formalism 1. Identifying recurring themes and narrative patterns 2. Examining the rhyme scheme, meter, and imagery 3. Exploring how character archetypes and narrative frameworks shape the story 4. Examining how their visual or linguistic representation enhances the aesthetic impact 5. Identifying the sequence of events and underlying patterns 6. Analyzing the author’s stylistic choices and use of language in shaping the plot 7. How they contribute to the poem’s overall meaning 8. Their formal properties, such as rhyme, meter, and imagery, and their impact on the reader’s experience 9. By exploring how dialogue contributes to the development of themes and relationships within the play 10. Analyzing the language and dialogue used by Essay • Differentiate formalism from structuralism approach • Why is it important for you as a student to analyze the story/text using structuralism/formalism approach? Answer: 1. Structuralism 2. Formalism 3. Structuralism 4. Formalism 5. Structuralism 6. Formalism 7. Structuralism 8. Formalism 9. Structuralism