Using a one-round version of DES and starting with the same bit pattern for the key K and the plaintext, namely: in hexadecimal notation: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F; in binary notation: 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111
Using a one-round version of DES and starting with the same bit pattern for the key K and the plaintext, namely: in hexadecimal notation: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F; in binary notation: 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111
Using a one-round version of DES and starting with the same bit pattern for the key K and the plaintext, namely: in hexadecimal notation: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F; in binary notation: 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111
Using a one-round version of DES and starting with the same bit pattern for the key K and the plaintext, namely: in hexadecimal notation: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F; in binary notation: 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33
Cryptography and
Network Security Chapter 9 Fourth Edition by William Stallings
Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown
Chapter 9 – Public Key Cryptography and RSA
Every Egyptian received two names, which were
known respectively as the true name and the good name, or the great name and the little name; and while the good or little name was made public, the true or great name appears to have been carefully concealed. —The Golden Bough, Sir James George Frazer Private-Key Cryptography traditional private/secret/single key cryptography uses one key shared by both sender and receiver if this key is disclosed communications are compromised also is symmetric, parties are equal hence does not protect sender from receiver forging a message & claiming is sent by sender Public-Key Cryptography probably most significant advance in the 3000 year history of cryptography uses two keys – a public & a private key asymmetric since parties are not equal uses clever application of number theoretic concepts to function complements rather than replaces private key crypto Why Public-Key Cryptography? developed to address two key issues: key distribution – how to have secure communications in general without having to trust a KDC with your key digital signatures – how to verify a message comes intact from the claimed sender public invention due to Whitfield Diffie & Martin Hellman at Stanford Uni in 1976 known earlier in classified community Public-Key Cryptography public-key/two-key/asymmetric cryptography involves the use of two keys: a public-key, which may be known by anybody, and can be used to encrypt messages, and verify signatures a private-key, known only to the recipient, used to decrypt messages, and sign (create) signatures is asymmetric because those who encrypt messages or verify signatures cannot decrypt messages or create signatures Public-Key Cryptography Public-Key Characteristics Public-Key algorithms rely on two keys where: it is computationally impossible to find decryption key knowing only algorithm & encryption key it is computationally easy to en/decrypt messages when the relevant (en/decrypt) key is known either of the two related keys can be used for encryption, with the other used for decryption (for some algorithms) Public-Key Cryptosystems Public-Key Applications can classify uses into 3 categories: encryption/decryption (provide secrecy) digital signatures (provide authentication) key exchange (of session keys) some algorithms are suitable for all uses, others are specific to one Security of Public Key Schemes like private key schemes brute force exhaustive search attack is always theoretically possible but keys used are too large (>512bits) security relies on a large enough difference in difficulty between easy (en/decrypt) and hard (cryptanalyse) problems more generally the hard problem is known, but is made hard enough to be impractical to break requires the use of very large numbers hence is slow compared to private key schemes Examples of ASSYMETRIC ENCRIPTION ALGORTHMS
Examples of asymmetric encryption
include: • Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) • the Digital Signature Standard (DSS), which incorporates the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) • Elliptical Curve Cryptography (ECC) • the Diffie-Hellman exchange method • TLS/SSL protocol RSA by Rivest, Shamir & Adleman of MIT in 1977 best known & widely used public-key scheme based on exponentiation in a finite (Galois) field over integers modulo a prime nb. exponentiation takes O((log n)3) operations (easy) uses large integers (eg. 1024 bits) security due to cost of factoring large numbers nb. factorization takes O(e log n log log n) operations (hard) Cont. RSA encryption generates a public key by multiplying two large, random prime numbers together, and using these same prime numbers, generates a private key. From there, standard asymmetric encryption takes place: information is encrypted using the public key and decrypted using the private key. RSA Key Setup each user generates a public/private key pair by: selecting two large primes at random - p, q computing their system modulus n=p.q note ø(n)=(p-1)(q-1) selecting at random the encryption key e • where 1<e<ø(n), gcd(e,ø(n))=1 solve following equation to find decryption key d e.d=1 mod ø(n) and 0≤d≤n publish their public encryption key: PU={e,n} keep secret private decryption key: PR={d,n} RSA Use to encrypt a message M the sender: obtains public key of recipient PU={e,n} computes: C = Me mod n, where 0≤M<n to decrypt the ciphertext C the owner: uses their private key PR={d,n} computes: M = Cd mod n note that the message M must be smaller than the modulus n (block if needed) Why RSA Works because of Euler's Theorem: aø(n)mod n = 1 where gcd(a,n)=1 in RSA have: n=p.q ø(n)=(p-1)(q-1) carefully chose e & d to be inverses mod ø(n) hence e.d=1+k.ø(n) for some k hence : Cd = Me.d = M1+k.ø(n) = M1.(Mø(n))k = M1.(1)k = M1 = M mod n RSA Example - Key Setup 1. Select primes: p=17 & q=11 2. Compute n = pq =17 x 11=187 3. Compute ø(n)=(p–1)(q-1)=16 x 10=160 4. Select e: gcd(e,160)=1; choose e=7 5. Determine d: de=1 mod 160 and d < 160 Value is d=23 since 23x7=161= 10x160+1 6. Publish public key PU={7,187} 7. Keep secret private key PR={23,187} RSA Example - En/Decryption sample RSA encryption/decryption is: given message M = 88 (nb. 88<187) encryption: C = 887 mod 187 = 11 decryption: M = 1123 mod 187 = 88 Exponentiation can use the Square and Multiply Algorithm a fast, efficient algorithm for exponentiation concept is based on repeatedly squaring base and multiplying in the ones that are needed to compute the result look at binary representation of exponent only takes O(log2 n) multiples for number n eg. 75 = 74.71 = 3.7 = 10 mod 11 eg. 3129 = 3128.31 = 5.3 = 4 mod 11 Exponentiation c = 0; f = 1 for i = k downto 0 do c = 2 x c f = (f x f) mod n if bi == 1 then c=c+1 f = (f x a) mod n return f Efficient Encryption encryption uses exponentiation to power e hence if e small, this will be faster often choose e=65537 (216-1) also see choices of e=3 or e=17 but if e too small (eg e=3) can attack using Chinese remainder theorem & 3 messages with different modulii if e fixed must ensure gcd(e,ø(n))=1 ie reject any p or q not relatively prime to e Efficient Decryption decryption uses exponentiation to power d this is likely large, insecure if not can use the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) to compute mod p & q separately. then combine to get desired answer approx 4 times faster than doing directly only owner of private key who knows values of p & q can use this technique RSA Key Generation users of RSA must: determine two primes at random - p, q select either e or d and compute the other primes p,q must not be easily derived from modulus n=p.q means must be sufficiently large typically guess and use probabilistic test exponents e, d are inverses, so use Inverse algorithm to compute the other RSA Security possible approaches to attacking RSA are: brute force key search (infeasible given size of numbers) mathematical attacks (based on difficulty of computing ø(n), by factoring modulus n) timing attacks (on running of decryption) chosen ciphertext attacks (given properties of RSA) Factoring Problem mathematical approach takes 3 forms: factor n=p.q, hence compute ø(n) and then d determine ø(n) directly and compute d find d directly currently believe all equivalent to factoring have seen slow improvements over the years • as of May-05 best is 200 decimal digits (663) bit with LS biggest improvement comes from improved algorithm • cf QS to GHFS to LS currently assume 1024-2048 bit RSA is secure • ensure p, q of similar size and matching other constraints Timing Attacks developed by Paul Kocher in mid-1990’s exploit timing variations in operations eg. multiplying by small vs large number or IF's varying which instructions executed infer operand size based on time taken RSA exploits time taken in exponentiation countermeasures use constant exponentiation time add random delays blind values used in calculations Chosen Ciphertext Attacks • RSA is vulnerable to a Chosen Ciphertext Attack (CCA) • attackers chooses ciphertexts & gets decrypted plaintext back • choose ciphertext to exploit properties of RSA to provide info to help cryptanalysis • can counter with random pad of plaintext • or use Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding (OASP) Elliptical Curve Cryptography (ECC) • ECC is an RSA alternative that uses smaller key sizes and mathematical elliptic curves to execute asymmetric encryption. • It’s frequently used to digitally sign cryptocurrency transactions; • in fact, the popular cryptocurrency Bitcoin uses ECC – the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), to be exact - to digitally sign transactions and ensure that funds are spent by authorized users only. • ECC is much faster than RSA in terms of key and signature generation, and many consider it the future of asymmetric encryption, mainly for web traffic and cryptocurrency but for other applications as well. Diffie-Hellman exchange method Diffie-Hellman, one of cryptography’s greatest breakthroughs, is a key exchange method that two parties who have never met can use to exchange public and private key pairs over public, insecure communication channels. Prior to Diffie-Hellman, two parties seeking to encrypt their communications between each other had to physically pre- exchange encryption keys so that both parties could decipher each other’s encrypted messages. Diffie-Hellman made it so that these keys could be securely exchanged over public communication channels, where third parties normally extract sensitive information and encryption keys. Advantages of asymmetric encryption algorithms
Key distribution not necessary
Exchange of private keys not necessary. Digital signature/message authentication: with asymmetric encryption, senders can use their private keys to digitally sign and verify that a message or file originated from them and not an untrusted third party. Disadvantages of asymmetric encryption algorithm The main disadvantage of asymmetric encryption is that it’s slower than symmetric encryption because of its longer key lengths, not to mention that asymmetric encryption calculations tend to be much more complex than their symmetric counterparts. Summary have considered: principles of public-key cryptography RSA algorithm, implementation, security
Transformation of Cryptography: Fundamental concepts of Encryption, Milestones, Mega-Trends and sustainable Change in regard to Secret Communications and its Nomenclatura