RSA Algorithm
RSA Algorithm
RSA Algorithm
Private-Key Cryptography
traditional
private/secret/single key cryptography uses one key shared by both sender and receiver if this key is disclosed communications are compromised also is symmetric, parties are equal hence does not protect sender from receiver forging a message & claiming is sent by sender
Public-Key Cryptography
probably
most significant advance in the 3000 year history of cryptography uses two keys a public & a private key asymmetric since parties are not equal uses clever application of number theoretic concepts to function complements rather than replaces private key crypto
key distribution how to have secure communications in general without having to trust a KDC with your key digital signatures how to verify a message comes intact from the claimed sender
public
invention due to Whitfield Diffie & Martin Hellman at Stanford Uni in 1976
known earlier in classified community
Public-Key Cryptography
a public-key, which may be known by anybody, and can be used to encrypt messages, and verify signatures a private-key, known only to the recipient, used to decrypt messages, and sign (create) signatures those who encrypt messages or verify signatures cannot decrypt messages or create signatures
is asymmetric because
Public-Key Cryptography
Public-Key Characteristics
it is computationally infeasible to find decryption key knowing only algorithm & encryption key it is computationally easy to en/decrypt messages when the relevant (en/decrypt) key is known either of the two related keys can be used for encryption, with the other used for decryption (for some algorithms)
Public-Key Cryptosystems
Public-Key Applications
can
encryption/decryption (provide secrecy) digital signatures (provide authentication) key exchange (of session keys)
some
algorithms are suitable for all uses, others are specific to one
like private key schemes brute force exhaustive search attack is always theoretically possible but keys used are too large (>512bits) security relies on a large enough difference in difficulty between easy (en/decrypt) and hard (cryptanalyse) problems more generally the hard problem is known, but is made hard enough to be impractical to break requires the use of very large numbers hence is slow compared to private key schemes
RSA
by Rivest, Shamir & Adleman of MIT in 1977 best known & widely used public-key scheme based on exponentiation in a finite (Galois) field over integers modulo a prime
uses large integers (eg. 1024 bits) security due to cost of factoring large numbers
each user generates a public/private key pair by: selecting two large primes at random - p, q computing their system modulus n=p.q
note (n)=(p-1)(q-1)
where 1<e<(n), gcd(e,(n))=1
publish their public encryption key: PU={e,n} keep secret private decryption key: PR={d,n}
RSA Use
to
to
note
that the message M must be smaller than the modulus n (block if needed)
in RSA have:
2.
3. 4.
5.
6.
7.
Select primes: p=17 & q=11 Compute n = pq =17 x 11=187 Compute (n)=(p1)(q-1)=16 x 10=160 Select e: gcd(e,160)=1; choose e=7 Determine d: de=1 mod 160 and d < 160 Value is d=23 since 23x7=161= 10x160+1 Publish public key PU={7,187} Keep secret private key PR={23,187}
Exponentiation
can use the Square and Multiply Algorithm a fast, efficient algorithm for exponentiation concept is based on repeatedly squaring base and multiplying in the ones that are needed to compute the result look at binary representation of exponent only takes O(log2 n) multiples for number n
Exponentiation
c = 0; f = 1 for i = k downto 0 do c = 2 x c f = (f x f) mod n if bi == 1 then c=c+1 f = (f x a) mod n return f
Efficient Encryption
encryption
but
if
Efficient Decryption
decryption
can
use the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) to compute mod p & q separately. then combine to get desired answer
only
owner of private key who knows values of p & q can use this technique
of RSA must:
determine two primes at random - p, q select either e or d and compute the other
primes
exponents
RSA Security
possible
brute force key search (infeasible given size of numbers) mathematical attacks (based on difficulty of computing (n), by factoring modulus n) timing attacks (on running of decryption) chosen ciphertext attacks (given properties of RSA)
Factoring Problem
factor n=p.q, hence compute (n) and then d determine (n) directly and compute d find d directly
have seen slow improvements over the years
as of May-05 best is 200 decimal digits (663) bit with LS
Timing Attacks
developed by Paul Kocher in mid-1990s exploit timing variations in operations
eg. multiplying by small vs large number or IF's varying which instructions executed
infer operand size based on time taken RSA exploits time taken in exponentiation countermeasures
use constant exponentiation time add random delays blind values used in calculations
RSA is vulnerable to a Chosen Ciphertext Attack (CCA) attackers chooses ciphertexts & gets decrypted plaintext back choose ciphertext to exploit properties of RSA to provide info to help cryptanalysis can counter with random pad of plaintext or use Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding (OASP)
Summary
have
considered: