Article 505
Article 505
Article 505
Due to the excess use of water, two problems grow simultaneously. First is the
reduced groundwater table and the second one is water pollution in ponds,
lakes, rivers and streams.
Groundwater pollution occurs due to both natural and anthropogenic factors.
The industrial waste and domestic waste either in solid or liquid form is
directly discharged or dumped on the ground either treated, partially treated
or in untreated form which ultimately causes pollution.
Study area
The samples were collected in the morning hour from all the study sites for
two years (2017 to 2019) on monthly basis.
The samples were collected after 10 minute of pumping from each site in a
Jerry can of 2 liters capacity using Grab sampling method and were
transported to the laboratory immediately.
The samples were analyzed for the physicochemical parameters such as
temperature, TDS, EC, TS, pH, TH, CaH, Cl, SO4 --, NO3 --- and Fe using
standard methods.
Water quality index
In the present study, the WQI was calculated using the weighted arithmetic
index method.
In this model, the components with different water quality are multiplied by
a weighting factor and then collected using a simple arithmetic mean.
To assess water quality first, a Quality Rating Scale (Qn) was calculated for each
parameter
Where,
Qn = is the Quality rating of nth parameter
Vs = Observed value of the water quality parameter obtained from laboratory analysis
Vio = Ideal value of that water quality parameter can be obtained from the standard Tables.
Vi = pH 7 and for other parameters it is equal to zero,
but for DO Vi = 14.6 mg/L
Sn = Recommended WHO standard of the parameter.
Then, after calculating the quality rating scale (Qn), the Relative (unit)
weight (Wn) was calculated by a value inversely proportional to the
recommended standard(Sn) for the corresponding parameter using the
following expression-
Where,
Wn = Relative (unit) weight for nth parameter
Xn= Standard permissible value for nth parameter
K= Proportionality constant.
Finally, the overall WQI was calculated by consolidating the quality ratings with
unit weights using the following equation-
Where,
Qn= Quality rating
Wn= Relative (unit) weight
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Parame-
EC Temp TDS TS pH TH CaH DO Sulphate Nitrate Cl Iron
ters
EC 1.00
Temp -0.31 1.00
TDS 1.00 -0.33 1.00
TS 0.97 -0.29 0.98 1.00
pH -0.06 -0.26 -0.05 -0.06 1.00
TH 0.28 -0.49 0.31 0.40 -0.05 1.00
CaH 0.24 -0.46 0.26 0.35 -0.02 0.98 1.00
DO -0.15 -0.02 -0.18 -0.34 0.23 -0.61 -0.51 1.00
Sulphate 0.15 -0.18 0.15 0.22 -0.35 0.51 0.54 -0.24 1.00
Nitrate 0.00 0.38 -0.04 -0.09 -0.16 -0.52 -0.39 0.69 0.14 1.00
Cl 0.32 -0.36 - 0.34 0.43 -0.44 - 0.72 0.70 -0.60 0.65 -0.25 - 1.00
Iron 0.68 0.27 0.70 0.80 0.05 -0.55
0.78 0.78 0.57 0.17 0.68 1.00
WQI at all stations
Conclusion
The study concluded that the maximum concentration of most of the parameters like EC,
TDS, TS, TH, and Fe was observed at SS-6 (Laksar) of Laksar block of Haridwar district in
Uttarakhand that may be due to the direct industrial discharge on the ground surface
mostly from small and large scale sugar industries, tyre industry and cement industry.
The values of TDS, TH, CaH, and Fe of groundwater at the sites SS6 (Laksar), SS-7
(DabkiKalan), SS-8 (Akaudha Aurangzebpur), SS-9 (KharanjaKutubpur) and SS-10 (Raisi)
were beyond the standards while that of nitrate, sulphate and chloride of the groundwater
were below the WHO and BIS standards at all the sites. Based on WQI values, SS-6 (Laksar)
was the most polluted site (WQI150.27), while SS-1 (Niranjanpur) was the least polluted
(WQI-46.46) site.
It is suggested that care should be taken that there is no direct industrial discharge on the
ground surface to avoid contamination of the groundwater quality of the area. The study
may be useful for managing the groundwater quality of the study area.
refrences
Standard Methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater , Lenore S C, Greenberg A E, Eaton A D,
(Eds.), 20th Edition, American Public Health Association, NW, Washington, DC.3.Bahmani, O. and Palangi, S.
(2018). Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Human Health Risk, Agriculture and Industry with the
Qualitative Indices in the Bahar Plain, West Iran. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution,15(4),
81-88.DOI: 10.3233/AJW-1800604.Bhutiani, R., Kulkarni, D. B., Khanna, D. R. and Gautam, A. (2016). Water
Quality, Pollution Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Ground-water of an
Industrial Area in North India. Exposure and Health8, 3-18. DOI 10.1007/s12403-015-0178-25.Bhutiani, R.,
Ram, K. and Ahamad, F. (2019). Assess-ment of suitability of groundwater quality in and around Laksar,
Haridwar, Uttarakhand on the basis Water Quality Index (WQI). Environment Conservation Journal,20(1-2),
41-46. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2019.1008.12076.Bhutiani, R., Ram, K., Taygi, V., Ahamad, F. and
Kaushik, P. (2018a Environment Con-servation Journal, 19(3), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.3
6953/ECJ.2018.193167.Bhutiani, R., Ahamad, F., Tyagi, V. and Ram, K. (2018b). Evaluation of water quality
of River Malin using water quality index (WQI) at Najibabad, Bijnor (UP) India. Envi-ronment Conservation
Journal,19 (1&2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2018.1912288.Bhutiani, R. and Ahamad, F. (2018).
Efficiency assess-ment of sand intermittent filtration technology for wastewater treatment. International
Journal of advance research in science and engineering (IJARSE), 7(03), 503-512. 9.BIS (2012). Indian
standard drinking water specification, Second Revision ISO: 10500:2012, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS),
Drinking Water Sectional Committee, FAD25. New Delhi, India.10.Biswas, A. K. and Tortajada, C. (2019).
Water quality management: A globally neglected issue. International Journal of Water Resources
Development
Thank you