Unit 4 Theories of Mass Communication
Unit 4 Theories of Mass Communication
Unit 4 Theories of Mass Communication
COMMUNICATION
Many social scientists studied the effect of mass
communication within the society. This has resulted
in a number of theories which essentially trace the
relationship between mass communication and
society.
Bullet Theory, Two-Step, Multistep Theory
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
In 30 October, 1938, Orson Welles (Mercury Theatre Group) broadcasted their radio
edition of H.G. Wells’ ‘War of the Worlds’.
On the eve of Halloween, radio programming was interpreted with a ‘news bulletin’ for
the first time; ‘Martian had begun an invasion on Earth in Grover’s Mill, New Jersey’.
Approx. 12 million people in United States heard the broadcast and about 1 million
believed that a serious alien invasion was underway. It disrupted the mass households:
• Interrupted religious services
• Traffic jams
• Clogged communication systems
• People fled their city homes to seek shelter in more rural areas
• Raided grocery stores
• Began to ration food
This project become known as the Panic Broadcast and changed broadcast history, social
psychology, and civil defense and set a standard of provocative entertainment.
This theory works by injecting the message directly into the bloodstream of the public,
attempting to create a uniform thinking.
Advantages Disadvantag
es
People are seen as passive • Media is a
and have a lot media material dangerous means
‘shot’ at them.
of communicating
an idea because the
People end up thinking what
receiver or
they are told because there is
audience is
no other source of information. powerless to resist
Media can shape audience the impact of the
perception. message.
• There is no escape
from the effect of
the message.
This theory was not accurate for the election studies
(The People’s Choice, 1944 Paul Lazarsfeld, Bernand
Berelson and Hazel Gaudet):
Public: Opinion
Leaders pass on
their own
interpretations in
addition to the
actual media
content to the
selected audience.
Opinion leaders are quite influential in changing the
attitudes and behaviours of the public and are quite
similar to those who influence.
The term ‘Personal Influence ’ was coined to refer to the
process of intervening between the media’s direct
message and the audience’s reaction to the message.
ADVANTAGES
This theory has improved our understanding of how mass
media influence decision-making.
It refined the ability to predict the influence of media
messages on audience behaviour.
It even explains why certain media campaigns may have
failed to alter the audience attitude and behaviour.
DISADVANTAGES
• It diminishes the original and the direct
influence of mass media
• Its effects are evident only in political
studies that were conducted decades ago
when there was no television influence
• This theory is not applicable to the
contemporary political scene.
• Two-step flow theory gave way to the
multi-step flow theory of mass
communication or diffusion of innovation
theory.
MULTISTEP THEORY
Further studies on opinion leaders led to the modification and re-
conceptualisation of the two-step flow concept into multi-step flow
because of the multi-directional influence of opinion leaders.
The influence was seen to be upwards or backwards towards the
media sources, when they sought to tell the gatekeepers (newspaper
editors, news editors, radio, TV, producers etc.) how and when to
share insights with other opinion leaders.
It has relay-points in the information reaching a member of the
audience is either direct or second hand, third hand, fourth hand etc.
It involves interpersonal communication and later
through mass media – the sequential flow of message is
made through various media and networks in an effective
manner.
The variables which contribute in these steps are:
• The source
• Quality
• Exposure or availability of mass media
• Extent of audience exposure to communicating agencies
• Nature and content of the message
• Importance of the message to the receivers or audiences
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
Cognition (Cognitive means the mental
action or process of acquiring knowledge
and understanding through thoughts,
experiences and the senses.)
Dissonance means lack of agreement or
harmony between people or things.
Psychologist Leon Festinger proposed a theory of cognitive
dissonance centred on how people try to reach internal
consistency.
He suggested that people have an inner need to ensure that
their beliefs and behaviours are consistent.
Inconsistent or conflicting beliefs lead to disharmony,
which people strive to avoid.
Cognitive dissonance can be seen as an antecedent condition
which leads to activity oriented toward dissonance reduction.
Example: just as hunger leads toward activity oriented toward
hunger reduction.
The degree of dissonance people experience can depend on a few
different factors, including:
• how highly we value a particular belief and
• the degree to which our beliefs are inconsistent.
In his 1957 book A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Festinger offers one example
of how an individual might deal with dissonance related to a health behavior.
Individuals who smoke might continue to do so, even though they know it is bad
for their health. Why would someone continue engaging in behavior they know is
unhealthy? According to Festinger, a person might decide that they value
smoking more than his or her health, deeming the behavior "worth it" in terms of
risks versus rewards.
Another way to deal with this dissonance is to minimize the potential drawbacks.
The smoker might convince himself that the negative health effects have been
overstated. He might also assuage his health concerns by telling himself that he
cannot avoid every possible risk out there.
Finally, Festinger suggested that the smoker might try to convince himself that if
he does stop smoking then he will gain weight, which also presents health risks.
By using such explanations, the smoker is able to reduce the dissonance and
continue the behavior.
How to Reduce Cognitive Dissonance
According to Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance, people try to
seek consistency in their thoughts, beliefs, and opinions as when there
are conflicts between cognitions, people will take steps to reduce the
dissonance and feelings of discomfort. Therefore, there are three key
strategies to reduce or minimize cognitive dissonance:
Focus on more supportive beliefs that outweigh the dissonant
belief or behavior.
For example, people who learn that greenhouse emissions result in global
warming might experience feelings of dissonance if they drive a gas-
guzzling vehicle. In order to reduce this dissonance, they might seek out
new information that disputes the connection between greenhouse gasses
and global warming. This new information might serve to reduce the
discomfort and dissonance that the person experiences.
Reduce the importance of conflicting belief.
For example, a man who cares about his health might be disturbed to learn
that sitting for long periods of time during the day are linked to a shortened
lifespan. Since he has to work all day in an office and spends a great deal of
time sitting, it is difficult to change his behavior in order to reduce his
feelings of dissonance. In order to deal with the feelings of discomfort, he
might instead find some way to justify his behavior by believing that his other
healthy behaviors make up for his largely sedentary lifestyle.
Change the conflicting belief so that it is consistent with other beliefs
or behaviors.
Changing the conflicting cognition is one of the most effective ways of dealing
with dissonance, but it is also one of the most difficult. Particularly in the case
of deeply held values and beliefs, change can be exceedingly difficult.
U S E S A N D G R AT I F I C AT I O N
T H E O RY
This theory explains how people use media for their need and gratification . It
deals with the effect on people by the media.
deals with how and why people adopt specific media to satisfy their needs .
The theory emphasizes a limited effect position; that is, the media have a limited effect on
their audiences because audiences are able to exercise control over their media.
Uses and Gratifications theorists explain why people choose and use certain media forms.
Even for communication (say interpersonal) people refer to the media for the topic they
discuss with themselves. They gain more knowledge by using media for reference.
This theory is contradictory to the magic bullet theory which states the audience is passive.
There are several needs and gratification for people, they
are categorized into five categories:
1. Cognitive needs
For e.g. People tend to relax watching TV, listening to radio and for satisfying their need
for entertainment there by relaxing from all the tension, people watch films, films on TV
etc
Note: The needs are individual in nature, and how u satisfies the need is individualistic.
E.g.: That’s why some watch news to relax and some get more tension by watching news,
Program is same but people use it for different needs.
Taking TV today, most people watch reality shows because
• It is more realistic
• For entertainment
• Interesting
• New concepts (different from other programs)
• In a way you can participate
• Controversy, people crying
• Sensationalism
The above reason is why we watch and how we use not because it’s popular.
CULTIVATION THEORY
The cultivation theory was proposed by a communications professor, George
Gerbner in 1960's. It is one of the core theories of media effects.
Cultivation theory suggests that exposure to media slightly "cultivates"
viewers' perceptions of reality.
Gerbner and Gross "Television is a medium of the socialization of most
people into standardized roles and behaviors.
According to the theory, people who watch television frequently are more likely to
be influenced by the messages from the world of television. The influence could go to
such an extent that their world view and perceptions start reflecting what they
repeatedly see and hear on television.
Television is, therefore, considered to contribute independently to the way
people perceive social reality.
Cultivation theory examines the long-term effects
of TV.
"The primary proposition of cultivation theory states
that the more time people spend 'living' in the
television world, the more likely they are to believe
social reality is parallel with reality portrayed on
television.
The images and ideological messages transmitted
through popular television media heavily influence
perceptions of the real world.
Assumptions
• Cultivation theory holds three core
assumptions.
• The first assumption highlights the medium, the
second, the audience, and the final assumption
deals with the function of the medium on
audiences and their ability to react to it.
• Television is fundamentally different from
other forms of mass media.
• Television shapes the way individuals within
society think and relate to each other.
• Television's effects are varied.
NORMATIVE
THEORIES
Media theory refers to the complex of social-political-philosophical
principles which organize ideas about the relationship between
media and society.
‘Normative theory’ is concerned with what the media ought to be
doing in society rather than what they actually do.
In general, the dominant ideas about the obligations of mass media
will be consistent with other values and arrangements in a given
society. In the western liberal tradition, this refers to matters such
as freedom, equality before the law, social solidarity and cohesion,
cultural diversity, active participation and social responsibility.
Therefore, normative theory of the press is now in
a considerable state of uncertainty because of
changes in the media and the rise of new media
forms, we can still identify certain broad traditions
of thought about the rights and responsibilities of
media in society and the degree to which `society'
may rightly intervene to protect the public interest.
The main relevant variants can be described as
follows:
AUTHORITARIAN
Authoritarian theory (which applies to early pre-democratic
forms of society and also to present- day undemocratic or
autocratic social systems).
In this view, all media and public communication are subject to
the supervision of the ruling authority and expression or
opinion which might undermine the established social and
political order.
This `theory' contravenes rights of freedom of expression, it can
be invoked under extreme conditions.
Authoritarian theory describe that all forms of communications are
under the control of the governing elite or authorities or influential
bureaucrats.
Authoritarians are necessary to control the media to protect and
prevent the people from the national threats through any form
communication (information or news).
The press is an instrument to enhance the ruler’s power in the
country rather than any threats. The authorities have all rights to
permit any media and control it by providing license to the media
and make certain censorship.
If any media violate the government policies against license, then
the authority has all right to cancel the license and revoke it. The
government have all right to restrict any sensitive issues from press
to maintain peace and security in the nation.
Censorship:
Censorship is a suppression of any communication which may
consider as harmful to the people, King, government and its
nation. Especially these censorship methods are much familiar
in press which against the freedom of speech and freedom of
expression. In some other cases, the censorship helps to
protect the rulers and authorities from sensitive issues.
There are different types of censors like
• Political censor
• Moral censor
• Religious censor
• Military censor
• Corporate censor
L I B E RTA R I A N (OPEN TO NEW IDEAS)
Government controls some aspects if media does not act as it should by the process of
registration, licensing, censorship, by preparing guidelines for media, monitoring, etc.
Self regulation of media is also encouraged
Participation and interaction of media and audience (as both are from the same group
of population)
Different communities, groups and organizations possessing their own media
S T R E N G T H S O F D E M O C R AT I C -
PA R T I C I PA N T T H E O R Y O F M A S S
C O M M U N I C AT I O N
The audience can participate and get alternatives if not satisfied with one media.
The theory is stricter than libertarian and social responsibility which makes it
more responsible towards the needs of the audience.
The community can work for themselves as social action.
The theory is not very authoritative unless the press hinders the work of the
government.
There are the concepts of equality, inclusion and equal access which makes it
eliminate marginalization.
Democracy becomes strong with the application of this theory.