Early Media Theories

Early Media Theories
Concern With Media Effects

 Early theories were primarily based on the
interest to find the effects of mass
communication on society and individuals
 They were based on te assumption that mass
media have an enormous and direct influence
upon society
 But later researches questioned this premise
 Later researches went against any direct cause and
effect relationship between mass communication and
society
 They focused on the importance of individual
differences, personal influences on the transmission,
acceptance and retention of messages
 While sociological theories looked at mass media as
an outcome of changes in society
 Other theories showed how media ought or

expected to behave under prevailing political
and economic situations
 Most theories tried to give insights into the
role of mass media in society and the way in
which audience utilize different mass media
 This raises important questions on the effects
of mass media:
 What do mass media do for society?
 What is the relationship of mass media with
society?
 Are mass media an outcome of changes
society?
 Or are they simply a response to certain
demands?
 Are media merely reflectors or are they

molders of society?
 Hypodermic or Bullet theory:
 This theory reflect the awe and fear of mass
media being used for massive propaganda as
during the World War II
 Media was seen as being able to manipulate it
audiences at will
 Media were seen to be like bullets shot at
defenseless and passive receivers
 Audiences were seen as passive recipients of media
messages
 Media were seen as extremely powerful institutions
and media consumers were naïve and malleable
 It saw audiences as an enormous undifferentiated
mass of humanity
 And each member of the audience would respond
identically to mass mediated messages
 Later researches did not support such a view of

audiences
 Psychological theories or Individual
Difference Theory:
 Focused on different personality variables that
resulted in different reactions to the same
stimuli
 Reactions to different media content differ
according to motivation of audience members,
their predispositions to accept or reject media
messages
 Factors such as intelligence, beliefs, opinions,
values, needs, moods, prejudices,
perceptibility all contributed to the way
individuals responded to media messages
 As a result selective exposure and selective
perception limit the scope of direct impact of
media messages
 Selective Exposure:
 People tend to expose themselves to messages
selectively
 And general expose themselves to messages
that are in accordance with their established
convictions
 And avoid those that question or challenge
their beliefs
 If by chance they are exposed to contrary
opinions they selectively invest these hostile
arguments with acceptable meanings
 Thus narrowing the gap between what they
already believe and what they are invited to
believe
 Selective Perception:
 Individuals tend to ‘read into’ the message
whatever suits their needs
 So individuals attend to, interpret and retain
messages that are related to their interests,
consistent with their attitudes, congruent with
their beliefs and supportive of their values
 These theories remained inconclusive

 Personal Influence Theories:
 Lazarsfeld 1940 ‘People’s Choice’, revealed

people are not directly influenced by mass
media in making political choices, other
people, particularly political ‘opinion leaders’,
had a greater influence on people’s decision
making than mass media
 Informal communication networks, and people
talking to each other was seen to play a
significant role
 From this emerged the Two-Step Flow theory
of communication
 Opinion leaders who had first hand access to
mass media information passed it down thus
providing an important link in a two step flow
of information
 Opinion leaders were more knowledgeable,
educated, influential both socially and
economically and more modern in their
outlook
 They were held in high esteem, and people
relied on them for ideas and guidance
 Multi-Step flow:
 Further studies led to the modification and re-
conceptualization of the two-step flow theory
 Because of the multi-directional influence of
opinion leaders
 Both the two-step theory and the multi step

theory discredited the belief of the direct
influence of the mass media
 Extraneous, and interpersonal channels and
social relations of audiences, which were often
complex multi-directional and multi
dimensional proved more important
 Sociological Theories of Mass Communication: are
based on the assumption that there is a definite
relationship between mass media and social change
and look at questions
 Do mass media cultivate common beliefs about the
world?
 Does the mass media set agendas for people?
 How do people use the media and why?
 Do media have control over audiences?
 Cultivation Theory: Developed by George
Gerbner 1967
 Assumed that mass media had subtle influence
on audiences
 Who in turn unknowingly absorb the dominant
symbols, images, and messages of the media
 This results in the cultivation of a ‘dominant
image pattern’
 Media provide a set of cultural indicators that

have reliability and authority analogous to
economic and social indicators for policy
makers
 Long persistent exposure to TV is capable of
cultivating common beliefs about the world
 Message of TV do not portray reality in
society
 Repeated exposure to such distortion leads to a
particular view of the world which gets
reinforced once they are developed
 Gerbner also strongly suggests that the

powerful effect of mass media act
cumulatively as molders of society
 Agenda Setting Theory: Maxwell McComb
and Donald Shaw 1967
 Agenda setting theory maintains that the media
sets an agenda for people
 Telling people ‘what to think about’ rather
than telling them ‘what to think’
 This was based on research showing
correspondence between the order media gives
to issues and the order of significance attached
to issues by the audience
 Priorities accorded to by media become public
priorities
 However many media thinkers felt the

evidence was insufficient to show such a
causal connection
 Uses and Gratification Theory: (I. Katze et al
1959)
 This approach assumes audiences are active
and willingly expose themselves to media
 Even the most potent media content cannot
influence an individual who has no ‘use’ for it
in the environment in which he or she lives
 The uses of the mass media are dependent on

the perception, selectivity and previously held
beliefs, values and interest of the people
 There is an underlying idea of function:

 For what purpose do people use the media?
 Study of soaps Bereleson (1948) revealed
 People use it for emotional release
 They treat it as a school of life
 Gratification refers to the rewards or
satisfaction people derive after media use
 According to this theory communication
effects can be more meaningfully explained in
terms of enabling people to have a more
meaningful relations between themselves and
the world around them
 Three groups of Gratification theories can be
distinguished:
 Those who conduct inquiries into a range of
satisfaction derived from mass media material
 Those that look at the social environmental
circumstances that are responsible for people turning
to the media
 Lastly the needs audience members are trying to
satisfy
 Albert Banduras Social Learning theory is
based on the concept of reinforcement
 Individual is seen as making choices about
behavior and seeks reinforcement from the
environment
 This is also called the ‘Modeling theory’
because it presumes that people adopt certain
behavior by watching other people
 By watching other people’s behavior and its

consequences
 If the consequence is positive then there is a
positive reinforcement of that behavior and the
viewer will tend copy/use it as a model for his
or her own behavior
 So people set goals that give positive rewards
 Adopt behavior which has the potential to
achieve those goals
 People interpret behavior and its consequences
in terms of reward and punishment
 Choices are made by perceived success or
failure of the past as well as by anticipated
consequences
 Dependency Theory: Melvin De Fluer and
Sandra Ball Rokeach
 Proposed an integrated theory of mass
communication recognizing both
psychological and sociological factors that
prevent the media from exercising arbitrary
control on its audiences
 Mass media not only lack arbitrary influence
powers but lack the personal freedom to
engage in arbitrary communication behavior
 Both the media and its audiences are integral
part of society
 Surrounding socio-cultural contexts provide
controls and constraints
 This control is evident not only on media
messages but also effects on audiences
 Communication has an important role in
holding society together
 Te need to belong to the society
 To understand the society and to keep up with
society has increased the dependency on the
media

Early Media Theories

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Early Media Theories

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Early Media Theories

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Early Media Theories

Concern With Media Effects

 Other theories showed how media ought or

 Are media merely reflectors or are they

 Later researches did not support such a view of

 These theories remained inconclusive

 Lazarsfeld 1940 ‘People’s Choice’, revealed

 Both the two-step theory and the multi step

 Media provide a set of cultural indicators that

 Gerbner also strongly suggests that the

 However many media thinkers felt the

 The uses of the mass media are dependent on

 There is an underlying idea of function:

 By watching other people’s behavior and its

You might also like