Watter Hammer
Watter Hammer
Watter Hammer
Pressure surge
Crash test
O Please imagine o Driving a compact car (e.g. a VW Golf) o against a massive concrete wall! o Kinetic energy: 1,5 Mio. kg m/s O Please imagine o Shutting a 5 km long penstock DN 1000 (v = 2 m/s) o instantaneous! j o Kinetic energy: 7,8 Mio. kg m/s
5 x as much !
2
Contents
O O O O O Introduction: A crash test Pressure surge theoretical background Pressure surge and hydro power plants Measures to reduce pressure surge Summary
- Assumption 1: tc = 0 (valve closes instantaneous) - Assumption 2: no head losses due to friction (smooth pipe
walls)
reservoir
L tR ! a
tR runtime of wave L penstock length a wave velocity
(p Jou ! a V v 0
With a wave velocity density of fluid v0 flow velocity at t=0
- modulus of elasticity of pipe material - bulk modulus of water - Fixation and bedding of pipe
o The lower the E-modulus The slower the pressure wave
11
Wave velocity
O E-modulus / bulk modulus: o Deformability of a material o Even water is deformable under pressure O Pressure wave velocity in a pipe o Bulk modulus fluid o Stiffness of the pipe o Pipe zone bedding and backfill have an influence
12
With a Wave velocity in a pipe density of fluid EF Bulk modulus fluid ER E-modulus pipe di inside diameter pipe s wall thickness ... Poisson number
Wave velocity
Druckwellengeschwindigkeit a
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0 Vollkommen starres Rohr Completely rigid pipe Rohre aus Guss, Stahl Faserzement
GRP, plastic
13
14
Penstock 2 GRP 3 m/s DN 1000 10 bar 21,2 mm (SN 10000) 7.000 15.000 N/mm (11.000) 363,3 m/s 11,2 bar
Ductile iron 3 m/s DN 1000 10 bar 13,5 mm 170.000 N/mm 741,1 m/s 22,6 bar
16
- Approximation by Micheaud
- Allievi
(p M A
a (v t R } g tC
With a Pressure wave velocity v Change in flow velocity tR Reflection time (= 2*tL) tc Closure time
17
18
19
20
21
Var. A: tc = 10s
Druckhhen- und Durchflussverlauf am Knoten K20 Pressure and discharge vs. time
250 10,00 8,00 200 6,00 4,00 150 2,00 0,00 100 -2,00 -4,00 50 -6,00 -8,00 0 0 200 400 600 Zeit t [s] H20 Q20 800 1000 -10,00 1200 Durchfluss Q [m3/s] Druckhhe H [m]
22
Discharge Q [m/s]
Pressure H [m]
Var. A: tc = 10s
Energiehhendiagramm und Bemessungsdrucklinien Pressure and discharge vs. position
250 Erdverlegte Druckrohrleitung DN1000, SN 10.000 PN10 200 Energiehhe [m]
167,81 160,66 170,26 170,74 171,22 171,70 172,18 172,66 173,14 173,62 174,10 174,58
150
136,73 127,99 118,91 109,53
153,09 145,11
100
90,03 80,00 79,01
99,88
78,03
77,04
Wasserfassung
76,05
75,07
74,08
73,09
72,11
71,12
70,13
69,14
68,16
67,17
66,18
65,20
64,21
63,22
62,24
61,25
60,26
50
2000
2500
3000
23
Turbine
O Closure time 60 s
Example B
Pressure andDurchflussverlauf am Knoten K20 Druckhhen- und discharge vs. time
250 10,00 8,00 200 6,00 4,00 150 2,00 0,00 100 -2,00 -4,00 50 -6,00 -8,00 0 0 200 400 600 Zeit t [s] H20 Q20 800 1000 -10,00 1200
24
Discharge Q [m/s]
Pressure H [m]
Durchfluss Q [m3/s]
Druckhhe H [m]
O Closure time 60 s
Var. B: tc = 60s
Pressure and discharge vs. position Energiehhendiagramm und Bemessungsdrucklinien
250 Erdverlegte Druckrohrleitung DN1000, SN 10.000 PN10 200 Energiehhe [m]
150
100
80,00 81,45 79,01 82,89 78,03 84,30 77,04 85,69 76,05 87,06 75,07 88,41 74,08 89,73 91,03
92,30
93,55
94,77
95,97
97,14
98,29
99,41
100,50
101,57
102,61
103,63
104,62
Wasserfassung
73,09
72,11
71,12
70,13
69,14
68,16
67,17
66,18
65,20
64,21
63,22
62,24
61,25
60,26
50
2000
2500
3000
25
Turbine
26
27
Surge tank
28
Surge tank
O Medium or high head plants wirth long headrace pipelines O HPP producing peak time energy O Surge tank shortens the distance between turbine and open surface (hydraulic separation)
Headrace tunnel
Close Open
Pressure oscillation
30
pressure surge
32
34
Headrace tunnel
Close Open
Pressure oscillation
35