RPD Design

Partial denture design
Objectives
To understand:
Decision making process for RPDs The stages of PD design
Communicate:
Design instructions to the lab
Design Stages
(after surveying mounted and articulated casts)
1. Saddles 2. Support
3. Retention
4. Reciprocation and Bracing 5. Connection 6. Indirect Retention
Saddles (yellow)
Rests on and covers alveolar ridge and includes artificial teeth and gum work.
Saddles
Pt naturally regards it as the most important component because it imparts both appearance and function to the denture.
Our main concerns are:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Design of occlusal surface Base extension Polished surface Material for fitting surface Saddle/ abutment tooth junction
area of occlusal table of posterior teeth esp if distal extension saddle present Use narrow posterior teeth or by reducing length by omitting teeth = force to underlying tissues during mastication bucco-lingual width of teeth - space for tongue (? Spread laterally) All help in the success of a mdr RPD!
on the ridge hard to adjust the metal. off the ridge retention of acrylic base.
Design Stages
3. Retention
Support (red)
Resistance to vertical force directed towards the teeth and mucosa. Vertical force may be resisted by:
1. Mucosa 2. Tooth 3. Both
Type of support available may vary and assessment of its quality is made during design procedures:
1. Root area of the abutment teeth 2. Extent of the saddles 3. Expected force on the saddles
Quality of support
Tooth support:
Rest design Tooth preparation
Mucosa support:
Saddle extension Quality of support
Tooth-mucosa support:
Free-end saddle Difficult to Rx (when missing posterior teeth)
? Shortened dental arch

Concept accepted by a great majorly of dentists but not widely practiced.
Should be included in all Rx planning for partially edentulous pts. Pts dont lose tooth surface by just eating. They are more likely to lose them by erosion/ bruxism.
Free end saddle

Distal rest placement causes tilting
Mesial rest placement prevents tilting
Design Stages
3. Retention
Types of retention (green)

1. Clasps 2. Neuromuscular forces 3. Physical forces 4. Guide surfaces 5. Other devices
Clasp
Metal arm which retains, or stabilises, a denture by contacting a tooth
Factors affecting clasp choice

Position of undercut
Periodontal status Sulcus shape (deep undercuts) Clasp length Appearance
Gingivally approaching Occlusally approaching
Flexibility of clasp
Influenced by: Material Length Cross section
In a premolar use a wrought clasp malleable In molar you may use wrought/ cast clasp
Clasps
Clasps may be round
Half round:
? More directional, accurate and stable
Design Stages
3. Retention
Reciprocation/ bracing (blue)
Prevents tooth movement escape
Reciprocation
1. As clasp being pulled up it goes over the bulbosity of the tooth 2. As clasp is going up, the other clasp on the other side is stopping it from going up thus stopping the tooth moving
Bracing
Force resisted by the other side of the denture
Design Stages
3. Retention
Upper jaw design

Full coverage
Ring connector Bar connectors:

1. Anterior 2. Posterior 3. mid-palatal
Lower jaw design

1. Lingual bar 2. Sublingual bar: least well tolerated 3. Lingual plate 4. Continuous or dental bar 5. Labial bar
Design Stages
3. Retention
Indirect retention
The clasp is always nearer to the indirect retainer (fulcrum) than is the displacing force. The clasp is therefore working at a mechanical disadvantage relative to the displacing force. The RPD design should strive to reduce the mechanical advantage of the displacing force by placing the clasp axis as close as possible to the saddle and by placing the indirect retainers as far as possible from the saddle.
Support for indirect retainer

1. Tooth support 2. Mucosa support
E (displacing force)
R (clasp)
F (indirect retainer)
Test
1. 2. 3. 4.
What Kennedy classification is this? Where can we put the saddles and what colour do we use? What rests can you identify and what colour do we use? How can we achieve retention, what types of clasps should we use and colour? 5. Where may we obtain bracing/ reciprocation from and what colour do we use? 6. What coverage can we consider for this case? 7. What other considerations do we need to have when designing a denture?
Answers
1. 2. 3. Class II mod II . .
4.
5.
.
.
6.
Wide palatal coverage by the connector. However, it is possible to keep the anterior border of the palatal plate away from the anterior teeth and from the sensitive area around the incisive papilla to promote hygiene and tolerance to the framework.
OHI compliance, tolerance, comfort, ? Addition, material selection, aesthetics, pt expectations
7.
References
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A clinical guide to removable partial denture design. Davenport et al 2000. Factors to consider in panning a removable partial denture. Dent update. 2002. 29 (8): 375 Impression making for partial dentures. Dent update. 2002. 29 (9): 422-7 Principles of design for removable partial dentures. Dent update. 2002. 29 (8): 474-81 Technological considerations when designing removable partial dentures. Dent update. 2003. 30 (1): 7-9 Diagnosis and treatment of removable denture problems. Dent update. 2003. 30 (2): 88-94, 96-7

RPD Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RPD Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RPD Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Partial denture design

Our main concerns are:

? Shortened dental arch

Free end saddle

Mesial rest placement prevents tilting

Types of retention (green)

Factors affecting clasp choice

Reciprocation/ bracing (blue)

Prevents tooth movement escape

Upper jaw design

Ring connector Bar connectors:

Lower jaw design

Support for indirect retainer

You might also like