Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Pile of food nutrition labels
The British Heart Foundation has proposed further labels on foodstuffs in the form of warning labels as used on tobacco products. Photograph: Imagesbybarbara/Getty Images
The British Heart Foundation has proposed further labels on foodstuffs in the form of warning labels as used on tobacco products. Photograph: Imagesbybarbara/Getty Images

Hard-hitting warning labels should be on everyday food, say campaigners

This article is more than 2 months old

Health charities call for taxes on salty products and bans on junk food sponsorship of sport to help cut deaths from heart disease

Hard-hitting warning labels should be put on everyday foodstuffs, new taxes imposed on salty products and junk food sponsorship of sport banned to cut rising deaths from heart disease, health campaigners have said.

These “bold” measures should be imposed as part of a determined drive to reduce the number of people dying prematurely from heart attacks and strokes, they said.

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) is also proposing other action to tackle the UK’s increasingly bad diet, including bans on junk food firms advertising on billboards or radio.

The charity is urging the government to force the food industry to start making its products more nutritious by stripping out what are often high – but hidden – levels of salt and sugar, which are damaging to health.

Taking such radical steps could cut the death toll from heart disease of people in England before they reach the age of 75 and save as many as 11,000 lives a year by 2035, the BHF estimates.

Cardiac fatalities have risen since 2019-22, after falling for 60 years before that. Overall, 39,000 people in England died before their 75th birthday in 2022 – the highest number since 2008.

The charity’s plea follows Keir Starmer’s statement last week that his administration is willing to take tough action to tackle deeply ingrained public health problems that cause disease, disability and death, such as by potentially banning smoking in some outdoor places.

The BHF is asking ministers to compel food producers to put stark warnings on cans, bottles and tins of their products in order to alert people to the health risks.

Those labels would have to be mandatory, because simply asking profit-driven food companies to voluntarily reformulate their portfolio to make it healthier – the approach taken by the Conservative governments between 2010 and this July – does not work, the charity added.

Its proposed ban on firms whose products are deemed unhealthy sponsoring sports events would bar energy drinks Carabao from attaching its name to English football’s League Cup, McDonald’s from sponsoring the Football Association’s youth football development programme, and KP Snacks from being an official team partner of the Hundred cricket competition, for example.

“The government must be ambitious about improving everyone’s health and implement the measures we know will work. A new levy on salt and sugar could prevent almost 2m cases of chronic disease and also raise up to £3bn a year,”, the BHF said in a 22-page action plan. The sugar tax imposed on soft drinks in the UK in 2018 has made many drinks healthier and boosted children’s health.

The charity is also recommending that ministers extend the planned ban on junk food adverts airing before the 9pm TV watershed or online to billboards and radio, and that “buy one get one free” offers in supermarkets, which recent governments have toyed with, are outlawed.

Bite Back, the campaigning arm of chef Jamie Oliver’s organisation, backed the BHF’s call. “Big challenges require bold solutions and we need this government to step in and introduce stringent regulations that prohibit the big food companies’ predatory marketing tactics of unhealthy products,” James Toop, its chief executive, said. “These measures must make it easier for everyone to be healthy and protect young people from being the cardiac statistics of the future.

Food packaging is incredibly deceptive, so we also need to ensure businesses use clear, front-of-pack labels and are not allowed to plaster unhealthy products with misleading health and nutrition claims,” he added.

The Food and Drink Federation said food and drink producers agreed that bold action was needed to address bad diet and excess weight, which causes cancer, diabetes and joint problems as well as heart problems.

“Businesses have invested more than £160m since 2023 to create healthier food and drink, by reducing calories, sugar and salt, and adding fibre, fruit and vegetables, alongside launching new products and smaller portion sizes,” a spokesperson said.

But healthcare providers and the third sector, not just industry, needed to be involved too, the federation added.

The Department of Health and Social Care declined to comment directly on the BHF’s proposals and said any changes to the tax regime were a matter for the Treasury. A spokesperson said: “Cardiovascular disease is one of this country’s biggest killers, and this government has already taken action to tackle it, recognising that prevention is better than cure.

“As part of this, we have already recently introduced health checks in workplaces, to help catch ill-health earlier. We expect up to 130,000 extra health checks to be delivered by March 2025 as a result.

“We will also introduce the tobacco and vapes bill, which will take action to tackle the harms of smoking.”

The headline and text of this article were amended on 6 September 2024. An earlier version described the BHF as calling for “cigarette-style” warning labels on foodstuffs. This has been changed to “hard-hitting warning labels” - the BHF is proposing clear traffic light labelling.

Most viewed

Most viewed