Avatar

just a little guy

@barkyboybeloved

🐾 caninekin 🐾 hyenakin 🐾 domesticated 🐾 🌻he/him 🌻 woof/woofs 🌻 end/enders 🌻 🐶Call me Duck ! 🐶 Black 🐶 ftm 🐶 Pawtism🐶 🦴21yo🦴 Side Blog 🦴 pfp by ladnsart 🐕‍🦺requests closed🐕‍🦺

🐶Hey yall pinned post🐶

■●●Things about me ●●■

🐾 Yall can call me Duck 🐾
🐾 lvl 21 🐾
🐾 He/him 🐾 Woof/Woofs 🐾 End/Ender 🐾
🐾 Black 🐾 FTM 🐾 Autistic 🐾
🐾 Duck Toller + Schipperke mix 🐾
🐾 Spotted Hyena 🐾
🐾 I love making moots but my main is
@radiantretriever so keep an eye out if I follow you back🐾

This is a side blog for me to post about being a dog theriotype, pet regression, and caninekin. This is a sfw account that is safe for minors, although I can't promise there won't be occasional swearing.

#duckdog barks = my og text post tag
#barkyboycreates = things I create: moodboards, art, poetry, etc
#duck barks back = any asks I've answered
#barks at queue = my queued posts

♡ I love making moodboards for different types of theriotypes and kins so don't be afraid to send me an ask !!!

♡ I Don't do marine animals

♡ I Don't do open ocean aesthetics

♡ I Don't do bugs/insects.

●●♡ Requests are currently open ♡●●

[Tw: Zoophilia mention]

Genuine question: WHY do so many people in this community jump on everything they find weird and immediate label it as zoophilia?!

Like- animal packers, fantasy toys, yiff art, pet play, kink gear, LITERALLY ANYTHING.

Seriously, relieving dysphoria, having "dirty" urges related to your identity, even straight up liking some freaky shit does NOT mean someone is attracted to animals. And it definitely does not mean they are actively harming/thinking of harming real animals.

People really take whatever is too weird for them and try to accuse it of war crime. Be better y'all.

Humans are a horrible species that destroy the planet and controll eachother through government/hierarchy. They are also incredibly weak and helpless; having to rely on technology for everything.

Of course there are plenty of great humans out there, but as a whole they kinda suck.

Really, why would anyone want to call themselves human?

This was tagged beastpunk.

But let me reassure my followers that forms of bigotry, up to and including misanthropy, are not beastpunk.

In beastpunk, the celebration of animality does not stop at the threshold of species that someone may consider undesirable, "weak," or "helpless." It does not discriminate against species; it does not discriminate against any variety of animals, up to and including humans. To quote 'BEASTPUNK: Being Unabashedly Animal,' the coining essay:

"Fash, including eco-fash misanthropes who say that all humans are a “disease” that need to be “eradicated,” cannot be Beastpunk. Beastpunk is explicitly pro-fictionkin, pro-therian, pro-otherkin, pro-Were, pro-extranthrope, pro-plural, pro-queer, pro-human, and pro-alterhuman."

The beastpunk movement embraces the fantastic and fantastical humans who exist alongside us, caught alongside us in the net of life and time. We reject the Disraeli's asserted angel/ape dichotomy, pulling down the sheer curtain of separation to reveal sameness even among the different. We are all animals, and that animality is something to embrace both in ourselves and in one another. If you don't believe so-- if you stand with with nose or muzzle turned up to the sky, not to gaze at the beauty of the stars in the night but to better look down upon others-- then beastpunk is not the movement for you.

Forgive me if I'm a little blunt here; I'm a little exhausted of this.

"Why would anyone want to call themselves human?"

Because some of us can see past the fact that a very small percentage of the human population have been causing a lot of damage for a very small amount of time, proportionally, and see that that's simply not the case for the vast majority of the population.

Because humanity is found in taking care of each other far more than it is in "destroying the planet" and "controlling each other", because we are inherently a social species that has been keeping our old and disabled alive for as long as we have been humans, who make art, who packbond with anything that moves and many things that don't, who mourn members of other species up to and including plants and even inanimate objects.

Because calling us "weak and helpless" while simultaneously complaining about the effects of us becoming one of the most widespread and successful mammalian species on the planet, and the species by far the most capable of changing our environment, is hypocritical. And if you experience species dysphoria, I'm genuinely sorry, that sucks, but that doesn't actually mean the human body is inherently bad to live in, just that it's not right for you.

Because I recognize that you contribute to the things you think make humanity "a horrible species" just as much as every average human around you - which is to say, very little. You may not be human, but you are a part of human society whether you like it or not - you are just as much of a contributor as everyone else around you. Blaming them more than yourself is short-sighted.

And because I am human, goddammit, and that is not a bad thing! I enjoy this life, I enjoy my human body even as I mourn its failings, I love my human family and friends! If my being a dragon, an arrogant, prideful, violent creature that would probably kill and eat smaller sapients without a second thought, isn't a bad thing, then my being a human isn't either.

Bluntly, "Of course there are plenty of great humans out there, but as a whole they kinda suck" is not the compromise you think it is. "Of course there are plenty of great gays out there, but as a whole they kinda suck" is still homophobic, y'feel? Allowing for "the good ones" does not actually make your statement any less cruel or hateful toward people who have done nothing to deserve it, for a trait they did not choose. You are still labeling me as "a horrible species" and "weak and helpless" first, and then as an afterthought going "but you might be okay, I guess."

Human behavior isn't even really unique.

Most animals keep a territory of some kind, from the largest elephant herd fending off rude bulls, to the smallest mealworm beetle protecting it's reproductive rights (hey, that's what I wrote my bachelor's thesis on!), and from the loosely defined "personal spaces" of lizards, to the strictly patrolled borders of dragonflies. In humans that behavior can escalate to war. Chimpanzee and ant and mongoose behavior can also escalate to war. Usually it doesn't. Usually animals (including humans) seek peaceful solutions - it just doesn't always work.

Most animals take what they need to survive. Sometimes that hurts other species. When grasshoppers transform into locusts and decimate entire grasslands, they don't do it out of maliciousness. They're just trying to survive in an unbelievably competitive and dangerous environment. When humans contribute to environmental destruction, they are just acting as cogs in a machine that they barely comprehend, and that they can't leave because they need to survive. It's not a uniquely human behavior, both in the sense that humans aren't the only animals doing it and in the sense that the behavior is not inherent to humans - humans can live without destroying their environment. Many humans do, and have done so for thousands of years.

To say that humans can't change, that humans can't live without hurting, that humans are all bad, that humans are inherently bad, isn't just misanthropic - it also betrays an ignorance of the world around you. It's anthropocentrism. It's human exceptionalism. When you tell humans that they can't help doing bad things, because doing bad things is just a part of human nature, you are giving them a free card to continue doing bad things. Misanthropy disregards the diversity of behaviors on Earth. Misanthropy excuses human warfare and anthropogenic climate change, because it insists that those things are just what humans do. Misanthropy is the most anthropocentric philosophy out there.

Fancied a new phone wallpaper

[ID: a digital drawing that features the four members of the Hyaenidae family, from the top to the bottom: striped hyena, brown hyena, aardwolf and spotted hyena. Only their heads are shown peeping out from the left. They're painted with bright, unnatural colors and their eyes are not detailed. The word Hyaenidae is written vertically at the bottom right. End ID]

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.