Pinned
So I somewhat like to use Suno to make ai music and whatnot - Yeah I know, ai is evil, but honestly, making these songs is sort of the only way I have to express myself. But uh, here's pretty much all my AI music content.
It'd be cool if some people heard some of them, and could identify with the songs, I don't know, they just... They have meaning to me, and I kind of desperately want to be 'seen', you know? To be understood.
She's also publicly stated that she believes that anyone who reads her books or watches her shows and films does so because they explicitly agree with her political views.
There's no "agree to disagree" with her work. Every time you pick up her work or talk about it you are saying to her "I agree with you Joanne" whether you like it or not.
It amazes me how the National Park Service is the most vocal department against Fascism. Even the Democrats are a mumble when compared to these park rangers' adamant denouncement and exposing of this administration. Support our bravest federal workers who keep our world one worth living in.
This evening, Rep. Al Green of Texas was forcibly removed from the joint session of Congress by the sergeant-at-arms for standing up and yelling “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid.” during the president’s address.
“He is a person who has consistently used incivility against civility,” Green said.
“I’m willing to suffer whatever punishment is available to me,” he continued. “I didn’t say to anyone, ‘Don’t punish me.’ I’ve said I’ll accept the punishment, but it’s worth it to let people know that there are some of us who are going to stand up against this president’s desire to cut Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security.”
“This is about the people who are being punished by virtue of losing their health care,” he added. “This is the richest country in the world, and we have people who don’t have good health care.” (Per HuffPost)
The cerulean whisper of a melting glacier echoed in the silent lexicon of a dream where numbers danced with the scent of wet asphalt. A solitary photon, weary from its eons-long voyage, momentarily illuminated the fossilized laughter of a forgotten constellation, its light painting fleeting hieroglyphs on the canvas of an unwritten symphony. The weight of unspoken theorems pressed against the fragile membrane of perception, hinting at universes woven from the fabric of absence, where the familiar laws of consequence dissolved into the gentle murmur of infinite possibilities.
*buys some Halls*
THUNK
"Mrow!"
So is it just me, or did TikTok start having loading problems ever since it was 'banned' and 'brought back'? I'll be scrolling and after maybe 12-15 TikToks, it does the lil rotating loading circle, and just won't load anything. You can keep scrolling, but none of the ones you scroll to will load either. So far the only 'fix' I've found is closing the app and opening it again.
Now, I'm not really a tech guy, but it is curious that suddenly, I'm having issues with things loading, almost as if the amount of data being sent has increased for some reason... Boy, I sure do hope that the American government hasn't started using TikTok to do the exact thing it claimed China was doing!
I finally found a good use for ai, and here is the unedited result except for changing my own name used in the ending;
BrotatoWho, here’s a comprehensive, fact-based overview of Donald Trump’s political track record and its impact on American well-being and national defense:
---
1. Track Record Overview
Inconsistency in Policy Implementation:
Throughout his political career, Trump has repeatedly promoted policies and made promises that often diverge from what is legally or practically achievable. For example, his pledge that Mexico would fund a border wall was made despite longstanding laws governing congressional appropriations. Instead, he declared a national emergency to divert funds—a move that many legal experts and fact-checkers have documented as circumventing established legal processes en.wikipedia.org.
Promised Actions Already Precluded by Law:
There are multiple documented cases where Trump publicly committed to actions that were, by existing legal standards, impossible. His promise to mass fire federal employees for noncompliance with personal directives, for instance, was met with swift judicial intervention—federal courts blocked such orders because they violated established due process protections apnews.com. Such instances are widely viewed as not just policy missteps but as deliberate misrepresentations of what was legally permissible.
---
2. Policy Areas and Their Impact
Immigration and Border Security
Promises and Legal Realities:
Trump’s border wall was a signature promise. However, the claim that Mexico would pay for it directly conflicted with U.S. law regarding foreign funding and appropriations. The subsequent declaration of national emergency to secure alternative funding was legally contentious and led to extended litigation.
Impact on Well-Being and National Defense:
While proponents argue that stricter border policies contribute to national security, the legal battles and forced funding reallocation have strained governmental processes. In practical terms, there’s little evidence that these actions have measurably improved the safety or well-being of the majority—especially when considering the disruption and uncertainty created by bypassing standard legal channels.
Federal Employment and Bureaucracy
Promised Reforms vs. Legal Constraints:
Trump repeatedly threatened or attempted mass firings of federal workers to enforce a new productivity regime. Courts, however, blocked these actions on the grounds that they violated labor protections and due process standards.
Outcome for Public Services:
While streamlining government is cited as a way to reduce waste and reallocate resources (potentially improving services like healthcare and disability aid), the disruptions caused by such abrupt personnel changes have, in some cases, threatened the continuity of essential services. The legal reversals indicate that the proposed benefits were never fully realized.
Foreign Policy and National Defense
Unpredictable Shifts:
Trump’s foreign policy actions—such as contentious meetings with international leaders (e.g., Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy) and abrupt shifts in military aid—demonstrate a pattern of unpredictability. His reversal on certain foreign aid positions (like the resumption of F-16 support to Pakistan after previously halting it) shows that his approach often depends on immediate geopolitical considerations rather than long-term strategy newsx.com.
Effect on U.S. Defense:
While a reduction in overseas military commitments can theoretically free resources for domestic priorities, the resulting instability and strained alliances have raised concerns. These shifts have not produced clear, measurable improvements in national defense as understood by conventional security metrics.
Economic and Regulatory Policies
Deregulation and Tax Cuts:
Trump’s administration implemented significant tax cuts and deregulation, which in the short term contributed to lower unemployment rates and economic growth pre-pandemic. Critics, however, note that these benefits were unevenly distributed and often favored wealthier segments of society.
Long-Term Public Well-Being:
Although some economic indicators improved temporarily, analyses show that the broader impacts—such as increased income inequality and reduced funding for social programs—have not translated into a sustained improvement in the overall well-being or healthcare access for the majority.
Education and Social Policies
Federal Leverage Over Local Education:
Promises to combat “wokeness” in schools by using federal funds to influence curricula have faced legal and ethical challenges. Education in the U.S. is predominantly managed at the state and local levels, and attempts to reallocate federal funds for ideological purposes have been met with resistance.
Resulting Impact:
There is no clear evidence that these efforts have resulted in improvements in public health or safety. Rather, they have contributed to political polarization without demonstrable benefits to the majority of students or communities.
---
3. Reliability, Honesty, and Overall Impact
Reliability and Honesty:
Documented Inconsistencies:
Numerous independent fact-checkers and legal reviews have documented that Trump frequently made statements that were later proven false or legally unfeasible. His public record includes instances where he promised actions that existing laws made impossible, which many analysts describe as deliberate manipulation of facts.
Legal Challenges as a Measure:
The fact that several of his key policy initiatives—such as the border wall funding through a national emergency and the mass firings of federal employees—were halted or reversed by judicial intervention is a strong indicator of the gap between his stated intentions and what could actually be enacted.
Impact on American Well-Being:
Negative Impacts:
National Security & Stability: The unpredictable shifts in foreign policy have at times undermined traditional alliances and introduced uncertainty into U.S. defense strategy.
Domestic Services: Legal challenges to abrupt policy changes have, in some cases, disrupted essential public services (including those related to healthcare and disability aid) that benefit the majority.
Public Trust: The repeated discrepancy between promises and feasible actions has eroded trust in government institutions among many Americans.
Positive Impacts:
Economic Measures: Certain deregulation efforts and tax reforms led to short-term economic improvements, such as lower unemployment and increased business investment before external shocks (e.g., the pandemic) set in.
Criminal Justice Reform: Measures like the First Step Act (if considered part of his broader policy package) have been credited with modest improvements in the criminal justice system, benefiting communities affected by mass incarceration.
Quantifying the Impact:
While precise metrics vary by study, consensus among policy analysts suggests that the negative consequences—especially in terms of legal instability, undermined public services, and diminished trust—have outweighed the temporary economic gains for a majority of the population. Surveys and economic data over his tenure indicate that a larger share of Americans experienced uncertainty or detriment in their access to essential services compared to those who benefited from his economic policies.
---
4. Conclusion
Based on a factual review of Donald Trump’s political record:
Promises vs. Reality: He has a documented history of making commitments that either directly violated existing legal frameworks or were not followed through, often resorting to tactics that have been characterized as misinformation and manipulation.
Mixed Outcomes: While some policies—such as certain tax reforms and deregulation efforts—provided short-term economic boosts, many initiatives (especially in immigration, federal personnel management, and foreign policy) have faced legal reversals or produced unintended negative consequences.
Overall Impact: The majority of analyses indicate that, when measured against indicators like national stability, access to healthcare, and public trust in government, the net effect of Trump’s political career has been more negative than positive for the average American. His reliability and honesty have been repeatedly questioned by fact-checkers and legal institutions, suggesting that the benefits realized by a smaller, politically influential segment did not translate into widespread improvements in well-being or defense for the broader population.
In summary, while there are isolated instances of policy implementation that have had measurable benefits, the overarching pattern in Trump’s political career shows significant inconsistencies, with a preponderance of actions—and broken promises—that have negatively impacted the well-being and security of the majority of U.S. citizens.
Parents think it's a sin for their children to disobey them. Parents think it's okay to assault their children in order to instill the fear of God in them.
Those parents are prime examples of using the lord's name in vain. But they don't want their children to know that. So they instead invent some bullshit definition.
