@browzerhistory / browzerhistory.tumblr.com
Pinned
donate to reem's gofundme for free art!
browzer/pixel - he/it/neos
19, posts here are mostly sfw/some suggestive
for system posts, go to @headhold
currently brainrotting mainly over ultrakill and rain world
art tag: #my silly art
ca$happ - $browzerhistory
oc masterpost (very big work in progress)
this trans day of visibility, i want to highlight and celebrate intersex trans people.
society ignores intersex trans people and tries to erase this overlap. and also ignores complex intersex experiences around gender. society denies our intersexuality, or our transness, or both. even in queer circles we are often seen as "basically cis" or "basically trans" or "intersex aka own separate species that can have nothing in common with other queer people."
intersex trans people are often denied gender affirming care. intersex trans people get their bodily autonomy attacked both as intersex and trans. even in trans accepting circles like gender clinics, we often face ignorance and incompetence.
people feel entitled to know and question our anatomy, physiology, transition goals, identities — everything about us.
our bodies belong to us. our identities belong to us. our experiences belong to us.
we deserve bodily autonomy. we deserve representation. we deserve recognition. we deserve celebration. we deserve pride.
intersex trans people, i love you.
This is cheaper than journaling when you think about it
We pay in other ways
VIBE CHECK! *yearns deeply for you from an unfortunate distance*
Happy TDOV to all intersex trans people ♡
You matter.
Call out posts basically have two steps: first, convince you that the target is deranged, and second, convince you that you should hate them for it.
More and more frequently, I'm seeing call outs that successfully complete step 1 but fail step 2, and essentially become an accidental recommendation.
If you start ranting to me that an indie YouTuber I've never heard of "SUPPORTS the production of Bulgarian girl jazz and KINS the aunt with a colossal ass from Robots (2005)” then my first thought is hmmm.... intriguing... mayhap I'll watch one of their veedios...,
i dont care how many sparkles u put over the button that activates some new stupid monetizable service, corporate application. im not clicking on it
happy tdov never kill yourself
that fucking crab that i hate
This is one of the more ambitious pieces I've done for a bit, and I did it on an absurd deadline, but my trans dragon back patch is done! The project ended up taking 130 hours of working time to finish, using two strands of cotton floss for both fills and outlines. The base pattern was from my own collection and was originally from 1936.
Happy Trans Day of Visibility. Wearing this vest in public makes me very very visible to everyone around me and I'd make it again in a heartbeat.
visible body, hidden heart
Hello so you said something about being pro-drug and I’m not 100% sure what you meant by it. I am absolutely for the decriminalization of all drugs ever. But like. Are you pro-using? Not that I’m anti users at all but i wouldn’t say I’m pro-using… just like based on my own experiences and my loved ones experiences and like what very hard drugs do to your body and mind and how they can like. Kill you. I 🩷 users and addicts and i don’t think criminalizing anything helps but… I’m prob misinterpreting your post so this may be a stupid question but I’ve seen all types of opinions on here so idk.
sarcastic answer, it's exactly this type of reaction that makes me think a truly pro-drugs stance is what communism needs today
less sarcastic answer, if drugs are the thing that makes someone's life tolerable and livable and even pleasurable then it would be uh, pretty fucking hypocritical of me to take issue with them using
even less sarcastic answer, you are overestimating the extent to which the danger of even "very hard drugs" (define that) comes from the drugs themselves rather than from the conditions of use: insecure supply driving desperation and making overdose more likely; black market making overdose more likely; intolerable conditions of living making using more necessary; &c. i can't speak to your life or loved ones but in my life i have observed and engaged in many different patterns of substance use, ranging from 'casually & occasionally using substances w high addiction potential' to 'intensely and compulsively using substances w much lower addiction potential' and everything in between. you are also jumping from "drugs" straight to "very hard drugs" (again, define that). drugs is an inclusive category: you need to be thinking here of substances ranging from heroin to caffeine to ibuprofen to xanax to ayahuasca to surgical anaesthetic cocktails.
really dead serious answer, yes, drugs can be dangerous. so can driving, working, and exercising. drugs can also be immensely beneficial, and that goes for drug use that's 'purely recreational' and pleasurable. as a matter of basic self-determination and autonomy, yes, i will defend people's right to get high for any reason they choose. as a matter of basic prison abolition politics i will defend that right twice over. i will also defend needle exchanges, social (not state) support systems, and the communist project of making the world a just and tolerable place to live in. but humans have enjoyed substance use for literally millennia, i personally enjoy substance use, and i don't think fearing it is politically useful or interpersonally helpful. at core, 'drug use' is simply the consumption of a substance that alters a person's psychological or physiological functioning in some way. it's not inherently 'good' or 'bad', morally or from a health perspective. what it is, though, is a common part of human existence, and not one i think can or should be eradicated.
i love comics they should invent a drawing comics that doesn't make your brain immediately tap into the still yet unknown to science "suicide ideation cortex"
ppl use "death of the author" to mean fucking anything they want on this site. i've seen people use it to fucking defend transmisogynistic jokes in movies??? thats literally the opposite of Death of the Author. thats Death of the Text. that's just not engaging with the conversation.
they practiced it on harry potter and now they just think it's three magic words that can absolve them of any media criticism
I am once again insisting that everyone actually read Death of the Author. It's like 7 pages.
Death of the Author is the Intersectionality and Male Gaze of literary theory: a concept that is extremely useful but that is invoked by people who don’t actually know what it means despite it being well defined and originating in an accessible essay that people don’t read
[Image ID: Tweet from Cameron Lauder (@/ UnarmedOracle) on 18 Sep 20 reading: I cannot stress this enough: Death of the Author is the title of an influential 1967 essay, not just a cluster of magic shapes and noises that makes you win arguments.
You can actually read it. It is a real thing that exists. /End ID]
