Avatar

cegan trash

@cegan

and more freakiness it's current year
PostsLikesFollowing

Pinned

Avatar
Reblogged
Avatar

Cegan Bingo YEAR TWO - NSFW Edition

General Guidelines:ย 

Standard bingo rules apply: five in a row (vertically, horizontally, diagonally) to โ€˜winโ€™ย 

ALL TYPES OF CREATIONS COUNT AS FILLS - fic, art, gifs, music, interpretive dance, what have you

You can use one prompt per creation OR try and wedge an entire line into one creation if youโ€™re an overachiever (affectionate). If you score a full card by the end please make a master post for bragging rights!!

Tag this account to be reblogged:ย @ceganbingo

Other hashtags to include: #ceganbingo #cegan bingo #cegan

PLEASE make sure to tag correctly for works containing any of the major warnings on AO3 (graphic violence, character death, rape/ non-con, underage)

This is for fun. No pressure to finish a whole card but that would be super awesome if youโ€™re feeling it!

New works or WIPs that you've been looking for an excuse to finish accepted INCLUDING expanding incomplete works on AO3.

*Note that you absolutely donโ€™t have to make NSFW/ explicit creations. These prompts were chosen with input from some fandom friends with one-track minds ๐Ÿ˜‰

AO3 Collection should be up by April 3rd, if it's not, please poke me.

Start Date: Thursday April 3rd aka S06E16: The Last Day on Earth release date. The โœจ meet cute โœจ if you will.ย 

End Date (completed bingo cards/ masterlists should be posted by this day): Thursday December 4th aka S07E07: Sing Me a Song. The Cegan Episode.ย 

This challenge is INTENTIONALLY long. No commitment, all casual all the time. Drop in and write a thing and then change fandoms for six months, it's alllll good!

Text list of prompts under the read more. Yes there are a couple repeats because they continue to please me.

HAVE FUN ๐Ÿฅณ

#cegan#cegan bingo#ceganbingo#bingo challenge
Avatar
Reblogged m-has-a-blog
Avatar
superhelldeactivated

I've realized recently that every time I'm asked for socials my response is sorta "oh i don't have twitter" "I'm not on Instagram much" "i uninstalled TikTok a few months ago" and this has led people into believing I'm just someone who doesn't do social media but in reality you can find me in here lets get it on cunts monday through shawty like a melody sunday, 9am to 12am, posting blorbo.

Avatar

I was going to be like "well that certainly was not true cause you deactivated" and then I looked at the blog and. that's literally my old blog.

Avatar
Reblogged sangohigurashi20
Avatar

cant take people fighting for morals in fiction seriously like game of thrones and house of dragons aren't massively successful incestuous shows or you freaks don't wanna fuck mads mikkelsen as hannibal. be a proud freak and not a puritan asshole.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

why did you go full poet on my last ask? all i asked is why you ship a literal fifteen year old with a forty something year old and you started talking about vehicles and clashing and whatever else, just because itโ€™s fiction doesnโ€™t mean that gives you the freedom to put a teenage boy and an adult man together sexually. as for carl being a โ€œtax payerโ€ hate to break it to you, but carl is in fact fifteen during his visit with began and just because heโ€™s badass or angry doesnโ€™t mean heโ€™s any more than a child. a whole page dedicated to pedophilia, fiction or not is kind of insane and you should delete it. hope this helps!!!

But you see what you're doing, right? Instead of engaging in the conversation you initiated, you're upset because the version of my answer wasn't tailored to your presuppositions. How was talking about vehicles and clashing and whatever else "going full poet" to you?

It seems like you're less interested in having a conversation and more focused on dictating the terms of acceptable thought. I engaged with your initial question thoughtfully and provided an explanation of the themes and dynamics that appeal to people in these fictional scenarios. Instead of addressing the points raised, you dismissed them outright because they didn't align with your expectations.

If you wanted a simplistic, reductive answer, you should've made that clear.

Let's clarify something important: these are fictional characters in a fictional world. Exploring controversial or unsettling dynamics in fiction is not equivalent to endorsing or normalizing those dynamics in reality. Fiction has always served as a space to grapple with difficult, uncomfortable, and morally complex ideas. To conflate engaging with a fictional narrative with endorsing real world harm is both disingenuous and reductive.

As for Carl's age, no one is arguing about it in the narrative timeline. The point is that his actions, agency, and development as a character often transcend the confines of what one might expect from someone of that age, which is part of why the dynamic is compelling to analyze. The ship this context isn't about age or morality, it's about exploring layered, morally fraught, and sometimes uncomfortable dynamics. It's something that fiction allows us to do without real-world consequences.

Calling the existence of an analysis of these dynamics "insane" or demanding its deletion is, frankly, an attempt at censorship disguised as moral outrage. If you're unwilling to discuss the complexities of fiction without reducing them to real world equivalencies, then perhaps this conversation isn't for you.

#anonymous
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.