Avatar

For Those We Have Lost. For Those We Can Yet Save.

@cloudsmovingcastle / cloudsmovingcastle.tumblr.com

Cloud | twenty-something | they/he | aspiring femboy | queer as in fuck you | nonbinary xion believer | eorzea’s okayest healer

simulacra for bootlickers

FYI, this post is a little more NSFW than usual with the language.

Usually I think McMansions are kind of funny. Sometimes, I even like them. If I didn't like them at least a little bit, I don't think I'd be running this blog for a solid eight years and counting. Some McMansions are so strange and so fascinating in their architectural languages (it's never just one language) that they test the boundaries of what residential architecture can do on an individual and often ad hoc level. Others so cogently and often whimsically express various cultural fascinations and deeply entrenched American ideas of what prosperity looks like (read: neuroticisms), that, as a sociological text they remain unrivaled.

But some (many!) McMansions are, to put it bluntly, evil. And it is these McMansions that reveal the ugly truth beneath the ugly architecture: that the McMansion is a manifestation of power and wealth meant to communicate that power and wealth to others as explicitly as possible, and that it does so in a country besieged by brutal and inescapable income inequality. In our present political moment characterized by extreme and deliberate cruelty, fear, and baleful destruction of all that is pro-social in nature (and nature itself), I figured it was my duty to show my readers a house that embodies these sentiments, one we can all use to assuage some of our perceived powerlessness by way of mocking the shit out of it.

There are a lot of fake White Houses in the US. Most of them can be found in or around the area of McLean, Virginia, the ground zero of DC blob sickos whose job it is to mete out the ratio of lethality and economy for weapons manufacturers. This one, however, is in Indiana, outside of Evansville. It was built at the apex of theme park mindset in architecture (1997) and is on the market for $4.9 million dollars. However, don't be fooled by this opening exterior shot. It takes literal drone footage to show how unhinged this house actually is. In reality, the White House facade is akin to the light dangling from an anglerfish, luring the unsuspecting victim in...

Completely NORMAL amount of money at play here!

There are some images historians (if there are any left) will look back upon and say, such a phenomenon truly would not be possible without an abundance of cheap oil and derivative products. Fortunately, in the immanent post-neoliberal chobani yogurt solarpunk utopia, this house will be converted into a half ruin garden (though this will take some time with all the plastic) half public spa complex. A better world is possible, but only if we imagine it.

Pro tip: there's a way of saying "wow it's so big" that can land as the most devastating insult in the rhetorical lexicon.

I'll be real, the armchair thing is a new one for me, too.

(Rise and grindset voice): Inside you are two lions. Both of them are hungry for prosperity and success. Let's get this bread, king.

Not to do gender here, but compared to the rest of the house, this is a "my wife got her way" room if there ever was one.

Fixer Upper was basically 9/11 for "architectural foam trappings" and "color." Look what they took from you...

Honestly, what a great juxtaposition. This is what that book The Machine in the Garden was all about. (No it's not.)

Half of this post tbh:

Well, that's it for this extremely upbeat and positive McMansion Hell post in this extremely positive and upbeat time we are living in. Join us soon for the concluding part 2 of the Neuschwanstein Castle series, especially if you like beautiful, psychosexually crippled swan boys (real and fictional) and kitsch theory.

Not into recurring payments? Try the tip jar! McMansion Hell stocks, much like mortgage-backed securities only ever go up!!

see. the interesting thing to me is that the Bible tends to depict disability in four different ways:

  1. disability as the result of sin (e.g. Deuteronomy 5:9)
  2. disability as curable via the profession of faith (e.g. Matthew 9:20)
  3. disabled people as a method for the abled to demonstrate faith (e.g. John 9)
  4. disability as a metaphor for human defect (e.g. Matthew 23)

and none of these things are any less common when you think about disability in popular culture in the year of our lord 2024!! by the way!!

  1. disability as the result of immoral choices (think about popular conceptions of diabetes, for example)
  2. if someone is still disabled, it is because they haven't tried hard enough to seek a cure ("have you tried yoga?")
  3. if an abled person helps a disabled person, they are thought of as a saint. when disabled people have our autonomy removed, this is seen as a moral good
  4. many literary depictions of disability only use disability as a metaphor, and not as. y'know. an actual disability (this is common with depictions of blindness)

anyway. I'm a Christian and I definitely don't think Christianity is inherently ableist. but I do think there is a lot of ableism in the church. and that definitely makes a fuckton of sense when you look at our source text. but I think this is an interesting example of Cultural Christianity. even those who don't believe in sin DO believe that disability is the result of sin. or at least, they act like they believe that to be the case

this post is a mess but 👍 this is vaguely what I've been working on today

and this isn't even getting into "sins of the father" ideologies! on account of. well. misogyny. the modern world is much more likely to appeal to "sins of the mother". think about how many disabilities are blamed on immoral actions made by mothers either in pregnancy or early in the child's life. I could spend all day just talking about that in the context of autism. let alone physical disabilities. it is. There. if you have eyes to see it

you ask most people if they think disability is a holy punishment, and they'll probably say no (putting aside Hillsong and other evangelicals for now). but it becomes really fucking evident that they do, deep down, believe that once they start to talk about disability for more than two seconds

  • if you're born with disability, everyone scrambles to blame the parents somehow
  • if you acquire disability, everyone scrambles to blame you for making the wrong lifestyle choices
  • if your disability is a chronic illness, everyone scrambles to tell you (explicitly or not) that it's your own fault that you haven't been cured yet

we still see disability as a punishment. it's everywhere. moral model of disability. sure is a trip

i actually love seeing vids from like british zoos that have coyotes cause i'm like hey little buddy, i saw you outside my house last night what are you doing in the place for fancy animals. and then i remember that coyotes and bobcats and raccoons and mountain lions are americas-exclusives

Fancy Animals

[North America has many fine Beasts!]

when you go to bed significantly earlier than usual, a little menu should pop up asking if you want Wake Up Early or More Sleep. and then you should get what you requested. that's my human body UI improvement for the day.

It's so weird to me when people are like 'but that will cost the government money!' So what? They're the government, they're supposed to be spending money. What, you want them to take your tax dollars and then do nothing with it? Lock it all up in a big government vault and just look at it? Why are you so scared of giving a third grader lunch or a homeless person a house.

being a symbolism enjoyer should humble you because at the end of the day no matter how eloquently you articulate it youre essentially saying "i love it when things have meaning"

my hobbies are Colours and Shapes but, like, in a mature, sophisticated adult way

bad news, euclid fans! i just disproved his assertation that parallel lines don't intersect for their entire infinite length. i walked along them for approximately 8.6 x 10⁸ km and you know what i found? that's right, a tangle.

they don't touch for the rest of their infinite length though, i did check. in both directions.

i'm sorry that's my fault i was walking along that stretch earlier and accidentally tripped and tangled them up and i couldn't get them untangled and i thought no one would notice i'm so sorry

"The nonbinary afab who goes by she/her, dresses femininely, and uses a push-up bra when I—" when you what? What's wrong with her?

Is she not nonbinary enough for you? Is the way she experiences her queerness and how she presents not perfect enough for you? Nonbinary people don't owe you androgyny, right? So why is she the exception? Why does she have to hate herself to appeal to your standards? Why is she any less trans—any less worthy of respect—cause it's "not visible"? Queer solidarity my ass. Don't spout this bullshit on Pride, man.

This, but also for enby amabs going by he/him and with hairy chests and beards

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.