Avatar

F. de l'Opéra

@fdelopera / fdelopera.tumblr.com

They/them. Proudly Jewish. I think this has become a Jewish history blog now. Mostly Jewish musings (and screaming into the void). I'm here to share my knowledge of the history of the Jewish people, which is more important now than ever. Jews are indigenous to Judea, there have always been large Jewish communities in the Levant, and Jews have the right to self-determination and self-governance in our ancestral homeland. I've also resumed work on my English translation of Gaston Leroux's Le Fantôme de l'Opéra. I'm doing a dual translation of the Gaulois newspaper publication and the 1st edition. Check out my blog for information about my translation.

Pinned

115 years ago today, on 8 January 1910, Gaston Leroux published the final installment of Le Fantôme de l’Opéra in Le Gaulois newspaper. You can read the final installment on my blog here.

Leroux and his editor at Pierre Lafitte & Cie. then edited his serialized text, removing a chapter (”The Magic Envelope”) and several other large sections in the process, and republished his work as a novel three months later in April 1910.

I encourage everyone to do something to mark the occasion and celebrate the beginnings of The Phantom of the Opera!

Below the cut, I have linked all 68 sections of Le Fantôme de l’Opéra, as they were first printed in Le Gaulois newspaper 115 yeas ago.

[ID: A fake invitation card, credited to chalavyishmael. It reads as follows:

"You're Invited to the 4th ANNUAL ANTI-ZIONIST PASSOVER LIBERATION SEDER "Next Year in... Well, Not There"

Join us as we mark Jewish liberation by condemning the one place Jews have actually liberated.

Date: Erev Passover Time: 6:30 PM sharp Location: Brooklyn Community Arts Collective (land acknowledgement pending)

Evening Highlights Include:

  • The Four Questions, including: "Is resistance kosher?"
  • A reimagined Haggadah, now with commentary from Pharaoh's perspective
  • Bitter herbs, symbolic of the discourse
  • Ten Plagues of Zionism, perlormed [sic] as interpretive dance
  • Breaking the middle matzah in solidarity with oppressed imperial cores

Please bring: A vegan, gluten-free, settler-conscious dish Your favorite deconstructed midrash An open heart and closed historical context"

End ID.]

Avatar
Reblogged

those of you who say matzah is best with chocolate, probably just need to try ✨matzah with hummus✨

ya welcome and don’t overdo it because whatever happens to your digestive system after is on you, yeah?

Avatar
Reblogged

Wow.

So there's this small tribal group, right? The colonizing power force marched them out of their homeland, and later forced them to live in horrible conditions, adding all of the force of law to do it. But they survived.

Part of the tribal religious beliefs involves the use of sacred baths of pure rainwater in order to cleanse and purify themselves, because the tribe originally came from scrubland and semi-desert. These baths are taken very seriously, to the point that the tribe considers them to be of utmost importance, and any community of them needs to have at least one.

Just recently, an avowed bigot tricked her way into one of the sacred baths in order to profane it. She claimed to be a member of the tribe, and the bath attendants took her at her word. The bigot then videoed herself in the sacred bath--itself an act of sacrilege--and basically did the equivalent of taking a shit in it.

And then, once she was done, she put the video up on TikTok, feeling proud of her sacrilege. She told her followers that if any of the tribal members complained or protested in the comments, she'd delete what they said. Furthermore, she is a member of a group directly associated with a Supremacist organization which has explicitly said they want to wipe out the entire tribe on the grounds of their race.

The bath attendants are terrified and angry, because their sacred bath has been profaned, and the bigot has also broadcast details about their security procedures across the internet. There is a real risk of an attack because of this, especially given the explicit threats from her associated Supremacist organization. Their organization is even looking into trying to charge the bigot with Criminal Trespass, because what she did was that serious.

But nobody seems to care aside from the tribal people. It's extremely disheartening and disturbing.

YUPPP. Here's the thread for anyone who doesn't know about this latest goyishe desecration of the Jewish community.

Also, in this goy's Backstage bio (she's an "actor" in Chicago), she lists her ethnicities as "White/European Descent", so she admits that she isn't Jewish.

The so-called "Jewish" group that she is part of isn't actually a synagogue -- it is Tzedek Chicago, an interfaith community in Chicago that is associated with JVP. She is part of this group as a Cultural Christian who practices basic bitch "Paganism" (aka she celebrates Samhain etc).

And as to the WHY of it all, WHY did this goy go to all the trouble of pretending to convert to Judaism on TikTok?

She did it because she is ideologically aligned with Hamas. She wants to destroy Jewish community from the inside. And her plan to destroy Jewish community is to convince other goyim to pretend to convert to Judaism, and then to infiltrate Jewish communities where they can spread Hamas' propaganda to other Jews.

In the comments of her video, she has told other goyim how easy it all is -- so she's broadcasting to her terrorist friends and showing them how to gain access to Jews when we're at our most vulnerable, and she's showing goyim how to sneak their way into Jewish spaces to proselytize to us about Hamas.

What she is doing is akin to what Christian missionaries do when they sneak into synagogues to spread the Gospel and try to convert Jews to Christianity, which still happens to this day.

I don't normally use this word because it's derogatory as hell, but this? This is shiksha behavior.

It's beyond "this isn't a valid conversion." It's beyond "this is a goy doing AsAJew" bullshit.

This is, in the most literal sense, a shiksha. An abomination. Not just "not Jewish," but someone antithetical to Judaism.

I sincerely hope she gets hit with a criminal trespass and charged fees for cleaning the mikvah.

this bitch deserves the hardest backhand you can throw. multiple times, even. make bigots afraid again.

"wants to infiltrate and proselytize" i can't wait to beat the shit out of someone for this and then explain to the cops why recruiting for a terrorist organization is a bad move and we just had a really passionate debate about it

AND GUESS WHAT FAM!!! i was the ONLY PERSON who contacted the synagogue about it!

One of the things that really, truly pisses me off about the Left is the utter hypocrisy when it comes to Jews. Not Israel, not even their reaction to the October 7 Pogrom, but how every principle goes out the door when the chance to shit on Jews comes up.

"Cultural appropriation is bad!/Respect closed traditions!"... until it's Jews, and then appropriating Jewish rituals and desecrating sacred spaces is something to not only do, but to film (itself an act of desecration) and share online!

@vigilantsycamore put it best the other day: the Left isn't interested in rejecting the social hierarchies--of race, of sex, of religion, of culture, of wealth--that the Right insists be maintained and strengthened. The Left just want to invert those hierarchies... which, ironically, is exactly what the Right fearmongers about.

For years, I thought that the "Oh, they want to make White People a minority!" fearmongering was baseless. The tongue-in-cheek rebuttal of "What? Are minorities poorly treated or something?" being the one that I would reply with. But now? Yeah, watching the way Leftists behave? I hate to say it, but if given a chance, they would follow through with White Replacement, and do so in a heartbeat. They would happily treat White people the way that People of Color had been treated. They would just flip the script, rather than just throw it out.

And I know that because that's what they're doing to Jews, who are White People ™ in the eyes of these Leftists, and how they justify their rampant, galloping Jew-hate.

Exactly this. Through the way the Left is SAVAGING the Jewish people, these Leftists are just broadcasting what they will do to ALL indigenous peoples once they start to achieve success and independence in their land-back movements.

Once these Leftists realize they can't use an indigenous people group to give "legitimacy" to the Left's brand of White Savior Complex, the Leftists will turn on them and try to DESTROY them faster than you can say Noble Savage Bigotry.

Byzantine manuscripts of Herodotus' Histories

Picture of a page of a byzantine manuscript of Herodotus' Histories with marginal annotations (marginalia).

Source: https://humanities.princeton.edu/event/how-did-byzantines-read-herodotus-the-case-of-marginalia-in-verse/

Oh hey, Herodotus! Fancy meeting you on this hellsite, O father of lies! I just wrote a looong post explaining how "Syria-Palaestina" was a Greek exonym that Herodotus coined for Judea in the mid-400s BCE while writing his "Histories", due to 5th Century BCE Athenian geopolitics between the Greco-Persian Wars and the Peloponnesian War.

Avatar
Reblogged

And here is the etymology of Palestine. Or, as it should be written, Συρία ἡ Παλαιστίνη (Syría hē Palaistínē). Yes, the word "Palestine" is GREEK. It is not Arabic, it is GREEK.

My degree is in Ancient Greek Theatre, and as part of my degree, I studied Herodotus' "Histories" within the sociopolitical context in which he was writing.

The Ancient Greek historian Herodotus coined the term Συρία ἡ Παλαιστίνη (Syría hē Palaistínē), Romanized as Syria-Palaestina, which was a name that the Ancient Greeks used to refer to Eretz Yisrael.

Later on during the Hellenic period following the reign of Alexander the Great, the Greeks started to correctly refer to Judea as Ἰουδαία (Ioudaia), which was a Greek approximation of the Hebrew endonym that the indigenous Jewish population called the land: יהודה (Yehudah).

The Greek word Ἰουδαία (Ioudaia) was also adopted and Romanized by the Roman Empire as Judaea.

Again, both Ἰουδαία and Judaea are approximations of the native Hebrew word for the land: יהודה (Yehudah).

Here is my full post on this matter. I'm including lots of links for people who have asked for them.

.

Palestine is a GREEK COLONIZER TERM. And the correct way to write it is Παλαιστίνη (Palaistínē).

Συρία ἡ Παλαιστίνη (Syría hē Palaistínē), Romanized as Syria-Palaestina, was a name coined by the Greek historian Herodotus in his "Histories", which he wrote in Athens in the 430s BCE. He coined this name because the Athenians were in a cold war with the Achaemenid Empire (what the Greeks called the Persian Empire), and Herodotus wanted to diminish the influence that Persia had in the Levant in order to appeal to the Athenian audience who was paying for his work.

The Greeks had fought off the Achaemenid Empire in a series of battles during the Greco-Persian Wars from 499 BCE through 480/479 BCE, culminating in the battles of Thermopylae, Salamis, and Plataea.

In fact, the Greeks came very close to losing the Greco-Persian Wars, as can be seen in this video about an archaeological dig on the Hill of the Acropolis in Athens. Before the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE, the Athenians evacuated Athens to regroup, and the Persians invaded and desecrated the Temple of the goddess Athena (the Old Parthenon) and destroyed the statues and holy objects that were on the Acropolis. Later on in the 440s - 430s BCE, the Athenians built the "new" Parthenon, the Temple of Athena, to celebrate their victory over the Persians. The Parthenon still stands on the Hill of the Acropolis, albeit in ruins.

If you have seen the movie or read the graphic novel 300, you are familiar with a (heavily) fictionalized version of one of the battles of the Greco-Persian Wars, the Battle of Thermopylae, which was fought in the summer of 480 BCE. The Spartan general Leonidas led a unit of 300 Spartan soldiers, along with around 2000 Thespians, Thebans, and Helots to hold off the advancing Persian army at the Pass of Thermopylae. Most of these Greek soldiers were killed in the battle, but they also caused heavy casualties to the Persian army, and they weakened the Persians' resolve to conquer Greece.

The Persian army was defeated a year later in 479 BCE at the Battle of Plataea. However, even though this defeat was definitive, and even though the Persian army largely disengaged from actively trying to conquer Greece at this time, there remained a cold war between Athens and Persia, especially during the First Peloponnesian War and Second Peloponnesian War -- an ongoing Greek Civil War between Athens and its former ally from the Greco-Persian Wars, Sparta.

The history of the Peloponnesian War was documented by Greek historian Thucydides, who is considered the first modern historian. Unlike Herodotus, whose "Histories" were a combination of Ancient Greek propaganda, religion, and supersessionism, Thucydides was more concerned with recording the events of the conflict between Athens and Sparta.

The Spartans eventually turned traitor in the final years of the Peloponnesian War. The Persian Empire wanted to limit Athenian dominance in the Aegean, and so they sought out an alliance with their old enemy, Sparta, which Sparta accepted. This unlikely Persian-Spartan alliance allowed Sparta to win the Peloponnesian War against Athens in 404 BCE.

This is the world in which Herodotus was writing. Herodotus was born circa 484 BCE, during the end of the Greco-Persian Wars. He was born in Halicarnassus (in modern-day Turkey), which was an Ionian Greek city under Persian rule. And so Herodotus witnessed the war machine of the Persian Empire firsthand, and he knew what it was like to be a Greek under Persian occupation.

Therefore, in Herodotus' writing, he sought to diminish the Achaemenid Empire in order to bolster the Greek and especially the Athenian cause.

Like many Greeks of his day, Herodotus referred to the entire Levantine region comprising modern-day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Israel as Συρία (Syria), aka Assyria, because the Assyrians had been defeated by the Babylonians 180 years before he was writing, and the Assyrians were therefore considered a historical people. They were not an existential threat to the Athenians like the Persians were.

And then in his survey of Eretz Yisrael, Herodotus discounted most of Yehudah (Judea) to the East, and he focused on the strip of land along the Judean coast, which he referred to as Παλαιστίνη (Palaistínē), which is what we would call Philistia -- aka Philistine-land.

Herodotus likely landed on the coast and didn't go too far inland, because he didn't refer to Jerusalem or any of the Jewish cities, other than the general area of Philistia -- and even then, he didn't refer to any of the cities in Philistia by name.

So, why did Herodotus only focus on Palaistínē (Philistia), and essentially ignore the rest of Judea?

Because he recognized that the area of Philistia had once been inhabited by the Mycenaean Greek Philistines from Crete, and since they had been Mycenaeans, they were Homeric cousins to him.

The Philistines were essentially Bronze Age Vikings. They were descended from the Peleset Tribe of the Bronze Age Sea Peoples, who were a loose confederation of people groups from the Aegean and Mediterranean. (Modern day Greece and Southern Italy.)

The Philistines had been a Aegean people from Crete. They were Mycenaean, since the earlier Minoan society on Crete had collapsed in the mid-1400s BCE, and the Island of Crete had been colonized by Mycenaeans from mainland Greece.

The Philistines had lived along the coast of Judea from the Late Bronze Age until around 600 BCE, when they were slaughtered by the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II during his campaign against Judea, which culminated in 586 BCE with the destruction of the Temple of Solomon (the First Jewish Temple in Jerusalem) and the beginning of the Babylonian Exile, where many of the Jews were taken captive to Babylon (in modern day Iraq).

When the Persian King Cyrus the Great led a campaign against the Babylonians and conquered Babylon in 539 BCE, he issued a proclamation stating that all peoples held captive by the Babylonians were free to return to their home nations. This included the Jews. The Jews who had been held captive in Babylon for 70 years returned to Judea in the last decades of the 500s BCE and began construction on the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which they completed by 515 BCE, under the auspices of the Achaemenid Empire. But when the Jews returned to Jerusalem from Babylon, they found that all of the Philistine settlements along the coast of Judea had been destroyed by the Babylonians, and the Philistines as a distinct Greek people group were no more.

However, 80 or so years later when Herodotus visited Judea to write his "Histories", he erased Judea (Yehudah) and called the entire land Παλαιστίνη (Palaistínē).

So, why did Herodotus do this? Because he was trying to assert a Greek presence in the land.

This is typical of the Athenians. They also referred to the Achaemenid Empire as Περσίς -- Persis, or "Persia" -- to give even their Persian sworn enemies a Greek origin. Herodotus writes in his "Histories" that the Persian people were descended from the Greek demigod Perseus through his son Perses.

Yes, "Persia" is a Greek exonym, JUST LIKE PALESTINE IS.

Let me say that again. Both Persia and Palestine are GREEK EXONYMS.

One of the endonyms for the region that the Greeks called "Persia" is Ērān -- aka Iran. Iran is the endonym. "Persia" is the Greek exonym.

Just like Yehudah is the Jewish endonym, and "Palaistínē" is the Greek exonym.

Also, I cannot stress enough how little the Greeks cared about different cultures, other than their own.

Let me say this more clearly: the Greeks referred to all peoples using Greek exonyms.

For example, the Egyptians called their land Kemet, but the Greeks called it Αἴγυπτος (Aigyptos), which is where we get the name "Egypt".

It's also important to note that Herodotus likely spoke to and interacted with many Jews when he traveled to Philistia (since the last of the Greek Philistines had been killed by the Babylonians around 600 BCE), but he seemed incapable of recognizing them as a distinct people group, and he continued calling the region "Syria" after the Neo-Assyrian Empire.

Again, this is because he was viewing the ENTIRE KNOWN WORLD through a Greek lens.

He didn't discuss monotheism or the Second Temple at all, because the concept of monotheism was completely foreign to the Greeks. And even if he had made it as far as Jerusalem (which it seems that he didn't), he probably would have just referred to Hashem as "the Syrian Zeus" or something similar.

The Ancient Greeks had no real concept of or interest in the Achaemenid Empire's practice of Zoroastrianism, either. For instance, in Aeschylus' play The Persians, written in Athens in 472 BCE, Aeschylus writes about the Persians praying to the Greek gods.

So, "Palaistínē" was where the Mycenaean Greek Philistines had once lived, before being slaughtered by the Babylonians in 600 BCE. Herodotus recognized the area of Philistia as once being inhabited by his Homeric cousins, and he used this as Greek propaganda against the Persian Empire.

Herodotus intentionally mis-labeled the region as Syria (to erase the Persian Empire) and Palaistínē (to bolster the Greek claim to the land). And he intentionally erased the endonym Yehudah (Judea), which is what the native Jewish inhabitants called the land.

And all this was done because of late 5th Century BCE Athenian geopolitics, 50 years after the Greco-Persian Wars.

Anyone who uses the term "Palestine" (Παλαιστίνη) to refer to Judea is just repeating this Ancient Greek propaganda.

And then 565 years later, in 135 CE, Emperor Hadrian of Rome slaughtered his way to victory over the Jews in the Bar Kokhba Revolt. He needed a way to erase the Jewish claim to the land of Yehudah (Romanized as Judaea). And so Hadrian officially changed the name of Judaea to Syria-Palaestina within Rome, using the Greek exonym for the land that was recorded in Herodotus' "Histories".

Hadrian was trying to literally wipe Judaea and Israel off the map.

And the name that Hadrian chose was deliberate. He renamed Judaea after the Assyrians and the Philistines, two of the Jewish people's greatest enemies, and he used the name coined by a Greek, another enemy of the Jewish people.

Three enemies in one name.

The Romans were nothing if not petty and cruel.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.