Avatar

sing out, louise

@glintglimmergleam / glintglimmergleam.tumblr.com

bread for all, and roses too // i think about regency england a lot

Fandom: Bridgerton (TV), rated T

Relationships: Eloise Bridgerton/Theo Sharpe; Anthony/Penelope

Tags: AU - Canon Divergence; Consorting With Political Radicals

Series: part 2 of Slings and Arrows

Summary:

Eloise stamps her foot. “I wish to be the politician, not his wife!” “You want to sit in Parliament?” Penelope asks incredulously. “I knew you wanted the vote, but I did not think you were this ridiculous.  Your naïveté borders on farce.” Eloise takes another careful breath. “You are being cruel. I have never been so unkind to you, and I do not know what I did to deserve such an attack.” “It would be crueler still to allow you to persist in fantasies. I say this as your friend and sister.” “Sister-in-law.” 

it's so over WE'RE SO BACK

LISTEN the funniest possible microagression happened to me today. was in a recurring meeting with 8 men + 4 women (we all know each other, no strangers) and the third guy to present opened his statement with:

"well, gentlemen..."

gentlemen!!!

sir, how is life in 1935 going for you? do you also enjoy smoking pipe tobacco and slicking your hair with brylcreem?

@shieldmaidenofsherwood keira knightley is too beautiful to be a convincing elizabeth bennet. it simply doesn't work.

Hahahaha again not my MAIN qualm with p&p 2005 but you ARE right. (Although I personally do think Jennifer Ehle is very beautiful and she's my Elizabeth forever so take this with a grain of salt I guess.)

yeah no shade to jennifer ehle who is lovely!! keira has supermodel cheekbones is the thing. modern beauty that's distracting

yes, i love a divorced middle-aged male fuckup. (hello stephen king IT). i love to see these sadsacks going thru it and growing up.

but i also love a divorced middle-aged female fuckup. the flawless female character is still patriarchy in action.

if you know a perfect woman in real life no you don't. the ones who seem like they have it all together either have a fuckton of money and help supporting them or are secretly exhausted and running on fumes.

more lady fuckups in art please!!

i am more likely to read romance in fan fic than in original fiction, and a big part of that has to do with character development and the lack of required tidy Happy Ever Afters.

people complain about "fan fic" writing a lot and sure there's a certain style that's annoying - but mostly what you're talking about is formulaic and unreflective writing.

my fave fic authors often have no emotional conclusions - the pining stays unresolved, the trauma never fully heals, the recovery isn't over, there's more adventure to come.

even their zombie AUs feel more emotionally realistic than standard romcom meet-cutes. i read em in any canon for a reason. good writing is good writing.

"this female character did nothing wrong in her entire life and criticism of her is misogynist"

gender essentialism aside, she sounds like she's boring as hell.

i like my blorbos to have flaws, to fuck up and recover. even comic book superheroes get knocked out every once in a while. if they're perfect there's no emotional stakes!

Two statements about characters can and should co-exist: Pride and Prejudice edition

Mr Bennet has a close relationship with Elizabeth and provides amusing observations on the folly of human nature BUT he is a terrible husband and father who consistently neglects the women who rely on him for absolutely everything; Elizabeth and Jane turned out so well in spite of him, not because of him.

Mrs Bennet's behaviour is understandable given the era in which she lived and the subsequent pressure she was under to get her daughters married well, which wasn't entirely for vanity reasons given that Longbourn was entailed BUT she was still fundamentally vain, ridiculous and rude; such pressure, even combined with an absent husband, still does not make her behaviour justifiable, nor her a sympathetic character, as she enabled Lydia (whose subsequent elopement with Wickham almost ruined the family) for far too long.

Mr Collins is unfairly portrayed as a middle-aged sycophant in most adaptations, rather than the young clergyman who sucks up to his patroness in pursuit of a more lucrative living that he was BUT he is still a ridiculous character who you are not meant to feel sympathy for when Elizabeth rejects him; he is rude, hypocritical and thinks of himself far too highly considering how vapid he actually is.

Caroline Bingley is often too harshly judged as a 'pick-me,' even though her relentless pursuit of Darcy is understandable given his wealth & status and how important it was for women to make a good marriage BUT she was still rude, vain and treated Jane terribly; plus she was a hypocritical snob, given the manner in which she looked down upon the Bennet family's relations despite the Bingleys' own background in trade.

Elizabeth is incredibly witty, courageous and endearing and instantly likeable which makes Darcy's slight of her at the Meryton assembly all the more of an affront to us as readers BUT, while it explains her dislike of him, she is no means perfect herself; she had far too much misplaced pride in her ability to successfully read others' characters and consequently ignored positive accounts of Darcy in favour of believing the deceitful Wickham, given her prejudice against the former.

Mr Darcy was harshly judged by Elizabeth, even though there are many more sympathetic elements to his character than immediately meet the eye BUT he was not shy or innocent; he was always a haughty rich man who had never been told no, thought far too highly of himself and, ultimately, thoroughly deserved to be rebuked and subsequently made to reform his character.

also I'm very tired of people quoting the first line of Pride & Prejudice out of context, because the SECOND line makes clear that Austen was being sarcastic:

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife. However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered as the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.

She is making fun of people who think this about rich bachelors! It was not in fact a rule of Regency society!

ok last fic nitpick:

Dear gentle reader It is a truth universally acknowledged that an incomparable must be in want of a man in possession of good fortune. Hence, it should be no revelation that the reason Miss Edwina Sharma left viscount Bridgerton at the altar earlier this week is her recent engagement to the Queen’s nephew, Prince Friedrich of Prussia - a choice for which no one could resent the young lady, as it is indeed quite the step up from a mere viscount.

groaner of an opening line aside, the real Lady Whistledown would at least do the young lady justice by capitalizing the i in "Incomparable"! It's a tongue-in-cheek title, just like "Viscount Bridgerton" -- which is also missing a capital letter, by the way.

You see? You can't take me anywhere. I ruin all the fun for everyone.

look - I'm sure if someone Britpicked my writing they'd find mistakes in there too. I'm not saying I'm fluent in Regency English vernacular by any means.

But I do read a LOT of books by British authors, historical and contemporary. The more you read, the more you absorb both the vocabulary and the rhythms.

You can't develop an ear for it without actually reading real Brits talking. Julia Quinn, like so many histrom authors, is American.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.