Avatar

Janna's weird crap

@karalianne / karalianne.tumblr.com

Things I care about that other people probably think are a little bit "out there." I tag all pictures of guinea pigs with piggy porn; most posts related to my faith (Christianity) with God-stuff; most posts about things that happen in my life with my life, parenting, and/or my husband; most posts about ADHD with ADHD and Actually ADHD; all posts to try and get people's attention with signal boost; and most posts about disabilities with disability, disability rights, and/or the specific disability (e.g., autism, ADHD, OCD). Blacklist away! As a note, if I wrote a long post or there are long paragraphs or words you don't understand, and you want to read the post and understand what I'm on about, please feel free to ask. I try to keep things readable but it doesn't always work out quite right, and questions can sometimes help me reword things or explain them more clearly.
Avatar
Reblogged

Accountability Post

I have a list. Let's see how we go.

First Triplet:

  1. Charlie Cage
  2. Dishwasher
  3. Laundry

My knee is being mean today so I am not going to risk the stairs, which means no laundry. So I checked my Motivated Moms list instead (it was next on the main list anyhow) and checked off a few things, then had lunch. Now I have a video going on YouTube and I'm going to see if I can crank out another triplet.

  1. Sort out my knitting
  2. Get that notebook done and up for sale
  3. Put my other new project ideas into my Excel spreadsheet/workbook

I did the things and I have about an hour until I need to start supper, so I'm going to knit. I'll post another triplet after supper because I have three things left on my list.

I am very tired and I have just been watching YouTube and playing the Sims. So I am going to bed now and we’ll see if I’m able to do stuff again tomorrow.

Avatar
Reblogged

Accountability Post

I have a list. Let's see how we go.

First Triplet:

  1. Charlie Cage
  2. Dishwasher
  3. Laundry

My knee is being mean today so I am not going to risk the stairs, which means no laundry. So I checked my Motivated Moms list instead (it was next on the main list anyhow) and checked off a few things, then had lunch. Now I have a video going on YouTube and I'm going to see if I can crank out another triplet.

  1. Sort out my knitting
  2. Get that notebook done and up for sale
  3. Put my other new project ideas into my Excel spreadsheet/workbook

I did the things and I have about an hour until I need to start supper, so I'm going to knit. I'll post another triplet after supper because I have three things left on my list.

Avatar
Reblogged

Accountability Post

I have a list. Let's see how we go.

First Triplet:

  1. Charlie Cage
  2. Dishwasher
  3. Laundry

My knee is being mean today so I am not going to risk the stairs, which means no laundry. So I checked my Motivated Moms list instead (it was next on the main list anyhow) and checked off a few things, then had lunch. Now I have a video going on YouTube and I'm going to see if I can crank out another triplet.

  1. Sort out my knitting
  2. Get that notebook done and up for sale
  3. Put my other new project ideas into my Excel spreadsheet/workbook
Avatar
Reblogged

What’s wrong with tariffs

It's not that the Republicans and the Democrats are the same…obviously. But for decades – since Clinton – the Dems have sided with neoliberal economics, just like their Republican counterparts, so the major differences between the two related to overt discrimination, to the exclusion of the economic policies that immiserated working people, with the worst effects landing on racial minorities, women, and gender minorities.

So the Dems stood against discrimination in mortgage lending – but not for the minimum wage that would have lifted the lowest paid workers out of poverty so the could afford a mortgage. They stood for abortion rights, but against Medicare For All, which meant all women had the right to an abortion, but the poorest women couldn't afford one. And of course, in a country where racial and gender discrimination were still the order of the day, the poorest and most vulnerable Americans were racialized, women, disabled, and/or queer.

The Dems' embrace of Reaganomics meant that working people of all types experienced steady decline over 40 years: stagnating wages, economic precarity, increased indebtedness, and rising prices for health care, education, and housing. When Trump figured out that he could campaign on these issues, Dems had no response. Trump's "Make America Great Again" was meant to appeal to a time when working Americans were – on average, depending on their whiteness, maleness and straightness – better housed, better paid, and better cared for.

Of course, those benefits were unevenly felt: America was slow to extend the New Deal to racial minorities, women, disabled people, and other disfavored groups. Trump's genius was to marry white supremacy to economic grievance, tricking white workers into blaming their decline on women, brown and Black people, and queers – and not on the billionaires who had grown so much richer even as workers got poorer.

But Trump couldn't have pulled this trick off without the Dem establishment's total unwillingness to confront the hollowness of their economic policies. From Pelosi's "We're capitalists and that's the way it is" to Hillary Clinton's catastrophic campaign slogan, "America is already great," the Dems' answer to workers' fear and anger was, "You are wrong, everything is fine." Imagine having had your house stolen in the foreclosure crisis after Obama decided to "foam the runways" for the banks by letting them steal their borrowers' homes and then hearing Hillary Clinton tell you "America is already great":

Racial and gender justice matter, of course, but when they're pursued without considering economic justice, they're dead ends. The point of racial and gender justice can't merely be firing half of the 150 straight white men who control 99% of the country's capital and replacing them with 75 assorted women, queers and people of color. The worst-treated workers in America are also its most discriminated-against workers, so the best way to help women, racialized people, and other disfavored minorities is to help workers: protect unions, raise the minimum wage, defend tenants, cancel student debt, and give everyone healthcare. In the same way that a special tax on incomes over $1m will disproportionately affect straight white men, an increase in the minimum wage will disproportionately benefit women and people of color – as well as the majority of straight white men who are also getting fucked over by people with $1m salaries.

I'm going to rant about unions here. I don't remember if I've gone off on unions here before, but buckle up.

I understand the history and importance of unions. When the union for Co-Op went on strike here, I didn't shop at Co-Op while that was on. Solidarity. The new contract the board wanted to use was ridiculous.

HOWEVER.

There are some sectors where unions going on strike doesn't hurt the people who actually have power in the situation. I have two clear examples for you.

Example the first:

Back in the day, the Teachers' Union in Calgary went on strike. None of the kids could go to school, parents were stuck if they had to work, etc. After the teachers went back, like, right after, the union for the school support staff went on strike. That means bus drivers, janitors, secretaries, and *education aides*. So now, everyone's back in class except the disabled kids. Because the EA's had to strike with the secretaries and janitors. Because that makes sense. And there are way fewer disabled students, so there isn't much power there to be able to push the school board to fix things and get things going again.

Example the second, very recent:

Canada Post went on strike at the end of November 2024. I have no problem with people wanting better pay and better benefits. What I have a problem with is that the people who were actually hit worst by the strike were people who live rurally. Why? Because *couriers don't deliver to rural addresses*. So people in towns and cities could still send and receive packages and letters, but anyone who doesn't live in a community like that or who lives in a tiny community up north? Hooped. And there are way fewer of us than there are city-dwellers. So we have no power.

(Speaking of city vs rural, it still really pisses me off that it's a huge hassle to have my address on my driver's license and with my bank. My DL is SASKATCHEWAN, the province has enough rural folk that I shouldn't have to know my LAND DESCRIPTION. And okay, my bank is BMO and Montreal is a city, but Quebec is HUGE and has a lot of rural people so what the heckin' heck Canada, fix your stuff this is ridiculous.)

Anyway, that's my rant. Unions are great in some cases and they suck ASS in others.

Oh, and also? Rules in unions for who gets what position are really bad when it comes to EA's, because it means that someone who's been there for forever can choose to take a position they shouldn't have and then screw up a kid. Because they have seniority and are just biding their time until they can retire, so they want the easy positions and don't actually care about the kids anymore. I HAVE SEEN IT HAPPEN SO DON'T @ ME ON THIS. My MIL took all the extra training she could so that she would have both training and seniority and she could choose her postings near the end of her career. But she always cared about the kids, and often when she took over from someone else the kids started doing WAY better across the board because she knew her stuff and she actually cared about them. Funny how that works.

Okay, I'm done now.

And like I said, unions are great in some cases. Not so in others. That's all.

I did not create this summary but I have permission to share it.

Act I, the background:

  • The video opens with a timeline of Nano's history, Kilby glazing herself, and bragging about participation numbers.
  • When Kilby joined the board, she "figured we must be getting five- and six-figure support from big publishers" and "big authors." But, SURPRISE! "Nanowrimo never had that level of backing."
  • Shows some charts (screenshots, below). Note that the charts show that right around half (give or take, depending on the year) of Nano's funding came from charitable contributions.
  • Immediately after showing these charts, she says the organization was "primarily funded by sponsorships and merchandies, and not by charitable contributions." This is a great sign for what's to come. *As of 2020, Nano was "six-figure[s]" in debt. Her time on the board was focused on fundraising.

Act II, the scandal:

  • Kilby claims that the grooming of children ONLY happened off-site, NEVER on nano itself.
  • Kilby claims that the board publicly shared the findings of its investigation into CF after 10 days. It is implied this was done back in MAY.
  • Kilby admits nobody had any relevant training or certification for dealing with children.
  • Kilby claims nobody at NaNo knew who CF/Mod X really was (blatant lie) because they just didn't keep those records, which prevented them from being able to work with child protection organizations.
  • Kilby claims she was tapped for the ED position because she "understood youth-facing organizations" and "had experience with the required state-mandated training." No evidence of this understanding or experience is supplied.
  • More self-glazing
  • "Our top priority is, and was, child safety." lol
  • Kilby claims they implemented staff background checks "immediately" (later in the video, she'll claim that some unspecified number of people had been "vetted" and were working with the org again).
  • Further claims that they "developed an advice content [sic]" aimed at teaching minors how to be safe online. ….where? who knows?
  • Claims they started verifying educators on YWP.

Act III, the community:

  • Forums: Inconsistent moderations, outdated TOS. Saw problematic, unaddressable behavior. Couldn't maintain the integrity of the space.
  • One of the problems was that they had "encouraged" "volunteers" to set up "unofficial" Discords and facebook groups with the Nano name. "Nobody under nanowrimo's authority was moderating those groups." Using resources to deal with issues from these "unaffiliated" groups.
  • "The number of people who view themselves as experts by virtue of how long they've been doing Nanowrimo… numbered in the tens of thousands." [The salt really starts here]

Act IV, the fallout:

  • ED job was "bigger than rebuilding after an educational crisis" [because you're so good at that, clearly]
  • When Kilby took over, there were more than a dozen existing labor violations.
  • Participation had been declining since before 2020, fell off a cliff.
  • Sponsor money in March 2023: $310k. Sponsor money in March 2024: $125k
  • 2023's funding shortfall was equal to 20% of their total annual budget
  • "We were operating outside of our mission." Claims they became an "advocacy group that actively lobbied for authors." No further specifics of how, for who, or to whom are provided.
  • We COULD recover from this, except for not having money.

Act V: Conclusion (why is there still 10 minutes left in the video??)

  • Nano is shutting down.
  • Website will stay up "as long as possible, but we cannot guarantee a specific end date" [because I don't know what the host's non-payment policies are or when the check will bounce]
  • We were going to merge with another writing org, but they noped out when they saw our debt.
  • "Other potential supporters" were scared off by mean, dastardly 'ol REDDIT
  • "Many people who withheld their support, or supported us anonymously, told us that the tone of the community was a big issue."
  • The press was mean to us and inaccurate about our position on AI. (what press? Youtubers??)
  • Kilby claims they TURNED DOWN "a number of" AI sponsors because it "went against our mission."
  • "The real alternative to the organization closing, and I can't say this enough, would have been for us to been funded [sic] by the community." No kidding?
  • "Community funding shouldn't have been a problem."
  • The collapse of Nano was because of things that happened before I got here (financial mismanagement), but it absolutely wasn't because of AI or a scandal. Don't put it in the newspaper that it was because of AI or a scandal. Those were just a coincidence.
  • Thank you to everyone I fired, drove away, etc. etc.
Avatar
Reblogged

So Nanowrimo is actually dead.

After 25 years of operation, Nanowrimo is shutting down.

An email came out in the hours approaching April Fools

A video was attached to the email, which can be viewed here:

The video is on Kilby’s channel and not the long dead Nanowrimo channel. The video is full of…

Kilby logic, but there is some relevant information contained within.

If have anything on Nanowrimo you need to get off the site, take it now. The site will likely not be around for too much longer.

Despite everything that the organisation has been through, the closure of a 25 year old nonprofit is still a tragedy, and my heart goes out to everyone that’s grieving from this. Nano has hurt a lot of people, but it meant a lot to so many, and I will be sorry to see that go.

Even if I don’t agree with many things in the recent video, I can agree with the sentiment of one slide.

I will update you all if and when relevant information comes out. Despite everything, I now doubt that this will be my last post.

an ornithologist pointed a microphone at a bird sitting alone on a wire and caught the sound of the bird singing a song at a decibel so low that it would be impossible for another bird to hear it, meaning the bird was singing quietly to itself I love life

"average cat owner spends 3 years in prison" factoid actualy just statistical error. average owner spends 0 years in prison. Miette's mother, who kicked her body like the football and went to jail for One Thousand Years is an outlier adn should not have been counted

I love how every single Georg post observes the original's typo

i like that you said "observe" instead of "preserve," implying this has religious importance.

Avatar
Reblogged

As you guys know, I study entrepreneurship, and I'm working with other people on a project, so i'd be great if yall send me a DM if you know any professionals who work with children(18 or 21 and below) with speech impediments, autism or adhd.

Reblogging this would help :) Background:

we're researching rn to help these kids. I live in south east asia, or a low income country, a third world country and whatnot, and we're aiming to create an innovative product to help these children.

In our culture, the toughest survives, and it's not good for kids with special needs once they grow up. Your help on this is greatly appreciated :D

Send me a dm, I'll gladly introduce real doofy to ya!

Pete Buttigieg is a next-level public speaker.

A third-trimester abortion has to be the most devastating moment in a person's life.

Too many opponents of abortion will never process these situations. They will put themselves in someone else's shoes.

Also, if the fetus has reached viable status it's not an abortion anyway. It's a birth. Usually if you're considering a third-trimester early delivery like that the child has severe complications that are incompatible with life anyway, or continuing the pregnancy will have severely detrimental effects on the mother. It's something we discussed when I was hospitalised during my pregnancy; we were lucky that we didn't have to deliver early, but there was no certainty given the circumstances. The doctors explained viability, and their goal was to get us at least to viability, even though if we had to deliver then we'd be looking at a lot of potential problems for our child.

Very few of these situations end up like that one woman whose fetus was injected with something (I forget the details but I did read her account) so it would die in the womb and then be delivered as a stillbirth. And in that situation, I believe the consensus was that the infant would suffer horrendously following a live birth, so it was more humane to have it go to sleep in the womb and just not wake up.

I am not pro-abortion. However, I think we all make the best choices we can given the information we have at the time, and I think that people should be able to easily access safe abortions if they decide that is the best choice for them at that time. And so, because I am not an asshole, if a friend of mine came to me and said they needed someone to go with them for an abortion, I would be that person for them. They already know what I think, so I wouldn't say it again. I would be there for them in that moment and be the support they need, not the Judgy McJudgerson who doesn't care to try and understand others' lives and situations.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.