"The Penitent Magdalene" ~ by Francesco Lupicini
bible says after we're resurrected not a single hair on our heads will be lost. rip to women who spent a fortune on laser hair removal. god does not care and hairy mother mary will be gluing that shit back on w tender loving care one by one
me looking at hair removal ads: i don't think my mother, inventor of Jesus Christ, would be too pleased to hear about this
Love, after all, is the only way God can be known. In the stillness of prayer, the heart and the will can accomplish what human reason never could attain. While God cannot be thought, God can be loved, the Cloud author declared. This capacity of love to grasp what the mind cannot is emphasized repeatedly in the tradition. "Love,” says Merton, "enters the darkness and lays hands upon what is its own! Love astounds the intellect with vivid reports of a transcendent Actuality which minds can only know, on earth, by a confession of ignorance. And so, when the mind admits that God is too great for our knowledge, love replies: 'know Him.'"
Belden C. Lane, The Solace of Fierce Landscapes: Exploring Desert and Mountain Spirituality
O God, Whenever I listen to the voice of anything You have made— The rustling of the trees The trickling of water The cries of birds The flickering of shadow The roar of the wind The song of the thunder, I hear it saying: “God is One! Nothing can be compared with God!”
— Rabi'a al-Adawiyya, Women of Sufism: A Hidden Treasure, (2003)
do you take any interest in liberation theology? if so, do you recommend any books/papers about it?
my recs—alves theology of human hope, yountae beyond man, keller political theology, moltmann theology of hope, rivera poetics of the flesh, rivera-pagán god the liberator, rose theology of failure, sobrino christology at the crossroads or christ the liberator, spivak can the subaltern speak, ateek justice and only justice, boff ecclesiogenesis, freire pedagogy of the oppressed, tonstad god and difference (esp chapter on abortive ecclesiology), segundo liberation of theology, thurman jesus and the disinherited, liew and segovia colonialism and the bible, menéndez-antuña bridging the interpretive abyss, tinker spirit and resistance. the rest i'm sure you know—cone, williams, gutiérrez
The Annunciation (1785) by Francisco Goya
"Christianity is the only major world religion to have as its central focus the suffering and degradation of its God. The crucifixion is so familiar to us, and so moving, that it is hard to realize how unusual it is as an image of God." Churches sometimes offer Christian education classes under the title "Why Did Jesus Have to Die?" This is not really the right question. A better one is, "Why was Jesus crucified?" The emphasis needs to be, not just on the death, but on the manner of the death. To speak of a crucifixion is to speak of a slave's death. We might think of all the slaves in the American colonies who were killed at the whim of an overseer or owner, not to mention those who died on the infamous Middle Passage across the Atlantic. No one remembers their names or individual histories; their stories were thrown away with their bodies. This was the destiny chosen by the Creator and Lord of the universe: the death of a nobody. Thus the Son of God entered into solidarity with the lowest and least of all his creation, the nameless and forgotten, "the offscouring [dregs] of all things" (1 Cor. 4:13).
—Fleming Rutledge, The Crucifixion: Understanding the Death of Jesus Christ (p.75)
Saint Lucy (detail, 1476) Carlo Crivelli
“God poured me out like milk and curdled me like cheese” sounds like a post you’d find on tumblr dot com, but it is in fact Job 10:10
Job would’ve done numbers on Tumblr if he live-blogged his experience. Probably would’ve gotten much the same responses too
The Circumcision of Christ (1605) by Peter Paul Rubens
Aertgen Claesz van Leyden (attributed to), The Raising of Lazarus (detail), 1530 - 1535. Oil on panel, 69.7 × 28cm. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.