this post is already doing numbers so idc if you reblog this addition or not, but this was specifically in reference to fansly cracking down on specific fetish creators, starting with slightly niche areas like hypno and ageplay under bullshit claims over "dubious consent" (in and of itself, a kink umbrella), as well as public/exhibition kinks with stringent privacy rules (ie; must be in a backyard that is properly fenced off and hidden from view of others). I've seen these changes 'justified' and even brushed off by some larger creators in that space, or moralized as 'oh fansly doesn't like making these changes either, it just wants to stay in mastercard/visa's good graces :( don't be mad guys'
It wasn't until fansly wholesale banned furry nsfw of any kind, including anthro, with the reasoning being that it's "simulated bestiality" that it received heavier backlash.
banning kink art, even kinks you find repugnant, isn't a "stepping stone" towards censorship. it's censorship straight up.