Avatar

This Is My Normal Face

@musical-chick-13 / musical-chick-13.tumblr.com

If there's a homicidal, emotionally complex female character, I probably like her. Adlock is OTP. Cersei Lannister is best girl. Area woman cannot have a popular fandom opinion to save her life.

Professional Cersei Lannister and River Song stan.

NOTE: I blog a fair amount about Jaime/Cersei in a romantic context because they are one of the biggest ships I have. THIS MEANS THERE WILL BE CANON FICTIONAL INCEST ON THIS BLOG. IF THAT IS GOING TO BOTHER YOU, THEN THIS IS NOT THE BLOG FOR YOU.

There are a lot of topics/fandoms on here, but the big mainstays are: Doctor Who (especially the Moffat and Chibnall eras), Game of Thrones, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, mental health activism, Shakespeare, music of all kinds (including musicals and opera), and whatever anime I've latched onto at the moment. I love messy, horrible women and unpopular characters. For a more comprehensive list of media and ships you'll find on this blog, feel free to check out my about page!

~THIS BLOG SUPPORTS TRANS PEOPLE AND DOES NOT SUPPORT T.E.R.F.S.~

Things I have written and/or made (minors do not interact with my mature and/or explicit fics!)

Also, stan Hot Milk

Saying that men are impacted equally or nearly as much as women by sexism or that it should be a goal of feminism to heal men’s wounded egos is so goddamn ridiculous. You can’t throw your hands in the air and say “can’t we all just get along?” as a response to thousands of years of systematic oppression. Not to mention the negative impacts of “masculinity” upon men are all brought on by sexism and homophobia. The fragile masculine ego is the result of men’s belief in their own inherent supremacy over women and if you think it’s a prerogative of feminism to comfort men about not always living up to their self-imposed expectation of being superior to women then you have a severe misunderstanding of what feminism is and you either need to re-evaluate that or be honest about the fact that you are not a feminist at all, but in fact opposed to any sort of recognition of or response to women’s oppression by men.

I think lumping all concerns about plagiarism via generative AI into “you’re shilling for copyright law” is disingenuous at best. With respect to academic writing, someone using my ideas/words in their own work without citing me directly affects not only my career but the overall impact of my research on the field— and it does this despite the fact that I don’t own the work, because any research I do within the scope of my employment at a university is considered property of the university. Citations and recognition are often the only things people receive back from publishing papers, especially in certain subfields. Citations are also both a very tangible form of social currency and a way to track progressions of ideas within a field. If someone cites my work, not only will more people go back to that work and read it, but people will be able to track the evolution of research and knowledge in the field. If someone uses it without citing, the trail ends there— you can’t trace the research backwards, because you don’t know it’s derivative of someone else’s research at all. Not only that, but given the propensity of generative AI writing to make mistakes it is potentially a massive misrepresentation of the research done to date, which would have its own obviously deleterious effects.

I LOVE FRIENDSHIP. BEST INVENTION EVER. BEING WITH FRIENDS >>>>>>>> EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

SHIP TAG GAME!!!

Thank you to @ichabodcranemills 💜

Rules: Without naming them, post a gif of ten of your favorite ships (any media), then tag people to do the same. I AM TAGGING EVERYONE WHO SEES THIS AND WANTS TO DO IT!!!

I just picked the first ten to come to mind, so don't take this as an Official List™ of any kind.

If I can be exceptionally petty for a second.

Very funny to look back at 2019 when season 8 was airing, during which you could find endless posts of "Suck it JC shippers, WE won, you're SHIT" only for 8x05 to come out like. A week or two later. And then. You know.

#I DON'T EVEN HATE THE OTHER SHIP#LIKE. TRUST ME I GET IT. I UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LIKE IT. I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST IT EXISTING.#EVEN IF I *DID* HATE IT THAT WOULDN'T MATTER BECAUSE THESE ARE FICTIONAL CHARACTERS.#I'LL EVEN STAND BY THE DECISION TO HAVE SAID RIVAL SHIP GO THERE™ BRIEFLY FOR THE SAKE OF THE THEMES™ AND HIS CHARACTER ARC#AND HONESTLY FOR HER ARC TOO!!!!#I DON'T EVEN HATE THAT THAT HAPPENED#but. you know. I mention...not even SHIPPING the thing I ship. just like. wearing a t-shirt with an unrelated quote from my girl. or#mentioning 'hey I think this character is neat'. and then. okay let's take a tally.#1) got harassed by a merchandiser when I was trying to purchase a t-shirt 2) got asked by MULTIPLE PEOPLE if I 'supported incest irl'#3) was publicly hit on in a really creepy way at a con by a panel moderator 4) was randomly harassed by OTHER strangers at cons in the wild#5) got one of the only instances of repeated actual honest-to-god anon hate I've ever had 6) had a friend's ex-boyfriend make really gross#speculations about my sex life TO SAID FRIEND and 7) was made to sit through a guy who was ostensibly trying to date me go on a#whole tirade of every horrible thing he wanted to do to this character#like. I am NOT making things up when I say that people for real gave me unacceptable levels of shit over A FICTIONAL CHARACTER.#NOT EVEN JUST ONLINE!!! MOST OF THIS WAS *IN REAL LIFE*!!!!!!!!!#like. okay fine maybe no one gets hurt when you hate a fictional woman BUT I. A REAL WOMAN. GET HURT WHEN YOU HARASS ME#FOR NO FUCKING REASON!!!!!!!!#tw: harassment#tw: incest mention#obligatory 'not everyone is like this' like genuinely like what you like hate what you hate I do NOT care#just don't bring REAL LIFE PEOPLE into it

My #1 recurring thing as an editor is to guide people away from writing shyly and defensively. If you preempt aggression and try defuse it in your writing itself, you are showing your belly. The audience wants blood.

If you write with the expectation of being hated, you are writing for your haters. This is exactly what they want. So the more you do it, the more of your readers will be haters.

Thing is. Sometimes I'm relatively sure I won't like how a topic is handled in a work of fiction, based on what I've seen people say about said work or based on glimpses of the work itself. This makes me, of course, not want to watch/read/etc. the thing. But also. I know that my original assessment might be unfair because I haven't. Actually watched/read/etc. the story.

Also, you cannot be a feminist and say that you think certain women "deserve" to be raped or abused. You also cannot be a feminist and say that Certain Groups Of Women "deserve" to have any accusations of assault or abuse they make immediately discarded.

Genuinely, with all of the disrespect I am capable of conveying in typed text, you give up all right to call yourself a feminist if you believe those things. You do not belong in this movement and you are not a safe person to be around.

THIS POST AND THIS BLOG SUPPORT TRANS WOMEN. THEY DO NOT SUPPORT T/RFS.

I feel like one of the things I don't see get mentioned a whole lot in the discussions of r/df/ms and why their rhetoric is harmful is that...intentionally or not, it comes across that they just. Hate women.

In addition to "men aren't capable of being nice, the best we can do is separate completely" (unhelpful and cynical doomer-ism), and "women are inherently more [insert quality here] and are much more well-suited to [x role]" (unhelpful and gender essentialist), and the frequent purity politics they seem to embroil themselves in and how a lot of them make being transphobic the most visible part of their identity (<-which in and of itself necessitates an entirely separate post based on how widespread and insidious of an issue it is)...

I've lost count of the number of times I've seen a self-labeled r/df/m call women married to men "handmaidens" (as if that's not a direct reference to a group of fictional women who were literally legally designated as "baby-makers with no personal identity"). Or suggest that bi women and straight women* are Inherently Tainted by their association with men (sometimes regardless of whether or not these women are even dating or have ever dated men in the first place???), which is. You know. Exactly what misogynistic sects of Christianity say about any woman who ever has sex. Or decry some random woman as "being available to men" (as if that's not exactly what entitled misogynistic men think about every woman). Or suggest that ONLY women like THEM are truly enlightened, every OTHER woman is STUPID and BRAINWASHED, she doesn't know what she wants she can't make any decisions for herself but *I* can because *I'm* not like THOSE women I'm NOT LIKE OTHER (frivolous, stupid, shallow, vapid, slutty) GIRLS.

Like this is literally just misogyny again.

PLEASE tell me you understand how this is just misogyny again.

*and it's absolutely not only lesbians who say this, plenty of women with other identities who identify as r/df/ms do this too--internalized prejudice is a very, very real thing

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.