Pinned
Any question can be answered with “fuck around and find out” and it will always be the right answer
@n0-1-important / n0-1-important.tumblr.com
"Rationalism" is up there with "Objectivism" in terms of "definitionally funny things to call your own belief system".
"Yeah man I've been doing some thinking and philosophy and I've come up with a framework called Being Right"
Calling my personal philosophy Realityism. Yeah, it's a philosophy where I'm uniquely aware of how reality works and base all my conclusions on that. If you're against it, it's because you're refusing to face reality.
Though I can't say that you're refusing to face facts, because I think that's the domain of the Factarians. Don't worry about them, though. Facts can lie to you about what's real, which is whatever I believe.
I was a hardcore Realityist but due to personal beef with the founder due to clear issues in the philosophy of Realityism we're schisming off into Correctism, which is a lot like Realityism except we're Correct about it and the optional support tiers on our forum are slightly more expensive and give you cooler looking badges.
I'm not conceited enough to think that I'm always right. It's just that everyone else is wrong. I don't want to spend any time talking about it with people who claim to share my beliefs because they get it wrong, and also they're all insufferable?
This belief system is so simple I don't even need a name for it.
You can find my sacred texts on Reddit.
Losing my mind at this poor girl in Argentina who found a kitten on the side of the road and adopted it only to find out it was a freaking jaguarundi. Look at that fucking thing. That's a whole ass kiddy cat
Better yet, she got in contact with a local wildlife reserve! She found him and his sister beside a dead animal on the side of the road, apparently quite thin, and assumed they were just abandoned kittens. The female passed shortly afterward but the male was fine- two months later she brought him to the vet and discovered "hey, thats a whole ass jungle cat." There's a good chance Tito will be back in the wild someday, even! IMHO, two kittens on the side of the road, and one didn't make it more than a couple days? they probably WERE abandoned. just dumb luck they got picked up!
LISTEN to those sweet cheeps. to me I hear that sound and immediately think wild cat, but I think its totally reasonable for a teenager to find a kitten this young and think it was a normal cat. Jaguarundi are also really small!
These are TINY little wildcats!
They have really distinct looking faces and especially ears, but
if a layman ran into one of these things where they werent expecting to see one, I think its pretty reasonable they might assume it was just a weird looking cat
UM GUYS. I JUST NOTICED A CRAZY ISSUE W THE TUMBLR UPDATE.
YOU CAN SEE THE ICONS OF ANONS SOMETIMES.
The way I was able to recognize several anons in one of my inboxes bc of this error. Oh my god. Guys. This isn’t supposed to happen.
Weighing in to say:
The profile pictures I see next to anon asks are profile pictures that belong to other, non-anon asks in my ask box also. Some info
Which is still a bad bug! Considering it makes it look like a long-time follower of mine sent me a spam ask.
And is worse if, say, one of these was anon hate.
But it's NOT the anon's real identity. It's a neighboring ask asker's identity
So if you have anon hate in your inbox that looks like it's attributed to your dear friend, who sends you lovely asks all the time, it was Not them.
Thanks @thepatchycat for being a test subject. As you can see the icon being attributed to this ask is NOT the patchy cat
The pictured icon belongs to @watchingforcomets who sent me a nice ask about nail polish yesterday which I have not yet answered!
Archive of Our Own (ao3), the internet
mutual did not see the post i reblogged specifically for them. 13 dead, 65 injured.
mutual reblogged the post i reblogged specifically for them from someone else. 78 dead, 1250 injured.
my soft and comfortable mama
I desperately wish people would start actually reading the AO3's TOS before confidently making 'user guides' to the AO3 that are just blatantly, flatly wrong.
Yes the AO3 has banned content. They do not allow anything that's illegal under US law - though US law, importantly, does not ban fictional depictions of things - and they do not allow any commercial content. That includes your ko-fi link, or mentions that you do fic commissions. If you do post fic commissions to AO3 and want to mention the commissioner, the fic is a 'request' from the commissioner. This protects the AO3 and you from copyright law.
No the AO3 is not 'a creative fanfiction archive'. It is a fandom archive. Your meta, insights, and theories are absolutely welcome and encouraged there. AO3 also encourages you to post other types of fanworks, like fan videos, podfics, and art, but unfortunately isn't able to natively host those like it does text, so fic has kind of become what it's known for. That absolutely does not mean that other types of fanwork aren't allowed, or are discouraged by the site culture! Anybody who tells you otherwise is just plain wrong!
And another thing:
IT’S AN ARCHIVE - A STORAGE SPACE
IT’S A LIBRARY, NOT A SOCIAL MEDIA SITE
So… (sigh) TAG YOUR FICS APPROPRIATELY AND PEOPLE WILL FIND YOUR STUFF.
That’s it.
If you see someone deliberately adding incorrect tags to their fic "for reach," you can and should report them for spam.
And if you deliberately add incorrect/non-applicable tags to your fic, odds are good that you'll be reported for spam. So don't do it.
@leaving-earth requested the least seen movies. So here we have a list of the top 100 films that tumblr users reported as having heard of but not having seen per results on @haveyouseenthismovie-poll.
TW: A couple of films famous for racism are on this list so please enter at your own risk.
Given the number of titles on this list that belong to relatively obscure films which later received much more popular remakes, I have to wonder how many respondents are unwittingly inflating their tally because they didn't notice it says Little Shop of Horrors (1960) and not Little Shop of Horrors (1986).
free healthcare should include teeth actually