Pinned
TEMA RE-INTRODUCTION YAY
(as a celebration for getting over 200 followers)
โข The Shadows of Pygmalion (personal fav): two canon necrophiles who label themselves as such, implied pseudo-incest, l0li x teen, dubcon somno, sexual assault, violence
โข Nurse Love Addiction: pseudo-incest, twincest, teacher x (adult) student, toxic yuri, cannibalism, implied necrophilia, forced amnesia, cheating, manipulation
โข Lilja and Natsuka Painting Lies: minor x adult
โข Malcatra's Maiden: pseudo-incest, manipulation, dubcon, violence, child abuse, toxic yuri (also check out other games by nadia nova!)
โข Girl's Monachopsis: pseudo-incest, dubcon
โข Without a Voice: toxic yuri, cannibalism
โข Kindred Spirits on the roof: teacher x student
โข Sistely Bliss: sister x sister
โข Oto-hime: toxic yuri, cannibalism
"but what if men start identifying as lesbians/women start identifying as gays?"
Whatever. Why should we care? It isn't doing harm. The lgbtq community has always meant to be ourselves without any want to fit in, because being a faggot has always meant being weird. If you say "it's making homophobes harder to accept us," please know that we aren't existing to appeal to others, especially ones that irrationally hated us from the start. Fuck off.
Antis: ew cope differently!!! You're an awful person for being proship
Me: ok, I'll use age regression, cuz you guys are ok with that
Antis: HEY NO YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO BE AN INNOCENT BABY THAT'S MANIPULATING!!!
Me: Ok, I'll return to just shipping
Antis: *anger noises*
(Actually happened to me but condensed)
๐ก DNI: Radq/TransID + supporters ๐ People who's DNIs I'm in. ๐ก
or:
"youre just playing out your pedophilic fantasies and acting like it's not sexual!!"
The argument that โfiction affects realityโ is inherently flawed, as even those who advocate for it often contradict themselves without realizing it. Allow me to illustrate this with an example. If you were to ask an โantiโ whether media depicting homosexuality makes someone gay, their answer would most likely be โnoโ (unless they hold conservative views). However, if you then asked whether media depicting age-gap relationships makes someone a pedophile, their answer would almost certainly be โyes.โ
This contradiction exposes a clear rhetorical fallacy and highlights the hypocrisy at play. Historically, people have frequently blamed fictional depictions of controversial actions as a means of justifying their own moral perspectives, rooted in a sense of inherent moral superiority.
Doesnโt it make more sense that reality influences fiction, rather than the other way around? After all, fiction is fundamentally rooted in real-world experiences and concepts.
Friendly reminder that if you label yourself as proship but you harass others for having squicks/limits/triggers, pleaae stop calling yourself that :)
You're not proship, you're an asshole!
Similarly, if you're an anti but enjoy murder, gore and other things- call comes from inside the house
I am feeling a bit controversial rn up to you to feed my need for attention /j
aaaaa thank you!! There are people who call themselves proshipper that went "I'm a proshipper but (says something offensive to other shippers over ship)" or plays the role of a rage-baiter. Twitter is always guilty of this.
I don't think you're a proshipper anymore if you're rage baiting since that's a job of an anti. I've been using the internet for years, rage baiters are mostly known for harassing people.
And also, you're not a proshipper if you're putting the life of a minor in danger especially when you're roughly around the age of 20s-30s or higher. Stop and self reflect the moment this minor is showing signs of fear and paranoia over you.
Educate them, not threaten them!
Feel free to add on what you've learned about disability!
runs for my life from them and you seeing this