theres been endless discourse about pathologic already and i dont want to stoke the fire but i feel like repeating the same theories and criticisms of the text sometimes has people totally ignoring stuff like sruts. i guess now that the quarantine demo just came out and theres a lot of new stuff in it mechanically and narratively, the focus naturally just kind of shifts
i know there will be different people working on every game like different localization, different art. and of course new fans that start with this entry. so maybe im jumping the gun but when patho4, or however theyre gonna call it, is announced it will be really sad to inevitably see sruts pushed aside again š¤” i guess im part of the problem because i will be following it and participating in fandom regardless.
there are definitely parts of pathologic that i dont like. same with the void its not like it tries to be "progressive" so to speak or make a concrete point it just kind of puts vague ideas forward, so i think its fine to pick and choose your favorite parts to focus on. in any game. especially considering theyre pretty dated now. its harder in pathologic because theres a lot more lore and text even outside the game like in the corpus, forums or old concept docs, even the artbook, but that doesnt make the canon itself something you can totally ignore like dringe, sruts and so on. if its a core part of the game but its so bad that people just look away, that just makes it even more apparent and more important to call attention to.
idk, every fandom had the same problems and the same quirks. im not implying fandom is its own monolithic entity or that theres something inherently wrong in participating in it. just putting my own take out there