Avatar

PostSatire

@postsatire / postsatire.tumblr.com

Quamquam ridentem dicere verum quid vetat?
Avatar
Reblogged

Clonmel Protests For Clonmel People

Far-right agitators from all over the country are converging on a housing development of 82 modular homes in Clonmel earmarked for asylum-seekers.

"We've seen lots of unvetted males being bussed in to shout abuse at vulnerable people," said one concerned Clonmel resident. "We don't know where they're from, or if they've been involved in any kind of criminal activity."

Other native Clonmel people were not so diplomatic.

"Go back to where you came from!" shouted another concerned Clonmel resident. "Just get back on your bus and go home!"

"We already have enough far-right goons in this town already," said another very concerned Clonmel resident. "You've seen what it's like on Saturdays. We just can't handle anymore."

  • Subscribe to print edition for more.
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Too many outsiders up in here.

Avatar
Reblogged

Special Israel Edition

A collection of headlines from our articles on the current conflict in Gaza.

Palestinians to Blame for Child Deaths "What sort of parents would raise their children in a war zone?" asked an IDF spokesman.

IDF To Enforce Minimum Diversity Quotas "It’s important to have representation while murdering Palestinian children," said an IDF spokesman.

Israelis Insist On Seeing Gaza As "Half Full" "Our experts are telling us it's all about framing," said an IDF spokesman.

Zionists Annex Moral High Ground "Brave IDF soldiers are destroying everything as we speak and the bulldozers are on their way," said an IDF spokesman.

Record Number of IDF Injuries Reported "Over a hundred of our active service members are reporting carpal tunnel syndrome in their aiming hand," said an IDF spokesman.

Israel Signs Ceasefire Deal "We have committed to a week's ceasefire if Israel wins the Eurovision," said an IDF spokesman.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

This is a very brief but good summary of the pipeline from “guy who wants to talk to girls” to “nasty white supremacist transphobic human trash”. I don’t even know what to do about it if someone you know is watching Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson videos and taking them seriously.

And when the Second Amendment itself get amended, I assume you will defend the new constitution with as much fervor.

These laws will change based on the changing needs of the population. They have before (prohibition). They will again.

Are you defending “the constitution” or just your personal opinion?

When the Second Amendment gets re-written to accommodate gun control (and at some point, the growing pile of dead middle-class white high-school kids will force them to), will you still defend the constitution? 

If not, then you will concede, however reluctantly, that you’re not defending “the constitution” at all. What you’re doing is something else. What do you think that might be?

Avatar
Reblogged
Avatar
marxistbarbie-deactivated202109

ERASE the idea that America saved lives by dropping two atomic bombs on Japan from your minds. ERASE the idea that it was anything more than a political move to scare Russia and also to satiate US curiosity as to the true ability of nuclear weapons. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were not military bases. They were heavily populated civilian cities chosen precisely bc the U.S. wanted to see how many people an atomic bomb could kill in one go. Japan was on the verge of surrendering, the U.S. literally wanted to test out their nuclear weapons on people that they deemed disposable. That is it. If those bombs were dropped by any nation other than the US veryone involved would have been tried as war criminals.

Japan attacked a military target thousands of miles away from any American land. America dropped two atomic bombs on concentrated civilian populations on the Japanese mainland.

We need to be able to speak these truths without feeling the need to add a “but”.

This tells us nothing about feminism or movies.

All it tells us is that you can make an interesting* movie sound boring. This is called “editorializing”. If you need to editorialize, it means you do not have faith in the facts alone to make your case.

*I’ve never seen The Lion King because I’m not a child, so I have no idea if it’s “interesting” or not. But the thing doesn’t work without that assumption so I’m guessing enough people liked it.
Avatar
Reblogged

Christians are only Christians because they want to sin. 

Perhaps the best evidence that Atheism is an intellectually vacant position is the Atheists need to create straw men to rationalize their stance. The crux of the issue in this pathetic cartoon is the concept of “sin”. The word sin has its roots in archery. Archers would shoot at a target with concentric rings from a great distance. The outer ring of the target was worth no points (but you still see that the arrow hit the target). In tournaments a judge would be placed down range, partly to prevent cheating, to observe the arrows strike the target and call out the result. If the arrow completely missed the target the judge would call out “sin” — you’ve completely missed the target.

Why is this important?

Because the real distinction between the Atheist and the Christian in this cartoon is their belief, or disbelief, in objective truth and objective reality — The “target” one must completely miss to “sin”. An atheist believes that morality is a construct and, by implication, reality is ultimately subjective — there is no target. This sets up two diametrically opposed ways of looking at the world:

The Christian, by believing in objective truth, implicitly believes that there are objective moral standards. It also follows from these premises, that there must be something just, moral and rational manifest in the Universe (aka God). The inductive proof of purpose: If purpose exists then there is a source from which purpose is derived (an author), otherwise all purpose (all meaning) is illusory and all logic fallacy. A Christian believes, given a truth out there, that, to be in harmony with the universe, he must be in conformity to this truth. A Christian acknowledges his own limits and lack of understanding and contemplates ‘mysteries”: While there is an objective truth, it is beyond his understanding. A Christian must rely on narrative to help him make sense of the vastness of reality. He knows his narrative isn’t “the truth”, he is a truth seeker attempting to move closer to something greater than himself. To the degree that his narrative is in error, the Christian will err — sometimes to the point of “sin”. It is, however, a Christian’s belief in, and love of, objective truth, reality and morality that drives his quest and calls him to repentance. Believing in a just, moral God, that loves and calls to its creation (and, yes, that can all be derived logically, much as the Stoics did), his desire to know and conform to God’s will absolves him of his sins - he is a participant as the universe mold him to it’s ends — dancing with God.

An atheist believes that he is the author of his own reality. His narrative, to him, is the truth (to the degree he believes there is truth)— he is, in essence, his own God. He rejects an objective God because his narrative cannot contain, let alone explain, the vastness of reality with all it’s seemingly contradictory and cruel manifestations. He must retain an unsupported belief in purpose to retain some semblance of sanity but he believes, absurdly, that purpose can be self-created (again, implicitly making himself the author of reality, aka, God). The cognitive dissonance of this world view allows him to assimilate Christian principles of objective reality, morality and truth (the foundations of western “Science” — which we used to call “philosophy”: love of Truth) without attributing them to their source. Ultimately, the Atheist seeks to make the universe conform to his own will and rebels against his own conformity. A Christian would quickly recognize this worldview as Satanic and it would not take a lot of inquiry to see how often atheism is the gateway drug to Satanism.

No.

The purpose of that cartoon is to demonstrate the poverty of the theist position that atheists “just want to sin”. That’s the entire purpose of that cartoon.

This guy appear to not only have missed that point, but typed a whole bunch of words that are essentially meaningless babble. It’s standard presuppositionalist nonsense. Just read that second paragraph above and try to make sense of any of it. Good luck.

Avatar
Reblogged

The worst form of pseudo-philosophy is shit like "everything in reality is either Chaos or Order," "everything in reality is either Masculine or Feminine," "everything in reality is either Dark or Light" like dude you haven't discovered some deep truth about the universe you've literally just discovered Adjectives. I can say everything in reality is either Heavy or Light depending on whether I can lift it over my head but that doesn't give you any profound fuckin insight I'm just describing shit and yes this is about jordan peterson

Forcing your reality into a series of clearly-defined boxes that don’t explain anything is the opposite of philosophy.

There is a serious and worrying undercurrent of racism and white supremacy in the coverage of the Ukraine invasion.

And yes, if you think there is something inherently superior about Ukrainians over Syrians or Palestinians or Yemenis, that is racism. And if you think there is something inherently superior about white people over brown people, that is white supremacy.

Here is some video footage of Africans being refused entry into a train taking people from Ukraine to Poland.  Are you OK with this?

I’ve regularly come across people who will honestly question my “feminist credentials” if I refuse to support Margaret Thatcher or some other woman who is setting us all back.

My refusal to support women who disempower other women (or who support policies which disempower other women) cannot be used as evidence that I’m not a “real feminist”, whatever the hell that means.

Fairly fucking obviously.

Because you keep asking them?

It doesn’t matter to me what you look like or how heavy you are, but it matters to some people, and most of those people are women, not men.

Avatar
Reblogged
Avatar
safavibes-deactivated20230210

What's happening right now in the Ukraine is awful, but also if you're a Muslim and not white enough you can go fuck yourself

Please think of the reasons we’re all so upset about what’s happening in the Ukraine and ask yourself whether or not those reasons also apply to other areas (like Palestine, Somalia, Yemen etc.). And if they do, why do you think you’re not upset by these? What do these places have in common that does not apply to the Ukraine?

What’s happening right now in the Ukraine is awful but if you’re a Muslim and / or not white enough, you can go fuck yourself.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.