Listen pal, it's completely valid to not like emoji pronouns because they're inaccessible. And frankly, I'd be bitter too if I tried to point out how something was inaccessible and people came and attacked me instead of taking the time to analyze WHY it's being called inaccessible and any potential SOLUTIONS to that problem!
Because I HAVE seen potential solutions people have done with them! Including how they can be spelled out for people who can't see emojis/screenreader stuff and other accessibility issues.
The LGBTQ+ community is full of BS like ableism, racism, etc. And people want to pretend it doesn't exist by being defensive trolls instead of thinking of solutions to a very obvious problem. Because emoji pronouns are just not accessible. Some screen readers read emotes but some emotes also have really strange names that will make it extremely confusing when the reader reads them aloud.
This doesn't invalidate people that like them or want to use them, but if they want people to use them who are disabled or impairments...they should make sure they can be used by those people?? Good people don't like to not use people's pronouns but sometimes there are circumstances where it's literally not possible and sometimes we have to make accomodations to be respected and respect others in the process without compromising anyone's identities 🤷