Avatar

i shall wear the creditors' loathing with pride

@technofeudalism / technofeudalism.tumblr.com

Avatar

Hello, Thank You For Being Here (Pt. 4)

  • age: 30+
  • pronouns: any
  • status: unavailable/partnered
  • side blogs: @toocoolforghoul / @in-the-woods
  • socialist with midwestern characteristics
  • anti-imperalist/anti-colonialist/anti-racist
  • autistic and itโ€™s obvious
  • hip hop/hardcore/punk aficionado
  • brbabcs/iasip/the wire super fan

note: although not explicitly NSFW, some reblogs or other contents of this blog may contain NSFW material such as suggestive text posts or memes. i do not interact with minors, zero exceptions. some other things you may expect to see on this blog include:

  • leftist agitprop
  • current events
  • politics & world news
  • history
  • art - photography, paintings, etc.
  • hip-hop & punk miscellanea
  • climate change grief
  • mental health stuff
  • oc writing (lol)
  • personal diatribes
  • animals
  • absurd/surreal memes
  • silly text posts
  • photos of my dog

here are some additional disclaimers that i ask you be aware of before interacting with my blog:

  • i find DNIs pointless, but if you are a: TERF or transphobe, zionist, religious fundamentalist, or subscribe to otherwise fascist ideology, please fuck off blindfolded directly into oncoming traffic. you are not welcome here.
  • PLEASE DO NOT REBLOG MY POSTS WITH PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE COMMENTS!
  • if i reblog something from one of the aforementioned groups of individuals and you have a problem with that, please address me like you would a stranger at Wal-Mart. i do not respond well to hostile behavior (especially online) and will likely be very mean to you and then block you. again, please don't do it. i'm trying to be a less angry person.
  • my sense of humor is extremely deadpan/sarcastic and sometimes does not translate well to text. if i am being particularly sarcastic, i will try to point it out. please be somewhat charitable. if something seems out of character, ask me for clarification and i'll provide it.
  • i do not participate in back-and-forth arguments or ideological pissing contests. unironically arguing with complete strangers on the internet has been pointless and stupid since 1993. you will get a block. i will not engage. do not waste your time.
  • this blog supports all marginalized and/or oppressed people globally, including all LGBTQ+ individuals, Black people, immigrants, indigenous people, and many others. i do not tolerate any form of racism, anti-semitism, islamophobia or any other hatred on this blog. you will get a block.

you are welcome to reblog anything i post here. if i don't want it reblogged, i will turn reblogs off. pretty simple resolution on my end. otherwise, enjoy your stay. i love you & thanks for stopping by.

Avatar

started rewatching The World At War from 1973 last night about WW2 and the events leading up to it and holy shit. i think i'm going to cut together parts of the first episode and post it here because it could literally have been filmed today and just translated to German. my mind was blown listening to the way people spoke about Hitler and Germany during the run up to the war.

Avatar

Gonna talk about the U.S. like Wikipedia talks about China:

"The situation ofย human rights in the United States has attracted significant criticism from foreign governments, foreign press agencies, and non-governmental organizations, alleging widespread civil rights violations such as detention without trial, forced confessions, torture, restrictions of fundamental rights, andย excessive use of the death penalty."

"The American constitution states that the "fundamental rights" of citizens includeย freedom of speech,ย freedom of the press, theย right to a fair trial,ย freedom of religion,ย universal suffrage, andย property rights. However, in practice, these provisions do not afford significant protection against criminal prosecution by the state.ย The U.S. has limited protections regardingย LGBT rights."

"Although some criticisms of government policies and the ruling party are tolerated, censorship of political speech and information are amongst the harshest in the world and routinely used to prevent collective action. The U.S. also has the most comprehensive and sophisticated Internet censorship regime in the world, with numerous popular social media apps and websites being controlled and censored by state policy.ย The government suppresses popular protests and demonstrations that it considers a potential threat to "social stability". The U.S. additionally uses a massive espionage network of cameras, facial recognition software, sensors, and surveillance of personal technology as a means of social control of persons living in the country"

"Under US economic policy, thousands of private corporations use sensitive personal information to assign individuals a 'credit score,' a legal form of discrimination which incentivizes citizens to make housing, banking and other consumer decisions optimized for maximal profit extraction by financial middlemen"

Avatar

i hate when people say "the media won't talk about this." 98% of the time, the media is actively talking about it. whatever it is, you can google it and there will be at minimum 3 articles from 3 major, mainstream news publications talking about it in great detail. does the media manipulate the message? yes. but they talk about literally everything that people say they don't talk about. they just do it in a way that pacifies most people who lack critical thinking skills and keen media literacy and gives them a reason to see nuance in every issue. this is why the Associated Press isn't the "apolitical, neutral" outlet you think it is. they will always tell the story in a way that benefits the interests of the United States and it's future, even if that means omitting details or lying. it's up to you to be able to recognize those lies, but the media isn't conspiring to "not report" on these things, they're conspiring to fucking lie to you about what they mean.

Avatar
Avatar
timequangle

every single discussion about the fucking signal groupchat makes me feel so insane. "what a display of incompetence! what a failure! let's all make accidental groupchat mistake jokes now" what the fuck are you talking about. it worked. the fact that THIS is the conversation now is literally the point. jeffrey goldberg literally did it again. selling the bombing of the middle east to the public is the entire purpose of his career as a "journalist"

former iof prison guard who spent the past year fully deepthroating the genocidal boot and famously sold the invasion of iraq as something that "will be remembered as an act of profound morality"? "journalist" who literally built his career on manufacturing consent for bombing arabs "accidentally" invited to a top secret group chat about bombing arabs oh no how could this happen? what are you TALKING about. fork found in kitchen! likely place for him to be! my god

Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, has been at the center of a national story after he was โ€œinadvertentlyโ€ included in a group Signal chat with administration officials as they planned a deadly bombing in Yemen. Much of the coverage has focused on the mishandling of military secrets, rather than the impact of the bombings themselves, targeting the poorest country in the Middle East, which the United States has helped bomb and blockade for over a decade. Goldberg is not just an observer: He is contributing to this disregard for Yemeni lives, and his dismissiveness sheds light on why he was an administration media contact to begin with.
In an interview that aired on March 26, Deepa Fernandes, one of the hosts of NPR's โ€œHere and Now,โ€ interviewed Goldberg about the โ€œgroup chat heard 'round the worldโ€ that included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance. During one portion of the interview, Fernandes did something few other journalists are doing. She asked Goldberg about the Yemeni people who were killed in the bombing, which took place on March 15.
Deepa Fernandes: There's little talk of the fact that this attack killed 53 people, as we mentioned, including women and children. The civilian toll of these American strikes. Are we burying the lede here?
Jeffrey Goldberg: Well, those, unfortunately, those aren't confirmed numbers. Those are provided by the Houthis and the Houthi health ministry, I guess. So we don't know that for sure. Yeah, I mean, obviously we're, well, I don't know if we're burying the lede, because obviously huge breaches in national security and safety of information, that's a very, very important story, obviously. And one of the reasons, you know, it's a very important story is that the Republicans themselves consider that to be an important story, when it's Hillary Clinton doing the deed, right? So that's obviously hugely important.
But yeah, I think that covering what's going on in Yemen, the Arab and Iran backed terrorist organization, the Houthis, that are that are firing missiles at Israel and disrupting global shipping and occupy half of Yemen, and all kinds of other things in the US, you know, and the Trump administration criticizing the Biden's response and Europe wants Trump to do more. I mean, yeah, there's, there's a huge story in Yemen. But Yemen is, as you know, is one of the more inaccessible places for Western journalists. So maybe this becomes like a substitute for a discussion of Yemen. I don't know.
Goldberg not only seems unconcerned about the death toll and eager to cast doubt on its veracity, but he also appears unprepared for the question. Itโ€™s as though it didnโ€™t occur to him that the substance of the Signal exchange itselfโ€”the bombingโ€”might be a legitimate topic of conversation, and he seems eager to move on.
This is despite the fact that there is evidence in the exchange itself that the United States hit a civilian site in the bombing. Waltz wrote in the Signal chat that the US military had bombed a residential building. โ€œThe first targetโ€”their top missile guyโ€”we had positive ID of him walking into his girlfriendโ€™s building and itโ€™s now collapsed,โ€ Waltz wrote in the chat, to which JD Vance replied: โ€œExcellent.โ€
Yet, as Nick Turse noted for The Intercept, โ€œSo far, however, there has been little focus on the specifics of the attack, much less discussion of the fact that one of the targets of the March 15 strike was a civilian residence.โ€
The story of US belligerence in Yemen should be a huge one. Since 2015, the US-Saudi coalition has used American manufactured bombs to hit wedding parties, factories, a school bus, and a center for the blind. Itโ€™s difficult to know the exact death toll, but around three years ago, the death toll from direct and indirect consequence of war surpassed 377,000. Direct bombings by both the Biden and Trump administrations threaten a wider war, and have occurred in lockstep with US support for Israel as it has ruthlessly bombed and attacked Gaza since October 7.
Goldberg, of course, was included in that group chat because he was a contact of someone on the administrationโ€™s thread, and his history of laundering the US militaryโ€™s mass atrocities is a good indicator of why. In the lead-up to the US-led war on Iraq, Goldberg was central to peddling the disproven conspiracy theory that Iraq had ties to al-Qaeda, a key lie of the George W. Bush administration, used to justify the invasion. One month before the US started the war, he went on NPR to discuss โ€œPossible Links Between Iraq and al Qaeda and Evidence That the Iraqis May be Trying to Evade Weapons Inspectors.โ€
Goldberg has a long career of uplifting the media narratives of the United States and its allies, including a big piece in 2010 where he floated justifications for a possible Israeli war on Iran. Like many of the Iraq War pushers, Goldbergโ€™s lies about Iraq did not harm his career, but marked its ascent. Under his tenure, the Atlantic has shut out Palestinian voices and stories, as the US has helped Israel wage genocide in Gaza.
Goldbergโ€™s dismissal of Yemeni deaths is not a small detail of this blockbuster story, but a central component. One way to get on the speed dials of high-level officials is to have a proven career of doing their bidding.
As we see wall-to-wall coverage of the Signal leaks on supposed liberal networks like MSNBC, itโ€™s important to remember that the primary scandal is the bombing of Yemen, a reality that the network has long obscured. As The Columnโ€™s Adam Johnson noted in July 2018, at that point it had been a year since MSNBC had mentioned the US backed destruction of Yemen. Yet during that same period, MSNBC had done 455 segments on the Trump-Stormy Daniels affair. As media reports and House Intelligence Committee hearings ignore the human toll of US military attacks, we continue to see the ascent of those who have built their careers on directing public attention away from the people the United States kills.
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
timequangle

"we were asked to make a statement about an oscar winner being beaten and abducted in the exact conditions illuminated by his oscar winning documentary but we have to keep in mind that we can't actually Take A Side because our 11000 global members have many diverse viewpoints! for example many of them would actually want him lynched <3" ok. die.

Avatar
reblogged

every single article, post or mention of a Muslim or Latino person on a Visa or Green Card getting dragged off the street by masked men in broad daylight has the same exact comments: "wow, they're gonna start doing this to citizens soon." some of these people have lived here since they were 8 months old and have lived here for over 30 years. it's very telling that Americans are still are managing to separate them in their head from a "citizen" and that their outrage will be far greater when it's someone who "actually lives here" as if 3 decades in the same country shouldn't qualify you for the same rights as everyone else.

It's not really about citizens vs noncitizens. Replace "citizens" with "white people" and the real worry becomes obvious.

Avatar
reblogged

every single article, post or mention of a Muslim or Latino person on a Visa or Green Card getting dragged off the street by masked men in broad daylight has the same exact comments: "wow, they're gonna start doing this to citizens soon." some of these people have lived here since they were 8 months old and have lived here for over 30 years. it's very telling that Americans are still are managing to separate them in their head from a "citizen" and that their outrage will be far greater when it's someone who "actually lives here" as if 3 decades in the same country shouldn't qualify you for the same rights as everyone else.

this is very much the point, though? like, the point of saying "being a citizen won't protect you from this" is the same point you're making. these are people deeply rooted in their communities being disappeared for their opinions and their race based on a legal technicality, and the point of "they're going to disappear citizens soon" posts is to try and break the default kneejerk response in a lot of people, which is that "oh this could happen to them but not to me, this piece of paper says i'm safe". i'm sorry but pointing that out isn't saying "oh but that's the line that shouldn't be crossed." most people pointing it out, in fact, think literally nobody should be abducted from their streets and communities by the fucking secret police. they're just trying to emphasize that that's what's actually going on, because the media won't. the media will be all "the secretary of state lawfully revoked the visas of another few hundred Bad Terrorist Supporters today, and they were peacefully detained by the Authorities ๐Ÿ˜‡". and this is bad. we live in fascism. it's okay to point that out.

imagine living your entire life and being this naive and optimistic about the country you live in. yeah. everyone in the United States is equally enraged about Green Card and Visa holders being kidnapped off the street. that's why there's hundreds of thousands of people marching to stop it.

no one is actually waiting until this effects them to act. that's crazy talk. there's definitely no historical precedent for that behavior either. people are saying "oh no citizens could be next" out loud over and over and not actually doing anything or forming any sort of meaningful resistance is because of the media, who has been playing videos of Mahmoud Khalil and a whole assortment of other students being charged with terrorism without due process for the last month now, on EVERY major news outlet in the United States.

corporate media simply groomed grown adults into thinking none of this is happening. it isn't antipathy or self preservation or selfishness or xenophobia. and it's just a coincidence that they qualify every statement with "well, if they TRULY weren't supporting Hamas....." as if that matters whatsoever when it comes to the 1st Amendment.

that's why Trump's approval rating has cratered to a devastating *checks notes* 47%.

let's check and see how Americans actually feel about abducting people who aren't "US citizens" right now!

WASHINGTON, March 26 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump gets better marks for his hardline approach to immigration than he does on his handling of the economy, foreign policy or other issues, Reuters/Ipsos polling shows, as the Republican tries to ramp up arrests and deportations. About half of U.S. respondents in recent polls approved of Trump's approach to immigration compared with a little more than a third who thought he was doing a good job dealing with the high cost of living, the other major issue in his 2024 campaign.

wow! i wonder if this number will wind up shifting whatsoever when the first "American Citizen" gets tossed in the back of a van for saying mean things about Elon Musk online. i wonder how people would react to that. i wonder if 49% of the American public would still approve of Trump's "immigration" policies if it was a white, blonde, Christian college student rather than a Muslim from some "weird nation" in the Middle East.

i'm sorry that i insinuated that the American public doesn't see immigrants as citizens or even human beings. it's just a coincidence that 40% of the country approves of putting immigrants in concentration camps while they await deportation. i've simply miscalculated the average American's passion for immigration reform.

Avatar
โ€œA half-century later, it remains a public secret that at least 46 KKL-JNF forests are located on the ruins of former Palestinian villages. American Independence Park, where the names of foreign donors are etched on the Wall of Eternal Life, is superimposed on the villages of Allar, Dayr al-Hawa, Khirbat al-Tannur, Jarash, Sufla, Bayt โ€˜Itab, and Dayr Aban, which were captured, โ€œdepopulatedโ€ of their 4,000 inhabitants, and razed by Israeli state actors in 1948. Nearby, in the hills west of Jerusalem, a park named after Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was established on land where he fought in that same war, land which had been home to 4,600 Palestinians in the villages of Bayt Jiz, Bayt Mahsir, Bayt Susin, Saris, and โ€˜Islin. At Martyrs Forest, six million trees are planted in memory of the victims of the Holocaust; they conceal the ruined villages of Aqqur, Dayr โ€˜Amr, Bayt Umm al-Mays, Khirbat al-โ€˜Umur, and Kasla. The list goes on.โ€
Avatar
Avatar
st-just

This is just very funny to me.

remember: these are machines that are ultimately trained on text data. you feed it court documents, web pages, tweets, social media comments, books, PDFs and increasingly deeper gulfs of endless digital content. it creates a lexicon.

if you want your burgeoning glorified chatbot on steroids to actually be accurate based on the (often stolen) real life data you've spent an infinite amount of hours feeding it and fine-tuning it to perfection to gain institutional legitimacy and to be seen as reliable among CEOs trying to lay off 75% of their staff over the next 5 years, then you can't ask it to just completely ignore millions upon millions of words typed on the internet in the last decade calling you a stupid piece of shit. it would undermine the very real, existing reality shared among hundreds of millions of people. history has already been written, big guy.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.