Avatar

World History Encyclopedia on Tumblr

@whencyclopedia / whencyclopedia.tumblr.com

Nicias: The Cautious General of Athens

Nicias, or Nikias, was a prominent Athenian politician and general during the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BCE). He advocated for a cautious approach, often opposing the aggressive strategies of leaders like Cleon and Alcibiades. Nicias negotiated the Peace of Nicias with Sparta in 421 BCE, temporarily ending the war.

Early Life and Career

  • Nicias was from a wealthy aristocratic family and used his wealth to influence Athenian politics.
  • He owned 1,000 slaves who worked in the silver mines of Laurium.
  • Known for his piety, Nicias was a frequent visitor to diviners, which later contributed to his downfall.

Military Campaigns

  • Minoa (427 BCE): Conquered the island near Megara, which was harassing Athenian shipping.
  • Melos (428 BCE): Failed to capture the island but devastated its land.
  • Cythera (424 BCE): Captured this key Spartan trading post.

The Peace of Nicias

  • Negotiated in 421 BCE after Cleon's death, aiming to end the Peloponnesian War.
  • The peace was short-lived, with Alcibiades attempting to restart the conflict.

The Sicilian Expedition

  • Nicias opposed the expedition but joined it as one of its generals.
  • The campaign came close to success but ultimately ended in defeat due to Nicias' indecision.
  • Captured and executed by the Syracusans in 413 BCE.

Legacy

  • Featured in Plato's dialogue "Laches" debating the meaning of courage.
  • Remembered for his piety and military competence, but criticized for his caution, which contributed to the Athenian disaster in Sicily.

Learn More

The above summary was generated by AI using Perplexity Sonar. To read the orginial human-authored article, please visit Nicias.

Notes on the State of Virginia

Notes on the State of Virginia (1785) is the only full-length work by Thomas Jefferson (l. 1743-1826) published in his lifetime and was written in response to questions from France regarding the thirteen states that formed the United States at that time. Among the topics Jefferson addresses is slavery and the supremacy of Whites over Blacks.

Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia began as a response to the questions submitted by François Barbé-Marbois (l. 1745-1837), then diplomat and ambassador to the United States (and best known for negotiating the Louisiana Purchase in 1803), to the thirteen states of the new country of the United States of America.

In 1779, as secretary of the French legation to the United States, Barbé-Marbois was tasked with organizing consulates in each state and, in 1780, submitted a series of questions to the governors of the states on their respective understanding of each one's geography, government, history, laws, military, resources, and other aspects of each region.

At this time, Thomas Jefferson was the governor of Virginia, and he responded with the work that eventually became Notes on the State of Virginia. The work's 'chapters' are, therefore, given as 'queries' in answer to each of Barbé-Marbois' questions. Query I deals with the boundaries of Virginia, Query II with its rivers, and so on through Query 23, along the way addressing physical features, climate, religion, government, commerce, laws, etc.

The work is interesting on many levels but has become famous (or infamous) for Jefferson's observations on slavery, the superiority of Whites over Blacks, and, in Query XIV (on laws), his dismissal of the African American poet Phillis Wheatley (l. c. 1753-1784), whose Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral, had made her famous in 1773. Jefferson characterizes her work as mere mimicry because, according to the prevailing understanding of the time, Black people were incapable of writing poetry, much less the kind of verse Wheatley was so admired for.

Reception & Influence

Notes on the State of Virginia not only influenced Europeans' views of the United States but also those of its citizens and, notably, passages from Query XIV (14) and Query XVIII (18) on slavery. Jefferson opposed slavery as a barbaric and financially imprudent institution, but he was also opposed to emancipation, favoring colonization (sending Blacks back to Africa) as the best means of resolving the 'peculiar institution.'

Abolitionists of the time derided Notes on the State of Virginia, and its passages on slavery were denounced by them for decades after Jefferson's death. The Black abolitionist David Walker's Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World (1829), to give only one example, claimed Jefferson's beliefs on race, reflecting a broader racialized belief system, had to be challenged if emancipation were ever to be realized and Blacks regarded as the equals of Whites.

Pro-slavery advocates were equally stirred by Jefferson's passages on race and the superiority of White people and, as with the abolitionists, continued to draw on Notes on the State of Virginia up through the mid-19th century. T. R. Dew's A Review of the Debate in the Virginia Legislature of 1831 and 1832 was heavily influenced by Jefferson's views, sometimes paraphrasing his lines. This work, by Thomas Roderick Dew (l. 1802-1846), then professor of history and political law at The College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, was written in response to debates over emancipation and colonization in the Virginia State Legislature in the wake of Nat Turner's Rebellion of August 1831. Dew's arguments, echoing Jefferson's, ended the debate in favor of retaining slavery in the state.

In the present day, Notes on the State of Virginia is generally regarded as a racialized sales pitch to France, reflecting poorly on its author, who later became the third president of the United States and, earlier, had penned the Declaration of Independence.

Read More

An infographic illustrating a typical Roman bathhouse design and elements. The Baths of the Roman Empire were a complex network of public facilities playing a major role in the daily lives of the citizens of the empire. Most Roman baths followed a similar layout of interconnected rooms and spaces, including a frigidarium (cold room), tepidarium (warm room), and caldarium (hot room), along with an...

Hitler's Rise to Power

Adolf Hitler, the infamous leader of Nazi Germany, didn't just wake up one day with absolute power. His journey to the top was a decade-long process filled with setbacks and strategic maneuvering. Hitler promised to revive Germany's lost glory, restore traditional values, and eliminate enemies like Communists and Jewish people, which resonated deeply with a nation reeling from World War I's devastating aftermath. His rise was enabled by those already in power seeking to leverage his popularity for their own gain.

Key Facts:

  • Popularity Gained Over Time: The Nazi Party won just 12 seats in 1928 but grew to 288 by 1933.
  • Strategic Promises: Hitler vowed to end unemployment, restore German pride, and expand the nation's territories.
  • Power Consolidation: Once in power, Hitler quickly dismantled all opposition.

Historical Context

Hitler's ascent took place amidst a backdrop of economic turmoil and political instability following the Treaty of Versailles. The Great Depression further exacerbated these tensions, leading many Germans to seek radical solutions.

Historical Significance

Hitler's rise to power not only marked the beginning of a totalitarian regime in Germany but also set the stage for World War II. His ability to exploit political weaknesses and economic distress to consolidate power remains a chilling lesson in the exploitation of crises for dictatorial purposes.

Poems of Phillis Wheatley and Jefferson's Criticism

Although Phillis Wheatley's poetry found an audience upon publication, it was not well received by everyone and some, notably Thomas Jefferson (l. 1743-1826), dismissed her work entirely as "mimicry" since, according to the prevailing understanding of the time, Blacks were incapable of the "higher thought" that was necessary in writing poetry.

There was no way a slave-holding society could recognize that Blacks were equal in every way to Whites while continuing to hold them in bondage. Many pseudo-scientific and religious justifications for slavery were widely circulated to 'prove' that Blacks were naturally inferior to Whites and, therefore, that slavery was ordained by God so that 'simple' Black people could be properly 'cared for' by their 'benevolent' White masters.

Phillis Wheatley (l. c. 1753-1784) challenged this belief, first in 1770 with a popular poem on the Reverend George Whitefield, and then with the publication of her Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral, in 1773. Scholar Oscar Reiss comments:

The book was reviewed in England, and all reviewers were positive in their critiques. They were impressed with her knowledge of mythology and literature as well as her piety, with some writing that there was a need for new views about blacks' mental ability. The book was not considered a work of genius, but they were impressed that Phyllis had been introduced to the English language only 16 months earlier. It was a belief commonly held in England that "people born closer to the sun" were dull compared with those raised in cooler climates. Wheatley's work caused many Englishmen to take a second look at Africans.
(141)

However that may be, it did not have the same effect on Thomas Jefferson (later the third President of the United States, serving 1801-1809) who, as a British colonial from slave-holding Virginia, rejected Wheatley's work as nothing more than what one might expect of a child mimicking the words and behavior of an adult. Jefferson does not devote much space to Wheatley in his Notes on the State of Virginia (1785), but his dismissal of her work, along with his commentary on racial differences generally, encouraged later slaveholders to maintain and defend the inferiority of Blacks in the United States.

Wheatley's Rise to Fame

Phillis Wheatley (l. c. 1753-1784), an enslaved African American in Boston, first gained recognition in September 1770 through her poem On the Death of the Reverend Mr. George Whitefield, published as a broadside in Boston and then reprinted at least nine times in Boston, London, Newport (Rhode Island), New York, and Philadelphia. The poem celebrated the life and teachings of the famous evangelist George Whitefield (l. 1714-1770), a popular, if controversial, figure.

This poem is usually considered her first publication because an earlier poem of hers, On the Affray in King Street, on the Evening of 5 March – published in March 1770 and dealing with the Boston Massacre of 5 March 1770 – was unsigned. Wheatley, encouraged by the publication of her work, continued to write, bringing out Poems on Various Subjects in London in 1773.

The book included a letter from her master, John Wheatley, attesting to her authorship, as well as attestations from leading White Bostonians who had brought her to court in 1772 to question her on whether she had actually written the poems published under her name. Wheatley successfully defended her authorship, and the decision of the court informed the attestations.

As Reiss notes, the book was well-received by the British literary community, and once published in the North American Colonies, it was just as successful. Still, Poems on Various Subjects, even with its preface of attestations from respectable White gentlemen, could not convince everyone that a Black woman could write poetry, much less poetry of such depth and lyrical quality.

Read More

Christian Celibate Martyrs

Martyrologies, a unique genre of Christian literature, appeared from the 2nd century CE. A martyrology tells the story of the suffering and ordeals of a Christian martyr and details their trial and execution. A shared element of martyrologies was the claim that all martyrs experienced cradle-to-grave virginity, untouched by the mundane pollution of sexual intercourse. procreation, and the sin of lust.

The Concept of Martyrdom

Rome's response to the spread of Christianity at the end of the 1st century included persecution, officially during the reign of the Emperor Domitian (r. 81-96). Christians were charged with the crime of atheism, disbelief, and non-participation in the state cults of the Roman Empire. Non-participation was seen as angering the gods, which imperiled everyone, and so atheism meant that you did not want the Empire to prosper. This was equivalent to treason, which everywhere and always carried a death penalty. Thus, "Christians to the lions . . . "

The Christian response to persecution was to adopt the Jewish concept of martyrdom from the story of the persecution of Jews during the Greek occupation and the subsequent Maccabean Revolt against Greek rule (167 BCE). The term "martyr" meant "witness" in the sense of court testimony, "witnessing to the truth." Martyrdom became a sacrifice, offering one's life for one's religious convictions. The reward was resurrection in heaven after death.

The books of the Maccabees utilized earlier concepts from the books of Jewish prophets. The Assyrian conquest of Northern Israel (722 BCE) and the Babylonian conquest and destruction of the first Temple in Jerusalem (587 BCE) caused a theological crisis. Difficult questions had to be answered: Were the gods of the Assyrians and Babylonians greater than the God of Israel? Why did God allow this to happen?

The prophets claimed that the God of Israel was still the mightiest, but utilized the other nations to punish Israel for their consistent lapses into idolatry, the worship of other gods. Polemically, idolatry led to the sexual immorality of non-Jews, Gentiles (the later pagans of Christianity). Highlighted in the Maccabee literature, political oppression was equated with sexual immorality: "For the temple was filled with debauchery and reveling by the nations, who dallied with prostitutes and had intercourse with women within the sacred precincts and besides brought in things for sacrifice that were unfit" (2 Maccabees 6:4). Jews created 'vice lists' of Gentile lifestyles. The letters of Paul the Apostle to the Gentiles contain the same polemical vice lists against the dominant culture of the Roman Empire.

Read More

Siege of Sevastopol in 1941-2

The siege of Sevastopol (Oct 41 to Jul 42) was an attack by Axis forces on the base of the USSR's Black Sea Fleet during Operation Barbarossa of the Second World War (1939-45). Sevastopol (aka Sebastopol) had one of the world's strongest fortresses, but the attackers had the largest ever assembly of Axis artillery under a single army command.

While the fortress and port were besieged, a large land battle was fought in eastern Crimea. Sevastopol fell to the Axis army led by the German general Erich von Manstein (1887-1973) on 4 July 1942, consolidating the possession of resource-rich Ukraine and opening the way to the oil fields of the Caucasus.

Operation Barbarossa

Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), the leader of Nazi Germany, was confident after swift Axis victories in the Low Countries and France in 1940 that he could make even greater gains in territory and resources by attacking the USSR. Hitler, as he had always promised, was determined to find Lebensraum ('living space') for the German people, that is, new lands in the east where they could find resources and prosper. Hitler was particularly interested in finding these resources in Ukraine.

Operation Barbarossa, the code name for the attack on the USSR, was launched on 22 June 1941. The overall objective was to smash the USSR's Red Army and take control of several key cities. The invading force, made up of German, Slovakian, Italian, Romanian, and Finnish forces, amongst others, consisted of 3.6 million men. The overall commander was Field Marshal Walter von Brauchitsch (1881-1948). The Axis force was divided into three massive army groups. Army Group South (AGS) was commanded by Gerd von Rundstedt (1875-1953). This army group consisted of between 46 and 52 infantry divisions and five panzer divisions. A significant part of the force was from the Romanian Army. AGS was tasked with striking into Ukraine.

Read More

Ellen and William Craft's Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom

Ellen and William Craft's Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom (1860) tells the story of the couple's escape from slavery, with Ellen disguised as a young, White gentleman of means and William as her slave. They successfully traveled to the free state of Pennsylvania in 1848 and became the most famous fugitive slaves in the United States.

Ellen Craft (l. 1826-1891) was born in Clinton, Georgia, to a light-skinned slave and her White master, and so was light-skinned herself and could pass as a White woman. William Craft (l. 1824-1900) was born in Macon, Georgia, where Ellen arrived in the company of her new mistress after the wife of her previous owner presented her to her daughter as a wedding gift to get her out of the house and remove the evidence of her husband's affair.

The Crafts devised a clever scheme in which Ellen would pose as a White gentleman traveling north for his health (since women could not travel alone with male slaves), accompanied by a faithful slave. Because neither could read or write, Ellen wore her right arm in a sling so that the couple would raise no suspicions when asked to sign guest registries. They traveled from Georgia to Pennsylvania, arriving in Philadelphia on Christmas Day 1848.

They were taken under care by the abolitionists in the city and moved to Boston, where they lectured on their experiences until the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was passed by Congress and slave-catchers were sent to bring them back to Georgia. With the help of Boston abolitionists, the Crafts fled to England, where they lived for the next 19 years, had five children, lectured on their escape, and, having learned to read and write, co-authored Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom, published in 1860.

They returned to the United States in 1868, three years after the end of the American Civil War and passage of the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, and they set up a farm school outside of Savannah, Georgia, employing former slaves. White supremacist policies made it difficult to maintain the school, which closed in 1878.

In 1890, the Crafts moved to Charleston, South Carolina, to live with their daughter. Ellen Craft died of natural causes in 1891, and William in 1900. Their book became a bestseller, especially among abolitionist circles, and remains a popular work in the present day.

Text

The following excerpt is taken from Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom; or, the Escape of William and Ellen Craft from Slavery, the Electronic Edition, published on the site Documenting the American South, pp. 27-43. The excerpt has been edited for space; omissions indicated by ellipses. The full account is given in the bibliography below and in the External Links.

My wife was torn from her mother's embrace in childhood and taken to a distant part of the country. She had seen so many other children separated from their parents in this cruel manner, that the mere thought of her ever becoming the mother of a child, to linger out a miserable existence under the wretched system of American slavery, appeared to fill her very soul with horror; and as she had taken what I felt to be an important view of her condition, I did not, at first, press the marriage, but agreed to assist her in trying to devise some plan by which we might escape from our unhappy condition, and then be married.
We thought of plan after plan, but they all seemed crowded with insurmountable difficulties. We knew it was unlawful for any public conveyance to take us as passengers, without our master's consent. We were also perfectly aware of the startling fact, that had we left without this consent the professional slave-hunters would have soon had their ferocious bloodhounds baying on our track, and in a short time we should have been dragged back to slavery, not to fill the more favourable situations which we had just left, but to be separated for life, and put to the very meanest and most laborious drudgery; or else have been tortured to death as examples, in order to strike terror into the hearts of others, and thereby prevent them from even attempting to escape from their cruel taskmasters.
It is a fact worthy of remark, that nothing seems to give the slaveholders so much pleasure as the catching and torturing of fugitives. They had much rather take the keen and poisonous lash, and with it cut their poor trembling victims to atoms, than allow one of them to escape to a free country and expose the infamous system from which he fled.
The greatest excitement prevails at a slave-hunt. The slaveholders and their hired ruffians appear to take more pleasure in this inhuman pursuit than English sportsmen do in chasing a fox or a stag. Therefore, knowing what we should have been compelled to suffer, if caught and taken back, we were more than anxious to hit upon a plan that would lead us safely to a land of liberty.
But, after puzzling our brains for years, we were reluctantly driven to the sad conclusion, that it was almost impossible to escape from slavery in Georgia and travel 1,000 miles across the slave States. We therefore resolved to get the consent of our owners, be married, settle down in slavery, and endeavour to make ourselves as comfortable as possible under that system; but at the same time ever to keep our dim eyes steadily fixed upon the glimmering hope of liberty, and earnestly pray God mercifully to assist us to escape from our unjust thraldom.
We were married, and prayed and toiled on till December 1848, at which time (as I have stated) a plan suggested itself that proved quite successful, and in eight days after it was first thought of, we were free from the horrible trammels of slavery, and glorifying God who had brought us safely out of a land of bondage.
Knowing that slaveholders have the privilege of taking their slaves to any part of the country they think proper, it occurred to me that, as my wife was nearly white, I might get her to disguise herself as an invalid gentleman, and assume to be my master, while I could attend as his slave, and that in this manner we might effect our escape. After I thought of the plan, I suggested it to my wife, but at first, she shrank from the idea. She thought it was almost impossible for her to assume that disguise and travel a distance of 1,000 miles across the slave States.
However, on the other hand, she also thought of her condition. She saw that the laws under which we lived did not recognize her to be a woman, but a mere chattel, to be bought and sold, or otherwise dealt with as her owner might see fit. Therefore, the more she contemplated her helpless condition, the more anxious she was to escape from it. So, she said, "I think it is almost too much for us to undertake; however, I feel that God is on our side, and with his assistance, notwithstanding all the difficulties, we shall be able to succeed. Therefore, if you will purchase the disguise, I will try to carry out the plan."
But after I concluded to purchase the disguise, I was afraid to go to any one to ask him to sell me the articles. It is unlawful in Georgia for a white man to trade with slaves without the master's consent. But, notwithstanding this, many persons will sell a slave any article that he can get the money to buy. Not that they sympathize with the slave, but merely because his testimony is not admitted in court against a free white person.
Therefore, with little difficulty I went to different parts of the town, at odd times, and purchased things piece by piece, (except the trousers which she found necessary to make,) and took them home to the house where my wife resided. She being a ladies' maid, and a favourite slave in the family, was allowed a little room to herself; and amongst other pieces of furniture which I had made in my overtime, was a chest of drawers; so when I took the articles home, she locked them up carefully in these drawers.
No one about the premises knew that she had anything of the kind. So, when we fancied we had everything ready the time was fixed for the flight. But we knew it would not do to start off without first getting our master's consent to be away for a few days. Had we left without this, they would soon have had us back into slavery, and probably we should never have got another fair opportunity of even attempting to escape.
Some of the best slaveholders will sometimes give their favourite slaves a few days' holiday at Christmas time; so, after no little amount of perseverance on my wife's part, she obtained a pass from her mistress, allowing her to be away for a few days. The cabinetmaker with whom I worked gave me a similar paper, but said that he needed my services very much, and wished me to return as soon as the time granted was up. I thanked him kindly; but, somehow, I have not been able to make it convenient to return yet; and, as the free air of good old England agrees so well with my wife and our dear little ones, as well as with myself, it is not at all likely we shall return at present to the "peculiar institution" of chains and stripes.
On reaching my wife's cottage she handed me her pass, and I showed mine, but at that time neither of us were able to read them. It is not only unlawful for slaves to be taught to read, but in some of the States there are heavy penalties attached, such as fines and imprisonment, which will be vigorously enforced upon anyone who is humane enough to violate the so-called law
…However, at first, we were highly delighted at the idea of having gained permission to be absent for a few days; but when the thought flashed across my wife's mind, that it was customary for travellers to register their names in the visitors' book at hotels, as well as in the clearance or Custom-house book at Charleston, South Carolina–it made our spirits droop within us.
So, while sitting in our little room upon the verge of despair, all at once my wife raised her head, and with a smile upon her face, which was a moment before bathed in tears, said, "I think I have it!" I asked what it was. She said, "I think I can make a poultice and bind up my right hand in a sling, and with propriety ask the officers to register my name for me." I thought that would do.
It then occurred to her that the smoothness of her face might betray her; so she decided to make another poultice, and put it in a white handkerchief to be worn under the chin, up the cheeks, and to tie over the head. This nearly hid the expression of the countenance, as well as the beardless chin…
My wife, knowing that she would be thrown a good deal into the company of gentlemen, fancied that she could get on better if she had something to go over the eyes; so I went to a shop and bought a pair of green spectacles. This was in the evening.
We sat up all night discussing the plan and making preparations. Just before the time arrived, in the morning, for us to leave, I cut off my wife's hair square at the back of the head, and got her to dress in the disguise and stand out on the floor. I found that she made a most respectable looking gentleman.
My wife had no ambition whatever to assume this disguise, and would not have done so had it been possible to have obtained our liberty by more simple means; but we knew it was not customary in the South for ladies to travel with male servants; and therefore, notwithstanding my wife's fair complexion, it would have been a very difficult task for her to have come off as a free white lady, with me as her slave; in fact, her not being able to write would have made this quite impossible.
We knew that no public conveyance would take us, or any other slave, as a passenger, without our master's consent. This consent could never be obtained to pass into a free State. My wife's being muffled in the poultices, &c., furnished a plausible excuse for avoiding general conversation, of which most Yankee travellers are passionately fond…
…When the time had arrived for us to start, we blew out the lights, knelt down, and prayed to our Heavenly Father mercifully to assist us, as he did his people of old, to escape from cruel bondage; and we shall ever feel that God heard and answered our prayer. Had we not been sustained by a kind, and I sometimes think special, providence, we could never have overcome the mountainous difficulties which I am now about to describe.
After this we rose and stood for a few moments in breathless silence, –we were afraid that someone might have been about the cottage listening and watching our movements. So I took my wife by the hand, stepped softly to the door, raised the latch, drew it open, and peeped out. Though there were trees all around the house, yet the foliage scarcely moved; in fact, everything appeared to be as still as death. I then whispered to my wife, "Come my dear, let us make a desperate leap for liberty!" But poor thing, she shrank back, in a state of trepidation.
I turned and asked what was the matter; she made no reply, but burst into violent sobs, and threw her head upon my breast. This appeared to touch my very heart, it caused me to enter into her feelings more fully than ever. We both saw the many mountainous difficulties that rose one after the other before our view and knew far too well what our sad fate would have been, were we caught and forced back into our slavish den. Therefore, on my wife's fully realizing the solemn fact that we had to take our lives, as it were, in our hands, and contest every inch of the thousand miles of slave territory over which we had to pass, it made her heart almost sink within her…
…We then opened the door and stepped as softly out as "moonlight upon the water." I locked the door with my own key, which I now have before me, and tiptoed across the yard into the street. I say tiptoed, because we were like persons near a tottering avalanche, afraid to move, or even breathe freely, for fear the sleeping tyrants should be aroused, and come down upon us with double vengeance, for daring to attempt to escape in the manner which we contemplated.
We shook hands, said farewell, and started in different directions for the railway station. I took the nearest possible way to the train, for fear I should be recognized by someone, and got into the negro car in which I knew I should have to ride; but my master (as I will now call my wife) took a longer way round, and only arrived there with the bulk of the passengers. He obtained a ticket for himself and one for his slave to Savannah, the first port, which was about two hundred miles off. My master then had the luggage stowed away and stepped into one of the best carriages.
But just before the train moved off, I peeped through the window, and, to my great astonishment, I saw the cabinetmaker with whom I had worked so long, on the platform. He stepped up to the ticket-seller, and asked some question, and then commenced looking rapidly through the passengers, and into the carriages. Fully believing that we were caught, I shrank into a corner, turned my face from the door, and expected in a moment to be dragged out. The cabinetmaker looked into my master's carriage, but did not know him in his new attire, and, as God would have it, before he reached mine the bell rang, and the train moved off.
I have heard since that the cabinetmaker had a presentiment that we were about to "make tracks for parts unknown;" but, not seeing me, his suspicions vanished, until he received the startling intelligence that we had arrived safely in a free State.

Read More

Views of the Afterlife in Roman Tombstone Inscriptions

Ancient views of the afterlife are reflected in literature, tomb inscriptions, and grave goods. Then, as now, a belief in another stage of existence after death was a shared belief by all ancient societies. Initially, the Greco-Roman Hades contained all the dead. Over time, the dead became distinguished by the virtuous and the wicked and were assigned different areas in the land of the dead.

Roman tombstone inscriptions demonstrate an absence of the often esoteric views of the schools of philosophy and the elevation of the soul after death. Philosophical reflections are rare. One of the shortest tombstone inscriptions summarizes what may have been an Epicurean concept. Epicureans believed in the existence of the gods but rejected their interference in human affairs. It was up to humans to avoid pain and suffering and focus on the good things of life, not worrying about the afterlife: "Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo" ("I was not; I was, I am not; I care not").

There are no references to the chthonic powers (the avenging divine beings such as Nemesis and the harpies), levels of Hades described by Plato (l. 424/423 to 348/347 BCE), or the walled cities in Hades described in Virgil's Aeneid. When references do appear, it is expressed more as hope than as a firm belief in the details of what awaits.

Education in the Ancient World

Historians often estimate the level of Roman education at 1-5%, coming from the upper classes. This is what we term formal education, which consisted of Romanized versions of the Greek mythology, Homer's tales, classical Greek drama, Roman histories, and various schools of Roman and Greek philosophy. An element for the elite, formal education required leisure and money, resources not available to the rest of the population. The upper classes utilized pedagogues (tutors), often educated slaves in philosophy, who lived with the family and were honored members of the household. Many cities had public libraries with borrowing privileges for the upper classes.

However, education in this sense was different from basic literacy. Basic education for girls in ancient Rome was the same as for boys; they were taught the basics of reading and writing, either in the home or in organized schools. This included some tales of Homer and some history of Rome. Especially among the business classes and trades, some literacy was required, as well as the essentials of mathematics, simply to do business. The dozens of examples of graffiti (many having to do with campaign promises during elections) would have been pointless if most of the public could not read.

The majority of Romans were exposed to what we term "classical literature" through the dozens of Greek tragedy and comedy performances offered during the religious festivals. Politicians dominated the Roman forum with speeches that referred to traditions. Then (as now), public trials were popular entertainment where advocates educated in Roman law couched their arguments with references to both traditions and myths.

In the literary versions of Hades, Minos, Rhadamanthus, and Aeacus were judges of the dead in the afterlife. According to their deeds in life, the dead were assigned various places in Hades. All Romans knew about this through the gladiator games. At the end of a bout, characters dressed as Minos and Rhadamanthus tested the loser with hot irons to make sure he was dead and not faking. But we find no reference to any judgment in the afterlife. Average Romans must have known various elements of Hades, but they did not produce a comparable equivalent body of literature on the details of what happened after death.

Read More

Ancient Trade Secrets: Indus Valley and Lapis Lazuli We know from Mesopotamian texts that the Indus people traded lapis lazuli along with gold tin and copper which was sourced from modern-day Afghanistan as well as semi-precious stones such as agate and carnelian which were commonly used for beads. The Indus Valley was known by the Mesopotamians as the Meluhates who came from the land of the Meluha. Did you know that the famous Cleopatra VII wore lapis lazuli eyeshadow from Meluha ? #indus #cleopatra #lapislazuli #civilisation #indian LEARN MORE --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaSprrRI83g

Europe Transformed

In the span of just 35 years, from 1914 to 1949, Europe underwent a profound transformation. The era was marked by World War I, the collapse of empires, and the rise of powerful ideologies like fascism and communism. This period, which culminated in World War II and the subsequent rebuilding of Europe, reshaped the continent's borders and political structures, laying the groundwork for the modern Europe we know today. One surprising aspect is how these events, driven by both war and ideological shifts, created the foundation for contemporary Europe's political landscape.

Key Facts

  • First World War (1914-1918): Led to the collapse of empires such as the Austro-Hungarian and German Empires.
  • Between the Wars: Saw the rise of fascist Italy under Mussolini and Nazi Germany under Hitler.
  • Second World War (1939-1945): Involved a global conflict with far-reaching consequences, including the formation of the United Nations.
  • Post-War Era (1945-1949): Began with the division of Europe into Eastern and Western blocs during the Cold War.

Historical Context

The period between 1914 and 1949 was pivotal for Europe as it transitioned from a continent dominated by traditional empires to one where new ideologies held sway. The aftermath of World War I created a power vacuum that allowed fascist and communist regimes to flourish.

Historical Significance

The events of this era set the stage for modern Europe by establishing the political and geographical structures that still influence the continent today. The formation of the European Union, for instance, was partly a response to the devastating effects of conflict in this period, as nations sought to promote peace through cooperation.

Europe 1914–1949: History Maps of the World Wars

This map collection explores the geopolitical transformation of Europe between 1914 and 1949. From the First World War (1914-18) and the collapse of empires to the rise of fascism, communism, and totalitarian regimes, through the Second Wolrd War (1939-45) and postwar reconstruction, these maps reveal how war and ideology reshaped European borders and power structures, laying the foundation for modern Europe as we know it today.

Read More

Phillis Wheatley

Phillis Wheatley (l. c. 1753-1784) was the first African American woman to publish a book of poetry and become recognized as a poet, overcoming the prevailing understanding of the time that a Black person was incapable of writing, much less writing poetry and, further, that an enslaved person, considered property, could do so.

She was not, as commonly claimed, the first African American author to publish poetry, as that distinction goes to Jupiter Hammon (l. 1711-1806), who published his An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, with Penitential Cries in 1761. Wheatley, however, holds the honor of being the first African American author to publish a full-length book of poetry, her Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral, in 1773.

Her book was widely praised both in England (where it was published) and in Britain's North American colonies. She received a personal response from General George Washington (l. 1732-1799) thanking her for a poem she had written in his honor in 1775, which was later published by Thomas Paine (l. 1737-1809) in the Pennsylvania Gazette.

Not everyone was a fan of Wheatley's works, however, and some, most notably Thomas Jefferson (l. 1743-1826), dismissed her as simply a mimic who was only capable of reflecting concepts she had absorbed from White classical writers. The backward views of Jefferson, and those like him, did nothing to diminish popular appreciation for Wheatley's work, however, and she remained highly regarded, even after falling on hard times, until her death at the age of 31.

Today, Phillis Wheatley is regarded as one of the greatest American poets and continues to be honored as such through place names, memorials, plaques, and educational institutions.

Life & Work

Wheatley's brief biography, as given by L. Maria Child and included in Homespun Heroines and Other Women of Distinction (1926), compiled and edited by Hallie Q. Brown, is given below, although some details are omitted, which will be addressed here.

Phillis Wheatley's actual name is unknown. She is thought to have been born c. 1753 in modern-day Gambia or Senegal and was one of the over three million people of those regions sold into slavery. She arrived in Boston, Massachusetts, aboard the slave ship Phillis in July 1761 and was purchased by John Wheatley, a wealthy merchant, and his wife Susanna. The Wheatleys named her after the ship that had brought her to them.

The Wheatleys had two children, twins, Mary and Nathaniel, who were then 18 years old. Mary taught young Phillis English and how to read and write, while Nathaniel assisted as his duties would allow. Phillis was a fast learner, and by the age of 12, was proficient in Greek, Latin, and the Bible. She wrote her first poem when she was 14, and, that same year, published another poem, on the near wreck of a merchant ship caught in a storm, in The Newport Mercury on 21 December 1767.

Although a slave, Phillis was treated like a member of the family and given light domestic work. The Wheatleys were progressive members of Boston society and, recognizing the girl's innate intelligence and quick wit, encouraged her education. She would frequently be invited to dinner parties given at the home to read her latest works, which were met with praise and gave her the confidence to write more.

By 1773, Phillis had a book-length manuscript of verse, and Susanna sent her to London, accompanied by Nathaniel, who was traveling there on family business, because she felt there were better chances of finding a publisher there than in the Colony of Massachusetts. Phillis had also been told by the family's doctor that she should avail herself of a sea voyage for her health as she suffered from asthma and a frail constitution.

Through Nathaniel's connections, Phillis was introduced to the members of high society in London, including the Lord Mayor, Frederick Bull. News of the young African poet circulated quickly, and Selina Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon, agreed to be her patron without ever having even met her. Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral was published 1 September 1773.

An audience was arranged with King George III of Great Britain (r. 1760-1820), but news arrived that Susanna Wheatley was seriously ill, and Phillis and Nathaniel left for Boston before she could be presented to the king. Upon her arrival home, the Wheatleys set her free, and she cared for Susanna during her illness until her death in the spring of 1774. John died in 1778, and Mary soon after. Nathaniel moved to London to manage the business there, and Phillis was left alone in Boston.

She found work as a domestic before meeting the free Black grocer, John Peters, whom she married. The couple lived in poverty, and their two children died in infancy. Peters' business failed, and when he could not pay his debts, he was sent to prison in 1784.

Phillis was left alone again, this time with a third infant child, and found work as a scullery maid. Never very robust, Wheatley developed pneumonia and died on 5 December 1784, along with her infant daughter.

Read More

Lebensraum

Lebensraum ('living space'), is a geopolitical concept which was adopted by Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), the leader of Nazi Germany, to justify the military domination of Central and Eastern Europe, and then the USSR. Hitler promised that Lebensraum in the east would gain vast new space and resources and so ensure economic prosperity and autonomy for Germanic peoples.

In addition to economic considerations, Nazi race theory was used to justify foreign conquests since the achievement of Lebensraum would also bring the destruction of the Nazis' main enemies: Communists, Jewish people, and Slavic people, all of whom were regarded as politically or racially inferior to Nazis and Germanic people.

Hitler's Popular Appeal

Adolf Hitler had won popularity amongst the German electorate in the early 1930s by making popular promises. Hitler said he would reverse the harsh settlement terms after the First World War (1914-18), which were embodied in the Treaty of Versailles. Germany had since suffered economic problems, especially after the Great Depression of 1929 onwards. World trade collapsed, and prices fell, badly affecting workers of all kinds as their wages were cut. Around one-third of German workers lost their jobs. Unemployment in 1928 was 1.4 million; in 1932, it was 6 million. Crime, particularly juvenile crime, rocketed. The governments of the Weimar Republic seemed unable to solve any of these problems, but Hitler promised solutions.

Hitler promised the people bread and work. He planned to massively rearm Germany, restoring national pride and creating jobs. He promised business leaders lucrative state contracts such as arms manufacturing. This idea was also popular with the German Army, which had been severely limited in size by the Treaty of Versailles.

Hitler talked of creating a Volksgemeinschaft or people's traditional folk community, a self-sufficient society that has no class distinctions. This community would not only be developed in Germany but in new conquered lands where new natural resources would ensure the prosperity of all. Hitler was selling a dream of a 'Greater Germany', and in post-war Germany, when times were tough, the idea of new lands and new resources to boost the economy appealed to many voters and many large business owners.

Read More

A map depicting the two transatlantic voyages of Amerigo Vespucci between 1499 and 1502. It is based on the 1507 map by Martin Waldseemüller, a German clergyman and cartographer, which first referred to the southern hemisphere where Amerigo Vespucci landed in 1501 as America. Waldseemüller and his collaborator Matthias Ringmann gave their Introduction to Cosmography an accompanying world map...

Life in Air Raid Shelters During the London Blitz

During the Second World War, air raid shelters became a crucial part of life in Britain, especially in London, as the city faced sustained bombing from the German Luftwaffe. The London Blitz, which lasted from September 1940 to May 1941, prompted civilians to seek refuge in various shelters.

Types of Shelters

  1. London Underground Stations: Over 150,000 people spent nights in these stations, despite challenges like limited sanitation and noise. However, even these were not immune to bombing, with incidents occurring at Sloane Square and Bank Stations.
  2. Community Shelters: Initially poorly constructed, these shelters improved over time, offering amenities like toilets and canteens. London had around 5,000 such shelters.
  3. Anderson Shelters: Made of corrugated steel and buried in gardens, these shelters protected against flying debris but not direct hits. Around two million were distributed.
  4. Morrison Shelters: Introduced in 1941, these were steel box-tables for use indoors if a garden shelter was unavailable.
  5. Other Options: People also used cellars, spaces under the stairs, or trekked to the countryside for safety.

The Blitz Experience

  • Warning System: Sirens signaled incoming attacks, usually 12 minutes in advance.
  • Psychological Impact: Despite strains, the Blitz fostered community spirit, with people gathering in shelters to share news and support each other.
  • Social Challenges: Refined shelters like those in the Savoy Hotel sometimes caused social tensions.

The End of the Blitz

The Luftwaffe concluded its campaign after conducting 85 major operations against London, dropping 24,000 tons of high explosives, and moving its focus to Operation Barbarossa in June 1941. Britain emerged unsubdued, though over 43,000 civilians were killed during the Blitz.

Learn More

The above summary was generated by AI using Perplexity Sonar. To read the orginial human-authored article, please visit Life in an Air Raid Shelter in the London Blitz.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.