I forgot I should be posting on tumblr so uhhh here, my husband :)) I swear Iโll post here more often
The masculine connotation of a bow tie and the feminine connotation of a bow on the top of the head implies a nonbinary bow style placed directly over the nose
Correct!!!!!!
blurrโs no good very bad solar cycle
UM GUYS. I JUST NOTICED A CRAZY ISSUE W THE TUMBLR UPDATE.
YOU CAN SEE THE ICONS OF ANONS SOMETIMES.
The way I was able to recognize several anons in one of my inboxes bc of this error. Oh my god. Guys. This isnโt supposed to happen.
Weighing in to say:
YES, I SEE THIS ON MOBILE. HOWEVER I DO **NOT** THINK IT'S SHOWING THE ANON'S REAL IDENTITY.
The profile pictures I see next to anon asks are profile pictures that belong to other, non-anon asks in my ask box also. Some info
- there are 14 asks in my inbox from the last ~5 days
- 9 anons, 5 logged in users
- ALL 14 show pfps, including the 9 anons
- ALL THE SHOWN PROFILE PICTURES BELONG TO THE 5 LOGGED IN USERS
I think the bug is the inbox INCORRECTLY attributing anons to neighboring, logged-in asks.
Which is still a bad bug! Considering it makes it look like a long-time follower of mine sent me a spam ask.
And is worse if, say, one of these was anon hate.
But it's NOT the anon's real identity. It's a neighboring ask asker's identity
So if you have anon hate in your inbox that looks like it's attributed to your dear friend, who sends you lovely asks all the time, it was Not them.
CONFIRMED THE BUG IS INCORRECT ATTRIBUTION.
Thanks @thepatchycat for being a test subject. As you can see the icon being attributed to this ask is NOT the patchy cat
The pictured icon belongs to @watchingforcomets who sent me a nice ask about nail polish yesterday which I have not yet answered!
bless this website
fries. envelopes. ive been awake for 18 hours can i go to bed now.
you know i think the fact that friends and enemies autocorrected to this and i didn't notice is reason enough i should sleep
Honestly just imagined that an 18 hour shift at the mailing-fries-in-envelopes factory must have been grueling.
god she has these gorgeous blue eyes you can get lost in forever. and that smile โฆ that damned smile
someone deleted my response and now aesthetic and roleplay blogs are reblogging this as some sort of deep quote and i just want you all to know this post is exclusively about how sexy and fuckable the blue car from cars is
something i think is really cool is how "old" writing distinctly feels like that because (iirc) eloquence, vocabulary, etc. were more valued over conciseness and simplicity. you can see quite obviously when you compare the more plain and straightforward styles of modern writing with the very. well. languid and leisurely paces of much of older writing (especially in the western world specifically, not to speak for all cultures exhaustively)
Shout out to @anosci for sending me the oldest Usenet mention of transformers he could track down, from May 22, 1984. The cartoon would not air until September 17, 1984. The very first issue of the Marvel comic was released on May 8, 1984.
This may very well be the first Transformers review ever written and it's by an absolute fucking HATER
syringa vulgaris + nigella damascena
purple lilacs: innocence and renewal
blue nigella: binding love, known to grow in patches of abandoned land