Avatar

trainasaber

@wirlibirb

(previously "yummers")
matching(?) with @calfrxca
they/he, can speak english/korean, adult
Avatar
Reblogged

I forgot I should be posting on tumblr so uhhh here, my husband :)) I swear Iโ€™ll post here more often

UM GUYS. I JUST NOTICED A CRAZY ISSUE W THE TUMBLR UPDATE.

YOU CAN SEE THE ICONS OF ANONS SOMETIMES.

The way I was able to recognize several anons in one of my inboxes bc of this error. Oh my god. Guys. This isnโ€™t supposed to happen.

Weighing in to say:

YES, I SEE THIS ON MOBILE. HOWEVER I DO **NOT** THINK IT'S SHOWING THE ANON'S REAL IDENTITY.

The profile pictures I see next to anon asks are profile pictures that belong to other, non-anon asks in my ask box also. Some info

  • there are 14 asks in my inbox from the last ~5 days
  • 9 anons, 5 logged in users
  • ALL 14 show pfps, including the 9 anons
  • ALL THE SHOWN PROFILE PICTURES BELONG TO THE 5 LOGGED IN USERS

I think the bug is the inbox INCORRECTLY attributing anons to neighboring, logged-in asks.

Which is still a bad bug! Considering it makes it look like a long-time follower of mine sent me a spam ask.

And is worse if, say, one of these was anon hate.

But it's NOT the anon's real identity. It's a neighboring ask asker's identity

So if you have anon hate in your inbox that looks like it's attributed to your dear friend, who sends you lovely asks all the time, it was Not them.

CONFIRMED THE BUG IS INCORRECT ATTRIBUTION.

Thanks @thepatchycat for being a test subject. As you can see the icon being attributed to this ask is NOT the patchy cat

The pictured icon belongs to @watchingforcomets who sent me a nice ask about nail polish yesterday which I have not yet answered!

bless this website

Avatar
sailorsscouts-deactivated201709

god she has these gorgeous blue eyes you can get lost in forever. and that smile โ€ฆ that damned smile

Avatar
sailorscouts
Avatar
sailorscouts

someone deleted my response and now aesthetic and roleplay blogs are reblogging this as some sort of deep quote and i just want you all to know this post is exclusively about how sexy and fuckable the blue car from cars is

something i think is really cool is how "old" writing distinctly feels like that because (iirc) eloquence, vocabulary, etc. were more valued over conciseness and simplicity. you can see quite obviously when you compare the more plain and straightforward styles of modern writing with the very. well. languid and leisurely paces of much of older writing (especially in the western world specifically, not to speak for all cultures exhaustively)

Shout out to @anosci for sending me the oldest Usenet mention of transformers he could track down, from May 22, 1984. The cartoon would not air until September 17, 1984. The very first issue of the Marvel comic was released on May 8, 1984.

This may very well be the first Transformers review ever written and it's by an absolute fucking HATER

some people are taking "doomed" to mean "dead". this is actually a misconception! you can be doomed even if you don't die! it's sometimes worse if you don't die!

I will NEVER see a prehistoric dinosaur

I will NEVER see an anomalocaris. I will NEVER hold a trilobite. I will NEVER see a dimetrodon or an eight foot long millipede. and I will NEVER see a pterosaur

Well as much as it pains me to say it they died

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.