Do you want to know what’s actually dishonest?
• Pretending to be neutral while shifting your stance – You went from “I’m not hating on Jellal” to undermining his entire role in the story. You backpedaled when challenged but continued pushing the same anti-Jellal and anti-Jerza rhetoric, insisting Erza should be the sole authority on his redemption while diminishing his character arc —all while benefiting from the Jerza fandom’s support, despite disrespecting the very foundation that gives you a standing.
• Gaslighting and bad-faith engagement – You repeatedly misrepresented my points, twisted my words, and then acted like I was the unreasonable one.
• Enabling harassment while playing innocent – You conveniently got defensive only after I exposed the anons, acting clueless despite clear evidence.
• Parroting other people’s disagreements with me under another identity – Taking criticisms from others, slightly altering them, and then regurgitating them under an anonymous guise to create the illusion of widespread disapproval. That’s not discourse—it’s calculated deception.
• Weaponizing fandom bias – You knew the Jerza fandom tends to favor Erza’s perspective, so you framed your argument in a way that painted me as unreasonable to rally silent support.
• Projecting your behavior onto me – Claiming I was dishonest when you were the one moving the goalpost, avoiding direct confrontation, and possibly sending (or at the very least, encouraging) hate anons.
• Trying to distance yourself from the harassment – Instead of condemning the anons, you made this about how I was wrong to assume it was you—without acknowledging that you directly benefited from it.
• Liking my posts immediately after being exposed – A weak attempt at damage control, hoping to look “civil” while ignoring the fact that you actively contributed to the situation escalating.
• Scrubbing your profile to hide bias – You loudly advertised yourself as “Erza’s #1 fan” and a “professional yapper,” yet after this argument you claim wasn’t that ‘deep’, you quietly erased that to appear more impartial. If you were confident in your stance, why did you feel the need to hide it?’
• Claiming the harassment only started after my post – How would you know that for sure? If you weren’t involved, you wouldn’t be able to make such a definitive claim. The only way you’d know the exact timeline is if you were responsible for it or knew who was.
You can pretend to be clueless now, but the pattern is clear, and no one’s buying it.