Property talk:P10241
Documentation
the taxon of an individual named organism (animal, plant)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#Value type Q16521, Q15707583, Q427626, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
Replacement property: instance of (P31)
Replacement values: (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#none of, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10241#Type Q110224119, Q30017383, Q95074, Q2239243, Q40614, SPARQL
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
(Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?taxon ?born ?died ?diff { ?item wdt:P10241 ?taxon; wdt:P569 ?born; wdt:P570 ?died. BIND ((YEAR(?died) - YEAR(?born)) AS ?diff). FILTER (?diff > 507). # Q13080849 }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P10241#Check old
Single-value constraint
[edit]@UWashPrincipalCataloger Hello, I removed the single-value constraint you added because this property is likely to be used in items for groups of individuals, such as Alej ke sv. Anně (Q10768532) which is composed of several trees. Hope that's all right with you. Cheers, Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's messy. Group of trees after all isn't an individual tree, is it? Using has part(s) of the class (P2670) instead of P31 to link remarkable tree (Q811534) would make more sense. Taxa of an alley could be rather linked using taxon found at location (P6803), or perhaps also using has part(s) of the class (P2670). 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:D95:8B9D:98C7:D69C 12:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Use as qualifier?
[edit]I'd like to use this as a qualifier for images that represent a higher taxon rank than species, i.e. here: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q14531295&diff=1793668844&oldid=1793668725&diffmode=source
Any objections? Mvolz (talk) 12:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
use on items for fictional animals
[edit]I started a discussion about the use of this property on items for fictional animals at Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Fictional_universes#is_an_individual_of_taxon_(P10241)_and_our_current_approach_to_modelling_fictional_instances_of_species. Please join there if you are interested in this. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 13:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
holotypes
[edit]Does this property make sense on holotypes, like holotype of Ouratea sipaliwiniensis (Q55200035)? --Azertus (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess only when it's a physical holotype, which might make this a bad idea... --Azertus (talk) 01:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with wikibase-item-datatype
- Properties used on 10000+ items
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with qualifiers constraints
- Properties with none-of constraints
- Properties with conflicts with constraints
- Taxonomy properties
- Properties with complex constraints