Wikidata:Landsbybrønden

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Edit

Hej og velkommen til Wikidatas dansksprogede Landsbybrønd! Her diskuteres almindelige spørgsmål om Wikidata på dansk.

Oversættelse af egenskaber

[edit]

Hej. Jeg har lavet en rapport med alle egenskaber efter om de er oversat eller ej på User:Steenth/Oversættelse egenskaber. Hvis den er oversat, kan sammenlignes med den engelske oversættelse, så der kan laves korrektur på det. --Steenth (talk) 10:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oversættelse af Wikidata-terminologi

[edit]

Jeg foreslår at snak om oversættelse af specielle ord og begreber som bruges i Wikidata diskuteres på diskussionssiden for den danske version af ordlisten. Jeg har der foreslået at "alias" konsekvent oversættes til "alias". Byrial (talk) 09:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi! I generated a list for pages on Hungarian Wikipedia that are connected to a Wikidata item, but on the Wikidata item there are no other interlanguage links (~the links are lonely on the Wikidata item). For many of these pages the corresponding pages on other Wikipedias actually exist, but are not connected yet. The list helps to find such pages. It can be found here:

If you are interested in generating a similar list for the Danish Wikipedia, please, inform me on my user talk page. Regards, Sanyi4 (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A newer, dynamic list generator is available at

Sanyi4 (talk) 03:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource is coming in 1 week!

[edit]

Apologies for using English; please help by translating this message!

Wikisource is coming in 1 week, on Tuesday, January 14! Help us prepare for the deployment at Wikidata:Wikisource. Specifically, we need your input in determining how Wikidata items will be created and used for each Wikisource page. Please join the discussion at Wikidata talk:Wikisource, and notify anyone who is interested in the discussion. --Rschen7754 08:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC) (using MassMessage)[reply]

twin place network

[edit]

Dear friends, http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim[17:35] AND claim[190] lists places from Denmark (Q35) with twinned administrative body (P190). Today the collection is randomly and many datas need to be added. Please do not use bots and make all additions (as adding qaualifiers, other places) manually. Feel free to join Category:♊.
FYI: http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim[190] lists all items with twinned administrative body (P190). As soon as some help material is available a link will be posted here. Regards gangLeri לערי ריינהארט (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Datoformat

[edit]

Hej. Jeg ved ikke, om der er nogen danskere, som har rettighederne til at gøre noget ved dette, men jeg forsøger alligevel. Ved importering af datoer fra Wikidata til Wikipedia, forsvinder . (punktummet) efter tallet. Rettere sagt; det findes faktisk slet ikke, hvilket sandsynligvis skyldes, at man ikke anvender dette på engelsk. Kan man gøre noget ved det? --Laketown (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Laketown: Hvorfor skulle man beholde det? --Ysangkok (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ysangkok:: Fordi det er korrekt dansk. Der skal være et punktum efter et tal i dansk datoformatering. --Laketown (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Laketown: Det kan være opsætning af din profil. Jeg set i dansk format. Og det er også godt at sætte babel op. Det gør at man bl.a. kan se labels og aliasser på dansk og andre sprog. --Steenth (talk) 15:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steenth:: Det tror jeg ikke. Artiklerne er så vidt jeg ved ikke afhængig af mine indstillinger ifbm. datoformat. Punktummet er ej heller at finde, hvis jeg logger af. --Laketown (talk) 20:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Laketown: Jeg kan se, at jeg kan se det er formateret korrekt. Datoer bliver gemt i et generelt format, som bliver formateret efter bruges opsætning. Jeg kan se, at du har ikke sat babel op - gør det! Og der skal stå dansk oppe ved siden af dit brugernavn i øverste venstre højne. --Steenth (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks mapping to Wikidata items - DEPLOYMENT IS TUESDAY

[edit]

Please take a look at Wikidata:Wikibooks/Development, and give your feedback on how we should handle Wikibooks interwiki links. The deployment is this Tuesday, so we really need to get this in order very quickly! Rschen7754, sent by --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Opting out of Global sysops 2

[edit]

A RFC has been started in regards to allowing global sysops to continue to perform admin actions on Wikidata. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2016

[edit]

Only this week left for comments: Wikidata:Wikimania 2016 (Thank you for translating this message). --Tobias1984 (talk) 11:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Reforming the property creation process

[edit]

See the above RFC for some proposals to reform the property creation process. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC) (on behalf of Rschen7754)[reply]

Ny egenskab

[edit]

Jeg har netop foreslået CVR's P-nummer som egenskab her: Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization#P-nummer. Jeg håber der er nogen der har kommentarer, kan stemme for eller imod egenskaben. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg her nu også foreslået Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control#Registreringsnummer for naturfredning. Jeg håber at ID-nummeret er persistent? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg er i tvivl om bygningsfredning. For eksempel Støvlet Kathrines Hus har et BBR-nummer på 173-95430-3. og et sagsnummer på 4592870. Hvilket er relevant? Sagsnummeret kan URL resolves, så måske er det mest relevant? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There is now a list at Wikidata:Database reports/items without claims categories/dawiki for Danish Wikipedia (dawiki).

It lists the categories in use at Wikipedia for items that don't have any statements. Currently there are only 17094 such items (5.9%). More stats here.

Links to PetScan make it easy to add suggested statements to these items. I added a few based on available English translations.
--- Jura 15:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denmark > Kingdom of Denmark

[edit]

You might want to comment on Wikidata:Bot_requests#Country_.E2.86.92_Denmark.
--- Jura 13:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Defining account creators

[edit]

I have started this RFC about account creators. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)[reply]

Hjælp, jeg har oprettet et emne der allerede findes

[edit]

Det drejer sig om Q47010791 som jeg har beskrevet som Historische Amtsbezeichnung.

Jeg har nu fundet ud af at det jeg ville gøre, skal gøres via dewiki, og ikke via wikidata. Pokkers..

Ihvertfald er Q47010791 tilovers og bør slettes. Med mange undskyldninger for roderiet Sechinsic (talk) 21:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Som du måske har opdateret er det slet ikke noget problem, og det sker ofte og der er en mekanisme til at flette to emner der handler om et samme. Halvanden time efteroprettelsen var den flettet. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Privacy and Living People

[edit]

There has been a request for comment about developing a policy about privacy and items about living people. Your participation is encouraged above. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC) (from Rschen7754)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Privacy and Living People

[edit]

Additional proposals have been made on the RFC, and your comments are welcome. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC) (for [[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754)[reply]

Hrímfaxi and Skinfaxi statue

[edit]

Can't find the sculptor and some other details of this Danish statue. Thank you for your help: Hrímfaxi and Skinfaxi statue (Q55342144) --Tobias1984 (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for comment/2018 administrator policy update

[edit]

A RFC has been proposed on changes to various administrator and user conduct policies including edit warring, page protection, involved administrators, and interface administrators. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)[reply]

Harassment and other negative issues in Wikidata

[edit]

I am wondering whether we have seen any instances of harasment or discriminatory behavior on Wikidata. It has been speculated in Creating Structured Linked Data to Generate Scholarly Profiles: A Pilot Project using Wikidata and Scholia (Q59652985): "...may be wary of participating in open community platform that may expose contributors to discriminatory behavior and harassment.". I cannot come up with a single instance. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen), The closest i can think of would likely be the deletion of the Boobpedia property. People got quite riled up about it.--Trade (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New tools and IP masking

[edit]

Hey everyone,

The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.

We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.

You can post in your language if you can't write in English.

Johan (WMF)

14:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started

[edit]

Hello,

In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".

Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.

How can you help?

  • Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
  • Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
  • Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.

We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!

-- Kbrown (WMF) 17:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project

[edit]

Please help translate to your language

Hello. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.

We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.

We would like individual feedback on the following:

  • Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
  • Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
  • Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far

We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.

When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:

  • Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
  • Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
  • Put things in logical and useful places
  • Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
  • Eliminate clutter
  • Plan for future growth

As well as the following constraints:

  • Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
  • Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
  • No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors

Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements

After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.

Thank you! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)

06:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Movement Learning and Leadership Development Project

[edit]

Hello

The Wikimedia Foundation’s Community Development team is seeking to learn more about the way volunteers learn and develop into the many different roles that exist in the movement. Our goal is to build a movement informed framework that provides shared clarity and outlines accessible pathways on how to grow and develop skills within the movement. To this end, we are looking to speak with you, our community to learn about your journey as a Wikimedia volunteer. Whether you joined yesterday or have been here from the very start, we want to hear about the many ways volunteers join and contribute to our movement.

To learn more about the project, please visit the Meta page. If you are interested in participating in the project, please complete this simple Google form. Although we may not be able to speak to everyone who expresses interest, we encourage you to complete this short form if you are interested in participating!

-- LMiranda (WMF) (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on movement names

[edit]

Hello. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Please help translate to your language if necessary. Thank you!

There are a lot of conversations happening about the future of our movement names. We hope that you are part of these discussions and that your community is represented.

Since 16 June, the Foundation Brand Team has been running a survey in 7 languages about 3 naming options. There are also community members sharing concerns about renaming in a Community Open Letter.

Our goal in this call for feedback is to hear from across the community, so we encourage you to participate in the survey, the open letter, or both. The survey will go through 7 July in all timezones. Input from the survey and discussions will be analyzed and published on Meta-Wiki.

Thanks for thinking about the future of the movement, --The Brand Project team, 20:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: The survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may subject it to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling, see the survey privacy statement.

Nuværende 4 forslag til egenskaber

[edit]

Der er pr forslag til egenskaber:

I må gerne give jeres mening tilkende på dem. --Steenth (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge av svensk, norsk och dansk?

[edit]

Ett förslag på att slå ihop den svenska, norska och danska Chaten finns på Wikidata:Bybrunnen! 62 etc (talk) 19:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Det kunne være en idé . Der er ikke meget gang i den dansk discussion her i 2024. Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 12:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


label of Dutch (Q7411) in Danish

[edit]

Currently https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7411?uselang=da shows

  • dansk: nederlandsk
  • hollandsk: Nederlands

meaning the Wikidata label is "nederlandsk", but the list we use through MediaWiki uses "hollandsk". Can we update the later to "nederlandsk" or should the label be corrected to "hollandsk"? --- Jura 22:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a prolonged discussion long time ago on the Danish Wikipedia about whether the country should be called "Holland" (colloquial language (Q901711)) or "Nederlandene"/"Nederland" (official language). It ended up with "Holland". I was not involved in the discussion. For that language the Danish Wikipedia uses "Nederlandsk" as the primary name. I see that currently the name that is shown to me for the language in the label section of an item in is Wikidata is "nederlandsk". Whatever is used is ok by me. "Nederlandsk" for the language is fine. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 12:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hvordan "merges"?

[edit]

Jeg har forsøgt sammenskrivning eller "merge" mellem retspleje "No label defined (Q12333310)" og procedural law (Q936044). Først klikkede jeg 'merge' og ventede en god tid. Så klikkede jeg 'postpone' og fik meddelelse om at merge.js var igang. Mit spørgsmål er så om der kan siges noget bestemt om hvor lang tid det tager? Holder scriptet inde hvis jeg lukker browseren? Sechinsic (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@к 178.133.56.89 11:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Landsbybrønden&oldid=2257031640"