Wikidata:Property proposal/Evil Angel video ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Evil Angel video ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
Description | identifier for a pornographic video in the Evil Angel video database |
---|---|
Represents | Evil Angel video database (Q104166407) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | video clip (Q677466) |
Example | NSFW:
|
External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
Formatter URL | https://www.evilangel.com/en/video/$1 |
Motivation
[edit]This new Wikidata property related to erotica or pornography (Q53671196) would enhance our coverage of pornographic film (Q185529). Evil Angel (Q1281891) is one of the biggest companies of the industry, and its database has more detailed information than Internet Adult Film Database (Q1052713) and Adult Film Database (Q732004) (e. g. exact release date, scene list for every movie). See also : WD:Property proposal/Evil Angel movie ID. — Mathieu Kappler (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit] Oppose Contains very little information. --Trade (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Trade: The advantage is that it has entries about seperate scenes, which the big databases do not have. For many scenes it is the only reliable database that can provide us with release date, which movie it is included in and what it depicts. Regards, Mathieu Kappler (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Trade (talk) 13:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Notified participants of WikiProject Authority control — MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please... I haven't enrolled the Authority control project to give my opinion about porn websites... It's not its purpose. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC).
- Question: That is, this is no longer the topic? There is no special project on erotic and pornography on Wikidata. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please... I haven't enrolled the Authority control project to give my opinion about porn websites... It's not its purpose. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC).
- Oppose Very few of the titles that the scenes are from are individually notable. I don't think this level of granularity is necessary. Trivialist (talk) 23:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mathieu Kappler, Trade, Nomen ad hoc, Trivialist: Not done —MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)