Wikidata:Property proposal/ITU-T Recommendation

Description	identifier of an ITU-T Recommendation
Represents	ITU-T Recommendation (Q55935585)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	ITU-T Recommendation (Q55935585), ITU-T recommendation version (Q55936923)
Allowed values	[ADEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXYZ]\.\d+(\.\d+)?( \((0[1-9]\|1[0-2])/(19\|20)\d{2}\))?
Example 1	G.711 (Q952898) → G.711
Example 2	Recommendation T.70 (11/1988): Network-independent basic transport service for the telematic services (Q26902004) → T.70 (11/1988)
Example 3	Recommendation E.165.1 (10/1996): Use of escape code "0" within the E.164 numbering plan during the transition period to implementation of NPI mechanism (Q27051333) → E.165.1 (10/1996)
Example 4	X.509 (Q1065865) → X.509
Source	https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/publications/Pages/recs.aspx
See also	ITU-R Recommendation (P5686)

Same concept as existing property ISO standard (P503), but for ITU-T recommendations. Dhx1 (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support but can you find a formatter URL? ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @ArthurPSmith: The ITU-T website uses numeric IDs for the standards pages on their website which don't match the unique identifier of each standard. I've also checked the search feature and it uses a HTTP POST method and some ugly/complex variables sent to the server. From a quick attempt to send obvious search form variables via a HTTP GET request, a blank page is returned. Dhx1 (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is also a proposal at Wikidata:Property proposal/ITU-R Recommendation. Why would it need two?
--- Jura 05:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1: ITU-T and ITU-R are two separate standards organisations. ITU-T F.106 and ITU-R F.106 exist as different standards that don't have anything to do with each other. Dhx1 (talk) 11:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. Two properties then.
  --- Jura 07:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu