Wikidata:Property proposal/Qobuz album ID 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Qobuz album ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | identifier for an album on Qobuz site |
|---|---|
| Represents | Qobuz (Q3412507) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | album (Q482994), single (Q134556), version, edition or translation (Q3331189) |
| Example 1 | Angels Ain't Listening (Q93373704) → o7r5t74027zic |
| Example 2 | Faded (Q22041338) → 0886446321981 |
| Example 3 | Alors on danse (Q708698) → 0060252752524 |
| Source | https://www.qobuz.com |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Putting value to albums available on the Qobuz site. |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.qobuz.com/gb-en/album/_/$1 |
| See also | Qobuz artist ID (P7071) |
Motivation
[edit]Property for albums included in Qobuz. Eurohunter (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Previously discussed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Qobuz album ID
Discussion
[edit]
Oppose we don't need to create identifiers for every streaming site out there, and there doesn't seem to be any particularly valuable information at this site that isn't available elsewhere. As far as I can tell nothing has changed since the proposal was previously rejected. Andrew Gray (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Gray: These are not arguments. There are already track ID for Shazam, Deezer and other stores as well as KKBox artist ID. Eurohunter (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is not an argument explaining why this property has any value, or why anything is different from when your previous request was rejected. Andrew Gray (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Gray: Why do you think it is limited? Where is the limit? 2, 5, 10, 17 or 237 store IDs and why? Eurohunter (talk) 18:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- This link gives us no useful information, just a link to buy the music. We do not need to be a directory of every commercial site that includes a track, any more than we would want a new identifier for every different online bookshop. As for the other identifiers, I don't think there should be a fixed numerical limit, but it already feels like many of the ones we have are of very low value as well. I don't think adding more will improve the situation.
- I would be fine with us adding new identifier properties if there's something informative or useful at the other end - chart rankings, for example - or if the index in the database is something important we can't get elsewhere. But we don't need many, many links to webshops, all hosting the same streaming music and the same metadata. It doesn't feel appropriate, and it doesn't feel useful. Andrew Gray (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Gray: Credits or details about release provided by Qobuz are useful information. Eurohunter (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Gray: Why do you think it is limited? Where is the limit? 2, 5, 10, 17 or 237 store IDs and why? Eurohunter (talk) 18:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is not an argument explaining why this property has any value, or why anything is different from when your previous request was rejected. Andrew Gray (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Gray: These are not arguments. There are already track ID for Shazam, Deezer and other stores as well as KKBox artist ID. Eurohunter (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Not done Stale, with no redeeming arguments given by proposer since the last proposal of this property. Mahir256 (talk) 21:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)