User talk:Kjetil r/arkiv4

---

OTRS

Hey, don't forget to respond to the email! The email regarding this image [1] was still in the queue. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 23:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Bastique. There is no "lock"-link on the permissions-commons e-mails, so I guess I am not allowed to answer to answer these. I put template:PermissionOTRS on these images because nobody else seemed to care about them. Kjetil_r 00:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:PD-NorwayGov

Image deletion warning

Template:PD-NorwayGov has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--80.202.174.201 16:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Dette blir tatt hånd om. Ha en fin ferie Kjetil! Finnrind 07:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, ser ut til at dette skal gå fint. Kamerat 80.202.174.201 har laget en del rot med slettingsforslag ikke satt opp på riktig måte, jeg skal se om jeg kan få ryddet opp litt. Hilsen --Kjetil r 19:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Jeg løp etter ham og la inn (feilformatterte) protester før jeg oppdaget at alle undersidene han hadde opprettet ikke var inkludert i selve slettesiden. Han har jo heller ikke merket de enkelte bildene for sletting, selv om han kanskje trodde det selv (han hadde erstattet malen PD-NorwayGov med en slettetag). Går ut fra det bare er å hurtigslette alle disse undersidene. Finn Rindahl 19:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Greit, da hurtigsletter jeg disse. --Kjetil r 22:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Jordan statue

Just curious, why did you add {{Derivative}} to Image:Michael jordan statue 1.jpg and Image:Michael jordan statue 2.jpg. The image was released under CC-BY-2.0 which is a valid commons license. If this was a mistake, please remove the speedy deletion tag ASAP. --PS2pcGAMER 00:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Because they are photos of a copyrighted statue. Kjetil_r 02:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jordan statue

Actually I'm not sure it's a copyvio. It's a publicly displayed statue and the photo is listed under creative commons-attribution license. Explain to me how this is a copyvio. Quadzilla99 10:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

See Commons:Derivative works. Kjetil_r 15:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

See Frank Gehry among about 50 other modern artists, architects, sculptors, etc. There no less than 58 Frank Gehry works on Wikimedia Commons. Quadzilla99 19:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Gehry is an architect. There is freedom of panorama for architectural works in the United States. But if you see a photo of a copyrighted sculpture from a country which does not have freedom of panorama, please tag it as a {{Derivative}}. Kjetil_r 21:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

So there isn't freedom of panorama for sculptures? Okay, you might as well delete this too then:[2] Quadzilla99 23:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Kjetil_r 23:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Wiki DYK?

Could you do me a favor? I started a couple of articles and submitted them for DYK? over on Wikipedia the pics I found haven't yet been checked to make sure they comply with the rules of creative commons. I was told they have to be checked if they are going to be put on the front page of Wikipedia with the DYK's so could you check them real quick and give them the approval. They're flickr pics and fine it should only take one minute:[3][4][5][6] Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 09:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. User:EPO has already chacked them, they are ok. Kjetil_r 18:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks

With regards to your comments on User talk:Ranveig: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. AnonMoos 13:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Very funny. I commented on the fact that you seem to consider a photo of two girls playing a “pre-teen upskirt pic.” Kjetil_r 00:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not in the slightest degree less than serious. You are the one who seems to be incapable of on-topic or mature relevant discussion of the problems which a picture of little girl's panties might possibly present, but instead have appointed yourself as an amateur Doctor of Psychology, and have taken it upon yourself to offer a pop-psychological psychobabble jargon "diagnosis" of my aleged "syndrome". If you could refrain from doing so in future, it would advance the discussion of problems which a picture of little girl's panties might possibly present to Wikimedia Commons. AnonMoos 00:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop the personal attacks, buddy. Kjetil_r 00:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

It's a funny thing how you are consistently completely and utterly unwilling to address any of the issues I have raised in any way, but you have lots of time and energy to spare for the purpose of attempting to taunt me on the basis of my national origin, and to insinuate that I'm a sexual pervert -- and when I point this out, you are incapable of any reply other than a childish "I know you are, but what am I?"

All this, apparently, in order to intimidate and harass me for having "dared" to raise issues with respect to Image:Two little girls.jpg. Well, I "dared" to raise issues with respect to User:Belginusanl, and he's permanently banned from Wikimedia Commons, and I'll continue to "dare" to raise issues with respect to this image whether you like it or not. AnonMoos 01:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Stop adding harrassment template

Stop adding a template to my user talk page whose purpose is to get "revenge" against me, and continue your campaign to intimidate and harrass me. AnonMoos 18:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in User_talk:AnonMoos. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

Funny. “intimidate and harrass you”. Where do you get such ideas? Kjetil_r 18:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Ever since you started personally attacking me over on User_talk:Ranveig instead of addressing any single one of the factual issues I raised there. AnonMoos 19:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I personally attacking you?! You are imagining things, or deliberately misunderstanding. Kjetil_r 19:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

We've gone over all this several times already. Your refusal to apologize for insinuating that I am a sex pervert at 04:46, 17 February 2007 on User talk:Ranveig is one of the things which convinces me that you are acting in bad faith: [7] -- AnonMoos 19:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

{{Delh}} and {{Delf}}

Hi. You don't have to subst these templates when closing a deletion request. In fact substing them will break my bot :( Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 09:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'll stop substing them. It was Bastique who told me to subst them a while ago. You should tell him not to spread misinformation! ;-) Kjetil_r 16:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

T-bane kart

Hei Kjetil r, håper det er greit vi tar på norsk.

Civitas er de som har laget selve bildet for Oslo Sporveier, men Oslo Sporveier er de som "eier" bildet i den forstand. Utifra sånn jeg har forstått er lovlig å distribuere offentlig tilgjengelig informasjonsbilder, ala dette, dersom disse er fra offentlige etater.

Når det gjelder definisjonen på bildet må jeg ærlig innrømme at jeg puttet det inn fordi jeg ikke aner hva som passet best. "Property of norwegian government" er som kjent ikke noe alternativ der. :-) Når jeg finner bilder (uten copyright av noe slag) har jeg et konstant problem med hva jeg skal markere det som. Ønsker du å slette bildet på bakgrunn av dette, skal jeg ikke protestere mot det.

Yosh3000.

Svarer deg på din diskusjonsside for å holde diskusjonen samlet. Kjetil_r 20:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

ah ok, da vet jeg det. Takk for opplysningene, og ha en fin kveld! :-) Yosh3000

Kevin Rose

You tagged this image [8] as not having a permissions source but I did link one. It is a screenshot from this podcast [9] which is creativly commonly licensed (see the website I linked to in the bottom left corner) allowing for sharing of the image SirGrant 04:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

NM I just saw what you said about some rights reserved != CC2.5 I'm going to e-mail the webpage about usage on commons. SirGrant 04:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, great. “Some rights reserved” may refer to a noncommercial license, so this needs to be clarified. Kjetil_r 08:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to give you an update on this, I got an email from David Pragar (COO and VP of programing [10]) that said

---

:Hi Grant,

:Thanks very much for checking in with us at Revision3. Please feel free to use this as permission to use any of the images you've referenced in your email. Also, let me know if there is anything else the admins/editors/powers that be require and I'll do my best to help you you.

:Regards,

:David Prager :Revision3 Corp

---

So I'm going to remove the permission tag on the kevin rose image and the other revision3 images I have already uploaded and apply that email text under the permission catagory. SirGrant 18:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh ugg I just found out that I have to get an OTRS filled out (sorry I'm from wikipedia I'm not used to all the commons protocols) I'll shoot an email back and try to get that filled out ASAP. SirGrant 00:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, it is nice that you do it the proper way. Note that one should use OTRS for premissions for Wikipedia as well, see en:Template:ConfirmationOTRS. Kjetil_r 01:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok np I'll categorize them this weekend (I have a midterm tomorrow). Just if you were curious most of them are en:TechTV personalities however once this TV channel got canceled most of the hosts of the shows went on producing tech content in the form of video/podcasts. Also thanks for helping me through wikimedia protocols, it actually took me a while to figure out the wikipedia policies and I have to learn the new ones they have here as well. Lates! SirGrant 02:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

merkelig

Prøvde å laste et bilde her to ganger Men fikk det ikke til å virke på WPno, så jeg la et lokalt også dette kan du slette. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bergendoevekirke.jpg da jeg trodde at problemet var øen. Sjekk hva som skjer med andre og om det som ligger her virker lokalt kan kopien der slettes. Jeg reiser til Oslo i morgen så jeg var litt utålmodig. ---Nina- 16:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Tja, ikke godt å si hva problemet var. Mulig det var noen problemer med tjeneren Commons ligger på. Det ser ut til å fungere nå, så jeg slettet den lokale kopien og Image:Bergendoevekirke.jpg. Hilsen Kjetil_r 21:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Please delete

I hadn't noticed this was already uploaded. Please delete it thanks:[11] (if you want to see the other one click on the Bruce Springsteen category on the pic's page). Quadzilla99 23:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. Kjetil_r 01:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Szent2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Szent2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 14:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kong_Harald_V.jpg

Vil du se etter at alt er gått rett her? Jeg har mail på at jeg kan laste de opp og at de er frie. La enhver tvil gå i mitt favør. NorwegianMarcus 10:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Hei. Dette ble feil. Du kan ikke sette CC-BY på et bilde der dealen er at det er «frigitt til bruk for dere». Man kan ikke sette en fri lisens på noe med mindre den som har rettighetene direkte sier det. Derfor bør man bruke Commons:Epostmaler når man ber om en slik tillatelse, og e-posten skal videresendes til info-no@wikimedia.org.

Legg merke til at an tillatelse må dekke alles bruk av bildet (også kommersielt), og spesifkt nevne retten til å gjøre endringer i bildet.

Slik tillatelsen er nå må nok bildet slettes. Hilsen Kjetil_r 15:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:CAvGalenBAMS200612.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CAvGalenBAMS200612.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 08:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Duplikat og feil tolkning av bilde

Hei! Se Image:Norwegian mech battallion soldier in UH-60.jpg. Du la det samme bildet inn som Image:Panserbataljonen.JPEG, som jeg fjernet fra artikkelen om Panserbataljonen på no:. Karen er fra Telemark bataljon, ikke Panserbataljonen, se bare merket på ermet. Harald Hansen 08:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Jeg svarer på no.wp, så vi holder diskusjonen samlet. Kjetil r 14:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

OTRS Status?

Hello. I noticed that you have OTRS access. There are two images (en:Image:BPM_37093_large.jpg and en:Image:Governor_White_70th_Leg_1987.jpg on en:WP that I'd like to move to Commons, but I don't want to do so until the permissions I logged with OTRS have been confirmed. I sent copies of the relevant permissions requests and responses to OTRS en-permissions about three weeks ago, but have not heard back from anyone at OTRS, haven't received a ticket number, and no one has updated the image descriptions. I'm not sure if this is perfectly normal (i.e. a large backlog in OTRS) or something has gone wrong. Is there anyway you can check what the status of these are? The e-mail subject names were "Permission for Image:Artist_impression_of_BPM_37093.jpg" and "Permission for Image:Governor_White_70th_Leg_1987.jpg". Thanks. —RP88 11:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello. They are fine. Image:BPM 37093 large.jpg has a ticket number of 2007022210015855, Image:Governor_White_70th_Leg_1987.jpg has 2007022110019488. You can move the images to Commons. Kjetil r 14:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your quick response. I've added the appropriate {{PermissionOTRS-ID}} tags to the image descriptions. —RP88 15:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Sletting av bilde

Gidder du slette Image:Bodø stasjon.JPG?, Image:Bodø jernbanestasjon.jpg er av langt bedre kvalitet og bør i stedet brukes (glemte å erstatte når jeg lastet opp). Røed 19:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Done. Mvh. Kjetil r 16:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Mail

Hvor fikk du mailen min fra? Simon wr 09:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hei. Jeg kan ikke huske å ha sendt deg mail. Kan du være litt mer spesifikk? Hilsen Kjetil r 16:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Beskyttelse

Hej Kjetil.

mange tak for at du beskyttede Image:Diyarbakir City walls.jpg‎, maske du ogsa vil beskytte Image:Hasankeyf.JPG, der er offer for samme revert-krig. Tak! Bertilvidet 19:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hei Bertil. Image:Hasankeyf.JPG er nu beskyttet. Hilsen Kjetil r 20:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:F porsche.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:F porsche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Polarlys 14:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

You should notify Benutzer:Bran rather than me. Kjetil r 19:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Biskop bilder

Ser du har merket bilder av norske biskoper for sletting. Jeg er ikke kjent med prosedyrer og regler for bildebruk, men vil peke deg til [12], der oppgir kirkens informasjonstjeneste at bildene kan brukes fritt dersom kilde oppgis.

Dersom det er behov for ytterligere bekreftelse om fri bruk av bildene, kan jeg gjerne være behjelpelig med kontakt med de rette organer i den norske kirke.

Poster her siden jeg ikke helt vet hvordan slettediskusjoner på commons fungerer, skal du svare meg bruk diksujonssiden min på no.

MVH no:bruker:finnrind, 11.01 CET

Re: Help needed

Hi Kjetil. Are you sure about that user? His upload log is clean.. maybe the username is wrong ;)

FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 17:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

AWB

Good evening Mr. Kjetil! How do you get AutoWikiBrowser access on Wikimedia Commons? I’d like to do some automated replacements in my uploaded files. Regards, --Polarlys 22:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Good evening Mr. Borealis. I have to admit that I have no idea how to get such access. I haven't been using MS Windows for many years, so I have never had the opportunity to use AutoWikiBrowser myself. Commons:AutoWikiBrowser isn't especially helpful either. Try asking at the Help desk. Sincerely, Kjetil r 03:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

You haven’t missed anything … Thank you anyway. --Polarlys 07:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Francois Bordes.png

Hi

In not speak english very well.

I have ask for permisión for this image by e-mail and I received an affimative reply, by same media

I don't know how translate this permission to the tags of common due to my low level of english.

That is my asking:

Dear Sir:

I write you to ask permission to reproduce your image (http:// www.hf.uio.no/iakh/forskning/sarc/iakh/SARCimages/bordes.gif) in Wikipedia, an open project for the creation of a free encyclopedia. :My intention is to include the image/s there (at the moment in the biography of François Bordes and one article about experimental flintknapping, both in Spanish)

Wikipedia was born in 2001, and in only five years of life it counts with thousands of articles in dozens of languages, thanks to the work of thousands of writers. You can visit the spanish version, with a total of 136.652 articles at http://es.wikipedia.org. All version, in more than 200 languages, sum more than 2.600.000 articles.

Wikipedia's texts and images are published under GNU Free Documentation License, known as GFDL. You can read the original version in http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html . If you want, in the description page of the image we can leave an explaining note ("Image reproduced under GFDL with the authorization of "your name" ") and a link to the original, but the freedom of utilize and modify which is refered in GFDL is indispensable. This note won't appear at the epigraph of the image. The image will be linked to it's description page, where the note and the link to the original will appear.

Without anything else to say, I thank you in advance your attention.

Yours sincerely,

José Manuel Benito Álvarez

http://jose-manuel-benito-alvarez.tk/

jbenit1@platea.pntic.mec.es

P.D: In case that you accept this authorization, I ask you to quote that you agree with the publication of the material under GFDL license.

And this is the reply (olaf.christensen@iakh.uio.no):

Dear José Manuel Benito Álvarez

You have hereby our permission to reproduce the image http://www.hf.uio.no/iakh/forskning/sarc/iakh/SARCimages/bordes.gif in Wikipedia.

Best wishes

Olaf Christensen

Information Officer

Department of Archaeology, Conservation and Historical Studies

University of Oslo

Maybe you can help me to standarize the tag of permission, I don´t know how. I was very interest in this image, please, dont delete it (You can chek the email is legal, so the permission too). Thanks--Locutus Borg 10:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Template:Autotravel

Hi Eugene. I need the help of a Russian speaker. Does this page mention derivative works and commercial use? Is it a free license? Kjetil r 23:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't think that this page said this clearly, but I think text could be very likely interpreted as allowing derivative works (в любом виде и контексте) and commercial use (безвозмездно). However I could recommend to ask active uploaders of images from Autotravel.org.ru to request owner of images to use CC-BY license. --EugeneZelenko 15:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for you kind assistance. Kjetil r 16:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Templates

They are OK. Someone from pl.wiki is negotiating cc-by for them ;)

--WarX 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Peter Crouch.jpg

I'm handling this specific one see [13]. I'm thinking its time to close it as unsuccessful and delete the image.--Nilfanion 21:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it seems like he doesn't see the need for a free license. That is weird, as he was willing to grant cc-by a year ago. Kjetil r 21:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Chicago1981

I did not know about the problem with derivative works. Then, others of my photos should be deleted too (see more sculptures in Chicago). Best.--Jrpvaldi 12:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

{{Kirkeinfo}}

Hey, you think you can add the OTRS ticket number to the template? Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 09:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

The license is mentioned at the source, see [14]. The source is linked to from the template. Isn't this good enough? Kjetil r 17:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

To be honest I just missed the part on the source website that mentioned the Creative Commons license - my bad. Yonatan ^talk 01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Derivative works question

Hi Kjetil r. Since you seem to be fairly familiar with Commons:derivative works, would you clarify a question of mine? I uploaded a bunch of images of a TV set (see Category:Jericho (TV series), all images but the maps) and then realized that they probably fall under the derivative works clause. The set isn't in a public place and is able to be easily torn down. If the images are derivative works, please delete them for me. Thanks. --PS2pcGAMER 10:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi PS2pcGAMER. Frankly, I have no idea if these are derivative works. You should ask at Commons talk:Licensing or Commons talk:Derivative works. Kjetil r 15:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. --PS2pcGAMER 22:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Upload/no

Wow, I wasn't expecting such a fast response. :) I will get my bot on it tonight or tomorrow I hope. thank you! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I noticed you put in some extra touches like "«no» for bokmål, «nn» for nynorsk". that's fantastic, I hope all the translators put in useful info for their language compatriots. :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Should be all done. Let me know if you notice any problems. BTW "my preferences" and "participate" aren't defined? --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 17:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sidney crosby.jpg

It seems fairly obvious to me this file, which you transfered from enwiki, is a copyright violation. See http://www.askmen.com/men/celeb_profiles_sports/6_sidney_crosby.html. Patstuart 17:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it seems like a clear copyvio. I will delete it immediately. I will also give User:Lycheeslush a warning about grabbing random images off the web and claim them as his own. Kjetil r 18:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Opplastingsskjemaer

Nå har jeg fått lest gjennom. Innholdet ser veldig bra ut. Jeg er enig i at selve opplastingssiden ikke er helt tilfredsstillende estetisk sett. Den vil sikkert fungere etter hensikten, men jeg tror ikke det er bortkastet hvis du har noen idéer om hvordan den kan gjøres penere. Cnyborg 22:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cesc Fabregas.jpg

Hey, I don't really wanna get into a revert war over a date as that's just silly :P but the game took place on October 14, 2006 though (Arsenal vs. Watford) so the metadata has to be wrong. In fact, Arsenal didn't have a game on October 9 and according to Sky Sports the game vs. Watford took place on the 14 (and as can be seen from the flickr user's other files, the game was against Watford). Yonatan ^talk 01:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess the metadata is wrong then. Make it Oct 14 :-) Kjetil r 01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Banners CIMG0256.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Banners CIMG0256.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

G.dallorto 14:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Banners CIMG0256.jpg

OK, I changed it as per your request: this is what I want to understand myself, where a "derivate" work starts. --G.dallorto 15:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I can understand that it might be a derivative work, but it is not completely obvious. Speedy delete should only be used when there is no doubt. Kjetil r 15:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:DSC00421.JPG

Vi tråkket oppå hverandre, og noe er galt. Regner med at vi begge fikk beskjed, og begynte revertering samtidig. Jeg trekker meg tilbake og lar deg fikse det i fred. Cnyborg 23:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Ett eller annet er galt ja, men jeg forstår ikke helt hva det er. Progamvaren oppførte seg ikke helt som den burde, bl.a. overskrev redigeringssammendraget mitt lisensinformasjonen (noe som ikke skal skje). Det er muligens MediaWikis mystiske cache-prosess som skaper problemer. Det ser ut til å fungere i artikkelen nå, men Image:DSC00421.JPG viser feil bilde uansett i hvilken nettleser jeg prøver, eller hvor mye jeg tar en "hard refresh". Det går seg sikkert til etterhvert, det pleier som regel det. Jeg skal også skrive en liten beskjed til han som overskrev bildet, og be ham passe på slik for fremtiden. Kjetil r 23:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Broken SVG

Hei Kjetil! Image:Sauerstoffschuld.svg (my own file) is broken, please delete it without bureaucracy. The png version is in use. Thank you! Hilsen, --Polarlys 09:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Hei, det er ok. Image deleted. Hilsen Kjetil r 14:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Translation

Hi, can you translate the following into Spanish for me? Kjetil r 21:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Dear Sirs,

I am thinking of reusing some content from your website. I have been told that the content is for “public use,” 
and I wonder what this means. May I take photos from you website and modify them to my needs, 
and then use them commercially? 

Yours sincerely,
Kjetil r

Sorry Kjetil r,

nice try. But you will have to find someone else to translate this. Also: it is quite some bad style to ask for that permission without citing the previous e-mail contact. (Just think: The webmaster of presidencia.gov.ar might have changed.)

Bye --ALE! ¿…? 21:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

?!? Why won't you translate it? I see no reason for you not to translate it, unless you attempt to sabotage the deletion dicussion. And the rules for reuse should be the same, it should not matter who the webmaster is, they should give the same answer. I do not see the need to cite the previous e-mail contact, I am asking as an individual, and he should give everyone the same answer. Kjetil r 21:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I will not participate anymore in this request. My opinion is clear. And you should at least give the webmaster a hint where to look in his archives (approx. date or such or give him a link to the template in Commons.). What you do is bad style. --ALE! ¿…? 21:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

No need to copy the thread to my talk page, it is better to keep it at yours. I have answered you there. Kjetil r 21:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Polarlys

Hi, I think the reason that * is used instead of # here is that support, oppose, and comment get mixed together, so the numbers would in some cases not work out. Polarlys is sailing along unopposed of course, but if one oppose is added, it would throw things off and need to be changed back. That's my view. I don't know if it's more than just that. ++Lar: t/c 11:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

You are quite possibly right. We will need to change it back then. Kjetil r 12:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Bryggen i Bergen

Prøver å rydde litt i Category:Bergen og underkategorier. Ha du et forslag til hva eg skal gjør med Category:Tyskebryggen og Category:Bryggen. Det er jo samme kategorien, men hvilken skal få forrang? Rettetast 11:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

En må jo slettes, men jeg har vel ingen formening om hvilken form som er den mest brukte.Det vet kanskje du? Da tømmer du i såfall den ene, og merker den med {{speedy|Duplicate category, all images moved to [[:category:<navnet på den andre kategorien>]]}}. Hilsen Kjetil r 16:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Spörsmål om OTRS

Hej Kjetil, jag har förstått att du har möjlighet att kontrollera OTRS-tillstånd? Har du möjlighet att titta efter om det verkligen finns ett tillstånd för Image:Andy Mapple interview.jpg, Image:Giancarlo Cosio podium.jpg och Image:Giancarlo Cosio.jpg? Thuresson 15:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Hei, e-mailen var så her:

I am the administrator of Scinauticando.com, a water-ski website.
I would like to confirm that all images from my website uploaded to  
Commons by user:Luzz are cc-by-sa, which is a different licence than  
the articles in the website itself.

Mailen var fra <info (at) scinauticando.it>. Kjetil r 16:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Folketinget

Kan du rykke webmasteren for et svar? På bl.a. dansk Wikipedia afventer vi med meget stor forventning resultatet. Du må gerne fortælle dem, at billederne anvendes i stor udstrækning og et snarligt, men klart svar behøves af samme årsag. --|EPO| 18:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Jeg skal maile webmasteren igjen i eftermiddag, og be om et snarlig svar. Kjetil r 20:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Keith

Hi, Keith's image was reuploaded in higher resolution (the older one was 56 kb, the new one is 750kb) as asked by two administrators to establish my ownership credentials. It is placed here [15] and the undelection discussion is here. [16] I think I have your support now. Thanks Machocarioca 08:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Machocarioca

Tar dette på norsk...

...har lastet opp et par bilder, gidder du ta en kikk for å fortelle meg hva jeg har gjort galt (for noe er det helt sikkert :-) ) før det blir satt på slettetag og full pakke... Finnrind 12:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Tja, så da greit ut dette. Det eneste jeg kan se er at du oppgir datoen til Bech-bildet uten å begrunne den, for det er vel ikke et fotografi? Men det er lite trolig at noen bryr seg, dette er sikkert bra. Kjetil r 16:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Akkurat den datoen var det faktisk Chris som la inn (ikke sikkert resten så like bra ut for han kom forbi heller ;) Men det ser i alle fall ut som om opplasting til Commons ikke er så forfryktelig vanskelig som man noen ganger kan få inntrykk av, det virker jo være relativt enkle regler å forholde seg til. Finnrind 18:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Addedwatchtext/no

Hei!

Jeg fant en skrivefeil ("overvåkningslistea") da jeg skulle legge noe i min watchlist. Etter litt leting i prefixindex fant jeg siden. Tar du og fikser det? — H92 (t · c · no) 15:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Heisann. Godt jobbet, jeg har endret teksten nå. Hilsen Kjetil r 20:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Thorpe pic

Could you delete this pic please? I uploaded it again with a better title. Quadzilla99 23:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I'll delete it. Kjetil r 05:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Incidentally, I originally thought that was King Gustav but I'm not sure that's why I changed the title. Quadzilla99 13:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Women making out.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Women making out.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Gledesdreper. Kjetil r 05:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Statue

I think this falls under the same status as the Jordan and Johnson statues. Am I correct? Or is it different as it's a government statue? Quadzilla99 13:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure, but it might be different if it is made by a federal government employee. If not, it is most likely a derivative work of a copyrighted statue, just like the Jordan and Johnson statues. I guess the best way of getting some more input is by nominating it for deletion. Kjetil r 13:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Uploading from en:wiki

Could you please take a look and see if I got this one right : Image:Lough Allen Leitrim.jpg. I used the commonshelper, and the result was rather confusing to a simple norwegian... ;) Finnrind 13:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Looks great. You might have cleaned up the multiple license templates a bit. I did that for you. Siebrand 13:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hei, jeg tar det på norsk. Det var grei den der, med to små ting som kan forbedres (Siebrand took care of both, thank you :-)

Første tingen var dette med flere lisensmaler, den nederste holder lenge. CommonsHelper er noen ganger litt for ivrig til å legge på flere av samme.

Det andre er «Description»-feltet. Jeg ville ha flyttet «Peter Gavigan» ned i «Author», og dette med «Camera Phone, own work» ned i «Source». Heldigvis tok vår nederlandske kollega seg av dette. Jeg ville også ha skrevet ett eller annet i «Description»-feltet, så andre brukere lettere ser hva bildet er av. Og forresten, jeg forandret datoen, basert på hva som var i filens metadata (akkurat den er vanskelig å legge merke til, og det forventes ikke at alle skal tenke på det). Hilsen Kjetil r 16:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Godt godt, takk for hjelpen. Da skulle det være mulig selv for meg å få lastet opp GFDL lisensierte bilder fra engelsk til commons - det lyser jo opp i hverdagen til en wikifant som begynner å bli grundig lei av norske biskoper... And thanks to Siebrand as well ;-) Finnrind 17:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Yibbedy, Yibbedy, my Norwegian kindof sucks :) Siebrand 18:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Yibbedy, Yibbedy sound like double-dutch to me ;) Finnrind 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

BTW, could I do anything to show on en:wiki that this picture has been uploaded, or is this something a bot will take care of?? Finnrind 19:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Add {{subst:ncd}}.

If you install CommonsHelperHelper (by adding importScript('User:Krimpet/CH2.js'); to your monobook.js), the script will do it automagically for you. Kjetil r 19:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, substing {{Ncd}} worked, but that monobook thing didn't (I think). Could you take a look and let me know if I did anything wrong. Skriver en setning på norsk på slutten til ære for engelskspråklige brukere som stikker innom. Finnrind 20:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Ser ut som den der burde fungere? Hvis ikke kan du legge til et semikolon bakerst og lagre. Prøv også rådet «Bypass your browser's cache to see the changes. Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror/Firefox: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5» - det burde fikse saken.

Nå skal det komme en knapp som sier «move image to Commons» når du trykker på «edit this page» for et bilde. Da starter man CommonsHelper i en ramme inne på bildesiden. Man får så opp en knapp som sier «click when finished uploading», den skal skrive subst:ncd automatisk. Kjetil r 20:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Av og til, av og til, er et semikolon nok (nynnes til tidlig nittitallsmelodi av Anne Grete Preuss). Automagically, the marvels of modern techno(lol)ogy... Finnrind 22:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmmmx2 Virker tilsynelatende ikke likevel. Jeg prøvde å laste opp image:Killaloe, County Clare, alt så greit ut men var det nok ikke. Se opprinnelig bilde i en:Killaloe. Skjønner ikke dette jeg... Finnrind 22:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Tja, ikke godt å si hva det var. Det er jo slik at du fortsatt må kjøre CommonsHelper helt igjennom, før man klikker på «click when finished uploading». Det fungerte helt fint for meg da jeg gjorde det (jeg flyttet bildet over nå). Kjetil r 23:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Merksnodig. Skal finne noen andre bilder og prøve igjen. Kan du fikse det engelske bildet, er fortsatt taget med det nye navnet jeg prøvde å gi det, og det peker jo ikke noe sted. Finnrind 23:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Skal jeg mellomlagre bildet på min maskin og laste det opp derfra (bla gjennom) eller skal 'source' være url'en til bildet på en:wiki? Har prøvd det første, og det ser ikke ut til å funke. Finnrind 23:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Du skal mellomlagre på din maskin, og så laste det opp igjen. Får du noen feilmelding? Kjetil r 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Det går bra helt til jeg trykker på 'Upload file'. Da blankes innholdet i 'Source name' (som altså er en fil på min maskin). Det jeg har gjort etter at Magnus' magi har gjort sitt er å velge filen jeg har mellomlagret (bla gjennom), pluss at jeg har valgt GFDL fra en:wiki som lisens. Finnrind 23:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hm, det samme hendte med meg i går. Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor dette skjer, og har vel egentlig ingen løsning på det. Bruker du forresten Internet Explorer? Den kan noen ganger ha problemer med JavaScript. Kjetil r 23:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Jepp, dårlig program på treg maskin... Systemoperatøren er ikke så rask lenger heller, tror jeg tar kvelden og prøver på nytt i dagslys... Takk for hjelp så langt, satser på at jeg finner ut av det i morra eller deromkring ;-) Finnrind 23:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Nå skal du får informatikerens beste råd: når noe ikke fungerer, sov på det, og be en stille bønn om at det fungerer i morgen. Kjetil r 23:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rare ting... Nå har jeg fått en advarsel på user:finnrind/monobook.js om at noen kan ha lurt meg, men såvidt jeg kan skjønne er det eneste kompromiterende med hjelpehjelperen at den ikke hjelper... I dagslys på en annen maskin får jeg ikke opp den første 'move image to commons' knappen en gang. Framleis forvirra, ikkje etter neste vekes episode av Forviklingar.... Finnrind 09:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Sikkert noe problemer med cachen, som det heter på godt norsk. Prøv Ctrl-F5. Hilsen Ree 09:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hjelper ikke... Kanskje jeg bare skal gå videre i livet ved hjelp av commonshelper, og la commonshelperhelper hjelpe seg selv. Å subste en trebokstavers mal er generelt overkommelig. (Men det er irriterende når jeg ikke forstår hav som er galt ;) To andre spørsmål. 1) skal jeg sette inn ncd når jeg finner et bilde både på engelsk og commons, og bildet på engelsk ikke viser til commons (antar svaret er ja) 2) Jeg tenker om bilder at de heller bør være overkategorisert enn underkategorisert - er dobbelkat. like tabu på commons som på no:wiki (antar svaret er nei). Finnrind 09:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Ja, da subster du inn ncd
2. I de norske områdene av Commons kjører vi (= de 3-4 brukerne som bryr seg) like streng kategorisering som på no.wikipedia. Dobbelkategorisering brukes derfor ikke. Jeg foreslår at du ikke overkategoriserer, men heller oppretter et galleri som viser enten alt eller det viktigste i underkategoriene (for eksempel er Vålerenga Fotball et galleri over de nåværende spillere, mens alle spillerne også ligger i underkategorier av Category:Vålerenga fotball). Nå er det imidlertid slik at kategori- og galleristrukturen på Commons er noe forskjellig fra område til område, for eksempel så bruker man gallerier for dyr og planter i større grad. Jeg råder deg til å se på hvordan ting er gjort for andre bilder med samme tema, og gjøre det på samme måte. Kjetil r 14:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Funker nå, etter at jeg tok til vett og lastet ned firefox ;-) Finnrind 11:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Hurra

Yndlingsstalkeren din har tydeligvis funnet meg også, skulle kanskje ikke omtalt ham som 'tulling' hos Babaroga sist han skrev F**K you hos deg... ;-) Føler det nesten som et slags ridderslag - nå er jeg en av de store gutta, trollene skjeller meg ut. Finnrind 16:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Skulle du sett. Dette betyr at må må ha gjort ett eller annet riktig, nå er du virkelig varm i trøya. :Han begynte til meg etter at jeg blokkerte han for hets mot Silje, i forbindelse med slettingen av artikkelen om bandet «Waffen SS». Etter det ble visst jeg «favoritten» hans, selv om han stadig stikker innom en del andre også (spesielt Bruker:Ekko på nynorsk, om jeg husker riktig). Kjetil r 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Da er jeg jo i godt selskap ;-) Finnrind 17:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

To på en dag til deg, kanskje ikke så mye å rope hurra for likevel. Lurer på hvordan slike mennesker egentlig har det med seg selv... (sukk) Finnrind 21:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Ikke godt å si hva de tenker på. Mulig det er et par 13-åringer som driver på med «skøy». Jeg tror det beste er å ikke gi dem noen som helt form for oppmerksomhet, og bare blokkere og tilbakestille i det stille. Jeg ser at enkelte brukere prøver å diskutere med personen, noe den sikkert synes er kjempefestlig. Kjetil r 21:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

PiNG pong

Kan du ta en kikk på en:Image:Carlingford Lough.PNG/Image:Carlingford Lough.png. Gjennom mellomlagringen før opplastingen forandret filen navn fra .PNG til .png, jeg rettet ncd etter substingen og trodde alt var i orden men nå har en bot vært innom og såvidt jeg skjønner erklært at filen ikke kan slettes fra :en likevel. Da forsvinner jo litt av vitsen med opplasting... De filene som fortsatt linker til PNG versjonen på engelsk er sandkasser/ talksider, og jeg er litt tilbakeholden med å gå inn å endre lenker der manuelt - bør jeg gjøre noe med dette)? Samme problematikken gjelder et par andre filer jeg har lastet opp fra en:wiki Finnrind 22:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Hm, dette har jeg ikke sett før. Åpenbart noe nytt. Vi får se hva som skjer med bildet, og om det ikke slettes i løpet av en uke eller to skal jeg grave mer i saken. Du kan også spørre på en:Wikipedia:Village pump (policy).

Selv ville jeg ikke hatt noen betenkeligheter med å endre bildelenker nær sagt uansett hvor det var, men jeg vet ikke helt om det egentlig er god kutyme. Kjetil r 11:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy

Hi, I would welcome your input on this draft policy. thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 08:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

www.geograph.org

Kan jeg laste bilder herfra opp til commons?? Finnrind 00:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Det kan du. Siden jeg er så snill har jeg gjort klart beskrivelsen for dette bildet:

==Summary==
{{Information
|Description=Strangford Lough at Ballydorn. Many of the islands in Strangford Lough are drowned drumlins. This is Hen Island seen from the shore at Ballydorn near Killinchy.
|Source=http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/281844
|Date=2006-11-20
|Author=[http://www.geograph.org.uk/user/Saxon/ Aubrey Dale]
|Permission=© Copyright [http://www.geograph.org.uk/user/Saxon/ Aubrey Dale] and licensed for reuse under this [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ Creative Commons Licence]
|other_versions=
}}
{{Location|54|29|27.532|N|5|38|52.811|W|type:landmark}}
==Licensing==
{{geograph|281844|Aubrey Dale}}
[[Category:<ett-eller-annet>]]

Så vidt jeg kan se har alle bildene der en lisens vi kan bruke. For en fantastisk side/konsept. Hilsen Kjetil r 11:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Skal det ikke være Category:Et-eller-annet... Såvidt jeg skjønner det er dette bilder som skal attributeres med lenke, har jeg 1) forstått dette rett? og i så fall 2)dekker beskrivelsen dette? Finnrind 12:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Om fotografen spesifikt hadde sagt at vi attributere (er dette et norsk ord ?) med lenke burde vi nok ha gjort det, men det har han jo ikke i dette tilfellet. (det er en diskusjonssak om beskrivelsen hadde dekket det) Men jeg ville definitivt brukt mal:byline når jeg bruker bildet i en artikkel. Kjetil r 12:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Bklager, skulle vært attribuere ;-b Enig i at dette er et klart tilfelle av byline, men problemet med å legge dette fritt opp på commons er jo at endel av våre venner har en eller anner for meg uforståelig motvilje mot å bruke denne (minner meg forresten på om at jeg må gå over de siste bildene jeg har satt inn og sjekke hva jeg selv har gjort... ) Finnrind 12:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Et grusomt bilde

Jeg lastet opp en ny versjon av mosaikkene fra Ravenna i kveld tatt i 2006 i kirken. Da kommer jeg over dette bildet: Image:Ravennamagi.jpg som er noe av det verste jeg har sett. Jeg håper at dette bildet blir slettet da det er manipulert slik at fargene er helt feile og kvaliteten ellers er vel heller ikke den beste. Veggen er ikke helt rett så et normalt bilde vil ha noe skjevheter Image:Magi (1).jpg. Mosaikken er laget av gulltesseraer, glasstesseraer og noen av stein. Fargene i mitt bilde er så gode og korrekte som det er mulig å få dem. ---Nina- 01:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Enig, den er helt forferdelig den første. Den merket som «superseded», men den oppgitte grunnen er thumb, altså at den med de grusomme fargene har for liten oppløsning :-)

Jeg ser to muligheter for å bli kvitt den grusomme. Jeg kan sette i gang en bot til å erstatte den med din (det brukes på 13 sider i 12 prosjekter), og så slette den uten videre seremonier. Dette er basert på ideen om at det er lettere å få tilgivelse enn tillatelse. (Jeg kan alltids argumentere med lisensproblemer i etterkant).

Den andre muligheten er å gå igjennom en vanlig slettediskusjon på Commons:Deletion requests. Dette er egentlig måten å gjøre det på etter boken, men da risikerer vi jo et en eller annen protesterer (og da kan vi i alle fall ikke ta den i det skjulte etterpå). Selv synes jeg den første fremgangsmåten er den beste. Hva tror du, er det greit å tøye regelverket litt for å bli kvitt et fælt bilde? Kjetil r 12:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Et ubetinget ja det er å øve vold mot kunstverket å beholde det. ---Nina- 14:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Da skal jeg fikse saken. Håper ingen klager. Kjetil r 14:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Da er det grusomme bildet slettet, og bruken i alle artikler er erstattet med ditt nyeste bilde. Bildet finnes fortsatt lastet opp til engelsk Wikipedia, men jeg har tatt det ut av bruk og foreslått det slettet. Jeg tviler på at noen der protesterer. Kjetil r 14:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

{{Geograph

I'm writing this in english since this should be a concern for english speaking editors more than norwegians... Thanks for your help, the picture is now uploaded av Image:Hen Island Strangford Lough.jpg, and hopefully put in useful categories. My concern however is that over 200 pictures from Geograph British Isles project now have been uploaded with their original numerical names and are only categorized in Category:Geograph images, leaving them useless for most purposes. I'm still not quite sure how things work around here, but might it be an idea to have a bot tagging these pictures, requesting additional information??Finnrind 16:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

True, those 200+ images should be considered uncategorized.

I have browsed the wikipediabot documentation, but I could not find a way of adding {{Uncategorized}} to the images in a category that do not belong to another category. Perhaps you should ask someone who knows more about bots than I do, such as User:Bryan or User:Siebrand? Kjetil r 15:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

All images in the category could be tagged {{Uncat}}, which adds them to Category:Media needing categories. Would that be a solution? If so, please request it on my talk page, so I'll be remembered about this... Cheers! Siebrand 15:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, only 200-250 of the images using the template are actually uncategorized. We don't want to add {{Uncat}} to the images that actually are properly categorized. Kjetil r 15:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't know how to do that, then. Could be done with AWB fairly easily, too... Siebrand 17:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Too much help

Commons helper was a bit too helpful, image:slievemore.jpg has between 5 and 10 licenses, and I'm not sure which to remove. Care to take a look? Finnrind 23:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I gave it {{self|author=[[:en:User:Turkishbob|]]|GFDL-en|cc-by-2.5}}. CommonsHelper does not like the new license templates at the English Wikipedia, these mistakes are common these days. It will hopefully get fixed soon. Kjetil r 00:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Chartres

Kan du ta en titt på dette? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Chartres.jpg&curid=416344&diff=5925969&oldid=5925498 noen har lastet opp et nytt bilde over det som var der. ---Nina- 21:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Jeg har tilbakestilt. Slikt kan man forresten gjøre selv, alle kan tilbakestille overskrivninger. Jeg skal si noen ord til den som lastet det nye bildet over om at dette ikke var helt bra. Kjetil r 21:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fint. Jeg syns det er best at flere ser på slikt om det skulle bli diskusjoner. ---Nina- 21:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

For lang og tro tjeneste

--Finnrind 17:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Mange takk for oppmerksomheten. Hyggelig å høre at jeg kan være til hjelp. Hilsen Kjetil r 12:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Subcat as redirect

Is there any point in Category:Christopher Wren (Subcat and redirect to Sir Christopher Wren)?? Finnrind 22:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

There is not. I have now deleted Category:Christopher Wren. Kjetil r 12:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

In doing so, it appears that you may have deleted data on the consensus that led to that redirect being put in place, given that English Wikipedia has the name without the honorific, w:Christopher Wren. What harm was the redirect doing? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 20:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Jeff. A redirected category might cause fragmentation or redundancy in the category system, as users may try to add [[category:Christopher Wren]] to an image, and then incorrectly believe that this is the correct category when the link appears as blue. That is why category redirects should be avoided.

Thanks, I did not realize that. Is there a bot that goes around resolving category redirects? If there is not such a bot, I think one would be helpful.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 15:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

However, it is possible that we should use Category:Christopher Wren instead of Category:Sir Christopher Wren. Should I restore Category:Christopher Wren and move all images from Category:Sir Christopher Wren? Best regards, --Kjetil r 21:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I think that is probably the right thing to do, given what exists on the English Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 15:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'll fix it. --Kjetil r 10:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Gå meg i sømmene

Hey, kjetil. Jeg har beveget meg ut på ukjent farvann og har oversatt noen maler. Hadde vært fint om du kunne gått over arbeidet mitt sånn at vi får det best mulig. Har oversatt Template:Test4/no, Template:Test3/no, Template:Test2/no og Template:Test/no. Tenker å ta flere, er det noen jeg burde prioritere over andre? -- Atluxity 17:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Halla. Godt jobbet, de var bra de. Jeg så litt på hva som manglet av oversatte maler, og fant ikke så alt for mye. Kanskje du kan ta {{PD/no}}?

Forresten, det er fint om du sier i fra på Commons:Tinget når du oversetter maler. Hilsen Kjetil r 08:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

My adminship

Hi. Thanks for commenting on my adminship nomination. Could you please write your comment in Enlgish too, if you don't mind. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov 00:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi. My comment was "Oppose. Not enough experience at the Wikimedia Commons." Best regards, --Kjetil r 21:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Bilde på Commons

Du har varslet sletting av bildet http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Nardo_skole%2C_Trondheim.jpg. Jeg har videresendt tillatelse fra skolen til permissions@wikimedia.org. Sendte mailen 21.06 kl. 21:14. Sjekker du? ChickenFalls 17:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Hei. Den er god, jeg har oppdatert beskrivelsen ([17]). Flott at du videresendte e-posten til OTRS. Hilsen Kjetil r 21:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Endring av brukernavn

Ønsker å endre brukernavn til Bricklayer da jeg kaller meg det på den norske brukeren min. Kan du gjøre det for meg? --Anorexorcist 18:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Hei. Jeg kan ikke gjøre det selv, men jeg har bedt en som kan det om å fikse det ([18]). Hilsen --Kjetil r 21:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Takk til Fred J for rask respons. --Kjetil r 23:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Takk for at du vidreformidlet ønsket mitt om å skifte brukernavn --Bricklayer 10:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

IMF

Hi, please see my discussion here- I do not believe that all material on the imf website is in the public domain- please see discussion here Commons:Village_pump#Clarification_needed_over_IMF_material. Gustav VH 09:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Napoleon-Hitler.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Napoleon-Hitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Matprat

Så svaret mitt til mollerup på tinget greit ut? Finnrind 21:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Ja, det så greit ut (jeg så ikke meldingen før nå, siden jeg fikk to identiske slettingsvarsler over og under). Hilsen --Kjetil r 22:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Napoleon-Hitler.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Napoleon-Hitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Nina Akamu's horse

I answered in the debate page. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto 13:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for your comments. --Kjetil r 22:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Kjetil r/sandkassi

What's up with this page? I looks like a license page first but then you changed it to a no source license? MECU≈talk 14:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

It is a sandbox. --Kjetil r 19:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nesna02.jpg

Kan du slette denne? Har merket den for sletting, men det ser ut til å ta litt tid... Finn Rindahl 10:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

 Done --Kjetil r 10:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gerrard:_Angry.jpg

Huh, where is the file? --Polarlys 11:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Strange... Must be a bug in the flickr upload bot. I have now uploaded it as Image:Gerrard- Angry.jpg. --Kjetil r 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, it was a request on my talk page. Have a nice weekend Kjetil. --Polarlys 15:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Maksim

Hi. User:Maksim, who uploaded much questionable material and then ran away over a year ago, posted to my user talk page in what looks like Esperanto, but I need some help translating its post, and perhaps communicating with that user about the seriousness of uploading such questionable material. Would you mind helping? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|Flickr review status nom) 11:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I totally forgot to answer you. I'll try to translate it now. --Kjetil r 21:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Awash river.jpg

Kan du sjekke denne. Bilde tatt av en venn, mail videresendt permissions... Finn Rindahl 19:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Den der var forbilledlig. Kort, men likevel uten flertydigheter. Hadde bare alle OTRS-tillatelser vært som denne... Hilsen --Kjetil r 21:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Bilder frå krigen

Hei Kjetil. Eg har arva ein bunke bilder (i papir) frå Måløyraidet. Desse er av ein slik natur at dei må ha blitt tatt av britane. Det ser ut som dei kan høyre til same serie som Image:Commandos archery.jpg. Kan eg laste desse opp til Commons? I tilfelle ja, kan du gje meg råd om kva merkelapp eg bør bruke på dei?Inge 13:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Hei Inge. Dette er jeg ikke helt sikker på, jeg råder deg til å spørre på Commons:Help desk. Hilsen Kjetil r 14:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Block User talk:Tomates

It appears you forgot to block User talk:Tomates, even though you put a message on his talk page about a one week block. I treated him to a two week block after continuing uploading unsourced material. Cheers! Siebrand 13:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Islands of Norway

This should be deleted or redirected to Category:Islands in Norway. Finn Rindahl 14:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Tja, Category talk:Islands in Norway sier det motsatte. Jeg foreslår at du diskuterer det med User:Mahlum først. Selv har jeg ingen sterke meninger. Hilsen Kjetil r 23:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Så ikke den, jeg flyttet det lille som var fordi det var mye mer innhold i "Islands in Norway", trodde det bare var en glipp... Det viktigste for meg er at vi har bare en kategori, in/of er samma for meg (men da må vi få en bot til å gjøre rekat ;) Finn Rindahl 23:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC) (kopierer dette til cat-talken)

Valgte of etter å ha tatt det opp med user:mahlum, innhold flyttet og in er nå redirect. Finn Rindahl 08:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Jeg gjorde om til en Category redirect. Da blir det slik at bilder som ved uhell blir lagt i in blir automatisk flyttet til of med jevne mellomrom. Kjetil r 16:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Godt godt, kjente ikke til den der... :) Finn Rindahl 23:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Spørsmål

Jeg har fått en CD med bilder av tidligere Liverpool spillere av Liverbirds Aalesund som er en lokal Liverpool supporterklubb. Hva slags lisens er det jeg skal legge det inn på? Det er Liverbirds Aalesund som har tatt bildene og gitt meg tillatelse til å bruke dem. Vennlig hilsen TEMH 15:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Hei,

Det spørs jo hva de har gitt tillatelse til. Husk at alle bilder skal kunne brukes av andre (også kommersielt), og det må tillates at det gjøres endringer i bildene.

Det enkleste tror jeg vil være om du får ansvarlig person i Liverbirds Aalesund til å sende en e-post som beskrevet i Wikipedia:Få bildet ditt på Wikipedia, der de også spesifiserer at det gjelder bildene du har fått på CD. Etter at de har gjort det skal jeg si deg hvordan de skal merkes; det er litt vanskelig å gjøre på forhånd da man skal bruke en mal som viser til et referansenummer som e-postsystemet vårt gir den.

Det hadde vært morsomt med en samling bilder av gamle spillere, så jeg kan gjerne hjelpe deg gjennom de litt kronglete bildereglene våre. Ikke nøl med å spørre meg om ting du lurer på. Hilsen Kjetil r 16:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Jeg regner med at de har skjønt reglene for bilder, men sender dem en mail for å være sikker. Det er bilder av over 20 tidligere spillere fra Liverpool og 20 tidligere norske spillere, så det er en omfattende samling. TEMH 19:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

tank You

Finn Rindahl 08:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Egill Skallagrímsson 1996-09-IS-03-36.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Egill Skallagrímsson 1996-09-IS-03-36.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Haukurth 09:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

You should notify the original uploader instead (User:Gangleri). --Kjetil r 18:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I have done so by e-mail and he has replied thanking me for the notice. Haukurth 19:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, great. Kjetil r 23:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Could you check these images?

Image:You are a big twat.jpg and Image:N00b.jpg, same image, insulting edit summary on both uploads and one originates from Flickr while the other doesn't give a source... Finn Rindahl 23:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted & blocked. --Kjetil r 05:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

What was the Flickr URL? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

It didnt't say. --Kjetil r 20:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Norwegian or english cat.name?

See Category:Bjørnøya and the recently created Category:Bear Island - which one should we keep? Finn Rindahl 13:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure. Categories are supposed to be in English, but we break that rule all the time. Category:Bjørnøya perhaps?? --Kjetil r 20:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Kan du sjekke denne

[19]

Ser for meg ut som IP'en har rett, men jeg skjønner ikke så mye av disse opphavsrettslige detaljene ;) Finn Rindahl 22:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Du bør kanskje ta en titt på denne også...Finn Rindahl 23:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

IP-en har vel rett i det første tilfellet. Det generelle slettingsforslaget for den malen stengte jeg ned nå. Hilsen --Kjetil r 07:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

forsvarsnett og lisens

svarte deg på siden min jeg. Yosh3000 12:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

PDF text files

What's the deal with files like this one File:WSFile968262.pdf here, this is totally out of scope I would presume? Speedy? Finn Rindahl 12:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I would think so. Additionally, it is licensed under a non-commerical and non-derivative CC license. I'll delete it. --Kjetil r 13:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Suppose that goes for all text-files regardless of license? Thanks for your quick response btw, but shouldn't you also leave a message to the uploader (User_talk:Ginae) ?? Finn Rindahl 13:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I'll leave her a note. This applies to most PDFs I guess, but I'm not sure if we have a policy saying that such material is unappropriate at the Wikimedia Commons. --Kjetil r 13:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't you just love being my "go to" admin... ?

...Sorry to pester you again, but [20] seems to be a steady supply of copyvios... (I have been nagging at other admins too occasionally....) Finn Rindahl 13:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

 Done. But now you will have to find another admin, as I'm off to Vålerenga-Start! Kjetil r 13:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Heia VIF! Finn Rindahl 13:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I just have to say

That's a damn slick hat you've got there. --Lucid 09:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

PD art Nordic countries

There's a mass deletion request for paintings of Norwegian artists in the making (being prepared by User:Jorunn right now, based on commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Nordic_countries from what i can see.) This really needs our attention, if all those images are deleted we will have a busy time defending in back at no: . I'm really not sure that the paragraph cited is relevant for this, but then again I'm really not sure about much when it comes to copyright law.... See commons:Deletion requests/Image:Harald Sohlberg Fra Akershusvollen, aften 1926.jpg and User_talk:Jorunn#Images_put_up_for_deletion for now.Finn Rindahl 10:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I've posted something at her talk page and at the "When to..." discussion page. Cnyborg 17:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hm, så det diskuteres om fotografier av gamle kunstverk er eksemplarfremstillinger eller fotografiske bilder med ny vernetid? Jeg tror ikke at jeg skal bry meg om denne diskusjonen, da tidligere slettingsforslag viser at «When to...»-reglene ikke betyr noe. Hilsen Kjetil r 13:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Gidder du...

...ta en kikk på denne og denne og avslå denne kveruleringensforespørselen før samvittighetsfulle adminer kaster bort mer tid på dette tullet. Finn Rindahl 13:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Jeg forsto ikke helt hva som hadde skjedd, men jeg slettet nå i alle fall siden og lot brukeren forbli blokkert. --Kjetil r 13:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Tullesak, som ble litt større en den trengte fordi jeg postet [21] fem minutter etter at Herby faktisk hadde gjort en CU basert på denne [22] (som jeg ikke hadde sett). Uansett, en smart unge som lager kvalm, og som etter å ikke ha fått oppmerksomhet på unblockrequesten sin gjorde den om til deletion request.Finn Rindahl 17:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Monobook.js/nn

Maybe we (that means you) should add this for our friends at nn: too. As far I can tell the only thing you'll need to change is the word "kategoriar" one place and "-laus" two places, and of course nn instead of no (did we agree to stick with no btw?). Another thing, when using nynorsk it's still "my preferences" , the rest seems ok. I'm not sure where to fix that (and it's probably protected anyway) Finn Rindahl 19:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

 Done, we have now translated Monobook.js/nn and Mypreferences/nn. Let us stick with tab_wikipedia = 'no' for now (I'm using English anyways) --Kjetil r 20:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Takkar så mykje, agree about 'no', I'm using English too (well, nynorsk right now ;) and so is Chris i believe...Finn Rindahl 20:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Nuvel... [23] Finn Rindahl 13:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

to ting

1. Kan du ta en kikk på User talk:sogning, fikk et spørsmål jeg ikke kunne svare på.
2. Kanskje lurt å signere når du stemmer... :P Finn Rindahl 18:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

1. Jeg synes du svarte bra jeg.
2. Bra noen følger med! ;-) Kjetil r 18:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

User:MediaWiki Update Bot

Hi. I'm not sure I agree to much with your update bot on this and especially this where the translations are almost done for Commons:Upload/de.

And one more thing, could you add MediaWiki:Mainpage to the pages that get updated, so that MediaWiki:Mainpage/deownwork would have Hauptseite, I know this link doesn't change much, but sometimes it does. --Steinninn 15:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't run this bot, and I have no idea what you are talking about. You will have to ask User:Pfctdayelise. ;-) Kjetil r 17:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Arg, sorry about that. My mistake. --Steinninn 18:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nenad Bogdanovic.jpg

In regard to this image, and others given to us by the Assembly of the city of Belgrade, I don't have an e-mail, but have secured permissions over the phone. This was when the article about Belgrade was to be featured on English Wikipedia, and they gave us the images to improve the ones which were already in it. Nikola Smolenski 08:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello Nikola. We don't usually accept permissions over the phone at the Wikimedia Commons. You should ask them to e-mail a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. See also Commons:OTRS. Sincerely, Kjetil r 16:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Kjetil, I'm Lahiru_k. I do upload my and other free pics to commons occasionally but I mainly active on en wiki. Since last few hours I upload some nice stuff from http://www.defenselink.mil. Can you have a look on my gallery and check whether it contain some photographs which is wroth to be nominate for Commons:Featured picture candidates? Thanks --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie} 14:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello Lahiru. Nice stuff that you have uploaded! I particularly like Image:720th STG.jpg. However, I don't participate that much at Commons:Featured picture candidates, so I don't know if they are FP quality. Maybe you could ask some of the regulars instead, for example User:MichaelMaggs or User:Acarpentier? Sincerely, Kjetil r 16:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I will contact one of them. Cheers --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie} 06:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:KnutSteen.1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:KnutSteen.1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 20:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:RansRealm.jpg

Advarsel om sletting av fil

Image:RansRealm.jpg har blitt foreslått slettet på Commons:Deletion requests, slik at fellesskapet kan diskutere om den skal beholdes eller ikke. Vi vil sette pris på om du forteller din mening om dette på oppføringen. Hvis du laget denne filen, vennligst merk deg at det at den er foreslått slettet ikke betyr at vi ikke setter pris på ditt bidrag. Det betyr utelukkende at en person mener det er et spesifikt problem med filen, som et rettighetsspørsmål. Dersom et bilde er foreslått slettet fordi den er erstattet av et bedre avledet bilde, tenk på at selv om filen blir slettet vil ditt arbeid bli bevart gjennom den nye filen. Uansett ber vi deg om å ikke ta sletteforslaget personlig. Det er aldri ment slik. Takk!

--Patstuart 18:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Geir Stian Orsten Ulstein av Tonsart .jpg

Ingen kommentar til min forespørsel tidligere, der jeg har forespurt om systemet Wikipedia siden tillatelse til å publisere bildet/bildene er oversendt commons per epost, opp til flere ganger?

damon20

Hei,

jeg forstår ikke helt hva du spør om her. Kan du omformulere deg? Hilsen Kjetil r 17:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

---

Re: http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geir_Stian_Orsten_Ulstein

Jeg sendte seg en epost angående bildet jeg lastet opp og brukte i denne artikkelen, men fikk aldri noe svar. Jeg har nå oversendt eposten med tillatelsen fra eieren av bildene til permission-commons (med bildene som vedlegg) TO ganger, men like fullt får jeg en tilbakemelding om at dette ikke er godt nok: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Damon20&diff=0&oldid=7604078. Får de ikke eller leser de ikke videresendte eposter eller hva? Jeg har fullt instruksjonene du ga på diskusjonsdelen av GSO Ulstein siden til punkt og prikke, men følger at jeg sliter i motbakke her. Og hva med diskusjonen for den artikkelen? Den synes overflødig og sår tvil om artikkelens innhold og opphav, selv om dette burde vært oppklart av de forklaringer som er gitt. Burde ikke da den diskusjonen utgå, eller i det aller minste boksen på toppen fjernes?

damon20

Men jeg tok da og svarte deg fra permissions-commons@wikimedia,org-adressen samme dag som du sendte meg en privat e-post? Der skrev jeg at alt nå var ok, og takket deg for å ha videresendt e-posten til Wikimedia. Bildesidene er nå oppdatert, og alt er i orden med bildene.

Den øverste boksen på Diskusjon:Geir Stian Orsten Ulstein er en standardboks som legges på diskusjonssidene til artikler som omhandler nålevende personer. Når det gjelder diskusjonen under kan den gjerne fjernes for min del. --Kjetil r 19:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Pussig at jeg ikke mottok det svaret da, eller noen av svarene, siden jeg videresendte samme epost med vedlegg to ganger. Men men, det viktigste er at alt er i orden med bildene og at jeg omsider klarte å få gjort dette riktig. Mange takk.

damon20

---

Tilbake til boksen på toppen av http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusjon:Geir_Stian_Orsten_Ulstein : dersom dette er, som du skrev i ditt svar, "en standardboks som legges på diskusjonssidene til artikler som omhandler nålevende personer", hvordan har det seg da at den ikke finnes andre steder, som f.eks http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusjon:Henrik_Bj%C3%B8rnstad, http://no.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskusjon:Jahn_Otto_Johansen&action=edit eller http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusjon:Harald_V bare for å nevne noen eksempler? Dette virker ikke konsekvent, og det tyder også på at denne boksen IKKE er like "standard" som det gies uttrykk for. Hva kommer dette av? Johansen sin side har ingen kommentarer/diskusjon, så det kan forklare den siden, men de to andre har/har hatt aktivitet, men ingen "standard boks". Er dette en tilfeldighet eller en glipp som jeg tilfeldgivis har kommet over?

--damon20 21:42, 30 October, 2007

Den finnes da mange steder, se Kategori:Biografier om levende personer. Jeg la den akkurat til på de tre du nevnte. Finner du biografier om levende personer uten denne boksen er det bare å legge den til. --Kjetil r 09:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Luftgrader.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Luftgrader.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

RG2 12:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I believe that this request is wrong, and have commented as much to RG2 and on the deletion request page. Haros 17:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:HMS Queen Mary Jutland.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.48.230.57 06:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

See the subsection “Links.” The following pages link to this file: Battle of Jutland and HMS Queen Mary. The image has been in the gallery HMS Queen Mary since 21:52, 8 May 2006, and in Battle of Jutland since 17:38, 8 May 2006.

Yours sincerely,

Kjetil r 11:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Wollert Konow x 2

Hei. Bildet Wollert SB Konow.jpg forestiller ikke den norske statsministeren Wollert Konow (SB) (1845–1924, fra Søndre Bergenhus amt), men derimot hans fetter, Wollert Konow (H) (1847–1932, fra Hedemarken amt). Så både filnavnet og beskrivelsen av bildet er feilaktig. Bevis: Se det samme bildet på Nasjonalbibliotekets sider, scroll ned. Feilen har forplantet seg hit, hit og hit. Teucer 20:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Takk for tipset. Jeg har oppdatert bildebeskrivelsen, og rettet opp artiklene på nn:, no: og en:. Hilsen Kjetil r 22:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Google earth bilder

Hei. Hvordan stiller man seg til uploading av redigerte bilder/kart med bakgrunn tatt fra Google Earth? Yosh3000 03:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hei. Ting fra Google Earth kan ikke brukes på Wikipedia / Commons. Hilsen Kjetil r 07:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Supreme Court.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Ny bruker som har lagt inn bilder

Hei,

Hold et øye med Image:Kviteseid gamle kirke.jpg og Image:Austad Kirke Lyngdal.jpg. Jeg har forsøkt å gi litt veiledning på brukersiden på :no. Tror ikke du har problemer med å se intensjonen til brukeren, selv om den ikke er korrekt utført. Helt ny bruker også på :no. Haros 08:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Hei,

Jeg skal følge litt med. Jeg synes kanskje du gjorde ting litt vel komplisert da du sa i fra, min erfaring er at man bør gjøre ting så enkelt som mulig. Jeg pleier å si ting som «Hei, ting ble litt feil da du lastet opp det ene bildet. Gå hit og fjern teksten {{own work}}. Skriv så inn {{self|GFDL}}, og alt vil være i orden.»

Hilsen Kjetil r 17:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Louis_T._McFadden.jpg

Nice work with GIMP's clone tool on this image. I am downloading that huge image of Bergin that you uploaded earlier this year and while I waited, poked around at what else you might have been doing.

btw, if there is a duplicate image available, all you need to do is to use the {{badname|Image:real name.jpg}} or {{duplicate|Image:real name.jpg}} (I like the second because it just sounds better) and the image gets deleted quickly and without discussion. Unless you want discussion.

Download is done, bye. -- carol 16:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Carol,

Are you referring to Image:Pregboobs.jpg? It is not I who want it deleted, I just noticed an incomplete deletion request and decided to fix it.

By the way, you have uploaded many nice retouched pictures. I don't do it often myself, as I find it tedious. But it is fun from time to time, for example when I removed some vanity user from Image:Igchiuchiu2.jpg :-) Kjetil r 17:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bahnhof Zarrentin 01.jpg and Image:Bad Saarow-Pieskow Bahnhof 01.jpg

Well, I don't understand why you had to delete these two images, but Image:S-Bahn Hamburg type 470 1.jpg was okay. So, all three were marked als öffentlich or public, so I thought it would be okay to load them up to Commons. Could you restore them, after checking what I meant? -- Platte C 14:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo. Image:Bahnhof Zarrentin 01.jpg was tagged as ©All rights reserved at Flickr. Image:Bad Saarow-Pieskow Bahnhof 01.jpg was tagged as «Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic». Both are unacceptable at the Wikimedia Commons.

I would recommend that you use flinfo when uploading from Flickr, as you seem to have some difficulties doing it correctly. Kjetil r 15:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I didn't know the tool yet before. Thansk and merry x-mas. -- Platte C 13:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007/Translations/nb

Hi Kjetil,

Are you able to help at all with the ‪Norsk (bokmål) translations for the Picture of the Year competition? It opens on the 10th January - less than a week now! - so naturally we want to get everything finalised ASAP. The original English messages are at Commons:Picture of the Year/2007/Translations/en. Also, are you or perhaps someone you know interested in being the Norwegian language contact? It just means if any Norwegian speaking users have problems you answer them and help them, and also post the announcements in the various project places.

Please let me know, I would be really pleased if we could finalise all the translations very soon. :)

thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I translated some of it, but I quickly lost interest. I might translate more if it later, though. --Kjetil r 12:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Olof_von_Dalin.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Olof_von_Dalin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 22:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Bilder fra byvedhav.no

Skal ikke bildene fra byvedhav.no som Pingvin har opplastet slettes siden de ikke kan brukes fritt?

Hei
Reglene finner du her:
http://www.kristiansund.no/index.asp?nr=280
her står det bl.a.:
"Hovedregelen er at. våpenet, bare kan brukes av administrasjonen
og institusjoner under utøvelse av kommunal myndighet og til dekorasjon."
Men Wikipedia er såpass seriøs aktør og det er heller ikke
private økonomiske interesser med i bildet.
Så du må gjerne bruke byvåpenet på Wickipedia.
Du kan også bruke klippfiskkjerringa hvis du ønsker:
http://www.kristiansund.no/index.asp?nr=288&bvid=280
Eller andre bilder som ligger i vårt bildearkiv.
http://www.kristiansund.no/index.asp?nr=288
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Svein Taknæs

mvh Banangraut 15:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Jo da, jeg skal slette dem nå. --Kjetil r 12:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Hjælp!

Spørsmål nummer ein er om du kunne tenke deg å gjenopprette image:Freudenberg-Ralph 05.jpg og image:Freudenberg-Naida 03.jpg, som i sletta tilstand skaper stygge hol på Nynorsk Wikipedia.

Om du føler for det, kan du kanskje også gå gjennom Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others og sjå om andre nyttige bilete er sletta. Eg veit at eg sjølv har lagt ned litt arbeid i å kategorisera dei. Har spurt han som sletta dei om dette tidlegare, utan å få svar. --Ranveig 18:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Da er de to bildene gjenopprettet. Jeg synes man bør ta seg tid til å sjekke om ting er i bruk før man sletter med begrunnelsen «ouside project scope» – det at disse var i bruk viser vel faktisk at de definitivt var innenfor Commons' «project scope».

Det var faktisk veldig mange bilder som ble slettet i Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others, så jeg har langt fra gått igjennom alle. Mesteparten var familiebilder fra ca. 1915-35 av det som så ut til å være tidstypiske amerikanske familier. Noen av dem hadde sikkert vært nyttige. Jeg gjenopprettet Image:Winblad Lattin 15.jpg, som sikkert kan brukes i en eller annen sammenheng der man vil illustrere historiske USAnske nasjonaldagsfeiringer eller en typisk picnic i mellomkrigstiden. Jeg er ikke helt sikker på hva mer som kan være av interesse – er det noen spesielle bilder du tenker på? --Kjetil_r 20:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Mange takk! Dei ville ikkje blitt så lette å erstatta. Nei, eg tenkte ikkje på noko spesielt bilde, hugsa berre at eg har lagt merke til samlinga positivt før ho blei sletta, medan andre tydelegvis har fått eit anna inntrykk. Eg ser at mannen bak fortsatt driv og lastar opp ting; kanskje han kan oppmuntrast til å be om gjenoppliving av bilde dersom det kan visast at dei er nyttige (ved at dei blir lagt inn i galleri og kategoriar). --Ranveig 23:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:MAal-Husayni.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:MAal-Husayni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

abf /talk to me/ 12:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Auguste_Viktoria.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Auguste_Viktoria.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 14:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:John_Jellicoe.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:John_Jellicoe.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk   21:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Captain_von_Trotha.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Captain_von_Trotha.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk   21:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wergeland_statue.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wergeland_statue.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -Nard 01:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Milevand gaard Sør-Aurdal

Is that (see also here) still active or solved already? -- Cecil 20:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Nobody claimed that the picture is a simple photograph, so I deleted the file. --Kjetil_r 23:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Rakk ikke...

...å opprette denne. Takk for rask saksbehandling. Finn Rindahl 20:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Men du bommet på lisensen i malen . --Kjetil_r 20:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

oopsie... ...enda du Sa fra på forhånd. Finn Rindahl 20:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Q: Origin of Image:Zama.jpg

Hi Kjetil_r,

I have a quick question about the following Wikipedia Commons image that you uploaded: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Zama.jpg.

I'd like to use this image in a commercial application, but I'd first like to know its origin. Do you know where this photograph came from? Did you take the photograph yourself? What is the original source of this image (the painting itself, or another reference - like a book - with a picture of the painting it in)?

I've already contacted the owners of the painting itself (the Art Institute of Chicago) and confirmed the original work of art is in the public domain (due to its age). But they were unable to confirm if the Zama.jpg image itself is copyrighted or not. I'd like to be absolutely certain about the origins and licensing of Zama.jpg before I use it. Knowing the origin will help me.

Your help with this would be greatly appreciated. Please get back to me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

cranke_boy Cranke boy 21:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Cranke_boy,

I unfortunately do not remember the source of the image. I did not take the photograph myself, I most likely found it on the web using Google images or a similar search engine. Regards, --Kjetil_r 21:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. So is it possible, since the original source is unknown, that this image (Zama.jpg) is actually copyrighted and therefore not public domain?

For example, the Art Institute of Chicago claims "we do own the copyright for any digital images of the painting created by our museum". This seems to imply that someone else could conceivably have a copyright on the image Zama.jpg as well ... any thoughts? Cranke boy 01:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

It depends on the jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, a reproduction like this is copyrighted, while in other jurisdictions, it does not meet the necessary threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. In the United States, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that mechanical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art are not copyrighted (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.), meaning that the copyright claims of the Art Institute of Chicago are most likely not valid. But you never know, another court might rule differently... --Kjetil_r 02:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

God 17 Mai!

Heisann Kjetil R, jeg kom hit bare for å si at jeg håper du har en god 17 mai. MVH --Kanonkas_(talk) 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Takk for det, håper du også har en fin feiring. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 13:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Tusen takk

Takk for at du redigerte Ani Lorak bildet og for stemmen din. Ha en god dag, mvh.--Kanonkas_(talk) 19:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 30094b9af1b85f62f22b73fb4c4bb9a4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

jeg knoter, Lupo ordner opp

Se User_talk:Lupo#MediaWiki:Uploadtext.2Fno - ser det greit ut nå? Finn Rindahl 13:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The text for the basic form still says to copy a template, although that template is hidden because it already is in the form ("med følgende kode som kan kopieres"). Did I understand that right? At MediaWiki:Uploadtext/de, I had solved that problem by moving the "Kopiere dies in die Beschreibung:" into the <div id=Uploadtext-template-box">. Lupo 13:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Fixed (I think). Another (minor) problem, going from http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uploadformstyle=basic to other languages by clicking the languagelinks you loose "uploadformstyle=basic". Is it possible/desirable to do something about that? Finn Rindahl 14:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Bruker:Superunknown kan du slette Image:Ryu Fort Minor.jpg

Kan du slette Image:Ryu Fort Minor.jpg for meg vær så snill. --Fgfgfggh 17:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Det var slettet allerede før du spurte. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 17:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Takk for det. --Fgfgfggh 18:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The Battle of Marston Moor

Hi there,

I am a research assitant on book celebrating the 500th anniversary of a London school, we would like to use the painting of The Battle of Marston Moor by J Baker for publication, could you point me in the direction of where you find the original? Thanks very much for any help,

Regards,

Memphis Barker

Hello,

I just moved the image from the English Wikipedia. According to the log, the image was originally uploaded by User:HLGallon, you should probably ask him instead. Regards, --Kjetil_r 11:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Navn og kategorier på commons

Jeg ser at det ikke er noen måte å skifte navn på bilder på commons (og det er det sikkert gode grunner til), men er det noen måte å legge ved en beskrivelse til bildene som har et filnavn som ikke beskriver noe som helst, slik at det kommer opp i category-siden.

Eksempelvis på Category:Nydalen så er det et bilde som heter P1011162.JPG (ikke veldig beskrivende som du skjønner), er det noe triks som gjør at det kan stå ErgoGroup der i stedenfor? Yosh3000 (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Nei, dessverre er det ikke noen enkel måte å løse dette på. Det eneste som løser problemet er å laste opp bildet på nytt med et mer beskrivende filnavn og slette det gamle. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 12:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Tja, dersom du merker bildet med {{rename|ErgoGroup.jpg}} så vil (etterhvert, og etter at en admin eller "trusted user" har sanksjonert det) et bot ta seg av ny opplasting og flittige admins (Siebrand&co) ta seg av at bildet blir globalt erstattet og den gamle fila slettet. Men dersom det er få bilder det er snakk om er det enkelere å gjøre det selv - husk i så fall å få med all opprinnelig informasjon når du laster opp på nytt. For å få slettet den gamle, bruk {{Dupe}} Finn Rindahl (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Takker for svar :-) Yosh3000 (talk) 14:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Bra noen passer på når jeg ikke får med meg alt! :-) --Kjetil_r 18:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks. Don't know how I missed that, normally carefull about the underscores =) /Lokal_Profil 00:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)