Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 12

[edit]

unused and likely AI generated — JJMC89(T·C) 00:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

used poor (AI?) modification of 06:33, 20 June 2022 version of File:Varakkal Thangal.jpg — JJMC89(T·C) 00:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused and likely AI generated — JJMC89(T·C) 00:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infringement of architect's copyright, as the UAE does not grant Freedom of Panorama for any copyrighted public space work, completed from March 1993 onwards. Needs commercial CC licensing permission from Adrian Smith and his architectural company SOM. Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in the United Arab Emirates has clear rules of compelling participants to review rules on copyright of UAE's public space landmarks before uploading (rule no. 3). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Burj Khalifa for past deletions of this landmark. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


unused and likely AI generated — JJMC89(T·C) 00:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pathiri files uploaded by DelphiLore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused images previously published at https://shabbustastykitchen.com/2020/05/04/tyre-pathiri/

— JJMC89(T·C) 00:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infringement of sculptor's copyright, as Rwanda does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kigali Genocide Memorial for prior deletions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Infringement of sculptor's copyright, as Rwanda does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kigali Genocide Memorial for prior deletions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign Against Genocide Museum sculptures

[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Rwanda, and these images infringe sculptors' copyrights. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Campaign Against Genocide Museum for prior deletions.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Does this serve anything? 186.172.150.177 01:34, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

photo found on internet, refer https://lens.google.com/search?ep=cntpubu&hl=en-US&re=df&s=4&p=AbrfA8oS5Cv-j-RrS36ZZl-z2WSYdebsVCyI2Ua91tg5-LiYe-z9rNFoPXU9uMGfSaywWubyR95MQIbHcVlIfPx_iTBMi--_EcuR3aBZY8yPXEiLqNhRGCwdHiBvuttN0jwNi9WoX3pwO_961yt_eDBK-b6r5oDmwBc3a8HbVAm43D4PnQfP-5bNFDdyEW3iRT2vdvu-cn_cyxU9xpdYiYfC3_D_OnEz8c_-QF4UlgOalWNgaFWKGicgZbChMavBml6BCLHAK9fGHhY_3sG9LnP6XD3Ms6QNcFL23blqS4lOG5Z_hRfEBAF22VLqKUeJYwtXEDmYHqx41rnLzZTbmCj-jyahSLAoeFgW#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKR0l5TjJFNFl6Y3hMVFl6TmpNdE5HWTVNQzFoWTJFeExXWTRPR0kzTm1GbE1UQmhOaElmZDNkbk1qWkZiMWMyZVZWU09FZHRjM3A0VFdaRGJITXplRFZmYjBwNGF3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxbW251bGwsbnVsbCwiaXAtMSJdLFsiY2U3M2E4Y2ItNzZjZC00NmFlLTkzM2MtZTg5ODVmMTRkYzBiIl1dLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW251bGwsWzI2ODAwLDEyMjk0LDc5NjEwLDQ0NzAwXV1dLFsiY2U3M2E4Y2ItNzZjZC00NmFlLTkzM2MtZTg5ODVmMTRkYzBiIl1d Chanakal (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Not uploader's own work, image widely circulating on web including on subject's Facebook page.--Obi2canibe (talk) 14:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Random nude AI photo, nothing special, only being used in user-namespace A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 13:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to English Wikipedia, the sculpture was only exhibited from 10 June till 2 August 2011, which means it is a temporary display. Thus, it cannot be benefited from Swiss FOP

A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is Christine Linsdell, not the same as the Panoramio user A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment likely the wife (or girlfriend or relative) of the Panoramio user? I dunno how North American copyright systems deal with such instances. I'm more curious to the user comments in the metadata: "Ours. Do not have image print. Public. Google Earth Approved." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Nonsense diagram. Should never be used. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete AI-generated patent nonsense. Dmartin969 (talk) 06:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. This is complete and utter nonsense. It has no relation whatsoever to the actual chemical structure of this compound. Omphalographer (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside: you should not assume that the text generated by ChatGPT is any more accurate or meaningful than this image, either. Omphalographer (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My response regarding this picture

[edit]
Image Source: The image was generated using an AI tool, specifically the OpenAI DALL·E model, which creates original images based on textual descriptions. It was not downloaded, copied, or traced from any other source, meaning it does not infringe on the rights of other authors or copyright holders. The image was originally created based on my textual description, and it does not violate any existing copyrights or intellectual property laws.
Copyright of the Image: AI-generated images do not have direct authors in the traditional sense of copyright, as they are created by the model based on descriptions. As the user who generated this image based on textual descriptions and subsequently uploaded it to the platform, I technically hold all rights to the use of this image since it was not created by any third party. The image is entirely original and cannot be found in any other image databases, meaning it does not conflict with any existing copyrights.
Purpose of the Image: The image was created solely for educational purposes, as the skeletal formula of the chemical compound N,N-diisopropylaminoethanol. Its use on Wikipedia contributes to the understanding of chemical structures and is important for the dissemination of scientific knowledge. The image illustrates the chemical structure of N,N-diisopropylaminoethanol (DIPA) and is intended solely for educational and scientific purposes, which aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
Licensing: I therefore propose that this image be licensed under an appropriate license on Wikimedia Commons, such as the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license, which allows others to use it freely without restrictions, making it available for free use in scientific and educational contexts.
Suitability for Wikimedia: The image does not contain any protected or commercial elements (such as logos, trademarks, or specific designs); it is simply a basic chemical formula, which is a standard practice on scientific and educational platforms like Wikipedia, where it will serve educational and scientific purposes.
My First Uploaded Image: Perhaps I made an accidental mistake when uploading this image, which may have led to some confusion. Maybe I pressed something incorrectly, but please forgive me for that since this is the first time I’ve uploaded an image, and I hope you will retain the image. I guarantee that this image certainly does not infringe on anyone's rights and can be freely posted, for example, under the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license.
I hope I have explained everything well, and that you will leave the image so that everyone can use it, as it does not infringe on anyone else’s rights. If you need further clarification, I am at your disposal, and you can ask me anything in order to resolve this issue. I wish you all the best. --Kadzo (talk) 16:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Explanation Regarding the Image: Since I didn’t clearly explain how the image was created earlier, I’d like to clarify now, as this might help. I was translating the article N,N-diisopropylaminoethanol with GPT-4 from one of the Wikipedias, though I don’t remember exactly which one, because when I write an article, I review multiple Wikipedia articles—not just from English Wikipedia, but also from French, German, Spanish, and others—in order to compile an excellent article. In one of the translations, there was an explanation about the skeletal formula of the chemical compound N,N-diisopropylaminoethanol. Since I didn’t quite understand everything clearly, I asked GPT-4 to explain it to me in more detail. In this further explanation, GPT-4 itself suggested generating an image to make the skeletal formula easier to understand, even though I hadn’t asked it to do so. It generated the image on its own to aid in better understanding.
Afterward, I asked GPT-4 if I could upload this image to Wikipedia and include it in the article I was writing. I also asked if the image already existed somewhere, so I wouldn’t infringe on anyone’s rights by posting it. The response was that this was a unique image, not found in any image databases, nor was there a similar image elsewhere. I was further assured that the image contained no trademarks and that I could freely upload it to Wikipedia for educational purposes. GPT-4 itself suggested which license to use—Creative Commons Zero (CC0).
That’s how I came up with the idea to upload this image, as I believe that it absolutely does not infringe on anyone’s rights and can be used for educational and scientific purposes. I hope I have clarified everything regarding this image and explained how it was created. --Kadzo (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copy vio, this file taken from the Uffizi website can't be used as it infringes the museums copyright, as the file contains 3D elements. The upload of this file is expressively not covered by the PD-art tag Oursana (talk) 04:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supposedly "Martian surface captured at night" but very obviously not that. Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy image. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Wait for translation to see if in scope or not. Dmartin969 (talk) 06:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a recently written essay broadly describing the en:Kingdom of Mewar. It's hard to tell for sure through a machine translation, but I have a feeling it may be AI-generated. Omphalographer (talk) 06:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Brian P. Weber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of words and names forming a broadcasting mic. A basketball firing up as a comet. I'm pretty sure the whole T-shirt is above COM:TOO US. And no, de minimis doesn't apply, especially when the photo focuses primarily on the T-shirt. George Ho (talk) 04:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use, reasonably within scope. Not a derivative work per COM:CLOTHES. Dmartin969 (talk) 06:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I suspect, you must have overlooked what it says: In any case, care must be taken not to infringe the copyright of any printed or woven design that may appear on the clothing's surface. Clothes might not be copyrightable, but the design on the T-shirt may be. George Ho (talk) 22:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable PD status, date of first publication missing to meet requirements of COM:Russia. As per description, taken from a family archive, so probably first published on Commons. Quick1984 (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We usually assume that old works were published at the time of creation, unless otherwise indicated. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 00:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-nominated with the same rationale, because it was closed with a clear contradiction to COM:EVID, COM:PCP and COM:HIRTLE: Unpublished works when the death date of the author is not known – 120 years from creation.

So again: Questionable PD status, date of first publication missing to meet requirements of COM:Russia. As per description, taken from a family archive, so probably first published on Commons.


I don’t know who was meant by the word “we” above, so I’ll give a few similar examples:

 Comment Re:"We": I copied @Yann word for word when I closed the Deletion request. And it's based on this Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Photographs_by_Pavel_Troshkin. As @Fae commented "Overly hypothetical doubts about copyright." The Precautionary Principal request significant doubt. COM:EVID is not written to address photos that are highly likely to be in the Public Domain. The Hirtle chart is specific to works published in the United States or made by Americans, and URAA specifically states that, "All other foreign works have their US copyright restored (according to US rules) if they were still in copyright in the source country (according to source country rules) on the relevant URAA date." If this was public domain on January 1, 1996, the relevant date in Russia, then it remains public domain. The test is whether this anonymous, possibly unpublished photograph was public domain in 1996, 73 years after the photograph was taken. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 07:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the U.S., the question of publication was tortured since there was no single definition, but the most common definition that seems to be used, would make distributing photos to friends (with no restrictions) likely be publication. Taking a photo yourself and putting in your own album, no that is not publication. Giving copies outside the immediate family with no restrictions, very well could be. For a group photograph like this, since prints exist, you would assume they were distributed to many of the participants of the photo -- so yes that would be considered published from a U.S. perspective and thus public domain in the U.S. no matter how you slice it. So, no "120 years from creation" issues that I can see. If no name was present on the initial copies (which would be the prints like this), it should be anonymous. And the anonymous term would start from the "disclosure", not strictly "publication", given newer Russian law. I am far less sure on the subtleties of Soviet and current Russian law (at the time, there was no Soviet copyright, so it would have had to be retroactively given by newer laws). But, "theoretically possible" is not the same thing as "significant doubt". You really would need to show a significant doubt based on current Russian law about its copyright there. That seems like a stretch to me, at first glance. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These images are derivatives of copyrighted packaging and New York State Department of Health is not the copyright holder.

Quick1984 (talk) 06:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ترويج أو دعاية  Mohammed Qays  🗣 07:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

شعار منظمة له حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 07:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Majidgeelani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal quotations by nonnotable individual, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Munexaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal quotations by nonnotable individual, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotations by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Salussalus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal quotations by nonnotable individual, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by questionably notable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal quotation by nonnotable individual, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

forbes india pic, likely not free license Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file after self-promotional article was deleted on ES:WP (see uploaders discussion page on ES:WP: es:Usuario_discusión:Aurea.soriano.vargas ) Archie02 (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rampam1923 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by UgoBoccabella (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Raphael Cherfem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The logo meets the threshold of originality and is likely to be under copyright of the Shri Channabasaveshwar Education Society. Ciridae (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mislicensed photo. File with proper license is File:Duterte with the Khos and Michael Yang 2017.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:34, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Urheber "Kameradenkreis der Gebirgstruppe"? Das kann nicht sein. War die Wehrmacht eine KdöR? Passen die Angaben zur angeblichen Gemeinfreiheit? GerritR (talk) 08:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ace0607 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope material...

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fails {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. The source cites "Pfc Ramirez" as the author credit of the images. Whether Ramirez is affiliated to Kawal Pinoy blog ("© Kawalpinoyblog.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.") or not cannot be ascertained. Even if Ramirez is affiliated to the Armed Forces of the Philippines, AFP website gives a clear copyright statement in the footer: "Copyright © [year] Armed Forces of the Philippines. All rights reserved." So nothing is in public domain and this image needs to be deleted as unfree for free culture and commercial uses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not own work. Taken from https://journalmetro.com/local/montreal-nord/2568500/le-directeur-de-lecole-henri-bourassa-est-remplace/ WikiEditor50 (talk) 09:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of image being the uploader's own work. Image taken from https://www.helicondesign.com/project/south-shore-charter-public-school/ WikiEditor50 (talk) 10:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of free license; vague source. J Milburn (talk) 10:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

foto pessoal de uma pessoa MuriloMichelonmarketing (talk) 10:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Foto pessoal de uma pessoa que no e admin ni Pessoa (Fernando, o poeta). 186.172.224.161 13:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Boxwoodie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional/fantasy, no COM:EDUSE, OOS per I am creating my own country called housa in mongolia

Achim55 (talk) 11:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of image being the work of the uploader. File taken from http://www.bokhs.co.za/ WikiEditor50 (talk) 11:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is duplicate of the following: National oil engine exhibit at Visvesvaraya Museum Kaartic [talk][kindly ping me] 11:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Yanlış resim (Alınan kaynak hatalı yönlendirdi) Klingbeil16 (talk) 11:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD old. Keep. 186.172.224.161 13:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


author request to delete this talk page Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian: out of scope. -- Karim (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope: unused and not useful private image George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kiki likn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam. The uploader has been blocked on zhwiki due to spam.

SCP-2000 12:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong mime type Coolmaster69 (talk) 12:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I got pointed towards a list of images, that appeared solely through unsolicited means on here. I don't neccessarily mean the bot, that's just crawling and doing its thing, but the fact that they were categorized as CC0 in the first place. Seemingly you can just choose it as a setting on Flickr. Had someone else manage that stuff, because I'm lazy and a yea-sayer. As for if it was intentional or not: I hope it wasn't, since it's a random assortment of pictures, but that's neither here nor there; everything and everyone involved is being scrubbed now. I think it's clear those pics have no place here and Wikimedia shouldn't be on anyone's mind as a first stop for private image hosting. Just put a checkmark next to this accident and it's back to usual business. Alice0815 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Free license at time of upload, has potential use. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

سکس در اماکن تاریخی در شهر 2A01:5EC0:2013:952C:8017:DCFF:FEA2:FCE8 12:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No potential (educational!) use... 186.172.224.161 13:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're not being very imaginative. The categories suggest possible uses. That said, if there are better alternatives, I wouldn't oppose deletion on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep given that there appears to be no problem about consent or license. And, yes, cross-dressing like this is a valid topic in human sexuality, and this illustrates it better than most. - Jmabel ! talk 16:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and:

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user generated, conlang number system, not related with confirmed iberian numerals (–, =, I, Π, L, S) Flaiddre (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ho sbagliato a caricarlo. COM:PENIS 186.172.224.161 13:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the author is unknown (?) doesn't necessarily mean that the file in question is copyrights free... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 13:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • So it's untrue that "This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek: Right now, the only available data we have (?) is the date of creation (i.e. 1942). However, we dont know the original creator or the original uploader of the file here on Commons didn't make any proper research regarding this matter. I'm not really sure whether the artist/designer (?) behind this propaganda poster died right on the spot so that it became public domain around 2012, however, this scenario doesn't look really plausible. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 21:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German freedom of panorama unfortunally not applies for temporary works.

Lukas Beck (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German freedom of panorama unfortunally not applies for temporary works.

Lukas Beck (talk) 13:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German freedom of panorama unfortunally not applies for temporary works.

Lukas Beck (talk) 13:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Samimi.1997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio files

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali307cc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ali307cc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably no sufficient license on the source site. Gumruch (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake license HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong photo Marcelduchamp26 (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong photo Marcelduchamp26 (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2008 statue. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:NOTEDU: One of the many historically incorrect 'green Fatimid' flags; apart from the fact that national flags in the modern sense did not exist then, the Fatimids never used green as their color. Constantine 15:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads by sockpuppet of Seyed haji (talk · contribs). Recieved files are out of Tasnim's license

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-upload of previously deleted files. This user is sockpuppet of Seyed haji (talk · contribs), known for uploading problematic photographs of Iranian military equipment. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Seyed haji for details.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a work by Mehr/Tasnim/Fars. Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a work by Mehr/Tasnim/Fars. Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nedaaymo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a work by Mehr/Tasnim/Fars. Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:NOTEDU: One of the many entirely fictitious early caliphate flags, that from here have spread to the rest of the internet; apart from the fact that national flags in the modern sense did not exist then, the Umayyads never used green as their color. The flag is only used in a couple of personal WP spaces, for such things as 'imaginary wars'. Constantine 15:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [1] gallery

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:

  1. No photographer is credited
  2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comment

Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:

  •  Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Delete if another agency is credited
  • undelete images that didn't need to be deleted

For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.

--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Clearly not a work by Fars News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with the "received" images above, I disagree with these six. I see no mention of "received" images. Vysotsky (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These photographs are not from Iran (France, Gabon, etc) and are from different times. If you check the link, this one even has a watermark and Fars News has not removed it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Didn't see that. Thanks for making that clear. Vysotsky (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not appear to be the original work of an Iranian press agency. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are 'recieved', not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per {{Tasnim}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are recieved

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Received. Not a work by Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The rights of these photos belong to Iranian defense ministry, as previously discussed (Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Files referred to here (link) were previously discussed and kept. Propose to keep per same argumentation. Vysotsky (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are received, not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No indication that this is a Tasnim work. No photographer credited.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Unlike khamenei.ir, files from Leader.ir are not freely licensed

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted above per nomination and discussion. Ellywa (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim, files from Leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not by Tasnim, but "Received", acc. to sources. Copyright not with Tasnim News Agency. Vysotsky (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Works are 'Received', CC license does not apply as they are taken by the source from somewhere else.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work claim, different author in metadata (author in metadata is "卓政興", uploader is "Jasonzhuocn"). No evidence that author and uploader are the same person.--125.230.85.73 16:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I believe there is sufficient reason to believe that the author and uploader are the same person. Firstly, there is the fact that the name "Jasonzhuocn" is visible in the file itself. Furthermore, their surnames match. 卓 (Chinese names have surname first) is pronounced Zhuo. It is not uncommon for Chinese people to have separate Chinese and English given names. TansoShoshen (talk) 04:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mandruss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused Wikipedia screenshots. Probably uploaded to illustrate something at some point, but it looks like they are not needed anymore (since they are not in use anywhere).

~TheImaCow (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tineye.com says this image is cropped from the original 2017 image owned by blakprophetz.com. https://tineye.com/search/fbed15651e890fab0595dda65248f26de91c0463?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Binksternet (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file's summary says it all. This file has been extracted from another file: BLAKPROPHETZ-CHRIS BROWN - BET AWARDS.jpg - the permission is here. This file, which was originally posted to Blak Prophetz, was reviewed on 1 April 2021 by reviewer Taivo, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.
Binksternet didn't even read the summary lol. You didn't need no Tineye.com to get what was written in the file's page Presley34 (talk) 17:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Copyvio — uploader’s name does not match copyright holder (see filename). KlausHeide (talk) 16:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Possible Copyvio — uploader’s name does not match copyright holder (see filename or description). KlausHeide (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

self promotional, no scope Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very low resolution version of File:Pavel Filonov - The German War.JPG Carl Ha (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promotion image of a sock manufacturer Gampe (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC) Also:[reply]

URAA-case. Derivative work, unveiled in 1938, of Finnish sculptor Emil Cedercreutz (Wikidata:Q11857751), died in 1949. Free from copyrightt in Finland, but copyright restored in U.S. because of URAA, until 2034. Htm (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo about uploader himself, out of project scope. In addition it does not look like own work, real photographer's copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the source page, the Library of Congress asserts that it has not evaluated the copyright in this image, and on the linked copyright page it explains that it does not possess any rights to items in its collections. Thus it couldn't make this photograph available under a CC0 dedication, even if it had in the past published the image with such a license statement. As it stands, if the image was not first published in the US (but for instance in China), it would still be copyrighted until 2069, and if published in the US, it would have to have been published without a copyright notice to have fallen in the public domain. There is no indication of this at the source or elsewhere, so the precautionary principle would in my opinion suggest deletion.. Felix QW (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of public domain, but no proof of how that is. Image is recent, has a watermark, and from https://www.shkodrasport.com/lufo-une-jamkrenare-dhe-falenderuese-qe-jam-pjese-e-nje-familje-te-tille-si-vllaznia/ RedPatch (talk) 18:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is from online, simple to look up. If it were not publicly useful, it would not have been online. Fedmonger (talk) 18:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being online does not mean it is in the public domain and not subject to copyright RedPatch (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of no value; being used as an attack image on en.wp 81.2.123.64 18:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.

Quick1984 (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Works of 1950s, bogus PD rationale: you can't count copyright term from the death of an unknown author.

Quick1984 (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"you can't count copyright term from the death of an unknown author". Why not? Is the issue that we don't know whether the photographer died between 1952 and 1954? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So far as i know, these pictures were taken by the man who died in that years. So maybe we should delete them, than wait for at least 10 years (the source can be erased due to some reasons of russian political situation, for example) and than upload? Author died somewhere in Indigirka, Boguchan, Oymyakon ragion in 50s, that for sure, but no proofs. It is unreal to proove it. I even cannot present my grandfather's death certificate, and he died in the 50s in Soviet Union.. - Zac Allan (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1954 is 70 years ago. Is that long enough to be in the public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Man, i'm the author of these uploads and my second granddad is the victim of this gulag camp, being there 6-7 years and than lived nearby until 1970s. I'm definitely not the person who want it to be deleted, i know i'm right and it can be stoed here but have no strict proofs. I think it will bw deleted. - Zac Allan (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, I will not upload it again here even if I asked. And third, i really thought about upload here my family's archive from 1977-1979 Afghanistan before war broke, USSR 1980-s and so on. I see no reason to do some work that can be erased any moment "just because". Let it burn. - Zac Allan (talk) 13:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should take your say-so, but I don't make decisions here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fotograf ist erst 1963 verstorben: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Munk%C3%A1csi 2A01:599:11F:4BB8:9D79:B76F:83B9:BFDD 19:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank with no content Rathfelder (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown if it's own work, it's the logo of a local swedish football club. Kakan spelar (talk) 19:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Nv8200p (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I cannot understand this. The photo is mine, I released the game via my company Romantic Robot and I retain full copyright. The game also contains my own music plus my track The Moons of Jupiter, which still attracts a lot of attention on YouTube. I am listed on Wikipedia as is my company Romantic Robot. AGRR (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AGRR: My mistake. So sorry. Removing deletion request. Nv8200p (talk) 21:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Zac Allan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of copyrighted 2D/3D artworks, no FoP in Belarus, Kazakhstan and in Russia (except architecture).

Quick1984 (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yeah, even trivia like "Dvina named train, Polotsk-Moscow. Couchette car. Train schedule information desk..jpg" is no longer need to be here. I have no interest in these files and have no will to protect them. Delete bravely. - Zac Allan (talk) 13:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this image was first published in China, it will still have been in copyright at the URAA renewal date and will therefore be copyrighted in the US for many years to come. However, Alamy credits a version of this photograph to Keystone, and if Keystone (simultaneously) first published it in the US, and did so without a copyright notice, then it would now be PD in the US. In my eyes though, that is too much of a hypothetical to keep this image. Felix QW (talk) 19:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was previously published at https://pinodigennaro.it/en/ and elsewhere online. A VRT ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1910s photograph, likely public domain in Germany, but we need evidence photographer died before 1954. Too young to assume photographer has been dead for 70 years. Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small low-rez 17 KB image by banned user Bull-Doser that is of very poor quality, below our minimum standards, I believe. Not used on any Wikipedia pages about the subject for that reason, perhaps. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Can you Please delete this image? I uploaded it here because I wanted to take part in a competition but I would like if My photo Would be deleted. Thank you in advance Letizia.snd (talk) 21:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I would like this picture to be deleted because I uploaded it here because I wanted to take part in a competition but I would like if My photo Would be deleted. Thank you in advance Letizia.snd (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I would like this picture to be deleted because I uploaded it here because I wanted to take part in a competition but I would like if My photo Would be deleted. Thank you in advance Letizia.snd (talk) 21:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by User:Defendersofhistory

[edit]

User with a bad history dubiously claiming own work.

These images appear to be re-uploads of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ribus157, albeit with changed names. Defendersofhistory appears to be a sock or colleague of Ribus157.

Defendersofhistory has uploaded numerous blatant copyright infringements claimed as own work. These remaining uploads cannot be assumed to truly be Defendersofhistory's own work. These images are small, very compressed, and some have narrow rectangles or slivers of another image along an edge, indicating these were cropped from an album (e.g. File:Azheekakam.jpg and File:Kattiparambuchurch.jpg).

--Risedemise (talk) 22:38, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like this picture to be deleted because I uploaded it here because I wanted to take part in a competition but I would like if My photo Would be deleted. Thank you in advance Letizia.snd (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Its blank. Rathfelder (talk) 21:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Achim55? 186.173.153.113 21:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eigenes Werk 186.173.153.113 21:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, bitte. 186.173.153.113 21:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Sandie Gilham 186.173.153.113 21:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo has been provided by Sandie Gilham and published with her permission. Labola (talk) 08:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. 186.173.153.113 21:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicht Benito Mussolini, wer ist? 186.173.153.113 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no permission no author given copyvio from https://artists.spotify.com/songwriter/1XZqzXp4oPygqjROdqLbmI Hoyanova (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The metadata says "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Thiago Leon", but is uploaded under "Own work" by User:Arquidiocese. How do we know that Arquidiocese is Thiago Leon? Kakan spelar (talk) 23:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Don't forget to delete the cropped file too if this one gets removed. // Kakan spelar (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be File:Santuário Nacional 20161110 (cropped).jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 07:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:FOP Romania, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. This is a contemporary building. plicit 23:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with the argument you've provided, any and every picture of a building in Bucharest should be deleted within Wikimedia Commons.Aquintero82, (talk), 13:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete summary with last update in 2013 (more than 10 years ago!) --Ein Dahmer (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]