Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 27th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Confusion au niveau des droits du fichier ː cette image en réalité n'est pas libre de droits LHBiblio (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: uploader's request within 7 days after upload date: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ripped from Evening Standard (London) website, Copyvio. Govvy (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Govvy (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, taken from premierleague.com Govvy (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photograph is freely licensed, the mural in the background is not covered by freedom of panorama in the US. De minimis would also not apply since the truck is clearly the minor object in this shot. As a derivative work we can't keep this image. De728631 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



OK, deleted. -- 19:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G7}} . ArturSik (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied per uploaders wish. --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Elementary schools in Chiayi County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no compelling need to subdivide Category:Elementary schools in Chiayi County into township categories.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in standardizing names. Keep other - --Chris Light (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 04:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plan de estudio. Fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ينقصه بيانات Mr.dagbashey (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidently created a new file on what was intended to be overwriten 100cellsman (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 23:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded Wrong Logo DrewPietrafesa (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:45, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: <incorrect logo/issues> --Krdbot 13:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded Wrong Logo DrewPietrafesa (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:45, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: <incorrect logo/issues> --Krdbot 13:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete, incorrect logo. DrewPietrafesa (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:45, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: <incorrect logo/issues> --Krdbot 13:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete, incorrect logo. DrewPietrafesa (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:45, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: <incorrect logo/issues> --Krdbot 13:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What the hell is this? Lousy artwork by non-notable individual.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, screenshot with visible copyrighted elements of graphics program. MKFI (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by InternetPhilanthropist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A school website was given as source but no evidence of permission.

Ammarpad (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope: unused personal artwork. MKFI (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by vector version of the same logo. Aida (talk) 01:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising --Alaa :)..! 14:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Secureindian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yeah, phantastic. Exhibitionist number 1.000.000 - no possible educational use Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in error -- please remove. Tssinger (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image - we have enough better images of penisses with real possibility of educaionl use. Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 18:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz. JurgenNL (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just another low quality penis picture. Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Depicted person's foot have different color, but this is probably mark of bad photo, not genetic disorder. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:NUDE and COM:PENIS. Out of project scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope - Not Educationally Useful / Redundant Bakertaylor28 (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thank you for your comments. The graph seems clear enough, so why does it need to be in SVG format? Also, what does “unused diagram of questionable notability” mean? Does it mean that a new diagram is not welcome? How do you justify “questionable notability”? Is unemployment unimportant? The diagram that is in the entry now does not show any unemployment at all. Is that realistic? No, it is misleading. So the new diagram corrects this misleading appearance.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usama7262 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, not used Civitas13 (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 16:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified self-made logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sii Migueltop (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 04:30, 2 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Migueltop --Krdbot 07:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DG3Rappers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no metadata, web-quality. No evidence of permission

Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laurent Neveu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright. Marcel Neveu died 1993. Missing permission.

Hystrix (talk) 16:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

name is wrong Gayatri dutta (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Duplicate of File:Burara oedipodea.jpg. LamBoet (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 06:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a photo JopkeB (talk) 05:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only part of a photo JopkeB (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishnukvv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 23:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a photo JopkeB (talk) 04:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This would be great candidate for re-upload. If that happens please  Keep, but if this is not done in timely manner this partial image should be  Delete. --Aida (talk) 10:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW Yasu (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use, very blur picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work of the uploader as claimed and out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 05:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Dont forget the redirect File:DMtPn48UIAAlv68 (1).jpg. --JuTa 05:54, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo isn't under a CC license (see sourcea) RoodyAlien (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source Shervin27 (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, Copyright issue Shervin27 (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Telegram" isn't a source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, big size is File:Ternopil Zamok XIX stolitt'a.jpg Микола Василечко (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, Copyright issue Shervin27 (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Telegram" isn't a source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, Copyright issue Shervin27 (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Telegram" isn't a source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, Copyright issue Shervin27 (talk) 20:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Telegram" isn't a source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source, Copyright issue Shervin27 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Telegram" isn't a source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chart with unknown meaning, out of scope. Einstein2 (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use in English Wikiversity. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-uploaded files by User:Hintha

[edit]

Added additional requests for deletion (self-nominated):

Orphaned files. Majority are self-uploaded text renderings of Burmese text. No longer needed with greater Unicode adoption. --Hintha (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I kept the last one, pls renominate with a specific motivation if needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mihai mad

[edit]

Orphans. First 4 images are incorrect Burmese spellings (I have corrected the spellings in the applicable articles). --Hintha (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free film characters. See en:The Pinchcliffe Grand Prix GeorgHHtalk   23:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Material. Original found here: https://www.deviantart.com/scotthartman/art/Monolophosaurus-548749807 Paleocolour (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work in temporary exhibition in a public place, not covered by FoP in Brazil Darwin Ahoy! 23:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this appears to be a royalty-free stock photo, photos from depositphotos.com don't appear to have a license compatible with Commons (and this one is falsely claimed as own work). Plus, with the website's watermark splashed across the image, it is not useable and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. Ed (Edgar181) 12:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:50, 4 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree stock image per source \ watermarks --Krdbot 01:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo Stolbovsky (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 15:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused thumbnail sized image of unknown location. MKFI (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BioRex Markkinointi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Company marketing material, no EXIF, web resolution, photographer unknown, shared company account.

MKFI (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally user has been blocked in Finnish Wikipedia. MKFI (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: small resolution file with no EXIF, only photograph uploaded by user. MKFI (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are minimum two sinagogues in Lida--Хомелка (talk) 06:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, picture already uploadad and now found again, belated, see File:Rheinpegel Mannheim 740.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HubiB (talk • contribs) 2018-10-25T06:54:29‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong first name entered in file name.

 Keep I've renamed the file. --bjh21 (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Privacy Fernasis (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. JurgenNL (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the whereabouts of the picture or its author. As, it seems, it's not exhibited outdoors, proper information about authorship is needed, in order to assert public domain Discasto talk 22:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ylesummeri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Upload account seems to be a corporate shared account, not personal. Photographer(s) unknown. OTRS permission needed.

MKFI (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tuulikki10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web resolution images with no EXIF and minimal descriptions. Most likely copyright violations.

MKFI (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work: map author unknown. MKFI (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork was made by Natalia Vashkevich (Russian: Вашкевич Наталья) in 2011 [1]. We need the permission from her to publish this image here. Jarash (talk) 10:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:The British warblers - pt 1 frontispiece.png Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, and redirected. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence that picture has been shot in Iran. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Given "after leaving Iran", it obviously wasn't taken in Iran. --bjh21 (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence that picture has been shot in Iran. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: the picture shows the cover of a book but doesn't explain why it is not copyrighted Civitas13 (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parroquia de Santiago Apóstol Teapa tabasco..jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

eliminar foto — Preceding unsigned comment added by XIARACO-ORM (talk • contribs) 02:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: allready deleted. --JuTa 11:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove it. this image is wrong. NIJO K K (talk) 12:18, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused commercial logo, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove it. this image is wrong. NIJO K K (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused commercial logo, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove it. this image is wrong. NIJO K K (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 09:58, 20 Dezember 2018 UTC: Broken redirect (G2) --Krdbot 13:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove it. this image is wrong. NIJO K K (talk) 12:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 09:58, 20 Dezember 2018 UTC: Broken redirect (G2) --Krdbot 13:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on the constitution of Adjar ASSR in 1937, 1978, and the Regulations on the State Flag of the Adjar ASSR, the Adjar ASSR uses the flag of the Georgian SSR without any inscription. See here for more info. All the pages that uses this flag should be replaced with this flag. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 03:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on multiple Wikipedias. As long as that remains the case, Commons should keep it (see COM:NPOV). You can, of course, note the disagreement on the file page. --bjh21 (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: No, it's like using a 49-star flag for the flag of USA in articles. While this is hardly noticeable, it would cause ado if someone realizes it. The same is with this flag.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 02:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We don't deal with misuse of File:US flag 49 stars.svg by deleting it from Commons. In the same way, if File:Flag of Adjarian ASSR.svg is being misused on other sites, that should be corrected on those sites. As explained on COM:NPOV, A file that is in good faith use on another Wikimedia project is, by that very fact, considered useful for an educational purpose and is not liable to deletion on the grounds that it is "wrong" in some way. You can, of course, request that the file be renamed, and explain how the flag isn't official in the file's description page. --bjh21 (talk) 12:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: So, what you mean that if I create 25 versions of the flag of the Adjar ASSR, with different inscriptions, e.g. inscriptions in latin letters, cyrilic letters, arabic letters, etc (the current one is in Mkhedruli), I can uploaded all of them to Commons. Even if those files were nominated for deletion, I can defend it by saying "Well, anyone who is reading about this flag must know the meaning of the inscription, so we should create different files for different people..." Is that the point you are conveying? --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. That is not what I mean. --bjh21 (talk) 18:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Well, rather than conveying a 49 star flag, imagine if a user one day puts out a 59 star flag as the flag of USA. No other users realize it, and the flag then would be used on different articles. Once one user know, he will tell it to everybody who is working on it. A fuss will occur.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Issue on enwiki has been solved, file unlikely to be further useful on Commons. Home Lander (talk) 04:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, just remove it. Diskad (talk) 22:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Image is still in use in English Wikipedia's Village Pump und it might be advisable to retain it for archival purposes? (as the Village Pump discussion supposedly will be archived at some point, still including the image). Gestumblindi (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Gestumblindi. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit dark, with a stroke and other white spots in it, not a good image B dash (talk) 04:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose And why would you delete this image? This is from Worldview. If you have a better image of this, please overwrite this image. For now, I oppose my picture deleting. - Nino Marakot (talk page) 00:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not a public domaine photo but has a copyright note on this site [2] Domdeparis (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral? - The text under the photo says: © The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia. Not a name or something. It's made in 1918, the photographer is possibly not alive anymore for many years.. So I doubt if this is really copyrighted, but there is no proof. Perhaps a tough decision for the moderator :-) . - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Richardkiwi: The copyright refers to a book on the subject [3] from which this photo was probably taken. --Domdeparis (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep According to PDIran law and the date of photo which have been taken, this photo basically does not have any copyright to be protected by... and the deletion nominating have no mean for it... Thanks.--ن.عامری (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is from Hungary during world war 2 and does not represent what the caption says it does. https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/549228117027998433/ on this version the star of David sown on to the clothes is clearly visible. Domdeparis (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Hoax, bad quality. --Yann (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

farsi ast va man Mister Germany (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Wdwd. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama does not apply to sculptures in the US. Derivative photos of this non-free artwork may not be published without permission from the original copyright holder of the sculpture. De728631 (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Birdonetwo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doesn't seems like it's own work. Possibilities of Copyright violation. No proper exif. No permission.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Birdonetwo, which it is about similar files from the same uploader. --Civitas13 (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry lousy artwork. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:18, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark indicates image is owned by https://www.hipipo.com/home/, which has no indication of free licensing. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request and also enough penis image RJ45LAN (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request and also enough penis image RJ45LAN (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press release picture, photographer unknown. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 18:53, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, file EXIF shows "Author ARI LAHTI". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image from the Internet. Copyright belongs to © 2018 SikhNet: https://www.sikhnet.com/news/leo-dicaprios-step-mom-turbaned-sikh ....HMS (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Blank daps of the United States

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة غير مناسبةللاطفال الصغار 105.67.6.228 14:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Народна Академія Українського козацтва" - это общественная организация, которая не является государственным органом Украины. Файл нужно удалить, так как он не подходит под лицензию {{PD-UA}}. Mitte27 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless picture of bottle. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Shadi12098 (talk)يمكن استعمالها في صفحة بيم[المغرب]، إنه منتوج (صابون سائل) يبيعه بيم#[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is apparently the uploader. File EXIF shows "Author SINIKKA JALKANEN". OTRS permission from photographer needed. MKFI (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author Kari Vainio Copyright holder Ask before use". Uploader is apparently band account, not personal. MKFI (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikmicped (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement.

MKFI (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The pic of the building and signs kept, the other 2 were blatant adverts. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Moment/Robert Seger". Very small resolution for Canon EOS 1D camera picture. MKFI (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Copyright holder Teemu Moisio/PTB-Creative MKFI (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Trigueiro martins (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image was uploaded far after September 2013. please read the license tag Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept since april 2018. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Original webpage(http://www.kandarioka.com/profile.html) is not licensed under CC. Takumiboo (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:23, 25 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: https://natalie.mu/music/news/243103 --Krdbot 13:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. It was tagged as such by Marcus Cyron, who pointed out that it's rather unlikely that Marceloapm, who was born in 1994 according to their user page, created this photograph in 1963. The uploader has a history of uploading historical photos with false authorship claims. The {{copyvio}} tag was inexplicably blanked out by Aspíllaga, who has also has a history of copyright violations and of disruptively blanking out problem tags and notices. LX (talk, contribs) 13:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The notice regarding this ongoing deletion discussion was just blanked out by 88.80.56.84 (a Russian IP address editing in Spanish). They also replaced the {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} claim with {{cc-by-2.5-pe}} and changed the source from {{own}} to point to http://www.pcm.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Historia_de_la_Presidencia_del_Consejo_de_Ministros_Tomo_II_pdf.pdf. That PDF does not mention any Creative Commons licenses. The actual terms on page 3 are completely non-free. ("Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de esta obra.") LX (talk, contribs) 20:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Aspíllaga: Did you edit as 88.80.56.84? Why did you overwrite the largest version in violation of COM:OVERWRITE?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aspíllaga: : For the picture to be kept, you need to demonstrate that it's not a breach of copyright for us to keep it. It's too recent to have fallen into the public domain, so you'd need to find evidence that the author has released it under a free licence. --bjh21 (talk) 12:55, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who's the painter ? Permission needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nina Shenturk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, not own works, invalid license. Copyright status is unclear.

Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirhosein Izadi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove it. this image is wrong. NIJO K K (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 01:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 18:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 01:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MAUVAISE QUALITE AlexBurn44 (talk) 19:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but such works are not covered by the US' freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the painter or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Provisional Keep
Unsure if w:WP:BEFORE applies here.
Mural appears to be a public work of art according to the Short North Art District, which appears to receive support/funding in whole, or in part, from the City of Columbus.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW work of material not covered by US FOP. Doesn't matter what funding source they got it is copyrighted and we would need the painter's permission. --Majora (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail image, most likely not own work. MKFI (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; (c) arr at https://www.bioethics.fi. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: no EXIF, only upload by user. Possibly Facebook or other website image based on title. MKFI (talk) 19:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source was https://www.ipmimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=5396450 which was licensed BY-NC (non-commercial use only) R. A. Nonenmacher (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Passed license review and source listed has correct license. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A better version File:山梨県富士吉田市市章.svg of this emblem exists. -- sarang사랑 00:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, will tag as duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is apparently a self-portrait by Joshua Front and not the uploader's own work. We need a permission from the original painter to keep this file. De728631 (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright? Rudolphous (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work. --Majora (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from mascots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the copyright holder has released the copyright. Perhaps can be loaded to enwiki under a NFUR when/if an article wishes to use it. David Biddulph (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: India follows TOO close to the US. PD-textlogo. Fine to stay where it is provided it is in use on the draft. --Majora (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 18:57, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader not likely copyright holder. --Majora (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Exact details about creation and location would be needed to show that it is under a copyright we accept. --Majora (talk) 22:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Black photo, nothing to see JopkeB (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry JopkeB, I do not agree. Zooming in, you'll notice it is a book cover. I added the categories to it. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probably the cover of the photo album containing these images. Lotje (talk) 08:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of project scope. A black cover with nothing on it presents no educational value. --Majora (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://scontent.fhga1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31326891_146654352844916_4420928202776510464_n.png?_nc_cat=102&_nc_ht=scontent.fhga1-1.fna&oh=f5ec736d4b5382a5ba8e73590bb9003b&oe=5C4828D7


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Appears to come from an official youtube channel with an acceptable license. --Majora (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo. The depiction of Ganesha is original enough to be copyrighted unless it is old enough for the copyright to have expired. De728631 (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. I just deleted all of the uploader's other images because they were in Category:Personal files for speedy deletion, but I declined the speedy on this one because it was previously kept at DR. Since the keep rationale no longer applies (it was in use, but it's no longer used), I don't see a good reason to retain it. Nyttend (talk) 18:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS, oops, File:Agnihotri Kuldeep.jpg was also kept at that DR, so I've restored it and tagged it for inclusion in this DR, since its situation is identical to that of Kuldeep @gnihotri.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At least we are really good at eradicating any and all selfies. We have quite some copyvios, but selfies, no, those are unacceptable! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, how is this one in COM:SCOPE? Nyttend (talk) 01:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All depends on your definition of scope. A while ago someone from Wikimedia came to the village pump - they needed about a 1000 selfie images to create some algorithm. But there weren't many, because we delete everything. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, honestly I'd vote a weak keep on this one. Kinda like it. Abzeronow (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to split the baby on this one and hope no one yells at me. Kept the original nominated image and deleted the one added later. I generally have a wider view of scope than some other people and that's fine. My personal view on the matter is that if it could be useful, anywhere, then it would be fine to leave it visible. I also give some matter of deference to other individuals who comment on scope related DRs if they can present a plausible rationale for why the image should be left visible. In my mind, Alexis Jazz has done that for the original image in question. I can also see how that image could possibly be useful as a visual representation of a specific group of people and additional categories could be useful to ensure that the image could be found if that is what people are looking for. As for File:Agnihotri Kuldeep.jpg I do not see how that could possibly be useful as it is clearly a personal photograph and has no additional use that I could see. So I deleted that one. --Majora (talk) 01:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation? The source of the file shows that the pic was published in a book by Vivan Sundaram, maternal grandson of the author of the pic — photographer Umrao Singh Sher-Gil.

English equivalent of the source named in the file: Amrita Sher-Gil: An Indian Artist Family of the Twentieth Century

There are other sources, that complain that the file is from a publication about photographs of Umrao Singh Sher-Gil named His Misery and His Manuscript and explanations too that the photographer was Umrao Singh Sher-Gil [5]. So the author of the file is fixed.

If the photographer is known the Licensing „The Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Chapter V Section 25) for Anonymous works“ is not possible and I really ask myself, if the copyright belongs to the heirs, especially Vivan Sunderam, who published the pic. ....HMS (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the photographer is known the Licensing „The Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Chapter V Section 25)“ transferred works 60 years after the death of the author regardless of the heirs into the public domain in India, I noticed yet. But the description of the file is wrong. Two dates, two sources (both are obviously not the right ones - the uploaded file is from His Misery and His Manuscript and not from Amrita Sher-Gil: An Indian Artist Family of the Twentieth Century and at last two authors? I think we have to discuss the situation, corrections in the description can not be easily done in that case. ....HMS (talk) 09:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be the best, to delete that file and to upload the mirror-inverted version given in the book Amrita Sher-Gil: An Indian Artist Family of the Twentieth Century which names the author, the year of creation and the titel of the pic — under Licensing Indian Copyright Act 1957. ....HMS (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need to know exactly who the author was and when they died in order to confirm the license. India is life + 60. Insufficient information given to confirm license. --Majora (talk) 23:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]