Wikipedia:Controversial articles: Revision history

18 January 2024

• curprev 07:2907:29, 18 January 2024 Patar knight talk contribs 15,656 bytes +20‎ clarify this hatnote link covers controversy sections as well undo

6 November 2023

• curprev 18:2518:25, 6 November 2023 FluffyKittehz talk contribs 15,636 bytes +121‎ No edit summary undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

1 September 2023

• curprev 21:3521:35, 1 September 2023 Aaron Liu talk contribs m 15,515 bytes −1‎ →Describe the controversy: hatnotes on top undo

23 August 2023

• curprev 03:3603:36, 23 August 2023 DIYeditor talk contribs 15,516 bytes +109‎ for CTOP undo

21 August 2023

• curprev 15:3615:36, 21 August 2023 --WikiUser1234945-- talk contribs m 15,407 bytes −27‎ Reverted edits by 2001:DF4:E000:3FC2:4D6:15FB:D0FE:9837 (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 15:3615:36, 21 August 2023 2001:df4:e000:3fc2:4d6:15fb:d0fe:9837 talk 15,434 bytes +27‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

28 November 2021

• curprev 09:0609:06, 28 November 2021 Ymblanter talk contribs 15,407 bytes +6‎ category moved undo

13 September 2021

• curprev 15:4915:49, 13 September 2021 Serols talk contribs m 15,401 bytes +354‎ Reverted edits by 71.46.215.66 (talk) (HG) (3.4.10) undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 15:4815:48, 13 September 2021 71.46.215.66 talk 15,047 bytes −354‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

15 July 2020

• curprev 09:5309:53, 15 July 2020 Occurring talk contribs 15,401 bytes −53‎ →Be careful with attribution: Word 'credulity' means "readiness to believe". Intended meaning here seems the very opposite: incredulity. Turning that into everyday terms, I use the word 'doubt' instead. For that, I replace 'veracity' with 'truth'. Otherwise, it's needless to controversially allege what word 'alleged' suggests "in most contexts". Do we have research consensus on that? Saying it "often" does is good enough and not controversial. And in general, I treat wordiness. undo

12 July 2019

• curprev 07:2307:23, 12 July 2019 Cydebot talk contribs m 15,454 bytes +3‎ Robot - Moving category Wikipedia essays on style to Category:Wikipedia essays about style per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 7. undo

25 November 2018

• curprev 23:0723:07, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,451 bytes +10‎ link fix undo
• curprev 23:0723:07, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,441 bytes +27‎ →Describe the controversy: crossref undo
• curprev 22:3922:39, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,414 bytes +39‎ also qualifies for this cat. undo
• curprev 22:3822:38, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,375 bytes −27‎ more specific cat. undo
• curprev 21:2921:29, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,402 bytes −23‎ template tweak undo
• curprev 21:2821:28, 25 November 2018 SMcCandlish talk contribs 15,425 bytes +95‎ →See also: +1 undo

18 June 2017

• curprev 11:5611:56, 18 June 2017 59.88.208.63 talk 15,330 bytes −3‎ independent secondary sources undo

6 June 2017

• curprev 14:0614:06, 6 June 2017 Jytdog talk contribs 15,333 bytes +22‎ →Raise source quality: shortcut undo

2 May 2017

• curprev 13:0613:06, 2 May 2017 Ian.thomson talk contribs 15,311 bytes −562‎ Undid revision by Proximity1 - this is still not a talk page, and you are contradicting *this very essay* as well as Wikipedia:Writing for the opponent. Write your own essay elsewhere if you disagree with this one. undo
• curprev 13:0313:03, 2 May 2017 Proximity1 talk contribs m 15,873 bytes +1‎ →Describe the controversy: spelling correction. undo
• curprev 13:0213:02, 2 May 2017 Proximity1 talk contribs 15,872 bytes +561‎ Undid revision 778326037 by Ian.thomson (talk) My point is unrelated to "Writing for the Enemy"--which describes a _good-faith_ exercise in seeing an opposing POV. undo
• curprev 12:5112:51, 2 May 2017 Ian.thomson talk contribs 15,311 bytes −561‎ Undid revision by Proximity1 - this is not a talk page and it misses the point of Wikipedia:Writing for the opponent. undo
• curprev 12:2312:23, 2 May 2017 Proximity1 talk contribs m 15,872 bytes +561‎ techniques to promote Neutrality as an objective: Partisans should not write, edit or design the presentation of their _adversaries'_ views, case, arguments, etc. The "prosecutor" should be in the position of representing the defendant's case for him. undo

14 January 2017

• curprev 17:0517:05, 14 January 2017 Fixuture talk contribs 15,311 bytes +2‎ new key for Category:Wikipedia controversial topics: "*" using HotCat undo

29 November 2016

• curprev 18:2718:27, 29 November 2016 Gwillhickers talk contribs 15,309 bytes +7‎ →Describe the controversy undo

22 February 2016

• curprev 05:0605:06, 22 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 15,302 bytes +18‎ →Describe the controversy: add info undo
• curprev 05:0105:01, 22 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 15,284 bytes +246‎ →Describe the controversy: add legal outcomes undo
• curprev 04:5704:57, 22 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 15,038 bytes +250‎ →Describe the controversy: add WP:UNDUE undo
• curprev 04:5404:54, 22 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 14,788 bytes +300‎ →Describe the controversy: add info undo

18 February 2016

• curprev 23:2523:25, 18 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 14,488 bytes −1‎ →Describe the controversy: para brk undo
• curprev 23:2423:24, 18 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 14,489 bytes +2‎ →Describe the controversy: para brk undo
• curprev 23:2223:22, 18 February 2016 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 14,487 bytes +848‎ add examples undo

23 November 2015

• curprev 18:1018:10, 23 November 2015 LjL talk contribs 13,639 bytes −17‎ Undid revision 681414871 by Wuerzele (talk) This is not a Wikipedia article; it doesn't matter that it's unreferenced. undo

17 September 2015

• curprev 02:1902:19, 17 September 2015 Wuerzele talk contribs 13,656 bytes +17‎ unreferenced undo

5 July 2015

• curprev 15:1415:14, 5 July 2015 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 13,639 bytes +92‎ add 2 caption undo
• curprev 15:0915:09, 5 July 2015 OnBeyondZebrax talk contribs 13,547 bytes +186‎ Add pic undo

26 June 2015

• curprev 07:4207:42, 26 June 2015 Jarble talk contribs 13,361 bytes +8‎ Undid revision 668730807 by Jarble (talk) undo
• curprev 07:4207:42, 26 June 2015 Jarble talk contribs 13,353 bytes −8‎ merging two hatnotes undo
• curprev 07:3807:38, 26 June 2015 Jarble talk contribs 13,361 bytes −56‎ →See also: copyediting undo

11 May 2015

• curprev 06:5406:54, 11 May 2015 Probing Mind talk contribs m 13,417 bytes +21‎ →Editing procedures: sentence structure was a bit awkward. undo

25 January 2015

• curprev 10:4010:40, 25 January 2015 JorisvS talk contribs m 13,396 bytes +3‎ →Be careful with weasel words undo

18 September 2014

• curprev 15:4915:49, 18 September 2014 24.0.133.234 talk 13,393 bytes +8‎ →Attribute each sentence, not just a paragraph: gr undo

5 April 2014

• curprev 21:3921:39, 5 April 2014 Carolmooredc talk contribs 13,385 bytes +197‎ →Attribute each sentence, not just a paragraph: tweak this per more usual practice; thoughts? undo

29 March 2014

• curprev 20:3520:35, 29 March 2014 Jarble talk contribs 13,188 bytes +44‎ added Category:Wikipedia controversial topics using HotCat undo
• curprev 20:3420:34, 29 March 2014 Jarble talk contribs 13,144 bytes −45‎ Undid revision 601867137 by Jarble (talk) This link might confuse some readers. undo
• curprev 20:3320:33, 29 March 2014 Jarble talk contribs 13,189 bytes +45‎ Linking undo

20 July 2013

• curprev 21:2321:23, 20 July 2013 Nick Levinson talk contribs 13,144 bytes 0‎ Moved a link and replaced a comma with a semicolon. undo
• curprev 21:1421:14, 20 July 2013 Nick Levinson talk contribs 13,144 bytes +7,721‎ Add recommendations; clarify terminology & sourceability; make sentences each consistent for grammatical number; cut on focus group (perhaps primary and usually unverifiable); replace word for syntactical consistency; space. undo

23 April 2013

• curprev 23:3623:36, 23 April 2013 Addbot talk contribs m 5,423 bytes −635‎ Bot: Migrating 11 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q11773611 undo