Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 21, 2024.

The World (weapon)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stands are not inherently "weapons". stands like emperor (a gun) and anubis (a katana) are pretty literal weapons, and heritage for the future has "weapon stands" (which is a game mechanic, not a literal category), but the world (a buff ghost) is neither. can't name any notable cases of someone using a world as a literal weapon, besides maybe amid evil's celestial claw, which shoots planets cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Stands are not weapons"? Huh, I didn't know that. Learn something new I guess. Anyway, expecting all readers to be on top of their Jojo lore in order use a Wikipedia redirect is unrealistic. Searchers have zero need to already understand the definition of a Stand, and whether or not Stands are weapons. Those fight scenes are hype, what else would "those things" be if not weapons? In any case, no other weapons are named "The World" at World (disambiguation), so there's no problems here. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    not inherently weapons. you wouldn't whack someone with khnum (a face), love love deluxe (puberty as seen in big mouth), super fly (i can't leave without my buddy superfly) or the world (buff guy, would you rather have it punch things or use it as an impractical bludgeoning tool?), but you might consider ratt (dart gun), sex pistols (bullets), and weather report (weather) to be weapon-like enough. also note stand (weapon), which got deleted not too long ago, and the world (stand), which was created by some wonk just after this rfd nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This Rfd must be the work of an enemy stand Delete as vague. There are actually several weaponized interpretations of The World raging such as Yugioh, House of the Dead and Persona. --Lenticel (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point, my main thing was "someone might be unclear what counts as a 'weapon'", but if there is ambiguity I have struck my !vote and opt for delete as vague per Lenticel instead. Cheers! Utopes (talk / cont) 22:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

AN/ALQ-128

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic of this redirect, the AN/ALQ-128, is barely mentioned on the target page about an aircraft, the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle. The target is a subsection that lists multiple specifications for the aircraft. The reader must look really hard to find the ALQ-128 mentioned. This redirect serves no real purpose and should be deleted. — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 21:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this seems to be a module installed on the F-15, but presumably this is installed on other US military aircraft. Delete to allow for article creation on this EW module, if notable. Natg 19 (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, looks like this was an article until 2022 when it was nominated as PROD, but then de-prodded and redirected to its current target. Maybe we should overturn the original BLAR and send to AFD. Natg 19 (talk) 02:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. not that i'm an expert in military doodads, but the second and third sources in the pre-blar diff don't seem all that reliable, significant, not user-generated, not deprecated over scraping and plagiarism... honestly, i'm not putting too much faith in the first one (which is currently down, seeing as the internet archive is also down) either, as the wording there implies it's more about the an/alr-56. i did find one seemingly reliable-ish article that mentions it, but it's in passing, not even about the f-15, and seems to only mention it by accident (mixing it up with the an/alq-218, probably) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Our Money

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see history for the explanation. vague, unmentioned in the target, unmentioned in gambling and gambling terminology articles, no entry on wiktionary, etc. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Real fruit juice

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Juice#100% fruit juice. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as opposed to fake fruit juice? is it referring to real juice or real fruit? created by an editor who was blocked for trolling with redirects, the term isn't mentioned in the target, and i don't think there are any potentially usable targets cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Refine to Juice#100% fruit juice which is a close enough synonym. Based on my experience, "real fruit juice" is used to market products containing actual juice as opposed to artifically flavored ones. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine per Presidentman. A simple google search gives me tens of different products just on the first page of results that claim to be or to contain "real fruit juice". This is a highly plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 22:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Real" is not synonymous with "100%" (aka "pure"). And not only that, but I suspect the proposed target section should probably get axed due to being...well...of incomprehensible scope, and with apparently non-WP:MEDRS-compliant sources. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine as per Presidentman. I disagree with the IP's assertion that "real" does not equate to "pure"-- if I am buying "real orange juice", and I discover that the juice I'm buying is artificially flavored, sweetened, and colored water, I'm going to want my money back, because I am expecting 100% orange juice made with real oranges.
    The WP:MEDRS/scope argument is an entirely different beast; however, it's ultimately outside of our scope at RfD. As it stands, right now, we're talking about the redirect, and as it stands, this is the best target. If you'd like to get some change on the article itself, I recommend heading to its talk page to get the ball rolling-- or, better, rustle up some better sources on what 100% juice is and what it can do compared to nonpure juice, and write up an edit yourself. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine per Presidentman --Lenticel (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine per above. Very plausible search, given how often the term is used in advertising and labelling. Fieari (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (do not refine) - the proposed section is specifically only about the health effects of 100% fruit juice, not about fruit juice in general. I think this is a perfectly plausible way to search for juice however, as the article is about "real" fruit juice as opposed to say soft drink. A7V2 (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine. To my understanding, we do not append "real" to titles of articles and then redirect them to the top of said article, as oftentimes there is a certain topic that searchers have in mind. In this case, something that is NOT just fruit juice comes to mind, and here is a subsection that applies, i.e. fruit juice from real fruit. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ulster dialect

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After creating it, I noticed Ulster English and Ulster Irish could be included under this phrase too. So I'm not sure if ambiguous. Web-julio (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate My search shows "ulster language/dialect" is used to refer all the languages in the Ulster region. [1][2] Ca talk to me! 22:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hyperion (Helsinki)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a future building, but it's not mentioned at the target at all. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Note that there are articles about the future building in Finnish and French, but that doesn't mean there has to be a redirect at the English Wikipedia to an article where the building is not mentioned. The page can always be recreated once we have an actual article about the building. JIP | Talk 09:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

God (artwork)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to God (disambiguation)#Arts, entertainment, and media. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While "God" is mentioned at the target, I'm not seeing anything about an art work. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: makes no sense. Is it implied that the god the creator believes in is an artwork of the universe? Or that the universe is the artwork of said deity? Cremastra (uc) 19:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. even the term "god" is vague here. could refer to fanart of arceus for all we know cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rayshelle Peyton

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Character who's not mentioned at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Edit summary when created indicates that a section on this character could be added, but without such a section this should be deleted (can always be recreated later if appropriate). Given a large number of mentions in various episode articles the character probably would be appropriate for inclusion. A7V2 (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of leaders of the opposition in the Goa Legislative Assembly

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No list of leaders of the opposition at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chinese Taipei women's national under-17 football team

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The under-17 team is not mentioned in any capacity at the target. Based on the ages in the included roster, this is the regular women's team. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

CzarNok

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned anywhere in the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2031 FIBA Basketball World Cup

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 23:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no relevant information listed at the target and not a single mention of the event. WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of deputy speakers of the Meghalaya Legislative Assembly

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of deputy speakers at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Palestine women's national under-17 football team

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The under-17 team is not mentioned or discussed at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tajikistan women's national under-17 football team

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The under-17 team is not mentioned or discussed at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Crapulinsky

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Crapulinsky

Unknown Artist - Making Her Bed

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target page and the generic words make google searches quite hard to do. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wheaton's law

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is an appropriate local target for this page, deletion should be contemplated. The plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at WP:SOFTSP). Thus, see this deletion discussion; if this is deemed worthy to exist as is, then that template will need to be restored. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bangladesh Khilafat Majlis

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was I've created a separate article. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 06:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Khilafat Majlis and Khelafat Majlish are distinct organizations, as per the Election Commission of Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate as per the reason. Mehedi Abedin 13:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects

Planet of Water

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Water planet. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an alternative name, it is just a descriptor. I think this should be retargetted to Water planet which better discusses the subject broadly. Cremastra (uc) 01:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget as per nom; I'd like to point out that "Planet of water" and "Water planet" mean the exact same frickin' thing lol 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Colour redirects to earth

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highly ambiguous and Earth-centric. Delete. Cremastra (uc) 01:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blue-green, not "blue and green". 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).