Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 21
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 21, 2024.
The World (weapon)
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- The World (weapon) → Dio Brando (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
stands are not inherently "weapons". stands like emperor (a gun) and anubis (a katana) are pretty literal weapons, and heritage for the future has "weapon stands" (which is a game mechanic, not a literal category), but the world (a buff ghost) is neither. can't name any notable cases of someone using a world as a literal weapon, besides maybe amid evil's celestial claw, which shoots planets cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep. "Stands are not weapons"? Huh, I didn't know that. Learn something new I guess. Anyway, expecting all readers to be on top of their Jojo lore in order use a Wikipedia redirect is unrealistic. Searchers have zero need to already understand the definition of a Stand, and whether or not Stands are weapons. Those fight scenes are hype, what else would "those things" be if not weapons? In any case, no other weapons are named "The World" at World (disambiguation), so there's no problems here. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- not inherently weapons. you wouldn't whack someone with khnum (a face), love love deluxe (puberty as seen in big mouth), super fly (i can't leave without my buddy superfly) or the world (buff guy, would you rather have it punch things or use it as an impractical bludgeoning tool?), but you might consider ratt (dart gun), sex pistols (bullets), and weather report (weather) to be weapon-like enough. also note stand (weapon), which got deleted not too long ago, and the world (stand), which was created by some wonk just after this rfd nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
This Rfd must be the work of an enemy standDelete as vague. There are actually several weaponized interpretations of The World raging such as Yugioh, House of the Dead and Persona. --Lenticel (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)- Good point, my main thing was "someone might be unclear what counts as a 'weapon'", but if there is ambiguity I have struck my !vote and opt for delete as vague per Lenticel instead. Cheers! Utopes (talk / cont) 22:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
AN/ALQ-128
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- AN/ALQ-128 → McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle#Specifications (F-15C) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
The topic of this redirect, the AN/ALQ-128, is barely mentioned on the target page about an aircraft, the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle. The target is a subsection that lists multiple specifications for the aircraft. The reader must look really hard to find the ALQ-128 mentioned. This redirect serves no real purpose and should be deleted. — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 21:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Deletethis seems to be a module installed on the F-15, but presumably this is installed on other US military aircraft. Delete to allow for article creation on this EW module, if notable. Natg 19 (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, looks like this was an article until 2022 when it was nominated as PROD, but then de-prodded and redirected to its current target. Maybe we should overturn the original BLAR and send to AFD. Natg 19 (talk) 02:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- delete. not that i'm an expert in military doodads, but the second and third sources in the pre-blar diff don't seem all that reliable, significant, not user-generated, not deprecated over scraping and plagiarism... honestly, i'm not putting too much faith in the first one (which is currently down, seeing as the internet archive is also down) either, as the wording there implies it's more about the an/alr-56. i did find one seemingly reliable-ish article that mentions it, but it's in passing, not even about the f-15, and seems to only mention it by accident (mixing it up with the an/alq-218, probably) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Our Money
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
see history for the explanation. vague, unmentioned in the target, unmentioned in gambling and gambling terminology articles, no entry on wiktionary, etc. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination as WP:COSTLY, too vague and implausible. ✴️IcarusThe Astrologer✴️ 22:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Unmentioned at target, but we're invited to see the history for explanation? All right, time to do a deep dive into the history! Okay, so.
-The original "Our Money" article was a 2005-era unsourced oneliner, defining "Our money" to be a state in which a gambler has already won money and is using already-obtained winnings to bet further.
-It was, indeed, merged with the Casino article in early 2006, originally put as an unsourced sentence in the opening paragraph.
-Said opener was then split in half two days later to create the Gambling in Casinos section, which was, several months later, moved underneath the History section.
-This lasts until September 2006, when an IP address changes the term mentioned, from "Our money", to "Playing with house money", presumably meaning the same thing (if you take "our" in this case to refer to the casino/house itself), and giving the exact same definition, but still with no source.
-Checking the modern article, this tidbit is still present, as seen at Casino#Gambling in casinos-- although it has been rewritten to "playing with the house's money" at some point, it is still present and is still not sourced at all.I would like to point out that the 'corrected' version of the term, as seen in the current version of the article, is on Wiktionary and is established in multiple places elsewhere. However, Our Money is far harder to source as a synonym for "playing with house money", and as already noted, is far more vague due to leaving up in the air who the "us" in "our" is referring to-- the House? the gambler? Someone entirely unaffiliated with gambling? Given the vagueness present, and how minimal the impact is on the actual history (it's... one sentence, and an unsourced sentence at that), I'd say that it's safe to delete this one. However, if it's determined that this history should be retained, might I suggest moving the history, and redirect, to Playing with house money? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)- eh, i don't think there's much worth carrying over in that history. in any case, i'm going to be reckless i mean bold and create that redirect (and also playing with the house's money) around 7 seconds after posting this reply, and no one can stop me!! cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well, they do say that wikt:playing with house money is a license to be reckless :3 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- eh, i don't think there's much worth carrying over in that history. in any case, i'm going to be reckless i mean bold and create that redirect (and also playing with the house's money) around 7 seconds after posting this reply, and no one can stop me!! cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Real fruit juice
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to Juice#100% fruit juice. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
as opposed to fake fruit juice? is it referring to real juice or real fruit? created by an editor who was blocked for trolling with redirects, the term isn't mentioned in the target, and i don't think there are any potentially usable targets cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine to Juice#100% fruit juice which is a close enough synonym. Based on my experience, "real fruit juice" is used to market products containing actual juice as opposed to artifically flavored ones. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine per Presidentman. A simple google search gives me tens of different products just on the first page of results that claim to be or to contain "real fruit juice". This is a highly plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 22:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. "Real" is not synonymous with "100%" (aka "pure"). And not only that, but I suspect the proposed target section should probably get axed due to being...well...of incomprehensible scope, and with apparently non-WP:MEDRS-compliant sources. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine as per Presidentman. I disagree with the IP's assertion that "real" does not equate to "pure"-- if I am buying "real orange juice", and I discover that the juice I'm buying is artificially flavored, sweetened, and colored water, I'm going to want my money back, because I am expecting 100% orange juice made with real oranges.The WP:MEDRS/scope argument is an entirely different beast; however, it's ultimately outside of our scope at RfD. As it stands, right now, we're talking about the redirect, and as it stands, this is the best target. If you'd like to get some change on the article itself, I recommend heading to its talk page to get the ball rolling-- or, better, rustle up some better sources on what 100% juice is and what it can do compared to nonpure juice, and write up an edit yourself. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine per Presidentman --Lenticel (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine per above. Very plausible search, given how often the term is used in advertising and labelling. Fieari (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (do not refine) - the proposed section is specifically only about the health effects of 100% fruit juice, not about fruit juice in general. I think this is a perfectly plausible way to search for juice however, as the article is about "real" fruit juice as opposed to say soft drink. A7V2 (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Refine. To my understanding, we do not append "real" to titles of articles and then redirect them to the top of said article, as oftentimes there is a certain topic that searchers have in mind. In this case, something that is NOT just fruit juice comes to mind, and here is a subsection that applies, i.e. fruit juice from real fruit. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Ulster dialect
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ulster language → Ulster Scots dialect (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Ulster dialect → Ulster Scots dialect (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
After creating it, I noticed Ulster English and Ulster Irish could be included under this phrase too. So I'm not sure if ambiguous. Web-julio (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate My search shows "ulster language/dialect" is used to refer all the languages in the Ulster region. [1][2] Ca talk to me! 22:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- dabify using the articles suggested by nom. --Lenticel (talk) 03:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Hyperion (Helsinki)
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a future building, but it's not mentioned at the target at all. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Note that there are articles about the future building in Finnish and French, but that doesn't mean there has to be a redirect at the English Wikipedia to an article where the building is not mentioned. The page can always be recreated once we have an actual article about the building. JIP | Talk 09:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
God (artwork)
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to God (disambiguation)#Arts, entertainment, and media. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
While "God" is mentioned at the target, I'm not seeing anything about an art work. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: makes no sense. Is it implied that the god the creator believes in is an artwork of the universe? Or that the universe is the artwork of said deity? Cremastra (u — c) 19:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- delete. even the term "god" is vague here. could refer to fanart of arceus for all we know cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to God (disambiguation)#Arts, entertainment, and media (if you think songs and musical albums are plausible for this search term), God (disambiguation)#Other arts, entertainment, and media (if you think musical works aren't but a play is) or God (sculpture) (if you think neither musical works nor a play are plausible). My first thought was a general article about depictions of god(s) in art, while we have Category:God in art and Category:Gods in art but I can't find a general article, only ones about one or more specific gods (God is about the concept of god in monotheistic religions not any individual deity, so we can't assume a specific one). Thryduulf (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to God (disambiguation)#Arts, entertainment, and media per Thryduulf. --Lenticel (talk) 03:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to God (disambiguation)#Arts, entertainment, and media per Thryduulf. A7V2 (talk) 23:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Rayshelle Peyton
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rayshelle Peyton → List of recurring The Simpsons characters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Character who's not mentioned at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Edit summary when created indicates that a section on this character could be added, but without such a section this should be deleted (can always be recreated later if appropriate). Given a large number of mentions in various episode articles the character probably would be appropriate for inclusion. A7V2 (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
List of leaders of the opposition in the Goa Legislative Assembly
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- List of leaders of the opposition in the Goa Legislative Assembly → Goa Legislative Assembly (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
No list of leaders of the opposition at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We do not appear to have relevant content anywhere. Thryduulf (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 03:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Chinese Taipei women's national under-17 football team
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Chinese Taipei women's national under-17 football team → Chinese Taipei women's national football team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
The under-17 team is not mentioned in any capacity at the target. Based on the ages in the included roster, this is the regular women's team. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 23:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
CzarNok
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned anywhere in the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
2031 FIBA Basketball World Cup
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 23:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2031 FIBA Basketball World Cup → FIBA Basketball World Cup (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
There's no relevant information listed at the target and not a single mention of the event. WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 17:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 23:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 05:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
List of deputy speakers of the Meghalaya Legislative Assembly
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- List of deputy speakers of the Meghalaya Legislative Assembly → Meghalaya Legislative Assembly (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
There is no list of deputy speakers at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Palestine women's national under-17 football team
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Palestine women's national under-17 football team → Palestine women's national football team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
The under-17 team is not mentioned or discussed at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is a Palestine women's national under-20 football team which also discusses under 19 and under 18 teams, but not the under 17 team. Also potentially WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. A7V2 (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Tajikistan women's national under-17 football team
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Tajikistan women's national under-17 football team → Tajikistan women's national football team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
The under-17 team is not mentioned or discussed at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and potentially WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. A7V2 (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Crapulinsky
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Crapulinsky
Unknown Artist - Making Her Bed
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unknown Artist - Making Her Bed → My Bed#Reactions (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Not mentioned at the target page and the generic words make google searches quite hard to do. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, no mention of "unknown artist" or "making her bed" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Wheaton's law
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wheaton's law → meta:Don't be a jerk (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Unless there is an appropriate local target for this page, deletion should be contemplated. The plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at WP:SOFTSP). Thus, see this deletion discussion; if this is deemed worthy to exist as is, then that template will need to be restored. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wheaton's Law points to Wil Wheaton, which no longer mentions Wheaton's Law either (removed in July 2023). As of today, the only mention in English Wikipedia is a WP:PTM of an unrelated international law book by Henry Wheaton. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 09:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- That should really be bundled into this, as there's no reason to treat them any differently. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete (both, assuming the other gets bundled after I write this). Unmentioned on WP, and a soft redirect to meta for something like this is highly inappropriate. On the other hand, if someone wants to add it back to the main bio article, then that would also be fine to retarget there (or even recreate if it's much later). 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: for context, "Wheaton's law" is a meme (see here) of a time Will Weathon asked to behave in online gaming, shortening it as "Don't be a dick". That became a meme, but also "Wheaton's law" as the safe for work name. So, unless it is deemed relevant for the article of Wheaton (nowadays it isn't) it should be deleted. The meme itself is not worth of an article, of course. Cambalachero (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Bangladesh Khilafat Majlis
edit- Bangladesh Khilafat Majlis → Khelafat Majlish (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was I've created a separate article. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 06:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Bangladesh Khilafat Majlis and Khelafat Majlish are distinct organizations, as per the Election Commission of Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate as per the reason. Mehedi Abedin 13:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects
Planet of Water
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to Water planet. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
It's not an alternative name, it is just a descriptor. I think this should be retargetted to Water planet which better discusses the subject broadly. Cremastra (u — c) 01:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to the disambig page per nom -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget as per nom; I'd like to point out that "Planet of water" and "Water planet" mean the exact same frickin' thing lol 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget per nom --Lenticel (talk) 03:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Ocean world, an article about planets where the ocean covers all or most of it. Water planet is a DAB, and probably not what the reader may be seeking with those terms. Cambalachero (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The phrase "planet of Water" could refer to the entries for planets named Water at the disambiguation page; or it could refer to the science exhibit "The Planet of Water" mentioned in the article Hydropolis, Wrocław; which now appears on the disambiguation page as well. "Ocean world" was already present on the disambiguation page. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Ocean world per Cambalachero, but I think adding Water planet to the hatnote of that article would be helfpul as well. A7V2 (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Colour redirects to earth
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Blue and green planet → Earth (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Green and blue planet → Earth (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Highly ambiguous and Earth-centric. Delete. Cremastra (u — c) 01:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment both Uranus and Neptune are blue-green ... -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Blue-green, not "blue and green". 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, silly. Nobody will seriously search it other than a 5 or less year-old kid. 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Unambiguous target. Even if only an elementary or pre-schooler would search for it (not a given, but assuming for the sake of argument here), why should we delete something that said elementary or pre-schooler would find useful? WP:CHEAP applies. Fieari (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Cremastra and 21 Andromedae. Not recommend for useful search (as pre-school or elementary) and possible too ambiguous as WP:COSTLY applied. ✴️IcarusThe Astrologer✴️ 14:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, many planets can be described as containing colors, Wikipedia is not a FAQ, there are much more suitable ways of reaching the page about "Earth", such as by typing in "Earth". Blue Planet and Green Planet are likelier as search terms, and the former disambig page mentions Earth on its list due to the abundance of water. If we wanted to be accurate, Earth would be a "blue, green, brown and white planet among other colors". None of these descriptions are mentioned at the target, though. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).