User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.

When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:

Use a descriptive subject/headline.
If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article.

Archives

2006
April 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 – September 2006 October 2006 – December 2006

2007
January 2007 – March 2007 April 2007 – June 2007 July 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – December 2007

2008
January 2008 – March 2008 April 2008 – June 2008 July 2008 – September 2008 October 2008 – December 2008

2009
January 2009 – March 2009 April 2009 – June 2009 July 2009 – September 2009 October 2009 – December 2009

2010
January 2010 – March 2010 April 2010 – June 2010 July 2010 – September 2010 October 2010 – December 2010

2011
January 2011 – March 2011 April 2011 – June 2011 July 2011 – September 2011 October 2011 – December 2011

2012
January 2012 – March 2012 April 2012 – June 2012 July 2012 – September 2012 October 2012 – December 2012

2013
January 2013 – March 2013 April 2013 – June 2013 July 2013 – September 2013 October 2013 – December 2013

2014
January 2014 – March 2014 April 2014 – June 2014 July 2014 – August 2014

2015
March 2015 April 2015 – June 2015 July 2015 – September 2015 October 2015 – December 2015

2016
March 2016 April 2016 – June 2016 July 2016 – September 2016 December 2016

2017
January 2017 – March 2017

2018
January 2018 – June 2018 July 2018 – September 2018 October 2018 – December 2018

2019
2019

2020
2020

2021
2021

2022
2022

2023
2023

Dried fruit

Hey Gogo (if I may; if not, Dr. Dodo?), thanks for reverting this act of spamming. The user is a repeat offender, by now; care to apply a more serious warning? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Professor Dodo! Drmies (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italy-Malta relations

May I ask you the reason for your revert? I was undoing an undiscussed, and non-supported merge - not deleting content, which you'll see was returned to Pro-Italian Maltese. If you did not realise this, I would be very grateful if you could revert again. If of interest, the request for page protection I filed is here. Cheers Geocourrier (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Geocourrier. BTW I am not Geocourrier, as you can verify if you wish by CU. All this mess has been created by the "hate toward everything italian" of PiccoloModificatoreLaborioso, who now uses even a french name probably because of that rejection. --Right2 (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

drookie98

I have been informed that Random.Person219 is drookie98. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclarenaustralia (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you look on his userpage it has drookie98 in the Aliases section. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know until he filled it in. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I said I was informed that it was him, I didn't said if I thought it was true or not. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mike's Day Off

Lucky you finally did. It's been about ten months since I've seen the episode, so my memory of it is somewhat fuzzy now. The only dilemma was why only this year and not the year it was produced. Because it seemed to me that it followed the rerun of the 200-jobs lookback episode. Also, did you see the episode in 4:3? All I know is that the show switched to 16:9 after the 100 Jobs Special. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Teej

Hi, I am not sure as to why the James Teej article is seen as advertising or whatever else is has been deleted for. Pls adivse me as to how I should change this. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecraigon (talk • contribs) 05:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Julianathomas

Thanks for your help and advise.

Julianathomas (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleting article

new to wikipedia confused to why our article/page on our band keeps getting deleted maybe you can help we looked at other band sites and added what we thought was enough to start our article Apparently we are doing something wrong. Appreciate the help

(67.117.172.234 (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC))Carbon 9[reply]

The article was deleted because it was blatant copyright infringement. The article also does not establish why the band is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the notability guideline. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OnMobile

Re. declined speedy for OnMobile

A related, very similar speedy was agreed; I don't see this company is notable, and specifically I don't see how this article can be cleaned up to make a valid entry without starting from scratch.

As you decided to decline the speedy, will you be checking all the links to see what portions of the facts they support, or will you be listing the article for AfD?

From a quick glance, I see that there is a long list of awards, which is not supported by a reference; the article, therefore, acts as an advertizement for the company concerned; the mere fact it appears on wikipedia serves to promote the organisation.

Do you believe that the article will be edited to create useful content? Or will nobody bother, and it will sit here promoting the company, thus abusing the principles of wikipedia?

I realise that, technically, it might be possible to find sufficient notability in some obscure financial news item, but I fail to see the value in keeping the article. I would ask you to consider WP:COMMONSENSE, ie what value will this article add to wikipedia.

I hope this doesn't sound too accusatory; that's not my intention. I hate spam, I hate spammers, and I'm fed up of spending hours checking obscure reference links, flagging articles as unreferenced, removing spam links, etc etc, just for an anonymous IP to pop in and reinstate them or put yet another odd reference in, which takes time to follow, and often there is a WP:SRS at the end of it.

Thanks for your time reading this - again, apologies for a bit of a rant,

-- Chzz ► 09:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to put back any parts that you feel are referenced with a suitable reliable source.

Thanks, -- Chzz ► 19:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the above article, you have just reinstated the following fact;

"60-70% p.a revenue growth"

Please could you tell me where the reference is for this information,

Thank you. -- Chzz ► 19:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you felt my edit summary was inadequate; I genuinely believed that the information I removed was the non-referenced portions of the article. My question above was a genuine one, and I think it's clear that there are no supporting references for either that specific information, or almost all of the other assertions in the article. Following your reversion, I have removed some specific segments of the article, in separate edits, with full comments in the edit summary and further information in the article talk page. If you do have any further objections or suggestions regarding the edits, I would appreciate it if you could discuss them in the talk page, especially prior to any further reverting. Regards, -- Chzz ► 21:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for helping me out!

KSWarrior8 (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

re the reverting of vandalism on my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting the hoax article Ashlie Michelle Cebak from recreation

I was taken in by it and spent 2 hours giving it a copy-edit... THEN realized the thing was probably fake... THEN got verbally abused by the creating editor.

I'll be a bit more leery before investing time in young articles. :)

Thanks for doing the admin thing, too. :) Have a great weekend! :)sinneed (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WQA notification

You may want to check out WP:WQA in regards to the comments made by your new friend WLaccount (talk · contribs). However, I probably should have went straight to ANI on this right away, as this is starting to spiral. MuZemike 08:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard all that. I'm going right to ANI. MuZemike 08:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from 121.96.122.156

i think this is still important, even with the season having no mutinies as of yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.122.156 (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I think the method you used only with the wording is a bit klunky. I recommend bringing it up on the article Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me?

have you been in ohlkahoma? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidyman7 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oooops.........................

i forgot to sign on the subject "Excuse Me?". i will sign NOW. Aidyman7 (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]