User talk:JamCor

Nomination of Nigerien Rugby Federation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigerien Rugby Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigerien Rugby Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 09:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mana Dubai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mana Dubai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 16:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 16:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks JamCor (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giovanni Simonetti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giovanni Simonetti, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EN-Jungwon 17:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Morne Jean moved to draftspace - unreferenced

An article you recently created, Morne Jean, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariela Jácome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Branch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

University Emergency Hospital Bucharest moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earl J. Ragsdale moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Earl J. Ragsdale, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Nguyen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Damien Nguyen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhinocola aceris moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rhinocola aceris, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Inexpiable (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Linkletter moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, George Linkletter, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Inexpiable (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Inexpiable. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:George Linkletter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please add reliable sources before creating any new article or they will be moved to draft. Inexpiable (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juozas Baikštys

The article Juozas Baikštys has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 119.59.121.171 (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dániel Jankovics

The article Dániel Jankovics has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 119.59.121.171 (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonas Wagner

The article Jonas Wagner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 119.59.121.171 (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oleh Myronets

The article Oleh Myronets has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vempala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vempala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chtonobdella moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chtonobdella, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Football West State Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 Football West State Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article created now - if you are interested. Matilda Maniac (talk) 08:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Athlete articles

Hi there! A lot of your new articles on athletes, such as Dániel Jankovics, are getting deleted because you have not added sufficient information or citations. Note that articles on living people will be automatically deleted if relevant citations proving the detail are not included. Furthermore, your articles are lacking a basic structure, such as reference sections, categories, or detail beyond one sentence.

When starting a stub article, you'll need to add sufficient detail and structure to avoid the article being deleted. Ghulam Abbas (hurdler) is an example of this, as it has relevant structure with sections and categories, includes the key points of subject notability, and provides multiple references for that material. It can take time to learn how these things are organised, so I'd suggest looking at existing articles on similar topics and copying their layout, or working on existing articles only until you are comfortable with Wikipedia's style. While it is tempting to work on new articles, creating new things does require a certain skillset beforehand. Good luck with your editing! SFB 15:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abdülkadir Topkaç

Hello, is it possible to connect this page with Turkish version? İsmail Kendir (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think so JamCor (talk) 07:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging article

Hi, please do not tag articles like Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter with "multiple issues" without stating which issues. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damien Nguyen (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damien Nguyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Damien Nguyen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earl J. Ragsdale (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review the guide to article creation and the manual of style.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Earl J. Ragsdale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Earl J. Ragsdale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Novem Linguae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not continue to submit and / or resubmit articles / drafts which do not pass the notability guidelines. Here are some links which may help you to get started properly:

Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ashwellthorpe and Fundenhall, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user | talk] 07:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If populated, may be notable per WP:NPLACE but will need sourcing for verification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: University Emergency Hospital Bucharest (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:University Emergency Hospital Bucharest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhinocola aceris (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhinocola aceris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rhinocola aceris, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morne Jean (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morne Jean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morne Jean, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Football West State Cup (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021 Football West State Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2021 Football West State Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast. Thanks! Zoozaz1 talk 03:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Linkletter (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add references. See WP:V.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Linkletter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Linkletter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleh Myronets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleh Myronets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleh Myronets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references to sources

Hi, I noticed that you are adding URLs below the References heading in articles. That is not the proper way to cite a source. Please follow the guidance at User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners. It explains where the reference should be placed and how to format it. Even if all you do is put the URL between <ref> and </ref> tags, the most important part is to put it immediately following the text that the ref supports. Thanks, and happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. It might also be useful to see if we can find some rather better local sources for village name meanings rather than Ekwall who is dubious at times. For example, Suckling tells us that Ashby in Suffolk was also known as Haskeby. How does that fit with Ekwall taking a modern place name from a map and telling us what the name must mean? Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Boughton, Northamptonshire

added a link pointing to Bucks

Bugbrooke

added a link pointing to Bucks

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle off Damietta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle off Damietta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Boughton, Northamptonshire

added a link pointing to Bucks

Hardingstone

added a link pointing to Thorn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Your enthusiasm for editing is welcome. However, you are doing it quite badly, and in doing so you are, in some cases, generating additional work for other editors who have to correct your edits. Just as one example.... at Polebrook you copied and pasted text verbatim from another site - which is a forbidden copyright violation; you failed to correct the grammar ("village's", not "villages"); you failed to notice that part of the text is meaningless out of context ("The site of the meeting-place is unknown.".... what "meeting-place"?); and you failed to format the reference correctly per WP:CS. Another one... you edited (correctly) that Monica Bandini had died, but you failed to provide a source, which is essential in recent deaths; you failed to format the death dates consistently, either in the text or the infobox; and you retained the "birth date and age" parameter in the infobox. All these are fairly minor errors, but they add up to a perception that you are editing too quickly, without care and attention to detail, and that clearly presents a problem for other editors. I have no interest in going through all your edits to check them - but you need to slow down, and take more care. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like this. It's easy - please do this yourself in future, rather than forcing others to correct your mistakes. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will, Thank You JamCor (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Stanford-on-Avon

added a link pointing to River Avon

Strixton

added a link pointing to Wollaston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denis Eden (painter), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ely, Dublin Review and Blackfriars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St Nicholas's Church, Arrington

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St Nicholas's Church, Arrington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.achurchnearyou.com/church/13853/about-us/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. eviolite (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, were you using the draft as a holding pen for that content as you rewrote it/ worked off of it? The content was copyrighted and we're unfortunately not allowed to keep content around in that way. If you want to work off the text like that please do so in an offsite document (such as Google docs or word) Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 18:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Andrew's Church, Wimpole (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Andrew's Church, Wimpole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St Andrew's Church, Wimpole, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comment

Hello JamCor. Re this edit, it's not clear how the comment can be considered vandalism. It is aimed at discussing the content of the article. While the user has not provided any sources to support their claim (though its already sourced in the article), it should not be the sole reason to remove the comment. Please go through WP:TPO for guidelines. If this was a mistake, don' worry, I have already restored it. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 09:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monken Hadley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heather.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve St Andrew's Church, Orwell

Hello, JamCor,

Thank you for creating St Andrew's Church, Orwell.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this article. Using a wikipedia article as a source or reliable reference is not admitted. Please replace this particular reference with another about St Andrews Church, Orwell, Cambridgeshire. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St Andrew's Church, Orwell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St Andrew's Church, Orwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.orwellpastandpresent.org.uk/page_id__71.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 05:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy content from other websites

Hello. I am Moneytrees and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Text you find online is almost always copyrighted, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. I've come across several copyright violations in your edits; I tagged All Saints Church, Adstone for speedy deletion as a copy of http://www.tinstaafl.co.uk/eandwhmi/northamptonshire/church%20pages/adstone.htm , I deleted Beckhithe as a copyright violation of https://www.getthedata.com/beckhithe/where-is-beckhithe , I removed most text on Church of St. John the Baptist, Achurch because it was copied from the Flickr source, and I removed almost all of the current content in your sandbox as it was copied from https://www.britainexpress.com/attractions.htm?attraction=4537 . All text must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 16:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Has thanked me

	Has thanked me
	Thnx Weenowastaken (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome! DammieJodger (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Place Names of Middlesex 1922

You may find this book useful as a reference: https://archive.org/details/placenamesofmidd00goverich/page/68/mode/2up?q=perivale Sciencefish (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will use it along with my other reference JamCor (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve St Mary's Church, Ashwell, Rutland

Hello, JamCor,

Thank you for creating St Mary's Church, Ashwell, Rutland.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you mention somewhere in the articlke, maybe the lede that it is a listed building. Thank you for creating

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 17:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please DON'T

do edits liike this. They are a COMPLETE NUISANCE when you are still working on an article. Unfortunately I spotted them too later to revert without even more hassle. So please JUST DON'T! Johnbod (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,249	Santos FC (talk)	Add sources
25	Alexander Elphinstone, 19th Lord Elphinstone (talk)	Add sources
14	Hottentots Holland High School (talk)	Add sources
7	Baron Wraxall (talk)	Add sources
18	Oliver Eden, 8th Baron Henley (talk)	Add sources
235	Raja CA (talk)	Add sources
1,198	United Torah Judaism (talk)	Cleanup
64	Health in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
348	History of books (talk)	Cleanup
409	Omer Bar-Lev (talk)	Expand
1,961	Bolivia national football team (talk)	Expand
4,092	Japan national football team (talk)	Expand
6,890	Likud (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
74	Book scanning (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6,467	2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
102	Miss Peru (talk)	Merge
227	Himitsu Sentai Gorenger (talk)	Merge
42	Cosmopolitan Soccer League (talk)	Merge
3	Michael Oliver (cardiologist) (talk)	Wikify
12	Willy De Clercq (talk)	Wikify
6	Hugh O'Neill, 3rd Baron Rathcavan (talk)	Wikify
4	Jayant Kumar Banthia (talk)	Orphan
2	Isa bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa (talk)	Orphan
2	Khallfa bin Duaij Al Khalifa (talk)	Orphan
13	Adryelson (talk)	Stub
50	Manila Grey (talk)	Stub
9	Harry Schüssler (talk)	Stub
108	Simon Fraser, 16th Lord Lovat (talk)	Stub
13	Édson dos Santos (talk)	Stub
196	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aberdeenshire (historic)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aberdeenshire (historic) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:40, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aberdeenshire (historic)

The article Aberdeenshire (historic) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aberdeenshire (historic) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Damietta (1732) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Damietta (1732) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle of Damietta (1732), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

short descriptions

Hi. They need to be below 40 characters, so I've pruned the one you did for Pole Vault (communications system). Secretlondon (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2018 FIFA World Cup

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2018 FIFA World Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2018 FIFA World Cup

The article 2018 FIFA World Cup you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2018 FIFA World Cup for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Symphyotrichum lateriflorum

Hello. Thank you for your changes to the Good Article Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. I'm sure they were done in good faith. However, I'm going to ask you to revert them. The reduction in length of the short description could make sense for most articles, but botanical articles typically have longer than normal short descriptions. The citation template changes where you added the volume are out of place because that field would be for the volume of the journal. The volume referenced in the title of both of those articles is for the "phases" of the articles themselves. The volume number is actually a part of the title, as written. Please revert. Thanks. —Eewilson (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radio short description adds

Just noted your edits to KBIF and KIRV to add short descriptions. They actually already had them as part of {{Infobox radio station}}. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 15:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now. That issue is one I need resolved because I'm not quite sure how to fix the location generation for that. The "type in location" module has some weird parsing I can't figure out. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haslewood Island

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haslewood Island, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Eden

Hi there! Looking at the article you nominated, I noticed it has a cleanup tag, which can cause the nomination to fail, and that KJP1 has given editors some useful pointers for improving the article. Any chance of you sorting the issues out? Ping me if you need help here. Also, I notice (to my horror) that you have yet to create the article for St. Mary's, South Luffenham, the village my mum lived in for 40 years. Tut, tut! Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, yes, I'm slowly making my way through Rutland, I'll get there eventually:) JamCor (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation bot

Hi JamCor

I have noticed that you are making multiple requests every day to Citation bot, in each case to the same page: User:JamCor.

A far as I can see, that page change very little: just one or two additions per day.

That means that Citation bot is parseing the same pages multiple times per day. That isn't a problem in theory, but in practice Citation bot has limited capacity: about 3 pages per minutes on modest-sized articles, falling to less than one per minute or big articles with hundreds of refs.

The sums are simple. With 197 articles currently linked from User:JamCor, then 3 pages per minute is 180 pages per hour ... so with 197 pages, that is over an hour of bot time for each time you run this list through it; probably more, because your list contains some very large articles: 32 of the articles on your list are over 100,000 bytes of wikicode; England has 521 ref tags to check, and United Kingdom has 694.

So probably over 90 minutes of bot time to process the lot.

If you do that three times a day, then we are looking at 4.5 hours of the bot's time every day being on this one small list.

I and a bunch of other editors are using the bot trawl through big selected lists of article, trying to work systematically through articles. Other editors use the bot to clean up individual pages. All of these tasks are significantly slowed by having the bot spend 20% of its time repeatedly trawling the same articles.

So I wanted to ask you a favour. Please would you kindly consider a big reduction in the frequency with you ask the bot the scan your list? Once per week would more than enough to keep on top of changes to the articles, and once a month would be better.

Thanks in advance --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS I should have said explicitly that I assume you were unaware of these issues with using the bot. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry I wasn't, I'm taking a short wikibreak so I won't be using the bot this week. Happy editing :) JamCor (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I take it that means you will be more restrained in bot use?

Hope you have a nice wikibreak. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back from your wikbreak, jamCor.

I had hoped that on your return you might have excised some restraint in your use of Citation bot, but sadly that seems not to be the case. The latest set of edits by Citation bot shows that you have just started yet another run of the bot processing pages linked from User:JamCor. The first edit[1] was at 17:03 UTC today.

Yesterday, you fed the bot all of the pages linked from User:JamCor: see these bot edits, where the first edit[2] was the 9th page processed, at 18:22 UTC yesterday.

When I initially wrote to you about this, above, I assumed that you were unaware of how much of bot's limited resources you were using. You assured me[3] that was indeed the case.

Yet now that you do know, you are still at it: clogging up the bot with repeated re-runs of the same set of pages. So what's going on?

Note that Citation bot has made only 1,894,524 edits since it began work in October 2008. Wikipedia currently has about 6.3 million articles, so even if every edit the bot had made was to a page it had not edited before, more than 2/3 of all articles have never been edited by the bot. The bot has no shortage of work; it is currently jammed up with so many big jobs that it won't even start on my latest list of articles specifically selected to have problems which the bot can fix (bare URL refs). So why are you continuing to feed the bot with articles which have ben processed dozens of times in your previous requests? Why not exercise a bit of self-restraint by running the bot on your list only once a month, and allow other pages to get their first pass on the bot? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chtonobdella

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chtonobdella, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Earl J. Ragsdale

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Earl J. Ragsdale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:University Emergency Hospital Bucharest

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rhinocola aceris

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rhinocola aceris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Morne Jean

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morne Jean, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 Football West State Cup

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Football West State Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Linkletter

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Linkletter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyakhovo, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earl Shilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edmund Plantagenet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Damien Nguyen

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Damien Nguyen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:University Emergency Hospital Bucharest

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "University Emergency Hospital Bucharest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert-Schumann-Konservatorium Zwickau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Morne Jean

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Morne Jean".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Football West State Cup

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Football West State Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lyakhovo, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyakhovo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lyakhovo, Stupinsky District, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyakhovo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Denis Eden

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Denis Eden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dugan Murphy -- Dugan Murphy (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Denis Eden

The article Denis Eden you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Denis Eden for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dugan Murphy -- Dugan Murphy (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Denis Eden

The article Denis Eden you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Denis Eden for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dugan Murphy -- Dugan Murphy (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Damietta (1732)

Hello, JamCor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Damietta (1732), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Earl J. Ragsdale

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Earl J. Ragsdale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lyakhovo, Domodedovo, Moscow Oblast

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyakhovo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Linkletter

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George Linkletter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Damietta (1732)

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Damietta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rhinocola aceris

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rhinocola aceris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Shaw and Crompton

I have nominated Shaw and Crompton for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]