Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior de Mocinha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Junior de Mocinha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG & WP:POLITICIAN, as the individual is a non-notable politician of a small town. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 15:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 15:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 15:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Vice-mayor of a municipality with a population of 19K is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but with just one primary source and zero independent or reliable ones, the article is not referenced even remotely close to well enough to actually get him over the "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" hump. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers. Bearcat (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Bearcat, WP:TNT, and WP:MILL. Besides that this page is poorly written (possibly a machine translation), there's nothing notable about being a minor official in a small town. Bearian (talk) 15:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and Bearcat. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.