Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 March 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 29 March 31 >

March 30

[edit]

Category:Gliese 581

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge Category:Gliese 581 planetary system to Category:Gliese 581 (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category only contains one article. MartinZ (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's because someone decided to remove Gliese 581/Gliese 581b/Gliese 581c/Gliese 581d/Gliese 581e/Gliese 581f/Gliese 581g from it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Or moved them to Category:Gliese_581_planetary_system? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a category move would have been more appropriate. Regardless of the outcome, someone may want to edit Template:Gliese 581 to add the new category and perhaps rename the template after appropriate discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess a move would have been more appropriate, but that's to late now—deletion (or perhaps redirection) is the only solution now. —MartinZ (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. The category trees are now messed up. The new category should be deleted, not the old one. The new category is missing all the category trees. And it is missing the star, since the star is the central element of the planetary system, the new category was obviously not thought out properly. -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The category trees are not messed up—it’s not missing the star, since the category of the star is a subcategory of the new category—and what does this sentence mean: “The new category is missing all the category trees.”?
See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomy#Unilateral_changes_for_this_project. Lithopsian (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MartinZ: They haven't said anything about any “technical problems.” —MartinZ (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, put the planet articles back into this category, and Delete the new article. I agree everyone else; I think having the parent star's name as the category title is appropriate. Loooke (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cricket in Colorado

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Sports in Colorado. No need to merge to the other parent category, the one article is already in Category:Cricket leagues in the United States. (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article and the scheme for cricket by state is empty otherwise. Article can be merged to any relevant categories. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bandy in Minnesota

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Sports in Minnesota (non-admin closure). @Koavf: Please mention merge targets explicitly in your nominations. It shouldn't be up to the closer to decide on the merge target. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article and the scheme for bandy by state is empty otherwise. Article can be merged to any relevant categories. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Military Merit Order (Bavaria), 4th class

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ((non-admin closure)) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non defining category, as none of the people included are notable for having received this award. Created by Special:Contributions/Folks_at_137 who created many such categories. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Knights 2nd class of the Albert Order

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non defining category as none of the recipients are notable for having received this decoration (see WP:CATDEF). K.e.coffman (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brazilian people of Native Brazilian descent

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The difference between the two categories is entirely negligible, in fact many articles are included in both categories. However on the latter category is standard across the board while I've never seen any category titled like the former. Lastly the former category is also confusing. While both categories refer to people who are of indigenous descent, technically anyone born in Brazil could call themselves a "Native Brazilian". Yes we do have Category:American people of Native American descent (a category which I think sounds pretty ironic), but the difference here is that Native American is the most widely used term for the original people of the United States, while Indigenous is more widely used in Brazil. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dallas Tennis Classic

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tournament changed names. Even the tournament on the Dallas Tennis Classic redirects to Irving. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Telengana articles missing geocoordinate data

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category name appears to be a misspelling of Telangana. Corresponding category with proper spelling already exists. Kevinsam2 (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Featured sounds

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at CFD 2017-04-22. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The featured sounds process stopped in November 2011 and after that point it became impossible to add or remove featured sound status to an audio or video recording. There's no continued point in having a category for "current" or former status. The categories are added through {{Featured sound}} or {{Former featured sound}} which will remain on the file description pages, so "what links here" will work if anyone wants to find out what used to be a featured sound or a former featured sound (or the page history of Portal:Featured sounds). BencherliteTalk 13:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Armbrust The Homunculus 12:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust The Homunculus 12:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brahmin Chief ministers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted. The only contents were four subcategories which were all miscapitalized duplicates of existing categories, and have been speedied accordingly — which then left this category empty. Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category is not relevant. A government official cannot be categorize by caste Arjunkmohan (talk) 07:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirected. Situations like this, where the correctly named category already exists, do not need to come to CFD for seven days of discussion, but can be handled through the speedy process. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category already exists Arjunkmohan (talk) 07:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chief ministers of West Bengal

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirected. Situations like this, where the correctly named category already exists, do not need to come to CFD for seven days of discussion, but can be handled through the speedy process. Bearcat (talk) 16:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category already exist Arjunkmohan (talk) 07:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chief ministers of Maharashtra

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirected. Situations like this, where the correctly named category already exists, do not need to come to CFD for seven days of discussion, but can be handled through the speedy process. Bearcat (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category is alrady exist Arjunkmohan (talk) 07:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chief ministers of Karnataka

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirected. Situations like this, where the correctly named category already exists, do not need to come to CFD for seven days of discussion, but can be handled through the speedy process. Bearcat (talk) 16:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category already exists category:chief Ministers of Karnataka Arjunkmohan (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ruthenian monarchs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge as it only contains a single child Category:Kings of Rus' and nothing else. Not really sure if it should also be merged to Category:Russian rulers, Category:Ukrainian rulers and Category:Belarusian rulers, the cultural center of this one kingdom was in the border region of current Ukraine and Poland. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pornographic films featuring Traci Lords

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERCAT: Specific performances by performer. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_30&oldid=1090392329"