Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 4

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 4, 2024.

Australia 2032

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Does not appear to be branded as "Australia 2032" from what I've searched, just as "Brisbane 2032". Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've added a number of related redirects in which "CountryName Year" redirects ended up being deleted or retargeted. There is precedence for deleting this redirect based on a number of deletions over the years. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The redirect seems like a reasonable aid to find the page. As redirects are for helping people find the right page, I don't think it should matter that the name is different from the official brand. It may be worth changing after 2032, but at the moment it seems fine. Safes007 (talk) 05:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Safes007: The point is that it's not the expect result based on the tens of thousands of other CountryName Year redirects that exist. As such, it's misleading because this isn't what one would expect to be the "right page". Hey man im josh (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 14:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chengdu Airport

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 22:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was intending to move the disambiguation page Chengdu airport to this name for proper capitalization. However, the original creator of the redirect states that this is a common name for the target airport. Would need sources to confirm this, and I'm unsure if this is even an appropriate redirect (due to the disambiguation page). Johnj1995 (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like this is more appropriate to ask via a WP:RM on the disambiguation page (i.e., whether Chengdu airport should be moved to Chengdu airport (disambiguation) to make it a redirect to the same page as the nominated one). 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4:. The disambiguation page should be moved to either Chengdu Airport or Chengdu Airport (disambiguation) for consistency (see Beijing Airport, Shanghai Airport). Also, I don't know if this is even an appropriate target for Chengdu Airport, because non-Chinese users might be looking for Chengdu Tianfu International Airport, which is where all international flights to Chengdu are operated. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Make "Chengdu Airport" a full disambiguation page because both Chengdu Tianfu International Airport (international) and Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport (now domestic) are equally notable WhisperToMe (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The status quo looks correct to me. Is Chengdu Tianfu International Airport commonly known as "Chengdu Airport"? The article gives "Tianfu Airport" as the shorthand for that one. On the other hand, the article says that the shorthand for Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport is "Chengdu Airport". As for the lowercase variant, one would be looking for an airport in Chengdu, not an airport named "Chengdu Airport". The disambiguation does list the airports in Chengdu, but I would suggest that Chengdu#Air is more helpful. -- Tavix (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chengdu Shuangliu for years was the only Chengdu Airport, so lots of older sources rightfully called it "Chengdu Airport". However all of the international flights went to Tianfu after it opened, and many EN wikipedians may be thinking of Tianfu Airport now when typing in "Chengdu Airport". I would look at the post-Tianfu opening source usage to see if Shuangliu is still called "Chengdu Airport" without disambiguaion WhisperToMe (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the creation of a disambiguation page as previously stated. The distinction between the two similarly named airports is not obvious to the uninitiated. Carguychris (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dabify Assumed that "Chengdu Airport" isn't created yet, it would be plausible to create new disambiguation page of it contained two major airports in Chengdu (except if Chengdu Tianfu Airport isn't exist). 103.111.100.82 (talk) 23:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Magik (film)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Someone passing by this page months or years from now, desiring to resurrect the article, *and* confident in the film's notability (because something significant about its status has changed), may feel free to request a WP:REFUND. wbm1058 (talk) 09:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Situation I haven't run into here: This was a BLAR to an article that does not currently mention the subject, but restoring the article would go against WP:NFF, which means there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that the article would survive AfD. I think the best approach is restore article but draftify, which is the better way to incubate something in development hell anyways. (Normally I wouldn't take something to RfD just to !vote restore, since anyone can do that, but if I were to unilaterally restore and draftify I feel like that would be backdoor deletion of the redirect.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or AfD after restoration?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Well, this is really two separate issues. The draft(s) can be restored and draftified, if desired. What needs to be determined here is: Are these appropriate titles to point (i.e redirect) to targets in the mainspace? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per WP:NFF as the nom points out. This looks like a film that was shelved a long time ago. Unless there has been any recent updates there is no point in draftifying it because it'll just be deleted six months down the road. -- Tavix (talk) 20:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well we can't predict now whether there will be updates in the next six months. But even if there aren't, having deleted history be at a draftspace title is helpful for if the film does get made years from now, letting a future editor know that they can have it undeleted. And if that doesn't happen and it does just get G13'd and never undeleted, then we're no worse off. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 06:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Given how long ago we're talking, I feel rather confident that there will be no updates in the next six months. Even if I'm wrong, I would rather deleted history be in mainspace rather than draftspace. The edit history would be less 'hidden' there because casual editors aren't as familiar with draftspace. -- Tavix (talk) 14:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try to form consensus...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This film is not discussed at the target page; therefore, it cannot be kept. The subject is not notable, canned since planned in 2015 with no evidence of anything besides an empty IMDb page. Cannot be restored per WP:NFF. Per WP:DRAFT, draftspace is not an infinite holding ground for future pages. There is no chance that the page can be "fixed" to survive deletion at this time, so draftification is not the way either. Deleted history is more useful in mainspace; people will see this in logs, and also seen again during the AfC & NPP process if something ever does come up here. With no suitable topic ever being at this title in the current state of production (or lack thereof), delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix and Utopes. Also delete Magik (2015) - bundle here and wait a week, or fresh nomination. Jay 💬 16:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay: Imo if there is consensus to delete Magik (2015 film) and Magik (film), there is consensus to delete Magik (2015). Especially so as this third page has no substantial history. {{Db-xfd}} may apply, as a bit of an WP:IAR procedure. Waiting a week to delete a page, for the sake of waiting a week to delete a page, feels like bureaucratic bureaucracy. Whether or not you concur with this logic idk. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if there is a non-film Magik work from 2015 to which it can be retargeted. Jay 💬 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Magik (disambiguation) shows no use of the year 2015. But if that's the concern, then a new RfD would be the way as your concern is entirely different from the film-specific concern discussed here. No need to slow this one to slow this one. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Couch sex

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There was some suggestion of retargeting this to Casting couch but there was enough opposition that I don't see a consensus for that. Given the way this current redirect fails our BLP policy, even if there had been consensus for a retarget, deletion of the history would have still been appropriate. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although one of the references includes "couch sex", it's not discussed in the actual article, and I'm curious if something like this will blow over... Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

erm, someone must have removed it. the info I was trying to direct to was just under "public opinion", and I've also been changing similar redirects to wherever has been the current destination since nobody could figure out where it goes in the article. I think it was also discussed in the talk page. YodaYogaYogurt154 (talk) 23:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
nope, the info is there, but yeah. a more helpful redirect would have been "JD Vance couch sex" or something. I can agree with the re-target to the obviously more established "casting couch" 👍 YodaYogaYogurt154 (talk) 23:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
retarget to casting couch. like how team fortress 2 isn't the primary topic for the concept of sandwiches, jd vance isn't the primary topic for the concept of having sex in (or with) a couch. i'd say retarget to castng couch, if only because human mating strategies, human sexual activity, sexual intercourse, and sexual arousal don't necessarily mention couches or sofas a whole lot cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 00:54, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:14, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all the first one is an obvious WP:G10. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Technical relisting to close Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 13 since the main Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion page is currently not showing all existing nominations. (As a reminder, per WP:RELIST, this discussion can be closed immediately and does not need to be opened for another 7 days if consensus is clear.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Silly mountain

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move Silly Mountain (Arizona) to Silly Mountain, retarget, and add a hatnote to Hanshan (poet). (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 22:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hanshan Deqing can be "Silly Mountain" - "Crazy Mountain" is in the article, but "Silly Mountain" can be used to distinguish from Hanshan (poet) ("Cold Mountain"). The other items in the disambiguation page are different Chinese characters and I don't think any can be "Silly". There is also Silly Mountain (Arizona) - not sure if there should be a separate disambiguation page or (if there are only two uses) a redirect to one or the other. Peter James (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yep, disambiguate these two meanings because neither seems to be primary for such a niche term. --Joy (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Silly Mountain (Arizona), or move that article to Silly Mountain and retarget there, possibly with a hatnote to it being an alternative name for Hanshan Deqing. The fact that "Silly Mountain" didn't even merit inclusion as a possible name at the latter article (which does include "foolish mountain" as well as the above mentioned "Crazy Mountain") seems to indicate to me that the Arizona mountain is what someone would be looking for searching under this, though it's a plausible translation and probably makes sense to hatnote. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 23:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC) (edited 01:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]
    @Dylnuge that could just be happenstance, though. We should probably avoid focusing on editor behavior (what is currently written in Wikipedia), rather on reader behavior (what is actually out there in the real world that should be documented by an encyclopedia; WP:RF). So we should probably answer these kinds of questions:
    • Is it likely that the bulk of our readers would associate this term with a single topic as the bulk of sources would do the same?
    • Is it an ambiguous name that our readers might encounter in reference to several topics in sources?
    --Joy (talk) 08:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I couldn't find any reliable sources that call Hanshan Dequing "Silly Mountain". Googling for it shows a few dozen self-published sites and college papers, but it's not clear to me it's a common translation in literature at all. Searching for "Silly Mountain" on its own pretty exclusively brings up stuff about the Arizona mountain. Did you find sources indicating otherwise? Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 14:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per Steel1943 and Jay's comments, I see no issue with the proposed move of Silly Mountain (Arizona) to Silly Mountain. Either way this redirect should target that article. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 01:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget and add a hatnote. What matters is whether sources exist and how prevalent they are, not whether they are reliable or not. Less than a minute on google found at least 7 sources that clearly identify this as a name for Hanshan Deqing, so it's clearly something that will be searched for. However, it is also clear that the mountain in Arizona is the primary topic so we should retarget there and add a hatnote. Thryduulf (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Silly Mountain does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 12:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why that's relevant, but obviously it can be created as a redirect to the same target when this is closed. Thryduulf (talk) 19:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Silly Mountain (Arizona), a title that is "Silly Mountain ([disambiguator])", and WP:PRECISE. (Didn't know that needed explanation to why it's incredibly relevant; it's de facto an issue since the base title does not exist.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Autofire

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous redirect, not mentioned in target article. ~Liancetalk 18:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

One-up

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oneupmanship should be a more appropriate target. Definition of "one-up" is "to practice oneupmanship on" per Merriam Webster. The video game term is spelled exclusively as "1-up" in the target article. "One ups" isn't even mentioned in the finger. ~Liancetalk 18:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also - One Up should most likely be moved to One Up (Central Cee song) and targeted to whichever article is ultimately decided as the most appropriate by consensus. ~Liancetalk 18:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moravec s paradox

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing an apostrophe by a space seems like an WP:UNNATURAL error. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

John Biden

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14#John Biden

Kondan (24°48′N 95°2′E)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for coordinates in a redirect title, and there are no sources that suggest this title will be particularly useful for navigating (i.e.: nothing actually calls the subject by its coordinate name). Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and delete all similar- there are a lot of these left over from a large disamb renaming/page moving that I did of many villages added in northern Sagaing Region. If any Myanmar villages with coordinates are still found, please ping me as I can find a more natural disamb. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 15:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I came across this single instance during WP:NPP but there weren't any others listed like it in the feed. Do you happen to know where I could find a full list of these? Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think most of the others got approved by others during NPP. Unfortunately, I didn't save the original list. The three RMs at Talk:Al Mushayrifah (31°30′0″N 35°52′0″E)#Requested move 28 December 2023 , Talk:Hunawng (24°49"N 94°53"E)#Requested move 29 December 2023 and Talk:Panglong (23°53'0"N 98°22'0"E)#Requested move 30 December 2023 are where I got the list to go through all the Burmese villages. The late RMs got deleted, however- I think the places listed there are in my user contribution history of new pages made from 15 March to 18 March. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vanguard Entertainment

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 15:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is not mentioned at the target page. IceWelder [✉] 14:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not only is this not mentioned at the target (or anywhere else) the only connection between the two seems to be they both publish iOS games. The deleted history is unrelated. Thryduulf (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moldorm

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. The subject of this redirect is a "boss" enemy in several The Legend of Zelda titles, leaving there potentially no target for this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 07:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect target changed. Apokrif (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted this change, considering this RFD is open. Per the edit I reverted, seems their intent was to "retarget to List of fictional worms#Video games". Steel1943 (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator comment: I oppose "retarget to List of fictional worms#Video games" since the subject of this redirect has affinity to the Legend of Zelda series, meaning readers looking up this term probably are not trying to locate an article about fictional worms. Steel1943 (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Target can be changed while the RFD is active. As the article about fictional worms is the only place where the meaning of this word is explained, it's an appropriate target. Apokrif (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hidden message appears with every transclusion of {{RfD}} while editing the tagged redirect: <!-- End of RFD message. Don't edit anything above here. Feel free to edit below here, but do NOT change the redirect's target. --> You literally were shown that message while you were making your edit: Changing the redirect's target for any reason not considered maintenance during an active RFD discussion is considered disruptive. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point of this discussion (to which almost nobody takes part)? We can just change the redirect target like I did and call it a day. Apokrif (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Traditionally, WP:SILENCE WP:NOQUORUM = nominator's proposal ("delete" by default), but that doesn't apply anymore since you have voiced an opinion for a retargeting option, and I don't agree with it. Steel1943 (talk) 04:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the link I meant. Steel1943 (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as the Moldorm boss does not originate from Link's Awakening; it first appeared in the game immediately before this one and so people looking for it are equally likely to be looking up the ALttP incarnation as the LA one. I'm not willing to Pokemon Test random LoZ bosses. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Retarget per Apokrif, no strong feelings either way. I don't see what the issue with the retarget is, except that its a one-liner and not very useful. The list entry does say Moldorm, from The Legend of Zelda and its sequels. Jay 💬 10:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget? Delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Feminist Perspectives on Eating Disorders

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Feminist Perspectives on Eating Disorders

Aušautas

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Aušautas

Aušlavis

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Aušlavis

Diedievaite

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Diedievaite

Bute (mythology)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Butes. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Correctly diacriticised Butė does not exist, and only mention of that spelling on the English Wikipedia is an unrelated surname at the 2019 Lithuanian presidential election article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Karorius

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Karorius

Ringie

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Ringie

Ǝ́

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Ǝ́

Nerubian

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Nerubian

Hozen

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hōzen-ji. ✗plicit 04:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Mentioned a few times at World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria but search is finding a number of unrelated uses so I'm not sure the fictional race is the primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Undermine (Warcraft)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Undermine (Warcraft)

High Council of Lordaeron

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vashj'ir

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is one of a handful of primary locations introduced with the expansion. Should already be mentioned. It is not arcane cruft. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Blademaster (Warcraft)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The redirect doesn't have an ambiguous target and discussion of the heroes is available there, even if the blademasters isn't called out as being one such. IznoPublic (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Death Knight (Warcraft III)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is at least unambiguous due to the disambiguation, but the sole mention of "death knight" at the target is Now an Undead Death Knight, Arthas meets with the leader of the dreadlords, Tichondrius, who tasks him with resurrecting Kel'Thuzad, which isn't really enough substance to support a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to match date of nomination comment time stamp.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 14:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Adam Angligena

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Adam Angligena

OoX

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#OoX

Arakkoa

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor plot element not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, happy for this to die. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention not yet added to List of fictional birds or World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

V̂

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#V̂

Terrorblade

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Terrorblade

Banehallow

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2017 PGL Open Bucharest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Death Prophet

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Death Prophet

Yabbying

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Yabby. ✗plicit 04:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a "yabby" (or cherax) is a type of crayfish, and "yabbying" refers to fishing for yabbies. was going to retarget to yabby and call it a day, but it turns out that's a dab, and there are two fish that can be referred to as "yabby", though the verb seems to refer mostly to the crayfish. opinions? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Looting the seas

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

refers to a series of journalistic investigations by the international consortium of investigative journalists on sussy stuff in the fishing scene. no longer mentioned in the target or in the icoij's article, so all we're left with is a vague term that could refer to pirates for all we know cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Priestess of the Moon

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Priestess of the Moon

SL i-League Invitational Season 3

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Esyllabus

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Esyllabus

Notional-functional syllabus

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Notional-functional syllabus

Gogaku

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Other than a passing mention at National_Diet_Library#Digital_Library_from_the_Meiji_Era, search results for "Gogaku" on the English Wikipedia appear to be surnames or other unrelated topics. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chapter Two: MADMAX

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 12:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created and incorrect title. The correct title is Chapter One: MADMAX. Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created the redirect after editing the Duffer Brothers page, where it erroneously called the episode "Chapter Two: MADMAX". I realised later that the redirect had the wrong title, but wasn't sure how to delete it. Mjks28 (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mjks28 adding {{Db-g7}} to the redirect (that you created) marks it for deletion. Gonnym (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know, I will use this in the future. Mjks28 (talk) 11:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Melbourne Commonwealth Games (disambiguation)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted under WP:CSD G14 criteria. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've converted the DAB page back into a redirect as the games are not going to happen in Melbourne - added a hatnote to the 2006 games instead. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Slap Pack

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an extremely obscure term for "Bad Boys of SNL" which is already a redirect to "History of Saturday Night Live". This redirect is obscure and unnecessary. StewdioMACK (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

-U-

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible search term for Ustaše. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment neither Google nor the internal search engine (nor any other search engine I'm aware of) distinguish between "-U-" and "U" so it is impossible to use them to verify how the term is used ("U" obviously being overwhelmingly more common). Thryduulf (talk) 10:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible search term and not useful. I think this symbol may be used by Croatian neo-Nazis on the internet, but it seems unlikely that someone unfamiliar with this would see it and then look it up on the English Wikipedia. People who speak Serbo-Croatian already know what the U represents. In the unlikely scenario that an English speaker sees this and looks it up, the redirect isn't very helpful because it provides no context on the symbol itself as used in the present day. You can look up "ušato U" for the symbol this is meant to represent, which is itself a variant of the symbol seen in the infobox at Ustaše. --Un assiolo (talk) 18:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wouldn't be surprised if this gets used in some sort of Internet vernacular, could it be a plausible search term? Goodness knows fringe organization sympathisers congregate in Internet forums, so it's plausible that they may have developed this sort of a shorthand without regular people noticing, and then it might be useful to allow regular people to look this up if encountered... In general, I'd say the listing at U#Other uses probably suffices, though our search results for -U- would not be useful to find U, the reader would have to first prune the symbols manually. (BTW I noticed we also used to have =U=, but it was deleted in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#=U=.) --Joy (talk) 09:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

,la

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't add any search aid to the target, Kamala Harris. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that's not a nickname for a politician, that's a pokémon. i'll make the unbelievably controversial vote that is weak keep. unless a source can be crammed somewhere in the article, in which case my vote can be changed to just keep. with that in mind, i found some, and will properly check them in a few minutes (3 hours) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
took a little longer than 3 hours, but from a quick look, i found this, this, this, and no komala jokes whatsoever. politico and ap news (not listed under the abbreviated name) are apparently reliable enough per wp:rsp, and slate seems reliable enough per wp:nppsg (thanks, qoh), but i'm not an expert on yeehawland politics, so i'll leave opinions on whether or not those three are worth adding to her article to someone else. if they're determined usable, then keep. otherwise, forget the aforementioned weak keep in favor of a strong meh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 01:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1958 Independent Air Travel Vickers Viking crasb

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Uambiguously created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This type of misspelling doesn't relate at all. I do prefer entire deletion since there isn't much history to keep. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dingle Ridge, New York

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

non-existent town name, only google search shows up for a street name Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Demonstation

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Demonstation

Remonstrance

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was set indexify. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think remonstrance is a synonym for "protest" (in the sense of a political protest). From what I can tell, it seems to be more of a synonym for disagreement instead. We do have disagreement, which is a dab (although I just tagged it with {{broad-concept article}}), and disagreeing, which is a redirect to argument. Perhaps wikt:remonstrance is the best target? Duckmather (talk) 02:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

November 12, 2001

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if American Airlines Flight 587 is the primary topic or if this should be redirected to November 12 or 2001#November. C F A 💬 16:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Similar RfDs have happened in the past which resulted in one of the previously mentioned targets, November 12 or 2001#November, being the optimal choice, but I cannot recall which one at the moment nor can I find the discussion(s). Either way, do not keep. Steel1943 (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per @Presidentman. Worthless redirect. -1ctinus📝🗨 01:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, two sentence-long entries does not seem to inspire a lot of reason for keeping this date as a redirect out of infinite dates, most of which also missing redirects (and it is impractical and implausible to create a redirect for every date that passes at a rate of one a day). No substantial coverage, delete for now, "date redirects" always have shaky precedents and this isn't the spot to iron them out. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

🎣

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fishing. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could likely also refer to angling, fishing rods, and fishing in general. really, the act of fishing for shits and giggles is the last possible target i'd expect cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Niggling

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Niggling

Super Mario RPG 2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Ambiguous as all get out. Between the the 2023 remake, the Paper Mario series, and the Mario & Luigi series, it is unclear what this redirect could refer to. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

funny thing. this was the japanese name for paper mario during its development, a fact that is mentioned in its article. outside of that, the name is also found in certain unused rooms in that game, but that hasn't been covered yet. retarget to paper mario (video game) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator comment: I just noticed the existence of the previous discussion in 2021, and added the old RfD list template to this discussion. For what it's worth, if I had participated in the 2021 discussion, I would have voted "delete" then as well. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
to be fair, then is no longer now cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The current target explains the connection to Paper Mario and Mario & Luigi. A remake is not a sequel so I'm not convinced that the remake would be considered "Super Mario RPG 2". If others disagree, I think the solution would be to simply remove the anchor since the remake is also discussed at the same article. -- Tavix (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Tavix, who said basically what I would have said. Remakes aren't sequels, and Paper Mario may have been loosely connected but it really is its own thing, and the current target explains this well enough. Fieari (talk) 23:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Whoopsie daisy

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Whoopsie daisy

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_4&oldid=1246664557"