Skip to content

Conversation

mstbbs
Copy link
Contributor

@mstbbs mstbbs commented Jul 13, 2017

Just some more context around how things work. This could all be built out much more, but I have been focusing on not dropping any balls on this migration.

@mstbbs mstbbs requested review from jyee and kmshultz July 13, 2017 19:45
Copy link
Contributor

@technovangelist technovangelist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fix the if and it looks great

README.md Outdated
## Datadog Staff

* Always branch off of master
* Create a branch `slack_handle/your_feature` if you would like to create a preview site and run tests
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would drop the 'if you would like....' - always create the branch. no ifs

Copy link
Contributor

@kmshultz kmshultz Jul 13, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the 'if' is meant to operate on 'Create'; it operates on 'you would like to create a preview site"

Probably 'Name' is better: "Name your branch slack_handle/your_feature if you would like to..."

The first item is about creating, and is not optional:

  • Create a local branch off of master; never commit directly to master
  • Name your branch slack_handle/your_feature if you would like to create a preview site and run tests

And so on.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but i think its a good naming strategy and we should encourage it. It seems to be what most do anyway

README.md Outdated

* Always branch off of master
* Create a branch `slack_handle/your_feature` if you would like to create a preview site and run tests
* Never commit directly to master
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems redundant with the first item. Maybe combine them both: "Always branch off of master; never commit directly to master"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

@mstbbs mstbbs merged commit f2670c3 into master Jul 13, 2017
@mstbbs mstbbs deleted the michaelw/readme-updates branch July 13, 2017 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants