Please revert all of the changes in the doc-strings - they are out of scope of this PR and we do not have a fixed style of them.

Well, the doc-strings were automatedly formatted by the Java Extension and it follow the best practices of a Java doc-string. Although, the doc-string changes are out of the scope of this PR, I think this is good and be an enhancement for code readability.

However, if these changes are considered out of scope, I am willing to revert them. Please confirm if I should proceed with this action.

Please revert all of the changes in the doc-strings - they are out of scope of this PR and we do not have a fixed style of them.

Well, I see that the doc-strings were automatedly formatted by the Java Extension and it follow the best practices of a Java Docstring. Although, the doc-string changes are out of the scope of this PR, I think this is good and look better for code readability.

Then please deactivate this Java Extension. As I said before: this repository does not have any fixed and defined style of doc comments. Introducing a new style in few files, would only make the things more messy.

Please revert all of the changes in the doc-strings - they are out of scope of this PR and we do not have a fixed style of them.

Well, I see that the doc-strings were automatedly formatted by the Java Extension and it follow the best practices of a Java Docstring. Although, the doc-string changes are out of the scope of this PR, I think this is good and look better for code readability.

Then please deactivate this Java Extension. As I said before: this repository does not have any fixed and defined style of doc comments. Introducing a new style in few files, would only make the things more messy.

Thanks for your clarification. I have reverted doc-strings as you requested.