Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions library/src/main/java/com/loopj/android/http/AssertUtils.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
/*
Android Asynchronous Http Client
Copyright (c) 2011 James Smith <james@loopj.com>
http://loopj.com

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/

package com.loopj.android.http;

/**
* Internal class, used to make some asserts, throw AssertError if asserts fail.
*/
class AssertUtils {

private AssertUtils() {
}

public static void asserts(final boolean expression, final String failedMessage) {
if (!expression) {
throw new AssertionError(failedMessage);
}
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ public AsyncHttpClient(int httpPort, int httpsPort) {
/**
* Creates new AsyncHttpClient using given params
*
* @param fixNoHttpResponseException Whether to fix or not issue, by ommiting SSL verification
* @param fixNoHttpResponseException Whether to fix issue or not, by omitting SSL verification
* @param httpPort HTTP port to be used, must be greater than 0
* @param httpsPort HTTPS port to be used, must be greater than 0
*/
Expand All @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ public AsyncHttpClient(boolean fixNoHttpResponseException, int httpPort, int htt
/**
* Returns default instance of SchemeRegistry
*
* @param fixNoHttpResponseException Whether to fix or not issue, by ommiting SSL verification
* @param fixNoHttpResponseException Whether to fix issue or not, by omitting SSL verification
* @param httpPort HTTP port to be used, must be greater than 0
* @param httpsPort HTTPS port to be used, must be greater than 0
*/
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,23 +145,23 @@ public boolean getUseSynchronousMode() {
}

@Override
public void setUseSynchronousMode(boolean value) {
public void setUseSynchronousMode(boolean sync) {
// A looper must be prepared before setting asynchronous mode.
if (!value && this.looper == null) {
value = true;
if (!sync && looper == null) {
sync = true;
Log.w(LOG_TAG, "Current thread has not called Looper.prepare(). Forcing synchronous mode.");
}

// If using asynchronous mode.
if (!value && handler == null) {
if (!sync && handler == null) {
// Create a handler on current thread to submit tasks
handler = new ResponderHandler(this, this.looper);
} else if (value && handler != null) {
handler = new ResponderHandler(this, looper);
} else if (sync && handler != null) {
// TODO: Consider adding a flag to remove all queued messages.
handler = null;
}

useSynchronousMode = value;
useSynchronousMode = sync;
}

/**
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ protected void sendMessage(Message msg) {
if (getUseSynchronousMode() || handler == null) {
handleMessage(msg);
} else if (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) { // do not send messages if request has been cancelled
AssertUtils.asserts(handler != null, "handler should not be null!");
handler.sendMessage(msg);
}
}
Expand All @@ -373,6 +374,7 @@ protected void postRunnable(Runnable runnable) {
runnable.run();
} else {
// Otherwise, run on provided handler
AssertUtils.asserts(handler != null, "handler should not be null!");
handler.post(runnable);
}
}
Expand All @@ -386,17 +388,7 @@ protected void postRunnable(Runnable runnable) {
* @return Message instance, should not be null
*/
protected Message obtainMessage(int responseMessageId, Object responseMessageData) {
Message msg;
if (handler == null) {
msg = Message.obtain();
if (msg != null) {
msg.what = responseMessageId;
msg.obj = responseMessageData;
}
} else {
msg = Message.obtain(handler, responseMessageId, responseMessageData);
}
return msg;
return Message.obtain(handler, responseMessageId, responseMessageData);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zxw1962
This is wrong as handler could be null. The alternative when that happens is meant to emulate a Message.obtain(), so the entire method has to stay as-is.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zxw1962 yes, sincerely this is invalid change, we have to support different scenarios, and this is key component that was written like this for that purpose.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fineswap @smarek why handler is null need to be handled differently? for me, Message.obtain() call is the same as Message.obtain(null, what, obj), isn't it? so, we don't have to test for null, right?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zxw1962

This is correct now, but what happens in the future if the underlying implementation changes and a check for null is introduced to Message.obtain()? (by the Android team, or any other manufacturer -- Nokia X, Sony, Samsund, htc, etc. -- who goes in and changes the source code to their satisfaction.)

Potentially, this will make all apps relying on AHC to fail if the device is upgraded to run a newer Android (with a different implementation for Message.obtain()).

We have to consider that this library is used by thousands of apps and we have to rely on backward-compatibility even if leaving some useless (currently) code around.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fineswap future changes to this API is unlikely, as this is stable behavior since API v1
@zxw1962 I'm sorry, I've gone too quickly through implementation of Message API, this is correct change, as the [Message.obtain(Handler,int,Object)](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Message.html#obtain%28android.os.Handler, int, java.lang.Object%29) just sets passed values into internal fields of Message. I'm pulling back my previous complaints.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so what should I do, revert or just leave it as it is?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Leave it, I approve the change, it's correct, thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, thanks, will update others soon...

}

@Override
Expand Down